Is “this'll” considered proper English?
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I understand that certain words when used over time are then embraced into the English lexicon. Is "this'll" one of those words?
Examples:
This'll do.
This'll stay in place.
As an insert, this'll be easier to do.
contractions
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I understand that certain words when used over time are then embraced into the English lexicon. Is "this'll" one of those words?
Examples:
This'll do.
This'll stay in place.
As an insert, this'll be easier to do.
contractions
From the song American Pie, "Singin' this'll be the day that I die."
– Jason Bassford
49 mins ago
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I understand that certain words when used over time are then embraced into the English lexicon. Is "this'll" one of those words?
Examples:
This'll do.
This'll stay in place.
As an insert, this'll be easier to do.
contractions
I understand that certain words when used over time are then embraced into the English lexicon. Is "this'll" one of those words?
Examples:
This'll do.
This'll stay in place.
As an insert, this'll be easier to do.
contractions
contractions
asked 2 hours ago
Rogue-OP
82
82
From the song American Pie, "Singin' this'll be the day that I die."
– Jason Bassford
49 mins ago
add a comment |
From the song American Pie, "Singin' this'll be the day that I die."
– Jason Bassford
49 mins ago
From the song American Pie, "Singin' this'll be the day that I die."
– Jason Bassford
49 mins ago
From the song American Pie, "Singin' this'll be the day that I die."
– Jason Bassford
49 mins ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
"This'll" is an example of a word that is spoken aloud frequently but is not part of standard written English. Even if one is writing with other contractions (can't, won't, I'll, etc.), "this'll" would not be written down and would instead be expanded as "this will."
New contributor
Hmm. It would never occur to me to expand this'll in a context where I would write he'll. But I concede that the iWeb corpus shows only 3 401 instances of this'll against 1 106 480 of this will - a ratio of 1:325. This compares with 226 568 against 2 916 449 (1:13) for it'll/it will, and 205 744 against 636 339 (1:3) for, he'll/he will. I wonder why this should be. It could be simply that "he will" is more likely to occur in informal contexts than "it will" or "this will" - but I don't know whether that is the case or not.
– Colin Fine
2 hours ago
Whence comes the bland statement that this'll "is not part of standard written English"? Is there an index available where this can be looked up, or does one merely bow to the obvious correctness of the view?
– John Lawler
4 mins ago
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
It is a perfectly normal contraction, in daily use by millions of English speakers.
It is also widely used in informal writing. Many people regard contractions of this sort as inappropriate for more formal writing.
Whether you regard it as "a word" or not is up to you.
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
"This'll" is an example of a word that is spoken aloud frequently but is not part of standard written English. Even if one is writing with other contractions (can't, won't, I'll, etc.), "this'll" would not be written down and would instead be expanded as "this will."
New contributor
Hmm. It would never occur to me to expand this'll in a context where I would write he'll. But I concede that the iWeb corpus shows only 3 401 instances of this'll against 1 106 480 of this will - a ratio of 1:325. This compares with 226 568 against 2 916 449 (1:13) for it'll/it will, and 205 744 against 636 339 (1:3) for, he'll/he will. I wonder why this should be. It could be simply that "he will" is more likely to occur in informal contexts than "it will" or "this will" - but I don't know whether that is the case or not.
– Colin Fine
2 hours ago
Whence comes the bland statement that this'll "is not part of standard written English"? Is there an index available where this can be looked up, or does one merely bow to the obvious correctness of the view?
– John Lawler
4 mins ago
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
"This'll" is an example of a word that is spoken aloud frequently but is not part of standard written English. Even if one is writing with other contractions (can't, won't, I'll, etc.), "this'll" would not be written down and would instead be expanded as "this will."
New contributor
Hmm. It would never occur to me to expand this'll in a context where I would write he'll. But I concede that the iWeb corpus shows only 3 401 instances of this'll against 1 106 480 of this will - a ratio of 1:325. This compares with 226 568 against 2 916 449 (1:13) for it'll/it will, and 205 744 against 636 339 (1:3) for, he'll/he will. I wonder why this should be. It could be simply that "he will" is more likely to occur in informal contexts than "it will" or "this will" - but I don't know whether that is the case or not.
– Colin Fine
2 hours ago
Whence comes the bland statement that this'll "is not part of standard written English"? Is there an index available where this can be looked up, or does one merely bow to the obvious correctness of the view?
