Git patch and calculate SHA
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
To avoid XY I will explain my goal:
I am writing a RunManager which should execute a process of given version. I want to add an option to run the process with the current directory contents (including uncommitted changes), and tag those changes somehow with a deterministic name.
What I'm thinking is to create a git patch, give it a SHA as if it was a commit, copy it to the remote server and apply.
How can I acheive the SHA part?
git sha git-patch
asked Nov 22 at 10:40
Elad Weiss
1,4342619
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
To avoid XY I will explain my goal:
I am writing a RunManager which should execute a process of given version. I want to add an option to run the process with the current directory contents (including uncommitted changes), and tag those changes somehow with a deterministic name.
What I'm thinking is to create a git patch, give it a SHA as if it was a commit, copy it to the remote server and apply.
How can I acheive the SHA part?
git sha git-patch
asked Nov 22 at 10:40
Elad Weiss
1,4342619
1
The git command to produce the SHA itself isgit hash-object path/to/said/object, but I'm unsure of what exactly you want to include in your patch, and a patch is not a commit... I'm confused.
– RomainValeri
Nov 22 at 10:45
@RomainValeri Thanks for your help! The patch should include all the uncommitted changes, including new file. Applying it should modify the file-system so it is exactly as it is now.
– Elad Weiss
Nov 22 at 10:50
@RomainValeri git diff > tmp.patch && git hash-object tmp.patch working!
– Elad Weiss
Nov 22 at 10:57
1
You could also commit all the changes to a temporary branch and use the regular push/pull commands. There might even be something in the low-level git plumbing commands that would let you do this without touching the working copy, its current branch, or its current index in any way.
– Thomas
Nov 22 at 10:58
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
To avoid XY I will explain my goal:
I am writing a RunManager which should execute a process of given version. I want to add an option to run the process with the current directory contents (including uncommitted changes), and tag those changes somehow with a deterministic name.
What I'm thinking is to create a git patch, give it a SHA as if it was a commit, copy it to the remote server and apply.
How can I acheive the SHA part?
git sha git-patch
asked Nov 22 at 10:40
Elad Weiss
1,4342619
To avoid XY I will explain my goal:
I am writing a RunManager which should execute a process of given version. I want to add an option to run the process with the current directory contents (including uncommitted changes), and tag those changes somehow with a deterministic name.
What I'm thinking is to create a git patch, give it a SHA as if it was a commit, copy it to the remote server and apply.
How can I acheive the SHA part?
git sha git-patch
git sha git-patch
asked Nov 22 at 10:40
Elad Weiss
1,4342619
asked Nov 22 at 10:40
Elad Weiss
1,4342619
edited Nov 22 at 10:50
asked Nov 22 at 10:40
Elad Weiss
1,4342619
asked Nov 22 at 10:40
Elad Weiss
1,4342619
asked Nov 22 at 10:40
Elad Weiss
1,4342619
1,4342619
1
The git command to produce the SHA itself isgit hash-object path/to/said/object, but I'm unsure of what exactly you want to include in your patch, and a patch is not a commit... I'm confused.
– RomainValeri
Nov 22 at 10:45
@RomainValeri Thanks for your help! The patch should include all the uncommitted changes, including new file. Applying it should modify the file-system so it is exactly as it is now.
– Elad Weiss
Nov 22 at 10:50
@RomainValeri git diff > tmp.patch && git hash-object tmp.patch working!
– Elad Weiss
Nov 22 at 10:57
1
You could also commit all the changes to a temporary branch and use the regular push/pull commands. There might even be something in the low-level git plumbing commands that would let you do this without touching the working copy, its current branch, or its current index in any way.
– Thomas
Nov 22 at 10:58
add a comment |
1
The git command to produce the SHA itself isgit hash-object path/to/said/object, but I'm unsure of what exactly you want to include in your patch, and a patch is not a commit... I'm confused.
– RomainValeri
Nov 22 at 10:45
@RomainValeri Thanks for your help! The patch should include all the uncommitted changes, including new file. Applying it should modify the file-system so it is exactly as it is now.
– Elad Weiss
Nov 22 at 10:50
@RomainValeri git diff > tmp.patch && git hash-object tmp.patch working!
– Elad Weiss
Nov 22 at 10:57
1
You could also commit all the changes to a temporary branch and use the regular push/pull commands. There might even be something in the low-level git plumbing commands that would let you do this without touching the working copy, its current branch, or its current index in any way.
– Thomas
Nov 22 at 10:58
1
1
The git command to produce the SHA itself is
git hash-object path/to/said/object, but I'm unsure of what exactly you want to include in your patch, and a patch is not a commit... I'm confused.– RomainValeri
Nov 22 at 10:45
The git command to produce the SHA itself is
git hash-object path/to/said/object, but I'm unsure of what exactly you want to include in your patch, and a patch is not a commit... I'm confused.– RomainValeri
Nov 22 at 10:45
@RomainValeri Thanks for your help! The patch should include all the uncommitted changes, including new file. Applying it should modify the file-system so it is exactly as it is now.
– Elad Weiss
Nov 22 at 10:50
@RomainValeri Thanks for your help! The patch should include all the uncommitted changes, including new file. Applying it should modify the file-system so it is exactly as it is now.
– Elad Weiss
Nov 22 at 10:50
@RomainValeri git diff > tmp.patch && git hash-object tmp.patch working!
– Elad Weiss
Nov 22 at 10:57
@RomainValeri git diff > tmp.patch && git hash-object tmp.patch working!
– Elad Weiss
Nov 22 at 10:57
1
1
You could also commit all the changes to a temporary branch and use the regular push/pull commands. There might even be something in the low-level git plumbing commands that would let you do this without touching the working copy, its current branch, or its current index in any way.
– Thomas
Nov 22 at 10:58
You could also commit all the changes to a temporary branch and use the regular push/pull commands. There might even be something in the low-level git plumbing commands that would let you do this without touching the working copy, its current branch, or its current index in any way.
– Thomas
Nov 22 at 10:58
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53429095%2fgit-patch-and-calculate-sha%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
The git command to produce the SHA itself is
git hash-object path/to/said/object, but I'm unsure of what exactly you want to include in your patch, and a patch is not a commit... I'm confused.– RomainValeri
Nov 22 at 10:45
@RomainValeri Thanks for your help! The patch should include all the uncommitted changes, including new file. Applying it should modify the file-system so it is exactly as it is now.
– Elad Weiss
Nov 22 at 10:50
@RomainValeri git diff > tmp.patch && git hash-object tmp.patch working!
– Elad Weiss
Nov 22 at 10:57
1
You could also commit all the changes to a temporary branch and use the regular push/pull commands. There might even be something in the low-level git plumbing commands that would let you do this without touching the working copy, its current branch, or its current index in any way.
– Thomas
Nov 22 at 10:58