Less morbid equivalent of the idiom “Giving someone enough rope to hang himself”?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}






up vote
0
down vote

favorite












In other words, an idiom for empowering someone with a capability that they might, through ignorance, misuse to self-detrimental effect.



The motivation for an alternative is the professional setting, where it's not appropriate to allude to suicide!










share|improve this question







New contributor




Paul Hendry is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1




    If you're worried about alluding to suicide in your professional environment, you might also want to avoid taking this action in the first place. It's generally poor team play to enable a teammate in this way.
    – Ian MacDonald
    5 hours ago






  • 1




    Not regarded as morbid. Just a figure of speech. Cherish the English language for its colour, rather than strangling it with bland weasel words.
    – David
    5 hours ago










  • Paul, to what extent d'you see that as morbid? What measure would make the difference you ask about?
    – Robbie Goodwin
    4 hours ago










  • @David On what basis can you say it's not regarded as morbid? Using death by hanging as a metaphor for an unrelated situation very much suits the definition of the term. To want to avoid allusions to death by hanging in a formal business setting does not seem at all in opposition to "cherishing the English language's colour", since there are plenty of other colourful expressions which are not appropriate to all audiences.
    – Paul Hendry
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    @RobbieGoodwin Your rude tone is not helpful or welcome. Plenty of additional context has been provided, so if you remain fixated on a choice of word in the title, then your input is not relevant.
    – Paul Hendry
    2 hours ago

















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












In other words, an idiom for empowering someone with a capability that they might, through ignorance, misuse to self-detrimental effect.



The motivation for an alternative is the professional setting, where it's not appropriate to allude to suicide!










share|improve this question







New contributor




Paul Hendry is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1




    If you're worried about alluding to suicide in your professional environment, you might also want to avoid taking this action in the first place. It's generally poor team play to enable a teammate in this way.
    – Ian MacDonald
    5 hours ago






  • 1




    Not regarded as morbid. Just a figure of speech. Cherish the English language for its colour, rather than strangling it with bland weasel words.
    – David
    5 hours ago










  • Paul, to what extent d'you see that as morbid? What measure would make the difference you ask about?
    – Robbie Goodwin
    4 hours ago










  • @David On what basis can you say it's not regarded as morbid? Using death by hanging as a metaphor for an unrelated situation very much suits the definition of the term. To want to avoid allusions to death by hanging in a formal business setting does not seem at all in opposition to "cherishing the English language's colour", since there are plenty of other colourful expressions which are not appropriate to all audiences.
    – Paul Hendry
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    @RobbieGoodwin Your rude tone is not helpful or welcome. Plenty of additional context has been provided, so if you remain fixated on a choice of word in the title, then your input is not relevant.
    – Paul Hendry
    2 hours ago













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











In other words, an idiom for empowering someone with a capability that they might, through ignorance, misuse to self-detrimental effect.



The motivation for an alternative is the professional setting, where it's not appropriate to allude to suicide!










share|improve this question







New contributor




Paul Hendry is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











In other words, an idiom for empowering someone with a capability that they might, through ignorance, misuse to self-detrimental effect.



The motivation for an alternative is the professional setting, where it's not appropriate to allude to suicide!







idioms idiom-requests






share|improve this question







New contributor




Paul Hendry is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




Paul Hendry is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




Paul Hendry is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 6 hours ago









Paul Hendry

11




11




New contributor




Paul Hendry is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Paul Hendry is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Paul Hendry is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 1




    If you're worried about alluding to suicide in your professional environment, you might also want to avoid taking this action in the first place. It's generally poor team play to enable a teammate in this way.
    – Ian MacDonald
    5 hours ago






  • 1




    Not regarded as morbid. Just a figure of speech. Cherish the English language for its colour, rather than strangling it with bland weasel words.
    – David
    5 hours ago










  • Paul, to what extent d'you see that as morbid? What measure would make the difference you ask about?
    – Robbie Goodwin
    4 hours ago










  • @David On what basis can you say it's not regarded as morbid? Using death by hanging as a metaphor for an unrelated situation very much suits the definition of the term. To want to avoid allusions to death by hanging in a formal business setting does not seem at all in opposition to "cherishing the English language's colour", since there are plenty of other colourful expressions which are not appropriate to all audiences.
    – Paul Hendry
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    @RobbieGoodwin Your rude tone is not helpful or welcome. Plenty of additional context has been provided, so if you remain fixated on a choice of word in the title, then your input is not relevant.
    – Paul Hendry
    2 hours ago














