Is there a distinction between ‘did“ and ”have done" in Japanese?
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
According to internet sources and my Chinese friend living in Japan, there isn't. However, can someone provide more evidence on this issue? If there is no grammatical distinction, how can we distinguish these two tenses? I mean, how do we know if one sentence is translated to "did something", while the other to "have done something"?
grammar tense past
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
According to internet sources and my Chinese friend living in Japan, there isn't. However, can someone provide more evidence on this issue? If there is no grammatical distinction, how can we distinguish these two tenses? I mean, how do we know if one sentence is translated to "did something", while the other to "have done something"?
grammar tense past
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
According to internet sources and my Chinese friend living in Japan, there isn't. However, can someone provide more evidence on this issue? If there is no grammatical distinction, how can we distinguish these two tenses? I mean, how do we know if one sentence is translated to "did something", while the other to "have done something"?
grammar tense past
According to internet sources and my Chinese friend living in Japan, there isn't. However, can someone provide more evidence on this issue? If there is no grammatical distinction, how can we distinguish these two tenses? I mean, how do we know if one sentence is translated to "did something", while the other to "have done something"?
grammar tense past
grammar tense past
edited 3 hours ago
Eiríkr Útlendi
16.4k13260
16.4k13260
asked 7 hours ago
Zeyuan
1855
1855
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
While there's no distinction grammatically in the positive sense, there is a distinction in negations:
朝食は、 何も食べなかった (I did not eat anything for breakfast)
朝から、何も食べていない (I have not eaten anything since breakfast)
As shown in the preceding examples, for negations, the た-form is used for the simple past (did not) and the ている-form is used for present perfect (have not done).
Some words that help indicate whether it means simple past or present perfect include:
- ご飯はまだ食べていない - have not done (negation present perfect)
- ご飯はもう食べた - have done (affirmation present perfect)
Here's a reference on this: https://www.wasabi-jpn.com/japanese-grammar/past-tense-and-present-perfect-tense-with-the-ta-form/.
"The た-form is used for the simple past (did) and the ている-form is used for present perfect (have done)." You are still talking about negations here, right?
– kandyman
4 hours ago
@kandyman Made it more clear.
– Ringil
4 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
Since your examples are in English, I should point out that the technical distinction you are making is between the simple past
(a past verb form with no auxiliary attached - 'did') and the present perfect
(a verb form with have/has + past participle - 'have done'). Japanese verbs operate very differently to this. Although there is a past tense in Japanese, there is no such thing as a past participle in Japanese. So there is no direct equivalent of 'have done'. Therefore there is no technical difference between 'did' and 'have done' in Japanese (i.e. a verb form which explicitly distinguishes the two as in English).
In other words, both the following translations are possible for the sentence:
宿題{しゅくだい}をした。
I did my homework. / I have done my homework.
However, that is not to say that there is no way at all to convey the difference. Depending on what you want to say, it will be possible to include contextual information like time-markers, auxiliary verbs, etc, which makes the intended meaning clearer. But you would need to provide more specific examples of what you want to say in order to highlight the different ways you could express it in Japanese.
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
While there's no distinction grammatically in the positive sense, there is a distinction in negations:
朝食は、 何も食べなかった (I did not eat anything for breakfast)
朝から、何も食べていない (I have not eaten anything since breakfast)
As shown in the preceding examples, for negations, the た-form is used for the simple past (did not) and the ている-form is used for present perfect (have not done).
Some words that help indicate whether it means simple past or present perfect include:
- ご飯はまだ食べていない - have not done (negation present perfect)
- ご飯はもう食べた - have done (affirmation present perfect)
Here's a reference on this: https://www.wasabi-jpn.com/japanese-grammar/past-tense-and-present-perfect-tense-with-the-ta-form/.
"The た-form is used for the simple past (did) and the ている-form is used for present perfect (have done)." You are still talking about negations here, right?
– kandyman
4 hours ago
@kandyman Made it more clear.
– Ringil
4 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
While there's no distinction grammatically in the positive sense, there is a distinction in negations:
朝食は、 何も食べなかった (I did not eat anything for breakfast)
朝から、何も食べていない (I have not eaten anything since breakfast)
As shown in the preceding examples, for negations, the た-form is used for the simple past (did not) and the ている-form is used for present perfect (have not done).
Some words that help indicate whether it means simple past or present perfect include:
- ご飯はまだ食べていない - have not done (negation present perfect)
- ご飯はもう食べた - have done (affirmation present perfect)
Here's a reference on this: https://www.wasabi-jpn.com/japanese-grammar/past-tense-and-present-perfect-tense-with-the-ta-form/.
"The た-form is used for the simple past (did) and the ている-form is used for present perfect (have done)." You are still talking about negations here, right?
– kandyman
4 hours ago
@kandyman Made it more clear.
– Ringil
4 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
While there's no distinction grammatically in the positive sense, there is a distinction in negations:
朝食は、 何も食べなかった (I did not eat anything for breakfast)
朝から、何も食べていない (I have not eaten anything since breakfast)
As shown in the preceding examples, for negations, the た-form is used for the simple past (did not) and the ている-form is used for present perfect (have not done).
Some words that help indicate whether it means simple past or present perfect include:
- ご飯はまだ食べていない - have not done (negation present perfect)
- ご飯はもう食べた - have done (affirmation present perfect)
Here's a reference on this: https://www.wasabi-jpn.com/japanese-grammar/past-tense-and-present-perfect-tense-with-the-ta-form/.
