Why was ante tribus translated as “fifteen years ago”?
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
In an answer I posted here, I provided someone else's translation which translated ante tribus as "fifteen years ago". The translation provided in the question also translated tribus the same way:
Portavi lacrimis madidus te nostra catella,
quod feci lustris
laetior ante tribus.
Is that correct? Why would it be fifteen years and not three?
translation time numbers
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
In an answer I posted here, I provided someone else's translation which translated ante tribus as "fifteen years ago". The translation provided in the question also translated tribus the same way:
Portavi lacrimis madidus te nostra catella,
quod feci lustris
laetior ante tribus.
Is that correct? Why would it be fifteen years and not three?
translation time numbers
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
In an answer I posted here, I provided someone else's translation which translated ante tribus as "fifteen years ago". The translation provided in the question also translated tribus the same way:
Portavi lacrimis madidus te nostra catella,
quod feci lustris
laetior ante tribus.
Is that correct? Why would it be fifteen years and not three?
translation time numbers
In an answer I posted here, I provided someone else's translation which translated ante tribus as "fifteen years ago". The translation provided in the question also translated tribus the same way:
Portavi lacrimis madidus te nostra catella,
quod feci lustris
laetior ante tribus.
Is that correct? Why would it be fifteen years and not three?
translation time numbers
translation time numbers
asked 4 hours ago
Expedito Bipes
1,9801311
1,9801311
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
6
down vote
accepted
Lustrum has several meanings, but that which applies here is the period of five years which elapsed from census to census. The phrase is actually lustris ante tribus, or 'three lustra ago'.
A good dictionary will give further explanation, if you require it.
OK. Thanks for the answer!
– Expedito Bipes
4 hours ago
Word order in Latin is insane, isn't it :-)
– Carl Witthoft
54 mins ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
6
down vote
accepted
Lustrum has several meanings, but that which applies here is the period of five years which elapsed from census to census. The phrase is actually lustris ante tribus, or 'three lustra ago'.
A good dictionary will give further explanation, if you require it.
OK. Thanks for the answer!
– Expedito Bipes
4 hours ago
Word order in Latin is insane, isn't it :-)
– Carl Witthoft
54 mins ago
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
accepted
Lustrum has several meanings, but that which applies here is the period of five years which elapsed from census to census. The phrase is actually lustris ante tribus, or 'three lustra ago'.
A good dictionary will give further explanation, if you require it.
OK. Thanks for the answer!
– Expedito Bipes
4 hours ago
Word order in Latin is insane, isn't it :-)
– Carl Witthoft
54 mins ago
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
accepted
up vote
6
down vote
accepted
Lustrum has several meanings, but that which applies here is the period of five years which elapsed from census to census. The phrase is actually lustris ante tribus, or 'three lustra ago'.
A good dictionary will give further explanation, if you require it.
Lustrum has several meanings, but that which applies here is the period of five years which elapsed from census to census. The phrase is actually lustris ante tribus, or 'three lustra ago'.
A good dictionary will give further explanation, if you require it.
answered 4 hours ago
Tom Cotton
13.4k11043
13.4k11043
OK. Thanks for the answer!
– Expedito Bipes
4 hours ago
Word order in Latin is insane, isn't it :-)
– Carl Witthoft
54 mins ago
add a comment |
OK. Thanks for the answer!
– Expedito Bipes
4 hours ago
Word order in Latin is insane, isn't it :-)
– Carl Witthoft
54 mins ago
OK. Thanks for the answer!
– Expedito Bipes
4 hours ago
OK. Thanks for the answer!
– Expedito Bipes
4 hours ago
Word order in Latin is insane, isn't it :-)
– Carl Witthoft
54 mins ago
Word order in Latin is insane, isn't it :-)
– Carl Witthoft
54 mins ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Latin Language Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flatin.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f7702%2fwhy-was-ante-tribus-translated-as-fifteen-years-ago%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown