Holomorphic function on an annulus











up vote
3
down vote

favorite












Let $f$ be a holomorphic function on the set $U={z in mathbb{C}: 1 leq |z| leq pi }$. Assume that $max_{|z|=1}|f(z)| leq 1$ and $max_{|z|=pi}|f(z)| leq pi^{pi}$.




How to prove that $max_{|z|=e}|f(z)| leq e^{pi}$?




Usually in such exercises one considers $g(z)$ of the form $alpha z^nf(z)$ where $alpha$ and $n$ are such that our assumptions on $f$ gives $|g(z)| leq 1$ on both circles being the boundary of $U$. However it is not guarantedd that $n$ would be integer thus in general we don't get a holomorphic function $g$ for which we could apply the maximum principle. If $n$ happens to be rational one can overcome this difficulty by considering $(alpha z^n f(z))^q$ where $n=frac{p}{q}$. However in our example $n$ turns out to be $pi$ and by considering $g(z)=f(z)/z^{pi}$ we don't get holomorphic function. How to handle this case?










share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    3
    down vote

    favorite












    Let $f$ be a holomorphic function on the set $U={z in mathbb{C}: 1 leq |z| leq pi }$. Assume that $max_{|z|=1}|f(z)| leq 1$ and $max_{|z|=pi}|f(z)| leq pi^{pi}$.




    How to prove that $max_{|z|=e}|f(z)| leq e^{pi}$?




    Usually in such exercises one considers $g(z)$ of the form $alpha z^nf(z)$ where $alpha$ and $n$ are such that our assumptions on $f$ gives $|g(z)| leq 1$ on both circles being the boundary of $U$. However it is not guarantedd that $n$ would be integer thus in general we don't get a holomorphic function $g$ for which we could apply the maximum principle. If $n$ happens to be rational one can overcome this difficulty by considering $(alpha z^n f(z))^q$ where $n=frac{p}{q}$. However in our example $n$ turns out to be $pi$ and by considering $g(z)=f(z)/z^{pi}$ we don't get holomorphic function. How to handle this case?










    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite











      Let $f$ be a holomorphic function on the set $U={z in mathbb{C}: 1 leq |z| leq pi }$. Assume that $max_{|z|=1}|f(z)| leq 1$ and $max_{|z|=pi}|f(z)| leq pi^{pi}$.




      How to prove that $max_{|z|=e}|f(z)| leq e^{pi}$?




      Usually in such exercises one considers $g(z)$ of the form $alpha z^nf(z)$ where $alpha$ and $n$ are such that our assumptions on $f$ gives $|g(z)| leq 1$ on both circles being the boundary of $U$. However it is not guarantedd that $n$ would be integer thus in general we don't get a holomorphic function $g$ for which we could apply the maximum principle. If $n$ happens to be rational one can overcome this difficulty by considering $(alpha z^n f(z))^q$ where $n=frac{p}{q}$. However in our example $n$ turns out to be $pi$ and by considering $g(z)=f(z)/z^{pi}$ we don't get holomorphic function. How to handle this case?










      share|cite|improve this question













      Let $f$ be a holomorphic function on the set $U={z in mathbb{C}: 1 leq |z| leq pi }$. Assume that $max_{|z|=1}|f(z)| leq 1$ and $max_{|z|=pi}|f(z)| leq pi^{pi}$.




      How to prove that $max_{|z|=e}|f(z)| leq e^{pi}$?




      Usually in such exercises one considers $g(z)$ of the form $alpha z^nf(z)$ where $alpha$ and $n$ are such that our assumptions on $f$ gives $|g(z)| leq 1$ on both circles being the boundary of $U$. However it is not guarantedd that $n$ would be integer thus in general we don't get a holomorphic function $g$ for which we could apply the maximum principle. If $n$ happens to be rational one can overcome this difficulty by considering $(alpha z^n f(z))^q$ where $n=frac{p}{q}$. However in our example $n$ turns out to be $pi$ and by considering $g(z)=f(z)/z^{pi}$ we don't get holomorphic function. How to handle this case?







      complex-analysis optimization holomorphic-functions maximum-principle






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked 4 hours ago









      truebaran

      2,1682723




      2,1682723






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          4
          down vote













          As you pointed out, to define the function $zmapsto z^{-pi}$ holomorphically, a branch cut is necessary, and it cannot be defined properly on the whole of the domain. Hence, to avoid this technical issue, theory of subharmonic functions is used. To be specific, instead of considering $zmapsto z^{-pi}$, one considers a subharmonic function
          $$
          u(z) =-pilog|z| + log|f(z)| in[-infty, infty)
          $$
          defined on $1leq |z|leq pi$. Then, one can show that maximum principle applies to $u$, and one gets $$-pilog|z|+log|f(z)|leq 0, quadforall z,$$ as a consequence.



