expressJS: REST routing params conventions incorrectly set?












0














I am working on a demo project and having a simple but annoying issue with one of my routers.



For the project ids are passed as parameters of the url. The project assign private views to users (routed as /user/:userid/), common views (eg. routed as /group/:grouid/profile) and views that are private to user but that would share data with common views in real time (eg. routed as /group/:groupid/:userid/).



I have currently a simple middleware authorization code to prevent no-registered users to visit group or private user views to see views they are not registered to. A summary of the code is as follows:



authorizationFunctionGroups: function(req, res, next) {
console.log('in middleware authorizationFunctionGroups');
console.log('userid', req.params.userid);
if (!_.isEmpty(registers.groups) && _.get(registers.groups, req.params.groupid)) {
//console.log(registers.groups[req.params.groupid]);
console.log(registers.groups[req.params.groupid]['membersuserid']);
registers.groups[req.params.groupid]['membersuserid'].indexOf(req.params.userid) > -1 ? next() : next(new Error("userid invalid or not in the group"));

} else {
next(new Error('Invalid groupid'));

}
}


However, when I call the group profile router (/group/:grouid/profile) from some sections of my frontend using the following code:



$('#button1').click(() =>; window.location = '.../group/' + url.pathname.split('/').slice(-2)[0] + '/profile');


the routers get confused, passing my call through the authorization middleware and triggers an error ("userid invalid or not in the group").



The call gets rejected because when the frontend method passes the call to the backend, my routing convention gets stuck as it doesn't recognise the second parameter of that call ("profile") as a user.



The hack I found to solve this is to change my current router /group/:groupid/profile into /group/:groupid/profile/profile, which I dont like.



I have to substitute the above code for:



Middleware



authorizationFunctionGroups: function(req, res, next) {
console.log('in middleware authorizationFunctionGroups');
console.log('userid', req.params.userid);
if (req.params.userid == 'profile') { ///?????????
res.redirect('/group/' + req.params.groupid + '/profile/profile');
} else if (!_.isEmpty(registers.groups) && _.get(registers.groups, req.params.groupid)) {
//console.log(registers.groups[req.params.groupid]);
console.log(registers.groups[req.params.groupid]['membersuserid']);
registers.groups[req.params.groupid]['membersuserid'].indexOf(req.params.userid) > -1 ? next() : next(new Error("userid invalid or not in the group"));

} else {
next(new Error('Invalid groupid'));

}
},


Frontend



$('#button1').click(() =>; window.location = '.../group/' + url.pathname.split('/').slice(-2)[0] + '/profile/profile');


Two Questions




  • It is clearly that my main problem is a conventional one. Any advice/resources on how to order/name my routers?


  • I am trying to keep a single view for everyone (group/:groupid/profile) instead of creating individual views with same data. However: is this a common best practice in the industry? If not, what is more appropriate?



Thanks in advance for your comments.










share|improve this question



























    0














    I am working on a demo project and having a simple but annoying issue with one of my routers.



    For the project ids are passed as parameters of the url. The project assign private views to users (routed as /user/:userid/), common views (eg. routed as /group/:grouid/profile) and views that are private to user but that would share data with common views in real time (eg. routed as /group/:groupid/:userid/).



    I have currently a simple middleware authorization code to prevent no-registered users to visit group or private user views to see views they are not registered to. A summary of the code is as follows:



    authorizationFunctionGroups: function(req, res, next) {
    console.log('in middleware authorizationFunctionGroups');
    console.log('userid', req.params.userid);
    if (!_.isEmpty(registers.groups) && _.get(registers.groups, req.params.groupid)) {
    //console.log(registers.groups[req.params.groupid]);
    console.log(registers.groups[req.params.groupid]['membersuserid']);
    registers.groups[req.params.groupid]['membersuserid'].indexOf(req.params.userid) > -1 ? next() : next(new Error("userid invalid or not in the group"));

    } else {
    next(new Error('Invalid groupid'));

    }
    }


    However, when I call the group profile router (/group/:grouid/profile) from some sections of my frontend using the following code:



    $('#button1').click(() =>; window.location = '.../group/' + url.pathname.split('/').slice(-2)[0] + '/profile');


    the routers get confused, passing my call through the authorization middleware and triggers an error ("userid invalid or not in the group").



