PLSQL : where condition outside of subquery












1














I've a query like this (the original is much more complicated)



select 0, 999, count(case when cond = 'aa' then 1 end) val1, sum(case when cond = 'aa' then amount else 0 end) amount1,
count(case when cond = 'bb' then 1 end) val2, sum(case when cond = 'bb' then amount else 0 end) amount2
from myTable
where amount between 0 and 999
union
select 1000, 2999, count(case when cond = 'aa' then 1 end) val1, sum(case when cond = 'aa' then amount else 0 end) amount1,
count(case when cond = 'bb' then 1 end) val2, sum(case when cond = 'bb' then amount else 0 end) amount2
from myTable
where amount between 1000 and 2999
union
...


There are multiple union and the select is way more complicated.



I'd like to simplify it. For this, I used the with clause



with q1 as(
select case when cond = 'aa' then 1 end val1, case when cond = 'aa' then amount else 0 end amount1,
case when cond = 'bb' then 1 end val2, case when cond = 'bb' then amount else 0 end amount2
)
select 0, 999, sum(val1) val1, sum(amount1) amount1, sum(val2) val2, sum(amount2) amount2
from q1 where amount between 0 and 999
union
select 1000, 2999, sum(val1) val1, sum(amount1) amount1, sum(val2) val2, sum(amount2) amount2
from q1 where amount between 1000 and 2999
union
....


But in my case this is still very long.
Is there a possibility in plsql to write it like this



with q1 as (
select minVal, maxVal, count(case when cond = 'aa' then 1 end) val1, sum(case when cond = 'aa' then amount else 0 end) amount1,
count(case when cond = 'bb' then 1 end) val2, sum(case when cond = 'bb' then amount else 0 end) amount2
from myTable
where amount between minVal and maxVal
)
select * from q1 insideWhere minVal=0 and maxVal=999
union select * from q1 insideWhere minVal=1000 and maxVal=2999
union ...


Or any other solution?










share|improve this question




















  • 1




    You could probably get some better answers, if you'd describe your real problem in more detail. I.e. what problem is the original query addressing? That way we may be able to give you better alternatives, than just blindly trying to follow your only direction (which may not necessarily be the the best, if possible at all).
    – Hilarion
    Nov 23 '18 at 12:39










  • it's about the same as the first query but with the (case when cond = 'aa' then 1 end) with more complicated conditions and with more than 20 case and even more union Further more the number of steps (between x an y) will change depending what is asked and my table is already the result of a with clause
    – user1753180
    Nov 23 '18 at 13:21


















1














I've a query like this (the original is much more complicated)



select 0, 999, count(case when cond = 'aa' then 1 end) val1, sum(case when cond = 'aa' then amount else 0 end) amount1,
count(case when cond = 'bb' then 1 end) val2, sum(case when cond = 'bb' then amount else 0 end) amount2
from myTable
where amount between 0 and 999
union
select 1000, 2999, count(case when cond = 'aa' then 1 end) val1, sum(case when cond = 'aa' then amount else 0 end) amount1,
count(case when cond = 'bb' then 1 end) val2, sum(case when cond = 'bb' then amount else 0 end) amount2
from myTable
where amount between 1000 and 2999
union
...


There are multiple union and the select is way more complicated.



I'd like to simplify it. For this, I used the with clause



with q1 as(
select case when cond = 'aa' then 1 end val1, case when cond = 'aa' then amount else 0 end amount1,
case when cond = 'bb' then 1 end val2, case when cond = 'bb' then amount else 0 end amount2
)
select 0, 999, sum(val1) val1, sum(amount1) amount1, sum(val2) val2, sum(amount2) amount2
from q1 where amount between 0 and 999
union
select 1000, 2999, sum(val1) val1, sum(amount1) amount1, sum(val2) val2, sum(amount2) amount2
from q1 where amount between 1000 and 2999
union
....


But in my case this is still very long.
Is there a possibility in plsql to write it like this



with q1 as (
select minVal, maxVal, count(case when cond = 'aa' then 1 end) val1, sum(case when cond = 'aa' then amount else 0 end) amount1,
count(case when cond = 'bb' then 1 end) val2, sum(case when cond = 'bb' then amount else 0 end) amount2
from myTable
where amount between minVal and maxVal
)
select * from q1 insideWhere minVal=0 and maxVal=999
union select * from q1 insideWhere minVal=1000 and maxVal=2999
union ...


Or any other solution?










share|improve this question




















  • 1




    You could probably get some better answers, if you'd describe your real problem in more detail. I.e. what problem is the original query addressing? That way we may be able to give you better alternatives, than just blindly trying to follow your only direction (which may not necessarily be the the best, if possible at all).
    – Hilarion
    Nov 23 '18 at 12:39










  • it's about the same as the first query but with the (case when cond = 'aa' then 1 end) with more complicated conditions and with more than 20 case and even more union Further more the number of steps (between x an y) will change depending what is asked and my table is already the result of a with clause
    – user1753180
    Nov 23 '18 at 13:21
















1












1








1







I've a query like this (the original is much more complicated)



select 0, 999, count(case when cond = 'aa' then 1 end) val1, sum(case when cond = 'aa' then amount else 0 end) amount1,
count(case when cond = 'bb' then 1 end) val2, sum(case when cond = 'bb' then amount else 0 end) amount2
from myTable
where amount between 0 and 999
union
select 1000, 2999, count(case when cond = 'aa' then 1 end) val1, sum(case when cond = 'aa' then amount else 0 end) amount1,
count(case when cond = 'bb' then 1 end) val2, sum(case when cond = 'bb' then amount else 0 end) amount2
from myTable
where amount between 1000 and 2999
union
...


There are multiple union and the select is way more complicated.



I'd like to simplify it. For this, I used the with clause



with q1 as(
select case when cond = 'aa' then 1 end val1, case when cond = 'aa' then amount else 0 end amount1,
case when cond = 'bb' then 1 end val2, case when cond = 'bb' then amount else 0 end amount2
)
select 0, 999, sum(val1) val1, sum(amount1) amount1, sum(val2) val2, sum(amount2) amount2
from q1 where amount between 0 and 999
union
select 1000, 2999, sum(val1) val1, sum(amount1) amount1, sum(val2) val2, sum(amount2) amount2
from q1 where amount between 1000 and 2999
union
....


But in my case this is still very long.
Is there a possibility in plsql to write it like this



with q1 as (
select minVal, maxVal, count(case when cond = 'aa' then 1 end) val1, sum(case when cond = 'aa' then amount else 0 end) amount1,
count(case when cond = 'bb' then 1 end) val2, sum(case when cond = 'bb' then amount else 0 end) amount2
from myTable
where amount between minVal and maxVal
)
select * from q1 insideWhere minVal=0 and maxVal=999
union select * from q1 insideWhere minVal=1000 and maxVal=2999
union ...


Or any other solution?










share|improve this question















I've a query like this (the original is much more complicated)



select 0, 999, count(case when cond = 'aa' then 1 end) val1, sum(case when cond = 'aa' then amount else 0 end) amount1,
count(case when cond = 'bb' then 1 end) val2, sum(case when cond = 'bb' then amount else 0 end) amount2
from myTable
where amount between 0 and 999
union
select 1000, 2999, count(case when cond = 'aa' then 1 end) val1, sum(case when cond = 'aa' then amount else 0 end) amount1,
count(case when cond = 'bb' then 1 end) val2, sum(case when cond = 'bb' then amount else 0 end) amount2
from myTable
where amount between 1000 and 2999
union
...


There are multiple union and the select is way more complicated.



I'd like to simplify it. For this, I used the with clause



with q1 as(
select case when cond = 'aa' then 1 end val1, case when cond = 'aa' then amount else 0 end amount1,
case when cond = 'bb' then 1 end val2, case when cond = 'bb' then amount else 0 end amount2
)
select 0, 999, sum(val1) val1, sum(amount1) amount1, sum(val2) val2, sum(amount2) amount2
from q1 where amount between 0 and 999
union
select 1000, 2999, sum(val1) val1, sum(amount1) amount1, sum(val2) val2, sum(amount2) amount2
from q1 where amount between 1000 and 2999
union
....


But in my case this is still very long.
Is there a possibility in plsql to write it like this



with q1 as (
select minVal, maxVal, count(case when cond = 'aa' then 1 end) val1, sum(case when cond = 'aa' then amount else 0 end) amount1,
count(case when cond = 'bb' then 1 end) val2, sum(case when cond = 'bb' then amount else 0 end) amount2
from myTable
where amount between minVal and maxVal
)
select * from q1 insideWhere minVal=0 and maxVal=999
union select * from q1 insideWhere minVal=1000 and maxVal=2999
union ...


Or any other solution?







sql oracle subquery






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 23 '18 at 13:22









a_horse_with_no_name

292k46447541




292k46447541










asked Nov 23 '18 at 12:33









user1753180user1753180

3015




3015








  • 1




    You could probably get some better answers, if you'd describe your real problem in more detail. I.e. what problem is the original query addressing? That way we may be able to give you better alternatives, than just blindly trying to follow your only direction (which may not necessarily be the the best, if possible at all).
    – Hilarion
    Nov 23 '18 at 12:39










  • it's about the same as the first query but with the (case when cond = 'aa' then 1 end) with more complicated conditions and with more than 20 case and even more union Further more the number of steps (between x an y) will change depending what is asked and my table is already the result of a with clause
    – user1753180
    Nov 23 '18 at 13:21
















  • 1




    You could probably get some better answers, if you'd describe your real problem in more detail. I.e. what problem is the original query addressing? That way we may be able to give you better alternatives, than just blindly trying to follow your only direction (which may not necessarily be the the best, if possible at all).
    – Hilarion
    Nov 23 '18 at 12:39










  • it's about the same as the first query but with the (case when cond = 'aa' then 1 end) with more complicated conditions and with more than 20 case and even more union Further more the number of steps (between x an y) will change depending what is asked and my table is already the result of a with clause
    – user1753180
    Nov 23 '18 at 13:21










1




1




You could probably get some better answers, if you'd describe your real problem in more detail. I.e. what problem is the original query addressing? That way we may be able to give you better alternatives, than just blindly trying to follow your only direction (which may not necessarily be the the best, if possible at all).
– Hilarion
Nov 23 '18 at 12:39




You could probably get some better answers, if you'd describe your real problem in more detail. I.e. what problem is the original query addressing? That way we may be able to give you better alternatives, than just blindly trying to follow your only direction (which may not necessarily be the the best, if possible at all).
– Hilarion
Nov 23 '18 at 12:39












it's about the same as the first query but with the (case when cond = 'aa' then 1 end) with more complicated conditions and with more than 20 case and even more union Further more the number of steps (between x an y) will change depending what is asked and my table is already the result of a with clause
– user1753180
Nov 23 '18 at 13:21






it's about the same as the first query but with the (case when cond = 'aa' then 1 end) with more complicated conditions and with more than 20 case and even more union Further more the number of steps (between x an y) will change depending what is asked and my table is already the result of a with clause
– user1753180
Nov 23 '18 at 13:21














2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1














This sounds like it should be a single aggregate query, e.g.:



SELECT min_val,
max_val,
COUNT(CASE WHEN cond = 'aa' THEN 1 END) val1,
SUM(CASE WHEN cond = 'aa' THEN amount ELSE 0 END) amount1,
COUNT(CASE WHEN cond = 'bb' THEN 1 END) val2,
SUM(CASE WHEN cond = 'bb' THEN amount ELSE 0 END) amount2,
FROM (SELECT cond,
amount,
CASE WHEN amount BETWEEN 0 AND 999 THEN 0
WHEN amount BETWEEN 1000 AND 2999 THEN 1000
END min_val,
CASE WHEN amount BETWEEN 0 AND 999 THEN 999
WHEN amount BETWEEN 1000 AND 2999 THEN 2999
END max_val
FROM mytable) -- using a subquery here to avoid repeating the case statement in both the select column list and the group by column list
GROUP BY min_val,
max_val;





share|improve this answer































    0














    To do what you're attempting you need to manifest the min/max groups into a table-like structure. You're already most of the way there: the easy way to do this is to use the WITH clause.



