Cost of electrolytic hydrogen











up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1












Working on a future history setting; the question arises, since the world cannot run on fossil fuels forever, one way or another, something must end up replacing them; what will that something be?



A co-author has suggested using nuclear energy to electrolyze water for hydrogen which is combined with carbon dioxide to produce methanol. The chemistry of this is sound but I'm not sure about the economics of getting hydrogen that way. As I understand it, hydrogen produced by electrolysis currently costs several times as much as that produced from natural gas, which suggests methanol produced by this method will always be at least a few times more expensive than current fossil fuels (assuming future nuclear energy will never be as cheap as current solar for applications like this that don't need external storage); it seems likely to me that the world will be very reluctant to accept a several-fold increase in the cost of fuel. (I'm not talking about what should happen, but what plausibly will happen.)



On the other hand, it turns out to my surprise that there already exists a facility making methanol by the above method except geothermal substituted for nuclear: https://www.chemicals-technology.com/projects/george-olah-renewable-methanol-plant-iceland/



On the third hand, that article does not discuss the economics of the hydrogen source; for all I know, maybe it's a pilot project built as proof of concept that is not, nor expected to be, economically competitive.



I can't find a clear answer as to how much hydrogen costs from various sources. Google finds estimates all over the map, ranging from a dollar per gram to a dollar per kilogram.



So my question is:



Assuming advanced nuclear reactors can provide a reasonably cheap (and clean and safe enough to satisfy political requirements) source of heat, and the technology is mature and acquires relevant economies of scale, how much would electrolytic hydrogen end up costing? Either in dollars per kilogram, dollars per joule, or relative to the price of oil or natural gas?










share|improve this question






















  • Assuming that this is carbon-neutral because the carbon is captured, are governments subsidizing carbon capture and taxing carbon-dioxide emissions?
    – Davislor
    4 hours ago










  • @Davislor Maybe, depending on various factors. I think political support for carbon-neutral energy sources is an available resource, but experience shows it is a limited one. Besides the proposed solution has to compete not only with fossil fuels, but also with other carbon-neutral solutions such as battery-powered cars charged with renewable electricity. So it still depends on just how expensive the hydrogen source will be.
    – rwallace
    4 hours ago










  • What is the methanol for?
    – RonJohn
    3 hours ago










  • it seems you are saying neglect that nuclear power aspect, and just deal with the electrolysis cost - which is hard to do, since that is the principle component, other than infrastructure & distribution, which are nothing new. maybe i'm missing something - but that seems like a question for industrial engineering experts doing long analyses.
    – theRiley
    3 hours ago










  • @RonJohn Replacing gasoline as a transport fuel.
    – rwallace
    3 hours ago















up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1












Working on a future history setting; the question arises, since the world cannot run on fossil fuels forever, one way or another, something must end up replacing them; what will that something be?



A co-author has suggested using nuclear energy to electrolyze water for hydrogen which is combined with carbon dioxide to produce methanol. The chemistry of this is sound but I'm not sure about the economics of getting hydrogen that way. As I understand it, hydrogen produced by electrolysis currently costs several times as much as that produced from natural gas, which suggests methanol produced by this method will always be at least a few times more expensive than current fossil fuels (assuming future nuclear energy will never be as cheap as current solar for applications like this that don't need external storage); it seems likely to me that the world will be very reluctant to accept a several-fold increase in the cost of fuel. (I'm not talking about what should happen, but what plausibly will happen.)



On the other hand, it turns out to my surprise that there already exists a facility making methanol by the above method except geothermal substituted for nuclear: https://www.chemicals-technology.com/projects/george-olah-renewable-methanol-plant-iceland/



On the third hand, that article does not discuss the economics of the hydrogen source; for all I know, maybe it's a pilot project built as proof of concept that is not, nor expected to be, economically competitive.



I can't find a clear answer as to how much hydrogen costs from various sources. Google finds estimates all over the map, ranging from a dollar per gram to a dollar per kilogram.



So my question is:



Assuming advanced nuclear reactors can provide a reasonably cheap (and clean and safe enough to satisfy political requirements) source of heat, and the technology is mature and acquires relevant economies of scale, how much would electrolytic hydrogen end up costing? Either in dollars per kilogram, dollars per joule, or relative to the price of oil or natural gas?










share|improve this question






















  • Assuming that this is carbon-neutral because the carbon is captured, are governments subsidizing carbon capture and taxing carbon-dioxide emissions?
    – Davislor
    4 hours ago










  • @Davislor Maybe, depending on various factors. I think political support for carbon-neutral energy sources is an available resource, but experience shows it is a limited one. Besides the proposed solution has to compete not only with fossil fuels, but also with other carbon-neutral solutions such as battery-powered cars charged with renewable electricity. So it still depends on just how expensive the hydrogen source will be.
    – rwallace
    4 hours ago










  • What is the methanol for?
    – RonJohn
    3 hours ago










  • it seems you are saying neglect that nuclear power aspect, and just deal with the electrolysis cost - which is hard to do, since that is the principle component, other than infrastructure & distribution, which are nothing new. maybe i'm missing something - but that seems like a question for industrial engineering experts doing long analyses.
    – theRiley
    3 hours ago










  • @RonJohn Replacing gasoline as a transport fuel.
    – rwallace
    3 hours ago













up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1






1





Working on a future history setting; the question arises, since the world cannot run on fossil fuels forever, one way or another, something must end up replacing them; what will that something be?



A co-author has suggested using nuclear energy to electrolyze water for hydrogen which is combined with carbon dioxide to produce methanol. The chemistry of this is sound but I'm not sure about the economics of getting hydrogen that way. As I understand it, hydrogen produced by electrolysis currently costs several times as much as that produced from natural gas, which suggests methanol produced by this method will always be at least a few times more expensive than current fossil fuels (assuming future nuclear energy will never be as cheap as current solar for applications like this that don't need external storage); it seems likely to me that the world will be very reluctant to accept a several-fold increase in the cost of fuel. (I'm not talking about what should happen, but what plausibly will happen.)



On the other hand, it turns out to my surprise that there already exists a facility making methanol by the above method except geothermal substituted for nuclear: https://www.chemicals-technology.com/projects/george-olah-renewable-methanol-plant-iceland/



On the third hand, that article does not discuss the economics of the hydrogen source; for all I know, maybe it's a pilot project built as proof of concept that is not, nor expected to be, economically competitive.



I can't find a clear answer as to how much hydrogen costs from various sources. Google finds estimates all over the map, ranging from a dollar per gram to a dollar per kilogram.



So my question is:



Assuming advanced nuclear reactors can provide a reasonably cheap (and clean and safe enough to satisfy political requirements) source of heat, and the technology is mature and acquires relevant economies of scale, how much would electrolytic hydrogen end up costing? Either in dollars per kilogram, dollars per joule, or relative to the price of oil or natural gas?










share|improve this question













Working on a future history setting; the question arises, since the world cannot run on fossil fuels forever, one way or another, something must end up replacing them; what will that something be?



A co-author has suggested using nuclear energy to electrolyze water for hydrogen which is combined with carbon dioxide to produce methanol. The chemistry of this is sound but I'm not sure about the economics of getting hydrogen that way. As I understand it, hydrogen produced by electrolysis currently costs several times as much as that produced from natural gas, which suggests methanol produced by this method will always be at least a few times more expensive than current fossil fuels (assuming future nuclear energy will never be as cheap as current solar for applications like this that don't need external storage); it seems likely to me that the world will be very reluctant to accept a several-fold increase in the cost of fuel. (I'm not talking about what should happen, but what plausibly will happen.)



On the other hand, it turns out to my surprise that there already exists a facility making methanol by the above method except geothermal substituted for nuclear: https://www.chemicals-technology.com/projects/george-olah-renewable-methanol-plant-iceland/



On the third hand, that article does not discuss the economics of the hydrogen source; for all I know, maybe it's a pilot project built as proof of concept that is not, nor expected to be, economically competitive.



I can't find a clear answer as to how much hydrogen costs from various sources. Google finds estimates all over the map, ranging from a dollar per gram to a dollar per kilogram.



So my question is:



Assuming advanced nuclear reactors can provide a reasonably cheap (and clean and safe enough to satisfy political requirements) source of heat, and the technology is mature and acquires relevant economies of scale, how much would electrolytic hydrogen end up costing? Either in dollars per kilogram, dollars per joule, or relative to the price of oil or natural gas?







science-based energy






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 4 hours ago









rwallace

690414




690414












  • Assuming that this is carbon-neutral because the carbon is captured, are governments subsidizing carbon capture and taxing carbon-dioxide emissions?
    – Davislor
    4 hours ago










  • @Davislor Maybe, depending on various factors. I think political support for carbon-neutral energy sources is an available resource, but experience shows it is a limited one. Besides the proposed solution has to compete not only with fossil fuels, but also with other carbon-neutral solutions such as battery-powered cars charged with renewable electricity. So it still depends on just how expensive the hydrogen source will be.
    – rwallace
    4 hours ago










  • What is the methanol for?
    – RonJohn
    3 hours ago










  • it seems you are saying neglect that nuclear power aspect, and just deal with the electrolysis cost - which is hard to do, since that is the principle component, other than infrastructure & distribution, which are nothing new. maybe i'm missing something - but that seems like a question for industrial engineering experts doing long analyses.
    – theRiley
    3 hours ago










  • @RonJohn Replacing gasoline as a transport fuel.
    – rwallace
    3 hours ago


















  • Assuming that this is carbon-neutral because the carbon is captured, are governments subsidizing carbon capture and taxing carbon-dioxide emissions?
    – Davislor
    4 hours ago










  • @Davislor Maybe, depending on various factors. I think political support for carbon-neutral energy sources is an available resource, but experience shows it is a limited one. Besides the proposed solution has to compete not only with fossil fuels, but also with other carbon-neutral solutions such as battery-powered cars charged with renewable electricity. So it still depends on just how expensive the hydrogen source will be.
    – rwallace
    4 hours ago










  • What is the methanol for?
    – RonJohn
    3 hours ago










  • it seems you are saying neglect that nuclear power aspect, and just deal with the electrolysis cost - which is hard to do, since that is the principle component, other than infrastructure & distribution, which are nothing new. maybe i'm missing something - but that seems like a question for industrial engineering experts doing long analyses.
    – theRiley
    3 hours ago










  • @RonJohn Replacing gasoline as a transport fuel.
    – rwallace
    3 hours ago
















Assuming that this is carbon-neutral because the carbon is captured, are governments subsidizing carbon capture and taxing carbon-dioxide emissions?
– Davislor
4 hours ago




Assuming that this is carbon-neutral because the carbon is captured, are governments subsidizing carbon capture and taxing carbon-dioxide emissions?
– Davislor
4 hours ago












@Davislor Maybe, depending on various factors. I think political support for carbon-neutral energy sources is an available resource, but experience shows it is a limited one. Besides the proposed solution has to compete not only with fossil fuels, but also with other carbon-neutral solutions such as battery-powered cars charged with renewable electricity. So it still depends on just how expensive the hydrogen source will be.
– rwallace
4 hours ago




@Davislor Maybe, depending on various factors. I think political support for carbon-neutral energy sources is an available resource, but experience shows it is a limited one. Besides the proposed solution has to compete not only with fossil fuels, but also with other carbon-neutral solutions such as battery-powered cars charged with renewable electricity. So it still depends on just how expensive the hydrogen source will be.
– rwallace
4 hours ago












What is the methanol for?
– RonJohn
3 hours ago




What is the methanol for?
– RonJohn
3 hours ago












it seems you are saying neglect that nuclear power aspect, and just deal with the electrolysis cost - which is hard to do, since that is the principle component, other than infrastructure & distribution, which are nothing new. maybe i'm missing something - but that seems like a question for industrial engineering experts doing long analyses.
– theRiley
3 hours ago




it seems you are saying neglect that nuclear power aspect, and just deal with the electrolysis cost - which is hard to do, since that is the principle component, other than infrastructure & distribution, which are nothing new. maybe i'm missing something - but that seems like a question for industrial engineering experts doing long analyses.
– theRiley
3 hours ago












@RonJohn Replacing gasoline as a transport fuel.
– rwallace
3 hours ago




@RonJohn Replacing gasoline as a transport fuel.
– rwallace
3 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote



accepted










$3-6 per gallon of gasoline equivalent (gge)



In 2009 the National Renewable Energy Laboratory assembled a panel to generate 80% confidence intervals for the future costs of hydrogen production. The report is here. This panel used technology available in 2005, but capitalized with a full industrial infrastructure, to make the best use of production scale (this is the 'central production model' discussed in the report). They panel focused on two technologies: alkaline water electrolysis and polymer electrolyte membrane electrolysis.



A kg of hydrogen is referred to as a gallon of gasoline equivalent, since it has roughly the same amount of energy as a gallon of gasoline.



The average cost was strongly dependent on the cost of electricity. The assumed 'high' price for electricity was $80 per MWh, whereupon hydrogen costs are $4.78 per gge. However, the levelized cost of nuclear power is currently around $120 per MWh. If we introduce this increase in electricity power, we get an assumption of more like $6 per gge in costs.



The low costs for electricity at $0.03 per kWh, and all other factors minimized would be about $1.70 per gge.






share|improve this answer





















  • -1 @kingledion I have commented,My deleted comment stands. I profoundly disagree with it's deletion in the context. Especially since I have neither been notified of it's deletion nor told why.
    – Duckisaduckisaduck
    1 hour ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "579"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f131200%2fcost-of-electrolytic-hydrogen%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
3
down vote



accepted










$3-6 per gallon of gasoline equivalent (gge)



In 2009 the National Renewable Energy Laboratory assembled a panel to generate 80% confidence intervals for the future costs of hydrogen production. The report is here. This panel used technology available in 2005, but capitalized with a full industrial infrastructure, to make the best use of production scale (this is the 'central production model' discussed in the report). They panel focused on two technologies: alkaline water electrolysis and polymer electrolyte membrane electrolysis.



A kg of hydrogen is referred to as a gallon of gasoline equivalent, since it has roughly the same amount of energy as a gallon of gasoline.



The average cost was strongly dependent on the cost of electricity. The assumed 'high' price for electricity was $80 per MWh, whereupon hydrogen costs are $4.78 per gge. However, the levelized cost of nuclear power is currently around $120 per MWh. If we introduce this increase in electricity power, we get an assumption of more like $6 per gge in costs.



The low costs for electricity at $0.03 per kWh, and all other factors minimized would be about $1.70 per gge.






share|improve this answer





















  • -1 @kingledion I have commented,My deleted comment stands. I profoundly disagree with it's deletion in the context. Especially since I have neither been notified of it's deletion nor told why.
    – Duckisaduckisaduck
    1 hour ago















up vote
3
down vote



accepted










$3-6 per gallon of gasoline equivalent (gge)



In 2009 the National Renewable Energy Laboratory assembled a panel to generate 80% confidence intervals for the future costs of hydrogen production. The report is here. This panel used technology available in 2005, but capitalized with a full industrial infrastructure, to make the best use of production scale (this is the 'central production model' discussed in the report). They panel focused on two technologies: alkaline water electrolysis and polymer electrolyte membrane electrolysis.



A kg of hydrogen is referred to as a gallon of gasoline equivalent, since it has roughly the same amount of energy as a gallon of gasoline.