          Note: A subharmonic function $u:Omega to [-infty,infty)$ is an upper-semicontinuous function such that $u(x)$ is less than or equal to the average of $u$ on $partial B(x,r)$ for every $r>0$ such that $overline{B(x,r)}subsetOmega$. We can see that $log|f|$ is subharmonic by Jensen's formula (and if $f$ does not vanish, it is harmonic.) By the definition of subharmonic function, if maximum of $u$ occurs at the interior point $x$, then $u$ is a constant on a component containing $x$.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Being the real part of the locally holomorphic function $U(z)=-pi log(z)+log f(z)$ it is harmonic. Then the maximum modulus principle can be seen from that $U$ is locally analytic so $u(z) = u(z_0)+ Re(C(z-z_0)^n)+O(|z-z_0|^{n+1})$ which doesn't have a local maximum at $z_0$
            – reuns
            3 hours ago













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3031944%2fholomorphic-function-on-an-annulus%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          4
          down vote













          As you pointed out, to define the function $zmapsto z^{-pi}$ holomorphically, a branch cut is necessary, and it cannot be defined properly on the whole of the domain. Hence, to avoid this technical issue, theory of subharmonic functions is used. To be specific, instead of considering $zmapsto z^{-pi}$, one considers a subharmonic function
          $$
          u(z) =-pilog|z| + log|f(z)| in[-infty, infty)
          $$
          defined on $1leq |z|leq pi$. Then, one can show that maximum principle applies to $u$, and one gets $$-pilog|z|+log|f(z)|leq 0, quadforall z,$$ as a consequence.



          Note: A subharmonic function $u:Omega to [-infty,infty)$ is an upper-semicontinuous function such that $u(x)$ is less than or equal to the average of $u$ on $partial B(x,r)$ for every $r>0$ such that $overline{B(x,r)}subsetOmega$. We can see that $log|f|$ is subharmonic by Jensen's formula (and if $f$ does not vanish, it is harmonic.) By the definition of subharmonic function, if maximum of $u$ occurs at the interior point $x$, then $u$ is a constant on a component containing $x$.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Being the real part of the locally holomorphic function $U(z)=-pi log(z)+log f(z)$ it is harmonic. Then the maximum modulus principle can be seen from that $U$ is locally analytic so $u(z) = u(z_0)+ Re(C(z-z_0)^n)+O(|z-z_0|^{n+1})$ which doesn't have a local maximum at $z_0$
            – reuns
            3 hours ago

















          up vote
          4
          down vote













          As you pointed out, to define the function $zmapsto z^{-pi}$ holomorphically, a branch cut is necessary, and it cannot be defined properly on the whole of the domain. Hence, to avoid this technical issue, theory of subharmonic functions is used. To be specific, instead of considering $zmapsto z^{-pi}$, one considers a subharmonic function
          $$
          u(z) =-pilog|z| + log|f(z)| in[-infty, infty)
          $$
          defined on $1leq |z|leq pi$. Then, one can show that maximum principle applies to $u$, and one gets $$-pilog|z|+log|f(z)|leq 0, quadforall z,$$ as a consequence.



          Note: A subharmonic function $u:Omega to [-infty,infty)$ is an upper-semicontinuous function such that $u(x)$ is less than or equal to the average of $u$ on $partial B(x,r)$ for every $r>0$ such that $overline{B(x,r)}subsetOmega$. We can see that $log|f|$ is subharmonic by Jensen's formula (and if $f$ does not vanish, it is harmonic.) By the definition of subharmonic function, if maximum of $u$ occurs at the interior point $x$, then $u$ is a constant on a component containing $x$.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Being the real part of the locally holomorphic function $U(z)=-pi log(z)+log f(z)$ it is harmonic. Then the maximum modulus principle can be seen from that $U$ is locally analytic so $u(z) = u(z_0)+ Re(C(z-z_0)^n)+O(|z-z_0|^{n+1})$ which doesn't have a local maximum at $z_0$
            – reuns
            3 hours ago















