Child sorcerers - are they a danger to themselves and others











up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












Young sorcerers' talent starts to emerge when they are two or three years old.



The level of their power varies greatly and isn't correlated with their intelligence or sense of responsibility.



They copy their parents' abilities but also experiment endlessly in the same way that children play with toys.



Knocking things over at a distance is usually one of the first things they discover but it's not unknown for them to invent more destructive abilities. Also of course they use the power to get things that they want.



Question



Let's just consider the knocking-things-over-at-a-distance ability for the purposes of this question.



A powerful 2-year-old sorcerer could easily knock over an unprepared adult or an equivalently weighted stack of loaded boxes at a distance of 20 paces.



How can these young sorcerers be taken out in public so that a tantrum doesn't become a disaster? We can't lock them up at home in a padded room with no loose objects. In any case they might discover fireballs and burn the house down with them in it.



Note



In this medieval society, Sorcerers and 'muggles' mix freely. They go to the same markets and other public places. Sorcerers mostly trade in magic items and perform spells for money. The legitimate ones are members of the Guild and are forbidden from using magic for evil purposes.










share|improve this question




























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    Young sorcerers' talent starts to emerge when they are two or three years old.



    The level of their power varies greatly and isn't correlated with their intelligence or sense of responsibility.



    They copy their parents' abilities but also experiment endlessly in the same way that children play with toys.



    Knocking things over at a distance is usually one of the first things they discover but it's not unknown for them to invent more destructive abilities. Also of course they use the power to get things that they want.



    Question



    Let's just consider the knocking-things-over-at-a-distance ability for the purposes of this question.



    A powerful 2-year-old sorcerer could easily knock over an unprepared adult or an equivalently weighted stack of loaded boxes at a distance of 20 paces.



    How can these young sorcerers be taken out in public so that a tantrum doesn't become a disaster? We can't lock them up at home in a padded room with no loose objects. In any case they might discover fireballs and burn the house down with them in it.



    Note



    In this medieval society, Sorcerers and 'muggles' mix freely. They go to the same markets and other public places. Sorcerers mostly trade in magic items and perform spells for money. The legitimate ones are members of the Guild and are forbidden from using magic for evil purposes.










    share|improve this question


























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      Young sorcerers' talent starts to emerge when they are two or three years old.



      The level of their power varies greatly and isn't correlated with their intelligence or sense of responsibility.



      They copy their parents' abilities but also experiment endlessly in the same way that children play with toys.



      Knocking things over at a distance is usually one of the first things they discover but it's not unknown for them to invent more destructive abilities. Also of course they use the power to get things that they want.



      Question



      Let's just consider the knocking-things-over-at-a-distance ability for the purposes of this question.



      A powerful 2-year-old sorcerer could easily knock over an unprepared adult or an equivalently weighted stack of loaded boxes at a distance of 20 paces.



      How can these young sorcerers be taken out in public so that a tantrum doesn't become a disaster? We can't lock them up at home in a padded room with no loose objects. In any case they might discover fireballs and burn the house down with them in it.



      Note



      In this medieval society, Sorcerers and 'muggles' mix freely. They go to the same markets and other public places. Sorcerers mostly trade in magic items and perform spells for money. The legitimate ones are members of the Guild and are forbidden from using magic for evil purposes.










      share|improve this question















      Young sorcerers' talent starts to emerge when they are two or three years old.



      The level of their power varies greatly and isn't correlated with their intelligence or sense of responsibility.



      They copy their parents' abilities but also experiment endlessly in the same way that children play with toys.



      Knocking things over at a distance is usually one of the first things they discover but it's not unknown for them to invent more destructive abilities. Also of course they use the power to get things that they want.



      Question



      Let's just consider the knocking-things-over-at-a-distance ability for the purposes of this question.



      A powerful 2-year-old sorcerer could easily knock over an unprepared adult or an equivalently weighted stack of loaded boxes at a distance of 20 paces.



      How can these young sorcerers be taken out in public so that a tantrum doesn't become a disaster? We can't lock them up at home in a padded room with no loose objects. In any case they might discover fireballs and burn the house down with them in it.



      Note



      In this medieval society, Sorcerers and 'muggles' mix freely. They go to the same markets and other public places. Sorcerers mostly trade in magic items and perform spells for money. The legitimate ones are members of the Guild and are forbidden from using magic for evil purposes.







      magic behaviour safety






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 1 hour ago

























      asked 1 hour ago









      chasly from UK

      7,17723574




      7,17723574






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          6
          down vote













          The answer is simple: you hold their hand.



