CVMetalTextureCacheCreateTextureFromImage - pixelFormat











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












From the tests I did, the pixelFormat parameter of CVMetalTextureCacheCreateTextureFromImage is the pixel format of the metal texture and not the actual pixel format of data in the Cove Video buffer. Is this right?



In that case, where and when the conversion is done (if the texture and buffer formats are different)? Is there any performance penallity for that conversion?



EDIT:



I rechecked documentation and the pixelFormat parameter is described as follow: "The Metal pixel format constant describing the image buffer’s "data. So the pixelFormat should match the pixel format of the Core Video buffer data, no?



However, for the same Core Video buffer (whichcontains integer data), it works if I use either MTLPixelFormatR8Uint or MTLPixelFormatR8Unorm. The only difference is that the values received in my shader are either integers [0..255] or floats [0.0..1.0]. In the later case, I would have expected to receive garbage since the intergers is the buffer would have been interpreted as floats. No?










share|improve this question






















  • MTLPixelFormatR8Unorm interprets the data as unsigned integers and then converts them to floats in the range [0.0..1.0]. It does not expect the data to already be some 8-bit floating-point type.
    – Ken Thomases
    2 days ago










  • So pixelFormat is not the format of the Core Video buffer data as described by the documentation, right? Also, Is there any performance penalty for that conversion? From what I recall, conversion from integer to float are free when done in the shader.
    – Yoshi
    2 days ago










  • It is the format of the Core Video buffer data. What did I say that implied otherwise? Both MTLPixelFormatR8Uint and MTLPixelFormatR8Unorm say that the buffer data consists of 8-bit unsigned integers in the range from [0..255]. It's just that, in shaders, unsigned normalized values are presented as floating-point values. That doesn't affect what's in the buffer data. I don't know for sure about a performance penalty, but 8-bit Unorm formats are very common for rendering, so they're presumably plenty fast.
    – Ken Thomases
    2 days ago










  • If the difference between MTLPixelFormatR8Uint and MTLPixelFormatR8Unorm is not the buffer data type (both say that the buffer data consists of 8-bit unsigned integers in the range from [0..255]) but rather how the MTLTexture outputs its values, isn't correct to says that the pixelFormat parameter describe the pixel format (or the output) of the MTLTexture?
    – Yoshi
    2 days ago










  • Ok, I think I got it... both those format doesn't says how The MTLTexture should output its values but they rather says how the 8-bit interger values in the buffer should be interpreted (i.e. their format).. For Uint, it mean that 255 is 255 and for Unorm, 255 mean max range and thus 1.0. I got it?
    – Yoshi
    2 days ago

















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












From the tests I did, the pixelFormat parameter of CVMetalTextureCacheCreateTextureFromImage is the pixel format of the metal texture and not the actual pixel format of data in the Cove Video buffer. Is this right?



In that case, where and when the conversion is done (if the texture and buffer formats are different)? Is there any performance penallity for that conversion?



EDIT:



I rechecked documentation and the pixelFormat parameter is described as follow: "The Metal pixel format constant describing the image buffer’s "data. So the pixelFormat should match the pixel format of the Core Video buffer data, no?



However, for the same Core Video buffer (whichcontains integer data), it works if I use either MTLPixelFormatR8Uint or MTLPixelFormatR8Unorm. The only difference is that the values received in my shader are either integers [0..255] or floats [0.0..1.0]. In the later case, I would have expected to receive garbage since the intergers is the buffer would have been interpreted as floats. No?










share|improve this question






















  • MTLPixelFormatR8Unorm interprets the data as unsigned integers and then converts them to floats in the range [0.0..1.0]. It does not expect the data to already be some 8-bit floating-point type.
    – Ken Thomases
    2 days ago










  • So pixelFormat is not the format of the Core Video buffer data as described by the documentation, right? Also, Is there any performance penalty for that conversion? From what I recall, conversion from integer to float are free when done in the shader.
    – Yoshi
    2 days ago










  • It is the format of the Core Video buffer data. What did I say that implied otherwise? Both MTLPixelFormatR8Uint and MTLPixelFormatR8Unorm say that the buffer data consists of 8-bit unsigned integers in the range from [0..255]. It's just that, in shaders, unsigned normalized values are presented as floating-point values. That doesn't affect what's in the buffer data. I don't know for sure about a performance penalty, but 8-bit Unorm formats are very common for rendering, so they're presumably plenty fast.
    – Ken Thomases
    2 days ago










  • If the difference between MTLPixelFormatR8Uint and MTLPixelFormatR8Unorm is not the buffer data type (both say that the buffer data consists of 8-bit unsigned integers in the range from [0..255]) but rather how the MTLTexture outputs its values, isn't correct to says that the pixelFormat parameter describe the pixel format (or the output) of the MTLTexture?
    – Yoshi
    2 days ago










  • Ok, I think I got it... both those format doesn't says how The MTLTexture should output its values but they rather says how the 8-bit interger values in the buffer should be interpreted (i.e. their format).. For Uint, it mean that 255 is 255 and for Unorm, 255 mean max range and thus 1.0. I got it?
    – Yoshi
    2 days ago















up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











From the tests I did, the pixelFormat parameter of CVMetalTextureCacheCreateTextureFromImage is the pixel format of the metal texture and not the actual pixel format of data in the Cove Video buffer. Is this right?



In that case, where and when the conversion is done (if the texture and buffer formats are different)? Is there any performance penallity for that conversion?



EDIT:



I rechecked documentation and the pixelFormat parameter is described as follow: "The Metal pixel format constant describing the image buffer’s "data. So the pixelFormat should match the pixel format of the Core Video buffer data, no?



However, for the same Core Video buffer (whichcontains integer data), it works if I use either MTLPixelFormatR8Uint or MTLPixelFormatR8Unorm. The only difference is that the values received in my shader are either integers [0..255] or floats [0.0..1.0]. In the later case, I would have expected to receive garbage since the intergers is the buffer would have been interpreted as floats. No?










share|improve this question













From the tests I did, the pixelFormat parameter of CVMetalTextureCacheCreateTextureFromImage is the pixel format of the metal texture and not the actual pixel format of data in the Cove Video buffer. Is this right?



In that case, where and when the conversion is done (if the texture and buffer formats are different)? Is there any performance penallity for that conversion?



EDIT:



I rechecked documentation and the pixelFormat parameter is described as follow: "The Metal pixel format constant describing the image buffer’s "data. So the pixelFormat should match the pixel format of the Core Video buffer data, no?



However, for the same Core Video buffer (whichcontains integer data), it works if I use either MTLPixelFormatR8Uint or MTLPixelFormatR8Unorm. The only difference is that the values received in my shader are either integers [0..255] or floats [0.0..1.0]. In the later case, I would have expected to receive garbage since the intergers is the buffer would have been interpreted as floats. No?







ios textures metal






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 2 days ago









Yoshi

517




517












  • MTLPixelFormatR8Unorm interprets the data as unsigned integers and then converts them to floats in the range [0.0..1.0]. It does not expect the data to already be some 8-bit floating-point type.
    – Ken Thomases
    2 days ago










  • So pixelFormat is not the format of the Core Video buffer data as described by the documentation, right? Also, Is there any performance penalty for that conversion? From what I recall, conversion from integer to float are free when done in the shader.
    – Yoshi
    2 days ago










  • It is the format of the Core Video buffer data. What did I say that implied otherwise? Both MTLPixelFormatR8Uint and MTLPixelFormatR8Unorm say that the buffer data consists of 8-bit unsigned integers in the range from [0..255]. It's just that, in shaders, unsigned normalized values are presented as floating-point values. That doesn't affect what's in the buffer data. I don't know for sure about a performance penalty, but 8-bit Unorm formats are very common for rendering, so they're presumably plenty fast.
    – Ken Thomases
    2 days ago










  • If the difference between MTLPixelFormatR8Uint and MTLPixelFormatR8Unorm is not the buffer data type (both say that the buffer data consists of 8-bit unsigned integers in the range from [0..255]) but rather how the MTLTexture outputs its values, isn't correct to says that the pixelFormat parameter describe the pixel format (or the output) of the MTLTexture?
    – Yoshi
    2 days ago










  • Ok, I think I got it... both those format doesn't says how The MTLTexture should output its values but they rather says how the 8-bit interger values in the buffer should be interpreted (i.e. their format).. For Uint, it mean that 255 is 255 and for Unorm, 255 mean max range and thus 1.0. I got it?
    – Yoshi
    2 days ago




















  • MTLPixelFormatR8Unorm interprets the data as unsigned integers and then converts them to floats in the range [0.0..1.0]. It does not expect the data to already be some 8-bit floating-point type.
    – Ken Thomases
    2 days ago










  • So pixelFormat is not the format of the Core Video buffer data as described by the documentation, right? Also, Is there any performance penalty for that conversion? From what I recall, conversion from integer to float are free when done in the shader.
    – Yoshi
    2 days ago










  • It is the format of the Core Video buffer data. What did I say that implied otherwise? Both MTLPixelFormatR8Uint and MTLPixelFormatR8Unorm say that the buffer data consists of 8-bit unsigned integers in the range from [0..255]. It's just that, in shaders, unsigned normalized values are presented as floating-point values. That doesn't affect what's in the buffer data. I don't know for sure about a performance penalty, but 8-bit Unorm formats are very common for rendering, so they're presumably plenty fast.
    – Ken Thomases
    2 days ago










  • If the difference between MTLPixelFormatR8Uint and MTLPixelFormatR8Unorm is not the buffer data type (both say that the buffer data consists of 8-bit unsigned integers in the range from [0..255]) but rather how the MTLTexture outputs its values, isn't correct to says that the pixelFormat parameter describe the pixel format (or the output) of the MTLTexture?
    – Yoshi
    2 days ago










  • Ok, I think I got it... both those format doesn't says how The MTLTexture should output its values but they rather says how the 8-bit interger values in the buffer should be interpreted (i.e. their format).. For Uint, it mean that 255 is 255 and for Unorm, 255 mean max range and thus 1.0. I got it?
    – Yoshi
    2 days ago


















MTLPixelFormatR8Unorm interprets the data as unsigned integers and then converts them to floats in the range [0.0..1.0]. It does not expect the data to already be some 8-bit floating-point type.
– Ken Thomases
2 days ago




MTLPixelFormatR8Unorm interprets the data as unsigned integers and then converts them to floats in the range [0.0..1.0]. It does not expect the data to already be some 8-bit floating-point type.
– Ken Thomases
2 days ago












So pixelFormat is not the format of the Core Video buffer data as described by the documentation, right? Also, Is there any performance penalty for that conversion? From what I recall, conversion from integer to float are free when done in the shader.
– Yoshi
2 days ago




So pixelFormat is not the format of the Core Video buffer data as described by the documentation, right? Also, Is there any performance penalty for that conversion? From what I recall, conversion from integer to float are free when done in the shader.
– Yoshi
2 days ago












It is the format of the Core Video buffer data. What did I say that implied otherwise? Both MTLPixelFormatR8Uint and MTLPixelFormatR8Unorm say that the buffer data consists of 8-bit unsigned integers in the range from [0..255]. It's just that, in shaders, unsigned normalized values are presented as floating-point values. That doesn't affect what's in the buffer data. I don't know for sure about a performance penalty, but 8-bit Unorm formats are very common for rendering, so they're presumably plenty fast.
– Ken Thomases
2 days ago




It is the format of the Core Video buffer data. What did I say that implied otherwise? Both MTLPixelFormatR8Uint and MTLPixelFormatR8Unorm say that the buffer data consists of 8-bit unsigned integers in the range from [0..255]. It's just that, in shaders, unsigned normalized values are presented as floating-point values. That doesn't affect what's in the buffer data. I don't know for sure about a performance penalty, but 8-bit Unorm formats are very common for rendering, so they're presumably plenty fast.
– Ken Thomases
2 days ago












If the difference between MTLPixelFormatR8Uint and MTLPixelFormatR8Unorm is not the buffer data type (both say that the buffer data consists of 8-bit unsigned integers in the range from [0..255]) but rather how the MTLTexture outputs its values, isn't correct to says that the pixelFormat parameter describe the pixel format (or the output) of the MTLTexture?
– Yoshi
2 days ago




If the difference between MTLPixelFormatR8Uint and MTLPixelFormatR8Unorm is not the buffer data type (both say that the buffer data consists of 8-bit unsigned integers in the range from [0..255]) but rather how the MTLTexture outputs its values, isn't correct to says that the pixelFormat parameter describe the pixel format (or the output) of the MTLTexture?
– Yoshi
2 days ago












Ok, I think I got it... both those format doesn't says how The MTLTexture should output its values but they rather says how the 8-bit interger values in the buffer should be interpreted (i.e. their format).. For Uint, it mean that 255 is 255 and for Unorm, 255 mean max range and thus 1.0. I got it?
– Yoshi
2 days ago






Ok, I think I got it... both those format doesn't says how The MTLTexture should output its values but they rather says how the 8-bit interger values in the buffer should be interpreted (i.e. their format).. For Uint, it mean that 255 is 255 and for Unorm, 255 mean max range and thus 1.0. I got it?
– Yoshi
2 days ago



















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53418065%2fcvmetaltexturecachecreatetexturefromimage-pixelformat%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















 

draft saved


draft discarded



















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53418065%2fcvmetaltexturecachecreatetexturefromimage-pixelformat%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Trompette piccolo

Slow SSRS Report in dynamic grouping and multiple parameters

Simon Yates (cyclisme)