          up vote
          4
          down vote










          up vote
          4
          down vote









          As you pointed out, to define the function $zmapsto z^{-pi}$ holomorphically, a branch cut is necessary, and it cannot be defined properly on the whole of the domain. Hence, to avoid this technical issue, theory of subharmonic functions is used. To be specific, instead of considering $zmapsto z^{-pi}$, one considers a subharmonic function
          $$
          u(z) =-pilog|z| + log|f(z)| in[-infty, infty)
          $$
          defined on $1leq |z|leq pi$. Then, one can show that maximum principle applies to $u$, and one gets $$-pilog|z|+log|f(z)|leq 0, quadforall z,$$ as a consequence.



          Note: A subharmonic function $u:Omega to [-infty,infty)$ is an upper-semicontinuous function such that $u(x)$ is less than or equal to the average of $u$ on $partial B(x,r)$ for every $r>0$ such that $overline{B(x,r)}subsetOmega$. We can see that $log|f|$ is subharmonic by Jensen's formula (and if $f$ does not vanish, it is harmonic.) By the definition of subharmonic function, if maximum of $u$ occurs at the interior point $x$, then $u$ is a constant on a component containing $x$.






          share|cite|improve this answer














          As you pointed out, to define the function $zmapsto z^{-pi}$ holomorphically, a branch cut is necessary, and it cannot be defined properly on the whole of the domain. Hence, to avoid this technical issue, theory of subharmonic functions is used. To be specific, instead of considering $zmapsto z^{-pi}$, one considers a subharmonic function
          $$
          u(z) =-pilog|z| + log|f(z)| in[-infty, infty)
          $$
          defined on $1leq |z|leq pi$. Then, one can show that maximum principle applies to $u$, and one gets $$-pilog|z|+log|f(z)|leq 0, quadforall z,$$ as a consequence.



          Note: A subharmonic function $u:Omega to [-infty,infty)$ is an upper-semicontinuous function such that $u(x)$ is less than or equal to the average of $u$ on $partial B(x,r)$ for every $r>0$ such that $overline{B(x,r)}subsetOmega$. We can see that $log|f|$ is subharmonic by Jensen's formula (and if $f$ does not vanish, it is harmonic.) By the definition of subharmonic function, if maximum of $u$ occurs at the interior point $x$, then $u$ is a constant on a component containing $x$.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited 3 hours ago

























          answered 3 hours ago









          Song

          1,58012




          1,58012












          • Being the real part of the locally holomorphic function $U(z)=-pi log(z)+log f(z)$ it is harmonic. Then the maximum modulus principle can be seen from that $U$ is locally analytic so $u(z) = u(z_0)+ Re(C(z-z_0)^n)+O(|z-z_0|^{n+1})$ which doesn't have a local maximum at $z_0$
            – reuns
            3 hours ago




















          • Being the real part of the locally holomorphic function $U(z)=-pi log(z)+log f(z)$ it is harmonic. Then the maximum modulus principle can be seen from that $U$ is locally analytic so $u(z) = u(z_0)+ Re(C(z-z_0)^n)+O(|z-z_0|^{n+1})$ which doesn't have a local maximum at $z_0$
            – reuns
            3 hours ago


















          Being the real part of the locally holomorphic function $U(z)=-pi log(z)+log f(z)$ it is harmonic. Then the maximum modulus principle can be seen from that $U$ is locally analytic so $u(z) = u(z_0)+ Re(C(z-z_0)^n)+O(|z-z_0|^{n+1})$ which doesn't have a local maximum at $z_0$
          – reuns
          3 hours ago






          Being the real part of the locally holomorphic function $U(z)=-pi log(z)+log f(z)$ it is harmonic. Then the maximum modulus principle can be seen from that $U$ is locally analytic so $u(z) = u(z_0)+ Re(C(z-z_0)^n)+O(|z-z_0|^{n+1})$ which doesn't have a local maximum at $z_0$
          – reuns
          3 hours ago




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3031944%2fholomorphic-function-on-an-annulus%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          What visual should I use to simply compare current year value vs last year in Power BI desktop

          Alexandru Averescu

          Trompette piccolo