    The call gets rejected because when the frontend method passes the call to the backend, my routing convention gets stuck as it doesn't recognise the second parameter of that call ("profile") as a user.



    The hack I found to solve this is to change my current router /group/:groupid/profile into /group/:groupid/profile/profile, which I dont like.



    I have to substitute the above code for:



    Middleware



    authorizationFunctionGroups: function(req, res, next) {
    console.log('in middleware authorizationFunctionGroups');
    console.log('userid', req.params.userid);
    if (req.params.userid == 'profile') { ///?????????
    res.redirect('/group/' + req.params.groupid + '/profile/profile');
    } else if (!_.isEmpty(registers.groups) && _.get(registers.groups, req.params.groupid)) {
    //console.log(registers.groups[req.params.groupid]);
    console.log(registers.groups[req.params.groupid]['membersuserid']);
    registers.groups[req.params.groupid]['membersuserid'].indexOf(req.params.userid) > -1 ? next() : next(new Error("userid invalid or not in the group"));

    } else {
    next(new Error('Invalid groupid'));

    }
    },


    Frontend



    $('#button1').click(() =>; window.location = '.../group/' + url.pathname.split('/').slice(-2)[0] + '/profile/profile');


    Two Questions




    • It is clearly that my main problem is a conventional one. Any advice/resources on how to order/name my routers?


    • I am trying to keep a single view for everyone (group/:groupid/profile) instead of creating individual views with same data. However: is this a common best practice in the industry? If not, what is more appropriate?



    Thanks in advance for your comments.










    share|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0







      I am working on a demo project and having a simple but annoying issue with one of my routers.



      For the project ids are passed as parameters of the url. The project assign private views to users (routed as /user/:userid/), common views (eg. routed as /group/:grouid/profile) and views that are private to user but that would share data with common views in real time (eg. routed as /group/:groupid/:userid/).



      I have currently a simple middleware authorization code to prevent no-registered users to visit group or private user views to see views they are not registered to. A summary of the code is as follows:



      authorizationFunctionGroups: function(req, res, next) {
      console.log('in middleware authorizationFunctionGroups');
      console.log('userid', req.params.userid);
      if (!_.isEmpty(registers.groups) && _.get(registers.groups, req.params.groupid)) {
      //console.log(registers.groups[req.params.groupid]);
      console.log(registers.groups[req.params.groupid]['membersuserid']);
      registers.groups[req.params.groupid]['membersuserid'].indexOf(req.params.userid) > -1 ? next() : next(new Error("userid invalid or not in the group"));

      } else {
      next(new Error('Invalid groupid'));

      }
      }


      However, when I call the group profile router (/group/:grouid/profile) from some sections of my frontend using the following code:



      $('#button1').click(() =>; window.location = '.../group/' + url.pathname.split('/').slice(-2)[0] + '/profile');


      the routers get confused, passing my call through the authorization middleware and triggers an error ("userid invalid or not in the group").



      The call gets rejected because when the frontend method passes the call to the backend, my routing convention gets stuck as it doesn't recognise the second parameter of that call ("profile") as a user.



      The hack I found to solve this is to change my current router /group/:groupid/profile into /group/:groupid/profile/profile, which I dont like.



      I have to substitute the above code for:



      Middleware



      authorizationFunctionGroups: function(req, res, next) {
      console.log('in middleware authorizationFunctionGroups');
      console.log('userid', req.params.userid);
      if (req.params.userid == 'profile') { ///?????????
      res.redirect('/group/' + req.params.groupid + '/profile/profile');
      } else if (!_.isEmpty(registers.groups) && _.get(registers.groups, req.params.groupid)) {
      //console.log(registers.groups[req.params.groupid]);
      console.log(registers.groups[req.params.groupid]['membersuserid']);
      registers.groups[req.params.groupid]['membersuserid'].indexOf(req.params.userid) > -1 ? next() : next(new Error("userid invalid or not in the group"));

      } else {
      next(new Error('Invalid groupid'));

      }
      },


      Frontend



      $('#button1').click(() =>; window.location = '.../group/' + url.pathname.split('/').slice(-2)[0] + '/profile/profile');


      Two Questions




      • It is clearly that my main problem is a conventional one. Any advice/resources on how to order/name my routers?


      • I am trying to keep a single view for everyone (group/:groupid/profile) instead of creating individual views with same data. However: is this a common best practice in the industry? If not, what is more appropriate?



      Thanks in advance for your comments.










      share|improve this question













      I am working on a demo project and having a simple but annoying issue with one of my routers.



      For the project ids are passed as parameters of the url. The project assign private views to users (routed as /user/:userid/), common views (eg. routed as /group/:grouid/profile) and views that are private to user but that would share data with common views in real time (eg. routed as /group/:groupid/:userid/).



      I have currently a simple middleware authorization code to prevent no-registered users to visit group or private user views to see views they are not registered to. A summary of the code is as follows:



      authorizationFunctionGroups: function(req, res, next) {
      console.log('in middleware authorizationFunctionGroups');
      console.log('userid', req.params.userid);
      if (!_.isEmpty(registers.groups) && _.get(registers.groups, req.params.groupid)) {
      //console.log(registers.groups[req.params.groupid]);
      console.log(registers.groups[req.params.groupid]['membersuserid']);
      registers.groups[req.params.groupid]['membersuserid'].indexOf(req.params.userid) > -1 ? next() : next(new Error("userid invalid or not in the group"));

      } else {
      next(new Error('Invalid groupid'));

      }
      }


      However, when I call the group profile router (/group/:grouid/profile) from some sections of my frontend using the following code:



      $('#button1').click(() =>; window.location = '.../group/' + url.pathname.split('/').slice(-2)[0] + '/profile');


      the routers get confused, passing my call through the authorization middleware and triggers an error ("userid invalid or not in the group").



      The call gets rejected because when the frontend method passes the call to the backend, my routing convention gets stuck as it doesn't recognise the second parameter of that call ("profile") as a user.



      The hack I found to solve this is to change my current router /group/:groupid/profile into /group/:groupid/profile/profile, which I dont like.



      I have to substitute the above code for:



      Middleware



      authorizationFunctionGroups: function(req, res, next) {
      console.log('in middleware authorizationFunctionGroups');
      console.log('userid', req.params.userid);
      if (req.params.userid == 'profile') { ///?????????
      res.redirect('/group/' + req.params.groupid + '/profile/profile');
      } else if (!_.isEmpty(registers.groups) && _.get(registers.groups, req.params.groupid)) {
      //console.log(registers.groups[req.params.groupid]);
      console.log(registers.groups[req.params.groupid]['membersuserid']);
      registers.groups[req.params.groupid]['membersuserid'].indexOf(req.params.userid) > -1 ? next() : next(new Error("userid invalid or not in the group"));

      } else {
      next(new Error('Invalid groupid'));

      }
      },


      Frontend



      $('#button1').click(() =>; window.location = '.../group/' + url.pathname.split('/').slice(-2)[0] + '/profile/profile');


      Two Questions




      • It is clearly that my main problem is a conventional one. Any advice/resources on how to order/name my routers?


      • I am trying to keep a single view for everyone (group/:groupid/profile) instead of creating individual views with same data. However: is this a common best practice in the industry? If not, what is more appropriate?



      Thanks in advance for your comments.







      rest express






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 22 at 21:17









      user3675901

      13




      13





























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53438075%2fexpressjs-rest-routing-params-conventions-incorrectly-set%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown






























          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53438075%2fexpressjs-rest-routing-params-conventions-incorrectly-set%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          What visual should I use to simply compare current year value vs last year in Power BI desktop

          How to ignore python UserWarning in pytest?

          Alexandru Averescu