– John Lawler
4 mins ago
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
"This'll" is an example of a word that is spoken aloud frequently but is not part of standard written English. Even if one is writing with other contractions (can't, won't, I'll, etc.), "this'll" would not be written down and would instead be expanded as "this will."
New contributor
"This'll" is an example of a word that is spoken aloud frequently but is not part of standard written English. Even if one is writing with other contractions (can't, won't, I'll, etc.), "this'll" would not be written down and would instead be expanded as "this will."
New contributor
New contributor
answered 2 hours ago
Typeset Mask
3154
3154
New contributor
New contributor
Hmm. It would never occur to me to expand this'll in a context where I would write he'll. But I concede that the iWeb corpus shows only 3 401 instances of this'll against 1 106 480 of this will - a ratio of 1:325. This compares with 226 568 against 2 916 449 (1:13) for it'll/it will, and 205 744 against 636 339 (1:3) for, he'll/he will. I wonder why this should be. It could be simply that "he will" is more likely to occur in informal contexts than "it will" or "this will" - but I don't know whether that is the case or not.
– Colin Fine
2 hours ago
Whence comes the bland statement that this'll "is not part of standard written English"? Is there an index available where this can be looked up, or does one merely bow to the obvious correctness of the view?
– John Lawler
4 mins ago
add a comment |
Hmm. It would never occur to me to expand this'll in a context where I would write he'll. But I concede that the iWeb corpus shows only 3 401 instances of this'll against 1 106 480 of this will - a ratio of 1:325. This compares with 226 568 against 2 916 449 (1:13) for it'll/it will, and 205 744 against 636 339 (1:3) for, he'll/he will. I wonder why this should be. It could be simply that "he will" is more likely to occur in informal contexts than "it will" or "this will" - but I don't know whether that is the case or not.
– Colin Fine
2 hours ago
Whence comes the bland statement that this'll "is not part of standard written English"? Is there an index available where this can be looked up, or does one merely bow to the obvious correctness of the view?
– John Lawler
4 mins ago
Hmm. It would never occur to me to expand this'll in a context where I would write he'll. But I concede that the iWeb corpus shows only 3 401 instances of this'll against 1 106 480 of this will - a ratio of 1:325. This compares with 226 568 against 2 916 449 (1:13) for it'll/it will, and 205 744 against 636 339 (1:3) for, he'll/he will. I wonder why this should be. It could be simply that "he will" is more likely to occur in informal contexts than "it will" or "this will" - but I don't know whether that is the case or not.
– Colin Fine
2 hours ago
Hmm. It would never occur to me to expand this'll in a context where I would write he'll. But I concede that the iWeb corpus shows only 3 401 instances of this'll against 1 106 480 of this will - a ratio of 1:325. This compares with 226 568 against 2 916 449 (1:13) for it'll/it will, and 205 744 against 636 339 (1:3) for, he'll/he will. I wonder why this should be. It could be simply that "he will" is more likely to occur in informal contexts than "it will" or "this will" - but I don't know whether that is the case or not.
– Colin Fine
2 hours ago
Whence comes the bland statement that this'll "is not part of standard written English"? Is there an index available where this can be looked up, or does one merely bow to the obvious correctness of the view?
– John Lawler
4 mins ago
Whence comes the bland statement that this'll "is not part of standard written English"? Is there an index available where this can be looked up, or does one merely bow to the obvious correctness of the view?
– John Lawler
4 mins ago
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
It is a perfectly normal contraction, in daily use by millions of English speakers.
It is also widely used in informal writing. Many people regard contractions of this sort as inappropriate for more formal writing.
Whether you regard it as "a word" or not is up to you.
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
It is a perfectly normal contraction, in daily use by millions of English speakers.
It is also widely used in informal writing. Many people regard contractions of this sort as inappropriate for more formal writing.
Whether you regard it as "a word" or not is up to you.
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
It is a perfectly normal contraction, in daily use by millions of English speakers.
It is also widely used in informal writing. Many people regard contractions of this sort as inappropriate for more formal writing.
Whether you regard it as "a word" or not is up to you.
It is a perfectly normal contraction, in daily use by millions of English speakers.
It is also widely used in informal writing. Many people regard contractions of this sort as inappropriate for more formal writing.
Whether you regard it as "a word" or not is up to you.
answered 2 hours ago
Colin Fine
62.7k167158
62.7k167158
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f476839%2fis-thisll-considered-proper-english%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
From the song American Pie, "Singin' this'll be the day that I die."
– Jason Bassford
49 mins ago