  • 1




    If you're worried about alluding to suicide in your professional environment, you might also want to avoid taking this action in the first place. It's generally poor team play to enable a teammate in this way.
    – Ian MacDonald
    5 hours ago






  • 1




    Not regarded as morbid. Just a figure of speech. Cherish the English language for its colour, rather than strangling it with bland weasel words.
    – David
    5 hours ago










  • Paul, to what extent d'you see that as morbid? What measure would make the difference you ask about?
    – Robbie Goodwin
    4 hours ago










  • @David On what basis can you say it's not regarded as morbid? Using death by hanging as a metaphor for an unrelated situation very much suits the definition of the term. To want to avoid allusions to death by hanging in a formal business setting does not seem at all in opposition to "cherishing the English language's colour", since there are plenty of other colourful expressions which are not appropriate to all audiences.
    – Paul Hendry
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    @RobbieGoodwin Your rude tone is not helpful or welcome. Plenty of additional context has been provided, so if you remain fixated on a choice of word in the title, then your input is not relevant.
    – Paul Hendry
    2 hours ago








1




1




If you're worried about alluding to suicide in your professional environment, you might also want to avoid taking this action in the first place. It's generally poor team play to enable a teammate in this way.
– Ian MacDonald
5 hours ago




If you're worried about alluding to suicide in your professional environment, you might also want to avoid taking this action in the first place. It's generally poor team play to enable a teammate in this way.
– Ian MacDonald
5 hours ago




1




1




Not regarded as morbid. Just a figure of speech. Cherish the English language for its colour, rather than strangling it with bland weasel words.
– David
5 hours ago




Not regarded as morbid. Just a figure of speech. Cherish the English language for its colour, rather than strangling it with bland weasel words.
– David
5 hours ago












Paul, to what extent d'you see that as morbid? What measure would make the difference you ask about?
– Robbie Goodwin
4 hours ago




Paul, to what extent d'you see that as morbid? What measure would make the difference you ask about?
– Robbie Goodwin
4 hours ago












@David On what basis can you say it's not regarded as morbid? Using death by hanging as a metaphor for an unrelated situation very much suits the definition of the term. To want to avoid allusions to death by hanging in a formal business setting does not seem at all in opposition to "cherishing the English language's colour", since there are plenty of other colourful expressions which are not appropriate to all audiences.
– Paul Hendry
4 hours ago




@David On what basis can you say it's not regarded as morbid? Using death by hanging as a metaphor for an unrelated situation very much suits the definition of the term. To want to avoid allusions to death by hanging in a formal business setting does not seem at all in opposition to "cherishing the English language's colour", since there are plenty of other colourful expressions which are not appropriate to all audiences.
– Paul Hendry
4 hours ago




1




1




@RobbieGoodwin Your rude tone is not helpful or welcome. Plenty of additional context has been provided, so if you remain fixated on a choice of word in the title, then your input is not relevant.
– Paul Hendry
2 hours ago




@RobbieGoodwin Your rude tone is not helpful or welcome. Plenty of additional context has been provided, so if you remain fixated on a choice of word in the title, then your input is not relevant.
– Paul Hendry
2 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote













Perhaps something like letting one "dig their own grave." Hope this helps.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




Omar Al Jamal is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 1




    Oh you are wicked!
    – David
    5 hours ago










  • It doesn't quite convey the same meaning of providing the capability; for that it would have to be more like "giving them a shovel to dig their own grave". Maybe it comes down to which of these idioms one is accustomed to hearing, but to me this definitely sounds like a less visceral metaphor than one describing the subject hanging themselves. Thanks for the response
    – Paul Hendry
    3 hours ago










  • I think "letting one dig..." suggests a kind of passive complicity on the part of the actor allowing the other to self-sabotage. I think it gets close to what you are looking for, but by no means am I arguing that my suggestion is your definitive answer. As you say, it is less visceral than one describing active complicity in facilitating suicide or self-harm.
    – Omar Al Jamal
    3 hours ago












  • @OmarAlJamal You're right, and on first read I was fixating on the quoted part of your response ("dig their own grave"). The full phrase does expand on the meaning. This is probably the closest equivalent that's commonly used.
    – Paul Hendry
    3 hours ago


















up vote
0
down vote













Well, to be nice to new contributors, here is a genuine suggestion:




Bite off more than he can chew




(unless the act of chewing is considered vulgar with its association with gum).



For a strict analogy to “Give him…” you would need to make this something like “Have him bite off…” or “Make him bite off…”.



[But I do think that we use many phases without thinking about the original meaning of the words — a killing look, dead beautiful, kick the bucket (death by hanging), dig your own grave, annihilate, wipe out (skiing terminology) etc. etc.]






share|improve this answer




























    up vote
    -1
    down vote













    More of a phrase than an idiom, but...



    set someone up to fail / set someone up for failure



    From Wikipedia (I know, I know... but it's the best source I could find):




    Setting up to fail is a well-established workplace bullying tactic.[6][7][8] One technique is to overload with work, while denying the victim the authority to handle it and over-interfering;[9] another is the withholding of the information necessary to succeed.[10]



    If a person puts another individual (usually a subordinate) in a
    stressful situation in which failure is almost certain, this may be an
    aspect of bullying wherein the outcome can then be used to discredit
    and blame the victim.[11] Sometimes, this may involve the bully
    covertly sabotaging and undermining an objective that may have
    otherwise been achievable. This type of bullying may be the result of
    the projection of the bully's own feelings of inadequacy onto the
    victim.[12]



    There can be cases where an employee is set up to fail because the
    stated goals of the task are considered harmful to the organization;
    an internal investigation is one example. Institutions may protect
    themselves by "going through the motions" of a sham investigation in
    which the findings conveniently fail to find any evidence of
    wrongdoing by the authorities involved with setting up the
    investigation.




    From the Harvard Business Review:
    comic illustrating a boss setting someone up to fail



    That was specifically about employees and bosses, but it's possible for parents/children, co-workers, teammates... any number of relationships. Even yourself!






    share|improve this answer





















      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "97"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });






      Paul Hendry is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f475619%2fless-morbid-equivalent-of-the-idiom-giving-someone-enough-rope-to-hang-himself%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      3
      down vote













      Perhaps something like letting one "dig their own grave." Hope this helps.






      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      Omar Al Jamal is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.














      • 1




        Oh you are wicked!
        – David
        5 hours ago










      • It doesn't quite convey the same meaning of providing the capability; for that it would have to be more like "giving them a shovel to dig their own grave". Maybe it comes down to which of these idioms one is accustomed to hearing, but to me this definitely sounds like a less visceral metaphor than one describing the subject hanging themselves. Thanks for the response
        – Paul Hendry
        3 hours ago










      • I think "letting one dig..." suggests a kind of passive complicity on the part of the actor allowing the other to self-sabotage. I think it gets close to what you are looking for, but by no means am I arguing that my suggestion is your definitive answer. As you say, it is less visceral than one describing active complicity in facilitating suicide or self-harm.
        – Omar Al Jamal
        3 hours ago












      • @OmarAlJamal You're right, and on first read I was fixating on the quoted part of your response ("dig their own grave"). The full phrase does expand on the meaning. This is probably the closest equivalent that's commonly used.
        – Paul Hendry
        3 hours ago















      up vote
      3
      down vote













      Perhaps something like letting one "dig their own grave." Hope this helps.






      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      Omar Al Jamal is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.














      • 1




        Oh you are wicked!
        – David
        5 hours ago










      • It doesn't quite convey the same meaning of providing the capability; for that it would have to be more like "giving them a shovel to dig their own grave". Maybe it comes down to which of these idioms one is accustomed to hearing, but to me this definitely sounds like a less visceral metaphor than one describing the subject hanging themselves. Thanks for the response
        – Paul Hendry
        3 hours ago










      • I think "letting one dig..." suggests a kind of passive complicity on the part of the actor allowing the other to self-sabotage. I think it gets close to what you are looking for, but by no means am I arguing that my suggestion is your definitive answer. As you say, it is less visceral than one describing active complicity in facilitating suicide or self-harm.
        – Omar Al Jamal
        3 hours ago












      • @OmarAlJamal You're right, and on first read I was fixating on the quoted part of your response ("dig their own grave"). The full phrase does expand on the meaning. This is probably the closest equivalent that's commonly used.
        – Paul Hendry
        3 hours ago













      up vote
      3
      down vote










      up vote
      3
      down vote









      Perhaps something like letting one "dig their own grave." Hope this helps.






      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      Omar Al Jamal is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      Perhaps something like letting one "dig their own grave." Hope this helps.







      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      Omar Al Jamal is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer






      New contributor




      Omar Al Jamal is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      answered 5 hours ago









      Omar Al Jamal

      514




      514




      New contributor




      Omar Al Jamal is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Omar Al Jamal is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Omar Al Jamal is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.








      • 1




        Oh you are wicked!
        – David
        5 hours ago










      • It doesn't quite convey the same meaning of providing the capability; for that it would have to be more like "giving them a shovel to dig their own grave". Maybe it comes down to which of these idioms one is accustomed to hearing, but to me this definitely sounds like a less visceral metaphor than one describing the subject hanging themselves. Thanks for the response
        – Paul Hendry
        3 hours ago










      • I think "letting one dig..." suggests a kind of passive complicity on the part of the actor allowing the other to self-sabotage. I think it gets close to what you are looking for, but by no means am I arguing that my suggestion is your definitive answer. As you say, it is less visceral than one describing active complicity in facilitating suicide or self-harm.
        – Omar Al Jamal
        3 hours ago












      • @OmarAlJamal You're right, and on first read I was fixating on the quoted part of your response ("dig their own grave"). The full phrase does expand on the meaning. This is probably the closest equivalent that's commonly used.
        – Paul Hendry
        3 hours ago














      • 1




        Oh you are wicked!
        – David
        5 hours ago










      • It doesn't quite convey the same meaning of providing the capability; for that it would have to be more like "giving them a shovel to dig their own grave". Maybe it comes down to which of these idioms one is accustomed to hearing, but to me this definitely sounds like a less visceral metaphor than one describing the subject hanging themselves. Thanks for the response
        – Paul Hendry
        3 hours ago










      • I think "letting one dig..." suggests a kind of passive complicity on the part of the actor allowing the other to self-sabotage. I think it gets close to what you are looking for, but by no means am I arguing that my suggestion is your definitive answer. As you say, it is less visceral than one describing active complicity in facilitating suicide or self-harm.
        – Omar Al Jamal
        3 hours ago












      • @OmarAlJamal You're right, and on first read I was fixating on the quoted part of your response ("dig their own grave"). The full phrase does expand on the meaning. This is probably the closest equivalent that's commonly used.
        – Paul Hendry
        3 hours ago








      1




      1




      Oh you are wicked!
      – David
      5 hours ago




      Oh you are wicked!
      – David
      5 hours ago












      It doesn't quite convey the same meaning of providing the capability; for that it would have to be more like "giving them a shovel to dig their own grave". Maybe it comes down to which of these idioms one is accustomed to hearing, but to me this definitely sounds like a less visceral metaphor than one describing the subject hanging themselves. Thanks for the response
      – Paul Hendry
      3 hours ago




      It doesn't quite convey the same meaning of providing the capability; for that it would have to be more like "giving them a shovel to dig their own grave". Maybe it comes down to which of these idioms one is accustomed to hearing, but to me this definitely sounds like a less visceral metaphor than one describing the subject hanging themselves. Thanks for the response
      – Paul Hendry
      3 hours ago












      I think "letting one dig..." suggests a kind of passive complicity on the part of the actor allowing the other to self-sabotage. I think it gets close to what you are looking for, but by no means am I arguing that my suggestion is your definitive answer. As you say, it is less visceral than one describing active complicity in facilitating suicide or self-harm.
      – Omar Al Jamal
      3 hours ago






      I think "letting one dig..." suggests a kind of passive complicity on the part of the actor allowing the other to self-sabotage. I think it gets close to what you are looking for, but by no means am I arguing that my suggestion is your definitive answer. As you say, it is less visceral than one describing active complicity in facilitating suicide or self-harm.
      – Omar Al Jamal
      3 hours ago














      @OmarAlJamal You're right, and on first read I was fixating on the quoted part of your response ("dig their own grave"). The full phrase does expand on the meaning. This is probably the closest equivalent that's commonly used.
      – Paul Hendry
      3 hours ago




      @OmarAlJamal You're right, and on first read I was fixating on the quoted part of your response ("dig their own grave"). The full phrase does expand on the meaning. This is probably the closest equivalent that's commonly used.
      – Paul Hendry
      3 hours ago












      up vote
      0
      down vote













      Well, to be nice to new contributors, here is a genuine suggestion:




      Bite off more than he can chew




      (unless the act of chewing is considered vulgar with its association with gum).



      For a strict analogy to “Give him…” you would need to make this something like “Have him bite off…” or “Make him bite off…”.



      [But I do think that we use many phases without thinking about the original meaning of the words — a killing look, dead beautiful, kick the bucket (death by hanging), dig your own grave, annihilate, wipe out (skiing terminology) etc. etc.]






      share|improve this answer

























        up vote
        0
        down vote













        Well, to be nice to new contributors, here is a genuine suggestion:




        Bite off more than he can chew




        (unless the act of chewing is considered vulgar with its association with gum).



        For a strict analogy to “Give him…” you would need to make this something like “Have him bite off…” or “Make him bite off…”.



        [But I do think that we use many phases without thinking about the original meaning of the words — a killing look, dead beautiful, kick the bucket (death by hanging), dig your own grave, annihilate, wipe out (skiing terminology) etc. etc.]






        share|improve this answer























          up vote
          0
          down vote










          up vote
          0
          down vote









          Well, to be nice to new contributors, here is a genuine suggestion:




          Bite off more than he can chew




          (unless the act of chewing is considered vulgar with its association with gum).



          For a strict analogy to “Give him…” you would need to make this something like “Have him bite off…” or “Make him bite off…”.



          [But I do think that we use many phases without thinking about the original meaning of the words — a killing look, dead beautiful, kick the bucket (death by hanging), dig your own grave, annihilate, wipe out (skiing terminology) etc. etc.]






          share|improve this answer












          Well, to be nice to new contributors, here is a genuine suggestion:




          Bite off more than he can chew




          (unless the act of chewing is considered vulgar with its association with gum).



          For a strict analogy to “Give him…” you would need to make this something like “Have him bite off…” or “Make him bite off…”.



          [But I do think that we use many phases without thinking about the original meaning of the words — a killing look, dead beautiful, kick the bucket (death by hanging), dig your own grave, annihilate, wipe out (skiing terminology) etc. etc.]







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 2 hours ago









          David

          5,03341235




          5,03341235






















              up vote
              -1
              down vote













              More of a phrase than an idiom, but...



              set someone up to fail / set someone up for failure



              From Wikipedia (I know, I know... but it's the best source I could find):




              Setting up to fail is a well-established workplace bullying tactic.[6][7][8] One technique is to overload with work, while denying the victim the authority to handle it and over-interfering;[9] another is the withholding of the information necessary to succeed.[10]



              If a person puts another individual (usually a subordinate) in a
              stressful situation in which failure is almost certain, this may be an
              aspect of bullying wherein the outcome can then be used to discredit
              and blame the victim.[11] Sometimes, this may involve the bully
              covertly sabotaging and undermining an objective that may have
              otherwise been achievable. This type of bullying may be the result of
              the projection of the bully's own feelings of inadequacy onto the
              victim.[12]



              There can be cases where an employee is set up to fail because the
              stated goals of the task are considered harmful to the organization;
              an internal investigation is one example. Institutions may protect
              themselves by "going through the motions" of a sham investigation in
              which the findings conveniently fail to find any evidence of
              wrongdoing by the authorities involved with setting up the
              investigation.