While there's no distinction grammatically in the positive sense, there is a distinction in negations:
朝食は、 何も食べなかった (I did not eat anything for breakfast)
朝から、何も食べていない (I have not eaten anything since breakfast)
As shown in the preceding examples, for negations, the た-form is used for the simple past (did not) and the ている-form is used for present perfect (have not done).
Some words that help indicate whether it means simple past or present perfect include:
- ご飯はまだ食べていない - have not done (negation present perfect)
- ご飯はもう食べた - have done (affirmation present perfect)
Here's a reference on this: https://www.wasabi-jpn.com/japanese-grammar/past-tense-and-present-perfect-tense-with-the-ta-form/.
edited 4 hours ago
answered 4 hours ago
Ringil
2,49011030
2,49011030
"The た-form is used for the simple past (did) and the ている-form is used for present perfect (have done)." You are still talking about negations here, right?
– kandyman
4 hours ago
@kandyman Made it more clear.
– Ringil
4 hours ago
add a comment |
"The た-form is used for the simple past (did) and the ている-form is used for present perfect (have done)." You are still talking about negations here, right?
– kandyman
4 hours ago
@kandyman Made it more clear.
– Ringil
4 hours ago
"The た-form is used for the simple past (did) and the ている-form is used for present perfect (have done)." You are still talking about negations here, right?
– kandyman
4 hours ago
"The た-form is used for the simple past (did) and the ている-form is used for present perfect (have done)." You are still talking about negations here, right?
– kandyman
4 hours ago
@kandyman Made it more clear.
– Ringil
4 hours ago
@kandyman Made it more clear.
– Ringil
4 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
Since your examples are in English, I should point out that the technical distinction you are making is between the simple past
(a past verb form with no auxiliary attached - 'did') and the present perfect
(a verb form with have/has + past participle - 'have done'). Japanese verbs operate very differently to this. Although there is a past tense in Japanese, there is no such thing as a past participle in Japanese. So there is no direct equivalent of 'have done'. Therefore there is no technical difference between 'did' and 'have done' in Japanese (i.e. a verb form which explicitly distinguishes the two as in English).
In other words, both the following translations are possible for the sentence:
宿題{しゅくだい}をした。
I did my homework. / I have done my homework.
However, that is not to say that there is no way at all to convey the difference. Depending on what you want to say, it will be possible to include contextual information like time-markers, auxiliary verbs, etc, which makes the intended meaning clearer. But you would need to provide more specific examples of what you want to say in order to highlight the different ways you could express it in Japanese.
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
Since your examples are in English, I should point out that the technical distinction you are making is between the simple past
(a past verb form with no auxiliary attached - 'did') and the present perfect
(a verb form with have/has + past participle - 'have done'). Japanese verbs operate very differently to this. Although there is a past tense in Japanese, there is no such thing as a past participle in Japanese. So there is no direct equivalent of 'have done'. Therefore there is no technical difference between 'did' and 'have done' in Japanese (i.e. a verb form which explicitly distinguishes the two as in English).
In other words, both the following translations are possible for the sentence:
宿題{しゅくだい}をした。
I did my homework. / I have done my homework.
However, that is not to say that there is no way at all to convey the difference. Depending on what you want to say, it will be possible to include contextual information like time-markers, auxiliary verbs, etc, which makes the intended meaning clearer. But you would need to provide more specific examples of what you want to say in order to highlight the different ways you could express it in Japanese.
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
Since your examples are in English, I should point out that the technical distinction you are making is between the simple past
(a past verb form with no auxiliary attached - 'did') and the present perfect
(a verb form with have/has + past participle - 'have done'). Japanese verbs operate very differently to this. Although there is a past tense in Japanese, there is no such thing as a past participle in Japanese. So there is no direct equivalent of 'have done'. Therefore there is no technical difference between 'did' and 'have done' in Japanese (i.e. a verb form which explicitly distinguishes the two as in English).
In other words, both the following translations are possible for the sentence:
宿題{しゅくだい}をした。
I did my homework. / I have done my homework.
However, that is not to say that there is no way at all to convey the difference. Depending on what you want to say, it will be possible to include contextual information like time-markers, auxiliary verbs, etc, which makes the intended meaning clearer. But you would need to provide more specific examples of what you want to say in order to highlight the different ways you could express it in Japanese.
Since your examples are in English, I should point out that the technical distinction you are making is between the simple past
(a past verb form with no auxiliary attached - 'did') and the present perfect
(a verb form with have/has + past participle - 'have done'). Japanese verbs operate very differently to this. Although there is a past tense in Japanese, there is no such thing as a past participle in Japanese. So there is no direct equivalent of 'have done'. Therefore there is no technical difference between 'did' and 'have done' in Japanese (i.e. a verb form which explicitly distinguishes the two as in English).
In other words, both the following translations are possible for the sentence:
宿題{しゅくだい}をした。
I did my homework. / I have done my homework.
However, that is not to say that there is no way at all to convey the difference. Depending on what you want to say, it will be possible to include contextual information like time-markers, auxiliary verbs, etc, which makes the intended meaning clearer. But you would need to provide more specific examples of what you want to say in order to highlight the different ways you could express it in Japanese.
edited 3 hours ago
answered 5 hours ago
kandyman
2,825521
2,825521
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Japanese Language Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fjapanese.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f63352%2fis-there-a-distinction-between-did-and-have-done-in-japanese%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown