Declaring variables / constants within or outside of a loop?











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Which strategy would be better?






// Creating the constant OUTSIDE the loop.
const expected = "Some String";

let expectedFound = result.some((element) => {
return element.textContent === expected;
});


// Creating the constant WITHIN the loop.
let expectedFound = result.some((element) => {
const expected = "Some String";

return element.textContent === expected;
});





Usually one says that one should declare variables as close to their actual usage as possible. But I'm not sure concerning the shown situation.



Wouldn't it be better to create the constant only one-time?
Can't it cause (theoretically) a problem a create lots of variables when the array is very large?










share|improve this question






















  • inside - the variable is local, so no use outeside of it.
    – Nina Scholz
    Nov 22 at 8:37












  • For strings it's probably fine, I would recommend not to re-create an array from a literal on every call though.
    – Bergi
    Nov 22 at 9:05















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Which strategy would be better?






// Creating the constant OUTSIDE the loop.
const expected = "Some String";

let expectedFound = result.some((element) => {
return element.textContent === expected;
});


// Creating the constant WITHIN the loop.
let expectedFound = result.some((element) => {
const expected = "Some String";

return element.textContent === expected;
});





Usually one says that one should declare variables as close to their actual usage as possible. But I'm not sure concerning the shown situation.



Wouldn't it be better to create the constant only one-time?
Can't it cause (theoretically) a problem a create lots of variables when the array is very large?










share|improve this question






















  • inside - the variable is local, so no use outeside of it.
    – Nina Scholz
    Nov 22 at 8:37












  • For strings it's probably fine, I would recommend not to re-create an array from a literal on every call though.
    – Bergi
    Nov 22 at 9:05













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











Which strategy would be better?






// Creating the constant OUTSIDE the loop.
const expected = "Some String";

let expectedFound = result.some((element) => {
return element.textContent === expected;
});


// Creating the constant WITHIN the loop.
let expectedFound = result.some((element) => {
const expected = "Some String";

return element.textContent === expected;
});





Usually one says that one should declare variables as close to their actual usage as possible. But I'm not sure concerning the shown situation.



Wouldn't it be better to create the constant only one-time?
Can't it cause (theoretically) a problem a create lots of variables when the array is very large?










share|improve this question













Which strategy would be better?






// Creating the constant OUTSIDE the loop.
const expected = "Some String";

let expectedFound = result.some((element) => {
return element.textContent === expected;
});


// Creating the constant WITHIN the loop.
let expectedFound = result.some((element) => {
const expected = "Some String";

return element.textContent === expected;
});





Usually one says that one should declare variables as close to their actual usage as possible. But I'm not sure concerning the shown situation.



Wouldn't it be better to create the constant only one-time?
Can't it cause (theoretically) a problem a create lots of variables when the array is very large?






// Creating the constant OUTSIDE the loop.
const expected = "Some String";

let expectedFound = result.some((element) => {
return element.textContent === expected;
});


// Creating the constant WITHIN the loop.
let expectedFound = result.some((element) => {
const expected = "Some String";

return element.textContent === expected;
});





// Creating the constant OUTSIDE the loop.
const expected = "Some String";

let expectedFound = result.some((element) => {
return element.textContent === expected;
});


// Creating the constant WITHIN the loop.
let expectedFound = result.some((element) => {
const expected = "Some String";

return element.textContent === expected;
});






javascript arrays algorithm






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 22 at 8:36









michael.zech

1,02911125




1,02911125












  • inside - the variable is local, so no use outeside of it.
    – Nina Scholz
    Nov 22 at 8:37












  • For strings it's probably fine, I would recommend not to re-create an array from a literal on every call though.
    – Bergi
    Nov 22 at 9:05


















  • inside - the variable is local, so no use outeside of it.
    – Nina Scholz
    Nov 22 at 8:37












  • For strings it's probably fine, I would recommend not to re-create an array from a literal on every call though.
    – Bergi
    Nov 22 at 9:05
















inside - the variable is local, so no use outeside of it.
– Nina Scholz
Nov 22 at 8:37






inside - the variable is local, so no use outeside of it.
– Nina Scholz
Nov 22 at 8:37














For strings it's probably fine, I would recommend not to re-create an array from a literal on every call though.
– Bergi
Nov 22 at 9:05




For strings it's probably fine, I would recommend not to re-create an array from a literal on every call though.
– Bergi
Nov 22 at 9:05












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










Given your example, creating a variable inside the some function is not really creating a variable inside a loop as it will be deleted upon exiting the function (so, at the end of each "iteration").



I'll go for the declaration inside the some function.






share|improve this answer




























    up vote
    1
    down vote













    Technically this is not a loop, even though it is similar in structure and functionality. Loops in JavaScript would be for, for ... in, for ... of and while. Those statements' body is a block. For instance:



    const expected = "Some String";
    let i = 0, expectedFound = false;
    while(i < result.length) {
    if(result[i].textContent === expected) {
    expectedFound = true;
    break;
    }
    i = i + 1;
    }


    would have a similar functionality to the some method.



    some is an Array method that gets passed a callback function. This has various differences but I'm not sure how they play out in this specific scenario. For instance, it would probably be very bad for performance to declare a variable inside of the block, but I'm not sure how it would impact the case of the Array method callback function.



    As a rule of thumb, I'd say if you're trying to squeeze performance out of JavaScript, you'd probably be better off with optimized loops than with Array methods. But that's a very important if. Unless we're talking about way over a hundred HTML elements, or of running this code several times per second, I don't think optimizing it should be a priority.



    Some reading I found on the matter: https://hackernoon.com/javascript-performance-test-for-vs-for-each-vs-map-reduce-filter-find-32c1113f19d7






    share|improve this answer





















      Your Answer






      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
      StackExchange.snippets.init();
      });
      });
      }, "code-snippets");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "1"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53426799%2fdeclaring-variables-constants-within-or-outside-of-a-loop%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      1
      down vote



      accepted










      Given your example, creating a variable inside the some function is not really creating a variable inside a loop as it will be deleted upon exiting the function (so, at the end of each "iteration").



      I'll go for the declaration inside the some function.






      share|improve this answer

























        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted










        Given your example, creating a variable inside the some function is not really creating a variable inside a loop as it will be deleted upon exiting the function (so, at the end of each "iteration").



        I'll go for the declaration inside the some function.






        share|improve this answer























          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted






          Given your example, creating a variable inside the some function is not really creating a variable inside a loop as it will be deleted upon exiting the function (so, at the end of each "iteration").



          I'll go for the declaration inside the some function.






          share|improve this answer












          Given your example, creating a variable inside the some function is not really creating a variable inside a loop as it will be deleted upon exiting the function (so, at the end of each "iteration").



          I'll go for the declaration inside the some function.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Nov 22 at 8:40









          Zim

          1,0341717




          1,0341717
























              up vote
              1
              down vote













              Technically this is not a loop, even though it is similar in structure and functionality. Loops in JavaScript would be for, for ... in, for ... of and while. Those statements' body is a block. For instance:



              const expected = "Some String";
              let i = 0, expectedFound = false;
              while(i < result.length) {
              if(result[i].textContent === expected) {
              expectedFound = true;
              break;
              }
              i = i + 1;
              }


              would have a similar functionality to the some method.



              some is an Array method that gets passed a callback function. This has various differences but I'm not sure how they play out in this specific scenario. For instance, it would probably be very bad for performance to declare a variable inside of the block, but I'm not sure how it would impact the case of the Array method callback function.



              As a rule of thumb, I'd say if you're trying to squeeze performance out of JavaScript, you'd probably be better off with optimized loops than with Array methods. But that's a very important if. Unless we're talking about way over a hundred HTML elements, or of running this code several times per second, I don't think optimizing it should be a priority.



              Some reading I found on the matter: https://hackernoon.com/javascript-performance-test-for-vs-for-each-vs-map-reduce-filter-find-32c1113f19d7






              share|improve this answer

























                up vote
                1
                down vote













                Technically this is not a loop, even though it is similar in structure and functionality. Loops in JavaScript would be for, for ... in, for ... of and while. Those statements' body is a block. For instance:



                const expected = "Some String";
                let i = 0, expectedFound = false;
                while(i < result.length) {
                if(result[i].textContent === expected) {
                expectedFound = true;
                break;
                }
                i = i + 1;
                }


                would have a similar functionality to the some method.



                some is an Array method that gets passed a callback function. This has various differences but I'm not sure how they play out in this specific scenario. For instance, it would probably be very bad for performance to declare a variable inside of the block, but I'm not sure how it would impact the case of the Array method callback function.



                As a rule of thumb, I'd say if you're trying to squeeze performance out of JavaScript, you'd probably be better off with optimized loops than with Array methods. But that's a very important if. Unless we're talking about way over a hundred HTML elements, or of running this code several times per second, I don't think optimizing it should be a priority.



                Some reading I found on the matter: https://hackernoon.com/javascript-performance-test-for-vs-for-each-vs-map-reduce-filter-find-32c1113f19d7






                share|improve this answer























                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote









                  Technically this is not a loop, even though it is similar in structure and functionality. Loops in JavaScript would be for, for ... in, for ... of and while. Those statements' body is a block. For instance:



                  const expected = "Some String";
                  let i = 0, expectedFound = false;
                  while(i < result.length) {
                  if(result[i].textContent === expected) {
                  expectedFound = true;
                  break;
                  }
                  i = i + 1;
                  }


                  would have a similar functionality to the some method.



                  some is an Array method that gets passed a callback function. This has various differences but I'm not sure how they play out in this specific scenario. For instance, it would probably be very bad for performance to declare a variable inside of the block, but I'm not sure how it would impact the case of the Array method callback function.



                  As a rule of thumb, I'd say if you're trying to squeeze performance out of JavaScript, you'd probably be better off with optimized loops than with Array methods. But that's a very important if. Unless we're talking about way over a hundred HTML elements, or of running this code several times per second, I don't think optimizing it should be a priority.



                  Some reading I found on the matter: https://hackernoon.com/javascript-performance-test-for-vs-for-each-vs-map-reduce-filter-find-32c1113f19d7






                  share|improve this answer












                  Technically this is not a loop, even though it is similar in structure and functionality. Loops in JavaScript would be for, for ... in, for ... of and while. Those statements' body is a block. For instance:



                  const expected = "Some String";
                  let i = 0, expectedFound = false;
                  while(i < result.length) {
                  if(result[i].textContent === expected) {
                  expectedFound = true;
                  break;
                  }
                  i = i + 1;
                  }


                  would have a similar functionality to the some method.



                  some is an Array method that gets passed a callback function. This has various differences but I'm not sure how they play out in this specific scenario. For instance, it would probably be very bad for performance to declare a variable inside of the block, but I'm not sure how it would impact the case of the Array method callback function.



                  As a rule of thumb, I'd say if you're trying to squeeze performance out of JavaScript, you'd probably be better off with optimized loops than with Array methods. But that's a very important if. Unless we're talking about way over a hundred HTML elements, or of running this code several times per second, I don't think optimizing it should be a priority.



                  Some reading I found on the matter: https://hackernoon.com/javascript-performance-test-for-vs-for-each-vs-map-reduce-filter-find-32c1113f19d7







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Nov 22 at 16:11









                  Pablo Barría Urenda

                  2,02241020




                  2,02241020






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                      Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                      Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53426799%2fdeclaring-variables-constants-within-or-outside-of-a-loop%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Trompette piccolo

                      Slow SSRS Report in dynamic grouping and multiple parameters

                      Simon Yates (cyclisme)