Execute function from unknow type T











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I have a class like this:



public class TestClass
{
public int A { get; set; }
public int B { get; set; }
//Other stuff...

public static static int TestFunction(int c, int d)
{
//Other stuff...
return c + d;
}
}


and I have many differend classes like this with differend properties but always with a "TestFunction" function with differend content (like +/*/:/-).



Now I want to to build another function that calls this function without knowing the type of the function but I know that "Testfunction" is always there.



Here is my try:



public static int AnotherFunction<T>(T inClass, int c, int d)
{
//Other stuff...
return inClass.TestFunction(c, d);
}


The functions are for showing purposes simplyfied (dont just say "call the function directly because it doesnt do much").

The Problem is that Visual Studio says "TestFunction" is unknown.

How can I do this without knowing what class I get?










share|improve this question


















  • 1




    You can't, because it's static. Why is it static? Or well you could, using reflection, but you don't want to. If it weren't, you could use an interface.
    – CodeCaster
    Nov 22 at 12:51

















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I have a class like this:



public class TestClass
{
public int A { get; set; }
public int B { get; set; }
//Other stuff...

public static static int TestFunction(int c, int d)
{
//Other stuff...
return c + d;
}
}


and I have many differend classes like this with differend properties but always with a "TestFunction" function with differend content (like +/*/:/-).



Now I want to to build another function that calls this function without knowing the type of the function but I know that "Testfunction" is always there.



Here is my try:



public static int AnotherFunction<T>(T inClass, int c, int d)
{
//Other stuff...
return inClass.TestFunction(c, d);
}


The functions are for showing purposes simplyfied (dont just say "call the function directly because it doesnt do much").

The Problem is that Visual Studio says "TestFunction" is unknown.

How can I do this without knowing what class I get?










share|improve this question


















  • 1




    You can't, because it's static. Why is it static? Or well you could, using reflection, but you don't want to. If it weren't, you could use an interface.
    – CodeCaster
    Nov 22 at 12:51















up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I have a class like this:



public class TestClass
{
public int A { get; set; }
public int B { get; set; }
//Other stuff...

public static static int TestFunction(int c, int d)
{
//Other stuff...
return c + d;
}
}


and I have many differend classes like this with differend properties but always with a "TestFunction" function with differend content (like +/*/:/-).



Now I want to to build another function that calls this function without knowing the type of the function but I know that "Testfunction" is always there.



Here is my try:



public static int AnotherFunction<T>(T inClass, int c, int d)
{
//Other stuff...
return inClass.TestFunction(c, d);
}


The functions are for showing purposes simplyfied (dont just say "call the function directly because it doesnt do much").

The Problem is that Visual Studio says "TestFunction" is unknown.

How can I do this without knowing what class I get?










share|improve this question













I have a class like this:



public class TestClass
{
public int A { get; set; }
public int B { get; set; }
//Other stuff...

public static static int TestFunction(int c, int d)
{
//Other stuff...
return c + d;
}
}


and I have many differend classes like this with differend properties but always with a "TestFunction" function with differend content (like +/*/:/-).



Now I want to to build another function that calls this function without knowing the type of the function but I know that "Testfunction" is always there.



Here is my try:



public static int AnotherFunction<T>(T inClass, int c, int d)
{
//Other stuff...
return inClass.TestFunction(c, d);
}


The functions are for showing purposes simplyfied (dont just say "call the function directly because it doesnt do much").

The Problem is that Visual Studio says "TestFunction" is unknown.

How can I do this without knowing what class I get?







c# function






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 22 at 12:49









SomePerson

519




519








  • 1




    You can't, because it's static. Why is it static? Or well you could, using reflection, but you don't want to. If it weren't, you could use an interface.
    – CodeCaster
    Nov 22 at 12:51
















  • 1




    You can't, because it's static. Why is it static? Or well you could, using reflection, but you don't want to. If it weren't, you could use an interface.
    – CodeCaster
    Nov 22 at 12:51










1




1




You can't, because it's static. Why is it static? Or well you could, using reflection, but you don't want to. If it weren't, you could use an interface.
– CodeCaster
Nov 22 at 12:51






You can't, because it's static. Why is it static? Or well you could, using reflection, but you don't want to. If it weren't, you could use an interface.
– CodeCaster
Nov 22 at 12:51














1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
5
down vote



accepted










You can create an interface and the types can inherit from it and provide their own implementation for those.



Then you can constraint your method for the generic parameter on that interface type so that all types inheriting from it can call respective implementation.



See the following :



public interface IInterface
{
int TestFunction(int c, int d);
}

public class TestClass : IInterface
{
public int A { get; set; }
public int B { get; set; }
//Other stuff...

public int TestFunction(int c, int d)
{
//Other stuff...
return c + d;
}
}


and now you can write a method like:



public static int AnotherFunction<T>(T inClass, int c, int d) where T : IInterface
{
//Other stuff...
return inClass.TestFunction(c, d);
}


Hope it gives you idea.






share|improve this answer





















    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    });
    });
    }, "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53431412%2fexecute-function-from-unknow-type-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    5
    down vote



    accepted










    You can create an interface and the types can inherit from it and provide their own implementation for those.



    Then you can constraint your method for the generic parameter on that interface type so that all types inheriting from it can call respective implementation.



    See the following :



    public interface IInterface
    {
    int TestFunction(int c, int d);
    }

    public class TestClass : IInterface
    {
    public int A { get; set; }
    public int B { get; set; }
    //Other stuff...

    public int TestFunction(int c, int d)
    {
    //Other stuff...
    return c + d;
    }
    }


    and now you can write a method like:



    public static int AnotherFunction<T>(T inClass, int c, int d) where T : IInterface
    {
    //Other stuff...
    return inClass.TestFunction(c, d);
    }


    Hope it gives you idea.






    share|improve this answer

























      up vote
      5
      down vote



      accepted










      You can create an interface and the types can inherit from it and provide their own implementation for those.



      Then you can constraint your method for the generic parameter on that interface type so that all types inheriting from it can call respective implementation.



      See the following :



      public interface IInterface
      {
      int TestFunction(int c, int d);
      }

      public class TestClass : IInterface
      {
      public int A { get; set; }
      public int B { get; set; }
      //Other stuff...

      public int TestFunction(int c, int d)
      {
      //Other stuff...
      return c + d;
      }
      }


      and now you can write a method like:



      public static int AnotherFunction<T>(T inClass, int c, int d) where T : IInterface
      {
      //Other stuff...
      return inClass.TestFunction(c, d);
      }


      Hope it gives you idea.






      share|improve this answer























        up vote
        5
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        5
        down vote



        accepted






        You can create an interface and the types can inherit from it and provide their own implementation for those.



        Then you can constraint your method for the generic parameter on that interface type so that all types inheriting from it can call respective implementation.



        See the following :



        public interface IInterface
        {
        int TestFunction(int c, int d);
        }

        public class TestClass : IInterface
        {
        public int A { get; set; }
        public int B { get; set; }
        //Other stuff...

        public int TestFunction(int c, int d)
        {
        //Other stuff...
        return c + d;
        }
        }


        and now you can write a method like:



        public static int AnotherFunction<T>(T inClass, int c, int d) where T : IInterface
        {
        //Other stuff...
        return inClass.TestFunction(c, d);
        }


        Hope it gives you idea.






        share|improve this answer












        You can create an interface and the types can inherit from it and provide their own implementation for those.



        Then you can constraint your method for the generic parameter on that interface type so that all types inheriting from it can call respective implementation.



        See the following :



        public interface IInterface
        {
        int TestFunction(int c, int d);
        }

        public class TestClass : IInterface
        {
        public int A { get; set; }
        public int B { get; set; }
        //Other stuff...

        public int TestFunction(int c, int d)
        {
        //Other stuff...
        return c + d;
        }
        }


        and now you can write a method like:



        public static int AnotherFunction<T>(T inClass, int c, int d) where T : IInterface
        {
        //Other stuff...
        return inClass.TestFunction(c, d);
        }


        Hope it gives you idea.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Nov 22 at 12:51









        Ehsan Sajjad

        48.9k1067118




        48.9k1067118






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53431412%2fexecute-function-from-unknow-type-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Trompette piccolo

            Slow SSRS Report in dynamic grouping and multiple parameters

            Simon Yates (cyclisme)