The average cost was strongly dependent on the cost of electricity. The assumed 'high' price for electricity was $80 per MWh, whereupon hydrogen costs are $4.78 per gge. However, the levelized cost of nuclear power is currently around $120 per MWh. If we introduce this increase in electricity power, we get an assumption of more like $6 per gge in costs.



The low costs for electricity at $0.03 per kWh, and all other factors minimized would be about $1.70 per gge.






share|improve this answer





















  • -1 @kingledion I have commented,My deleted comment stands. I profoundly disagree with it's deletion in the context. Especially since I have neither been notified of it's deletion nor told why.
    – Duckisaduckisaduck
    1 hour ago













up vote
3
down vote



accepted







up vote
3
down vote



accepted






$3-6 per gallon of gasoline equivalent (gge)



In 2009 the National Renewable Energy Laboratory assembled a panel to generate 80% confidence intervals for the future costs of hydrogen production. The report is here. This panel used technology available in 2005, but capitalized with a full industrial infrastructure, to make the best use of production scale (this is the 'central production model' discussed in the report). They panel focused on two technologies: alkaline water electrolysis and polymer electrolyte membrane electrolysis.



A kg of hydrogen is referred to as a gallon of gasoline equivalent, since it has roughly the same amount of energy as a gallon of gasoline.



The average cost was strongly dependent on the cost of electricity. The assumed 'high' price for electricity was $80 per MWh, whereupon hydrogen costs are $4.78 per gge. However, the levelized cost of nuclear power is currently around $120 per MWh. If we introduce this increase in electricity power, we get an assumption of more like $6 per gge in costs.



The low costs for electricity at $0.03 per kWh, and all other factors minimized would be about $1.70 per gge.






share|improve this answer












$3-6 per gallon of gasoline equivalent (gge)



In 2009 the National Renewable Energy Laboratory assembled a panel to generate 80% confidence intervals for the future costs of hydrogen production. The report is here. This panel used technology available in 2005, but capitalized with a full industrial infrastructure, to make the best use of production scale (this is the 'central production model' discussed in the report). They panel focused on two technologies: alkaline water electrolysis and polymer electrolyte membrane electrolysis.



A kg of hydrogen is referred to as a gallon of gasoline equivalent, since it has roughly the same amount of energy as a gallon of gasoline.



The average cost was strongly dependent on the cost of electricity. The assumed 'high' price for electricity was $80 per MWh, whereupon hydrogen costs are $4.78 per gge. However, the levelized cost of nuclear power is currently around $120 per MWh. If we introduce this increase in electricity power, we get an assumption of more like $6 per gge in costs.



The low costs for electricity at $0.03 per kWh, and all other factors minimized would be about $1.70 per gge.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 3 hours ago









kingledion

71.1k24237414




71.1k24237414












  • -1 @kingledion I have commented,My deleted comment stands. I profoundly disagree with it's deletion in the context. Especially since I have neither been notified of it's deletion nor told why.
    – Duckisaduckisaduck
    1 hour ago


















  • -1 @kingledion I have commented,My deleted comment stands. I profoundly disagree with it's deletion in the context. Especially since I have neither been notified of it's deletion nor told why.
    – Duckisaduckisaduck
    1 hour ago
















-1 @kingledion I have commented,My deleted comment stands. I profoundly disagree with it's deletion in the context. Especially since I have neither been notified of it's deletion nor told why.
– Duckisaduckisaduck
1 hour ago




-1 @kingledion I have commented,My deleted comment stands. I profoundly disagree with it's deletion in the context. Especially since I have neither been notified of it's deletion nor told why.
– Duckisaduckisaduck
1 hour ago


















 

draft saved


draft discarded



















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f131200%2fcost-of-electrolytic-hydrogen%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

What visual should I use to simply compare current year value vs last year in Power BI desktop

Alexandru Averescu

Trompette piccolo