          (Source: The experience of raising a toddler who is currently wielding a highlighter under my desk while I write this. I'm keeping her fed with sufficient paper; so far the walls and carpet are unadulterated)



          One of the more terrifying things for a parent in today's society is cars. Cars move fast. You don't realize how fast they move until you are responsible for the life of a little booger monster of vile... angel. Your angel has no idea what 15mph will do to a body, much less 45mph. Your angel gets what is coming to them is completely innocent and needs to be protected in a remarkably deadly world.



          Excuse me one moment. The sharpie has disappeared from my desk. I really need to move those to a higher shelf. I do this to myself, honestly.



          The solution every parent learns is to hold the child's hand. Not only does this provide a critical physical safety preventing them from tearing out like a helion in front of a car, but it also provides a remarkable amount of feedback. The human body is geared for touch. You learn a remarkable amount about what the child is about to do just by feeling the way they respond to your hand. You can sense what they are feeling and they can sense what you are feeling. It gives you a way to guide them along in the right direction without yanking their arm from its socket constantly. (At least on good days)



          So I would expect a child sorcerer would be subjected to the same technique. You'd hold their hand so that you can sense what they are doing. And, if they're about to cast a really big spell, it provides a lever to manhandle gently ensure the child's larger spells don't complete.



          As for the tantrums, a child can already do a remarkable amount of damage. We keep a lot of our strength in reserve. It's how a mother can lift a car off of their child. Well, during a tantrum, the child has access to their full strength reserve and can do some rather remarkable things. As such, I would expect a similar approach as we have to tantrums today. You remove the child from the scene, and make them sit outside until they calm down. I'm assuming that, in these situations, the parents know enough to not be caught off guard. Any parent that lets their guard down during a child's tantrum is only human going to learn a lesson very quickly.



          I would expect parents to learn how to damp the effects of their children's magic. This would get into the particulars of your spellcrafting system, but if the parents can exert a continuous effort to keep dangerous spells from materializing, that would be a major start, and fit in well with the dead tired fatigue joys of parenting.






          share|improve this answer





















          • Frankly, there is no reason for anyone else to even contemplate writing an answer. Cort has said truly all that needs to be said on the matter! Basic parenting is the same for muggles and witchfolk: teach the little blighters to love; telling them "NO" is the same thing as telling them "I love you"; do both over and over; discipline them consistently from an early age; respect them and their abilities; restrain them when they pose a danger to self or others; let go when they can do things on their own; prepare them (as well as yourself) for that letting go! You'll raise up a good sorcerer!
            – elemtilas
            1 hour ago











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "579"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f131122%2fchild-sorcerers-are-they-a-danger-to-themselves-and-others%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          6
          down vote













          The answer is simple: you hold their hand.



          (Source: The experience of raising a toddler who is currently wielding a highlighter under my desk while I write this. I'm keeping her fed with sufficient paper; so far the walls and carpet are unadulterated)



          One of the more terrifying things for a parent in today's society is cars. Cars move fast. You don't realize how fast they move until you are responsible for the life of a little booger monster of vile... angel. Your angel has no idea what 15mph will do to a body, much less 45mph. Your angel gets what is coming to them is completely innocent and needs to be protected in a remarkably deadly world.



          Excuse me one moment. The sharpie has disappeared from my desk. I really need to move those to a higher shelf. I do this to myself, honestly.



          The solution every parent learns is to hold the child's hand. Not only does this provide a critical physical safety preventing them from tearing out like a helion in front of a car, but it also provides a remarkable amount of feedback. The human body is geared for touch. You learn a remarkable amount about what the child is about to do just by feeling the way they respond to your hand. You can sense what they are feeling and they can sense what you are feeling. It gives you a way to guide them along in the right direction without yanking their arm from its socket constantly. (At least on good days)



          So I would expect a child sorcerer would be subjected to the same technique. You'd hold their hand so that you can sense what they are doing. And, if they're about to cast a really big spell, it provides a lever to manhandle gently ensure the child's larger spells don't complete.



          As for the tantrums, a child can already do a remarkable amount of damage. We keep a lot of our strength in reserve. It's how a mother can lift a car off of their child. Well, during a tantrum, the child has access to their full strength reserve and can do some rather remarkable things. As such, I would expect a similar approach as we have to tantrums today. You remove the child from the scene, and make them sit outside until they calm down. I'm assuming that, in these situations, the parents know enough to not be caught off guard. Any parent that lets their guard down during a child's tantrum is only human going to learn a lesson very quickly.



          I would expect parents to learn how to damp the effects of their children's magic. This would get into the particulars of your spellcrafting system, but if the parents can exert a continuous effort to keep dangerous spells from materializing, that would be a major start, and fit in well with the dead tired fatigue joys of parenting.






          share|improve this answer





















          • Frankly, there is no reason for anyone else to even contemplate writing an answer. Cort has said truly all that needs to be said on the matter! Basic parenting is the same for muggles and witchfolk: teach the little blighters to love; telling them "NO" is the same thing as telling them "I love you"; do both over and over; discipline them consistently from an early age; respect them and their abilities; restrain them when they pose a danger to self or others; let go when they can do things on their own; prepare them (as well as yourself) for that letting go! You'll raise up a good sorcerer!
            – elemtilas
            1 hour ago















          up vote
          6
          down vote













          The answer is simple: you hold their hand.



          (Source: The experience of raising a toddler who is currently wielding a highlighter under my desk while I write this. I'm keeping her fed with sufficient paper; so far the walls and carpet are unadulterated)



          One of the more terrifying things for a parent in today's society is cars. Cars move fast. You don't realize how fast they move until you are responsible for the life of a little booger monster of vile... angel. Your angel has no idea what 15mph will do to a body, much less 45mph. Your angel gets what is coming to them is completely innocent and needs to be protected in a remarkably deadly world.



          Excuse me one moment. The sharpie has disappeared from my desk. I really need to move those to a higher shelf. I do this to myself, honestly.



          The solution every parent learns is to hold the child's hand. Not only does this provide a critical physical safety preventing them from tearing out like a helion in front of a car, but it also provides a remarkable amount of feedback. The human body is geared for touch. You learn a remarkable amount about what the child is about to do just by feeling the way they respond to your hand. You can sense what they are feeling and they can sense what you are feeling. It gives you a way to guide them along in the right direction without yanking their arm from its socket constantly. (At least on good days)



          So I would expect a child sorcerer would be subjected to the same technique. You'd hold their hand so that you can sense what they are doing. And, if they're about to cast a really big spell, it provides a lever to manhandle gently ensure the child's larger spells don't complete.



          As for the tantrums, a child can already do a remarkable amount of damage. We keep a lot of our strength in reserve. It's how a mother can lift a car off of their child. Well, during a tantrum, the child has access to their full strength reserve and can do some rather remarkable things. As such, I would expect a similar approach as we have to tantrums today. You remove the child from the scene, and make them sit outside until they calm down. I'm assuming that, in these situations, the parents know enough to not be caught off guard. Any parent that lets their guard down during a child's tantrum is only human going to learn a lesson very quickly.



          I would expect parents to learn how to damp the effects of their children's magic. This would get into the particulars of your spellcrafting system, but if the parents can exert a continuous effort to keep dangerous spells from materializing, that would be a major start, and fit in well with the dead tired fatigue joys of parenting.






          share|improve this answer





















          • Frankly, there is no reason for anyone else to even contemplate writing an answer. Cort has said truly all that needs to be said on the matter! Basic parenting is the same for muggles and witchfolk: teach the little blighters to love; telling them "NO" is the same thing as telling them "I love you"; do both over and over; discipline them consistently from an early age; respect them and their abilities; restrain them when they pose a danger to self or others; let go when they can do things on their own; prepare them (as well as yourself) for that letting go! You'll raise up a good sorcerer!
            – elemtilas
            1 hour ago













          up vote
          6
          down vote










          up vote
          6
          down vote









          The answer is simple: you hold their hand.



          (Source: The experience of raising a toddler who is currently wielding a highlighter under my desk while I write this. I'm keeping her fed with sufficient paper; so far the walls and carpet are unadulterated)



          One of the more terrifying things for a parent in today's society is cars. Cars move fast. You don't realize how fast they move until you are responsible for the life of a little booger monster of vile... angel. Your angel has no idea what 15mph will do to a body, much less 45mph. Your angel gets what is coming to them is completely innocent and needs to be protected in a remarkably deadly world.



          Excuse me one moment. The sharpie has disappeared from my desk. I really need to move those to a higher shelf. I do this to myself, honestly.



          The solution every parent learns is to hold the child's hand. Not only does this provide a critical physical safety preventing them from tearing out like a helion in front of a car, but it also provides a remarkable amount of feedback. The human body is geared for touch. You learn a remarkable amount about what the child is about to do just by feeling the way they respond to your hand. You can sense what they are feeling and they can sense what you are feeling. It gives you a way to guide them along in the right direction without yanking their arm from its socket constantly. (At least on good days)



          So I would expect a child sorcerer would be subjected to the same technique. You'd hold their hand so that you can sense what they are doing. And, if they're about to cast a really big spell, it provides a lever to manhandle gently ensure the child's larger spells don't complete.



          As for the tantrums, a child can already do a remarkable amount of damage. We keep a lot of our strength in reserve. It's how a mother can lift a car off of their child. Well, during a tantrum, the child has access to their full strength reserve and can do some rather remarkable things. As such, I would expect a similar approach as we have to tantrums today. You remove the child from the scene, and make them sit outside until they calm down. I'm assuming that, in these situations, the parents know enough to not be caught off guard. Any parent that lets their guard down during a child's tantrum is only human going to learn a lesson very quickly.



          I would expect parents to learn how to damp the effects of their children's magic. This would get into the particulars of your spellcrafting system, but if the parents can exert a continuous effort to keep dangerous spells from materializing, that would be a major start, and fit in well with the dead tired fatigue joys of parenting.






          share|improve this answer












          The answer is simple: you hold their hand.



          (Source: The experience of raising a toddler who is currently wielding a highlighter under my desk while I write this. I'm keeping her fed with sufficient paper; so far the walls and carpet are unadulterated)



          One of the more terrifying things for a parent in today's society is cars. Cars move fast. You don't realize how fast they move until you are responsible for the life of a little booger monster of vile... angel. Your angel has no idea what 15mph will do to a body, much less 45mph. Your angel gets what is coming to them is completely innocent and needs to be protected in a remarkably deadly world.



          Excuse me one moment. The sharpie has disappeared from my desk. I really need to move those to a higher shelf. I do this to myself, honestly.



          The solution every parent learns is to hold the child's hand. Not only does this provide a critical physical safety preventing them from tearing out like a helion in front of a car, but it also provides a remarkable amount of feedback. The human body is geared for touch. You learn a remarkable amount about what the child is about to do just by feeling the way they respond to your hand. You can sense what they are feeling and they can sense what you are feeling. It gives you a way to guide them along in the right direction without yanking their arm from its socket constantly. (At least on good days)



          So I would expect a child sorcerer would be subjected to the same technique. You'd hold their hand so that you can sense what they are doing. And, if they're about to cast a really big spell, it provides a lever to manhandle gently ensure the child's larger spells don't complete.



          As for the tantrums, a child can already do a remarkable amount of damage. We keep a lot of our strength in reserve. It's how a mother can lift a car off of their child. Well, during a tantrum, the child has access to their full strength reserve and can do some rather remarkable things. As such, I would expect a similar approach as we have to tantrums today. You remove the child from the scene, and make them sit outside until they calm down. I'm assuming that, in these situations, the parents know enough to not be caught off guard. Any parent that lets their guard down during a child's tantrum is only human going to learn a lesson very quickly.



          I would expect parents to learn how to damp the effects of their children's magic. This would get into the particulars of your spellcrafting system, but if the parents can exert a continuous effort to keep dangerous spells from materializing, that would be a major start, and fit in well with the dead tired fatigue joys of parenting.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 1 hour ago









          Cort Ammon

          105k15180371




          105k15180371












          • Frankly, there is no reason for anyone else to even contemplate writing an answer. Cort has said truly all that needs to be said on the matter! Basic parenting is the same for muggles and witchfolk: teach the little blighters to love; telling them "NO" is the same thing as telling them "I love you"; do both over and over; discipline them consistently from an early age; respect them and their abilities; restrain them when they pose a danger to self or others; let go when they can do things on their own; prepare them (as well as yourself) for that letting go! You'll raise up a good sorcerer!
            – elemtilas
            1 hour ago


















          • Frankly, there is no reason for anyone else to even contemplate writing an answer. Cort has said truly all that needs to be said on the matter! Basic parenting is the same for muggles and witchfolk: teach the little blighters to love; telling them "NO" is the same thing as telling them "I love you"; do both over and over; discipline them consistently from an early age; respect them and their abilities; restrain them when they pose a danger to self or others; let go when they can do things on their own; prepare them (as well as yourself) for that letting go! You'll raise up a good sorcerer!
            – elemtilas
            1 hour ago
















          Frankly, there is no reason for anyone else to even contemplate writing an answer. Cort has said truly all that needs to be said on the matter! Basic parenting is the same for muggles and witchfolk: teach the little blighters to love; telling them "NO" is the same thing as telling them "I love you"; do both over and over; discipline them consistently from an early age; respect them and their abilities; restrain them when they pose a danger to self or others; let go when they can do things on their own; prepare them (as well as yourself) for that letting go! You'll raise up a good sorcerer!
          – elemtilas
          1 hour ago




          Frankly, there is no reason for anyone else to even contemplate writing an answer. Cort has said truly all that needs to be said on the matter! Basic parenting is the same for muggles and witchfolk: teach the little blighters to love; telling them "NO" is the same thing as telling them "I love you"; do both over and over; discipline them consistently from an early age; respect them and their abilities; restrain them when they pose a danger to self or others; let go when they can do things on their own; prepare them (as well as yourself) for that letting go! You'll raise up a good sorcerer!
          – elemtilas
          1 hour ago


















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded



















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f131122%2fchild-sorcerers-are-they-a-danger-to-themselves-and-others%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Catalogne

          Violoncelliste

          Héron pourpré