              From the Harvard Business Review:
              comic illustrating a boss setting someone up to fail



              That was specifically about employees and bosses, but it's possible for parents/children, co-workers, teammates... any number of relationships. Even yourself!






              share|improve this answer

























                up vote
                -1
                down vote













                More of a phrase than an idiom, but...



                set someone up to fail / set someone up for failure



                From Wikipedia (I know, I know... but it's the best source I could find):




                Setting up to fail is a well-established workplace bullying tactic.[6][7][8] One technique is to overload with work, while denying the victim the authority to handle it and over-interfering;[9] another is the withholding of the information necessary to succeed.[10]



                If a person puts another individual (usually a subordinate) in a
                stressful situation in which failure is almost certain, this may be an
                aspect of bullying wherein the outcome can then be used to discredit
                and blame the victim.[11] Sometimes, this may involve the bully
                covertly sabotaging and undermining an objective that may have
                otherwise been achievable. This type of bullying may be the result of
                the projection of the bully's own feelings of inadequacy onto the
                victim.[12]



                There can be cases where an employee is set up to fail because the
                stated goals of the task are considered harmful to the organization;
                an internal investigation is one example. Institutions may protect
                themselves by "going through the motions" of a sham investigation in
                which the findings conveniently fail to find any evidence of
                wrongdoing by the authorities involved with setting up the
                investigation.




                From the Harvard Business Review:
                comic illustrating a boss setting someone up to fail



                That was specifically about employees and bosses, but it's possible for parents/children, co-workers, teammates... any number of relationships. Even yourself!






                share|improve this answer























                  up vote
                  -1
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  -1
                  down vote









                  More of a phrase than an idiom, but...



                  set someone up to fail / set someone up for failure



                  From Wikipedia (I know, I know... but it's the best source I could find):




                  Setting up to fail is a well-established workplace bullying tactic.[6][7][8] One technique is to overload with work, while denying the victim the authority to handle it and over-interfering;[9] another is the withholding of the information necessary to succeed.[10]



                  If a person puts another individual (usually a subordinate) in a
                  stressful situation in which failure is almost certain, this may be an
                  aspect of bullying wherein the outcome can then be used to discredit
                  and blame the victim.[11] Sometimes, this may involve the bully
                  covertly sabotaging and undermining an objective that may have
                  otherwise been achievable. This type of bullying may be the result of
                  the projection of the bully's own feelings of inadequacy onto the
                  victim.[12]



                  There can be cases where an employee is set up to fail because the
                  stated goals of the task are considered harmful to the organization;
                  an internal investigation is one example. Institutions may protect
                  themselves by "going through the motions" of a sham investigation in
                  which the findings conveniently fail to find any evidence of
                  wrongdoing by the authorities involved with setting up the
                  investigation.




                  From the Harvard Business Review:
                  comic illustrating a boss setting someone up to fail



                  That was specifically about employees and bosses, but it's possible for parents/children, co-workers, teammates... any number of relationships. Even yourself!






                  share|improve this answer












                  More of a phrase than an idiom, but...



                  set someone up to fail / set someone up for failure



                  From Wikipedia (I know, I know... but it's the best source I could find):




                  Setting up to fail is a well-established workplace bullying tactic.[6][7][8] One technique is to overload with work, while denying the victim the authority to handle it and over-interfering;[9] another is the withholding of the information necessary to succeed.[10]



                  If a person puts another individual (usually a subordinate) in a
                  stressful situation in which failure is almost certain, this may be an
                  aspect of bullying wherein the outcome can then be used to discredit
                  and blame the victim.[11] Sometimes, this may involve the bully
                  covertly sabotaging and undermining an objective that may have
                  otherwise been achievable. This type of bullying may be the result of
                  the projection of the bully's own feelings of inadequacy onto the
                  victim.[12]



                  There can be cases where an employee is set up to fail because the
                  stated goals of the task are considered harmful to the organization;
                  an internal investigation is one example. Institutions may protect
                  themselves by "going through the motions" of a sham investigation in
                  which the findings conveniently fail to find any evidence of
                  wrongdoing by the authorities involved with setting up the
                  investigation.




                  From the Harvard Business Review:
                  comic illustrating a boss setting someone up to fail



                  That was specifically about employees and bosses, but it's possible for parents/children, co-workers, teammates... any number of relationships. Even yourself!







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 2 hours ago









                  miltonaut

                  1,5161918




                  1,5161918






















                      Paul Hendry is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      Paul Hendry is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                      Paul Hendry is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      Paul Hendry is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                      Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                      Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                      Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f475619%2fless-morbid-equivalent-of-the-idiom-giving-someone-enough-rope-to-hang-himself%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Trompette piccolo

                      Slow SSRS Report in dynamic grouping and multiple parameters

                      Simon Yates (cyclisme)