    WITH value_groups AS
    (SELECT 0 AS min_val, 999 AS max_val FROM DUAL
    UNION ALL
    SELECT 1000, 2999 FROM DUAL),
    q1 AS
    (SELECT *
    FROM my_table
    PIVOT
    (COUNT (*) FOR cond IN ('aa' AS aa, 'bb' AS bb)))
    SELECT min_val,
    max_val,
    COUNT (aa) as val1,
    SUM (aa * amount) as amount1,
    COUNT (bb) as val2,
    SUM (bb * amount) as amount2
    FROM q1 JOIN value_groups ON amount BETWEEN min_val AND max_val
    GROUP BY min_val, max_val


    I've also converted your CASE statements into a pivot. This will group matching sets of count/amount (i.e. if there are two 'aa' rows with an amount of 100, that will be returned as amount=100, count=2), which is why I'm multiplying the two to get the correct sum.






    share|improve this answer





















      Your Answer






      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
      StackExchange.snippets.init();
      });
      });
      }, "code-snippets");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "1"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53446806%2fplsql-where-condition-outside-of-subquery%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      1














      This sounds like it should be a single aggregate query, e.g.:



      SELECT min_val,
      max_val,
      COUNT(CASE WHEN cond = 'aa' THEN 1 END) val1,
      SUM(CASE WHEN cond = 'aa' THEN amount ELSE 0 END) amount1,
      COUNT(CASE WHEN cond = 'bb' THEN 1 END) val2,
      SUM(CASE WHEN cond = 'bb' THEN amount ELSE 0 END) amount2,
      FROM (SELECT cond,
      amount,
      CASE WHEN amount BETWEEN 0 AND 999 THEN 0
      WHEN amount BETWEEN 1000 AND 2999 THEN 1000
      END min_val,
      CASE WHEN amount BETWEEN 0 AND 999 THEN 999
      WHEN amount BETWEEN 1000 AND 2999 THEN 2999
      END max_val
      FROM mytable) -- using a subquery here to avoid repeating the case statement in both the select column list and the group by column list
      GROUP BY min_val,
      max_val;





      share|improve this answer




























        1














        This sounds like it should be a single aggregate query, e.g.:



        SELECT min_val,
        max_val,
        COUNT(CASE WHEN cond = 'aa' THEN 1 END) val1,
        SUM(CASE WHEN cond = 'aa' THEN amount ELSE 0 END) amount1,
        COUNT(CASE WHEN cond = 'bb' THEN 1 END) val2,
        SUM(CASE WHEN cond = 'bb' THEN amount ELSE 0 END) amount2,
        FROM (SELECT cond,
        amount,
        CASE WHEN amount BETWEEN 0 AND 999 THEN 0
        WHEN amount BETWEEN 1000 AND 2999 THEN 1000
        END min_val,
        CASE WHEN amount BETWEEN 0 AND 999 THEN 999
        WHEN amount BETWEEN 1000 AND 2999 THEN 2999
        END max_val
        FROM mytable) -- using a subquery here to avoid repeating the case statement in both the select column list and the group by column list
        GROUP BY min_val,
        max_val;





        share|improve this answer


























          1












          1








          1






          This sounds like it should be a single aggregate query, e.g.:



          SELECT min_val,
          max_val,
          COUNT(CASE WHEN cond = 'aa' THEN 1 END) val1,
          SUM(CASE WHEN cond = 'aa' THEN amount ELSE 0 END) amount1,
          COUNT(CASE WHEN cond = 'bb' THEN 1 END) val2,
          SUM(CASE WHEN cond = 'bb' THEN amount ELSE 0 END) amount2,
          FROM (SELECT cond,
          amount,
          CASE WHEN amount BETWEEN 0 AND 999 THEN 0
          WHEN amount BETWEEN 1000 AND 2999 THEN 1000
          END min_val,
          CASE WHEN amount BETWEEN 0 AND 999 THEN 999
          WHEN amount BETWEEN 1000 AND 2999 THEN 2999
          END max_val
          FROM mytable) -- using a subquery here to avoid repeating the case statement in both the select column list and the group by column list
          GROUP BY min_val,
          max_val;





          share|improve this answer














          This sounds like it should be a single aggregate query, e.g.:



          SELECT min_val,
          max_val,
          COUNT(CASE WHEN cond = 'aa' THEN 1 END) val1,
          SUM(CASE WHEN cond = 'aa' THEN amount ELSE 0 END) amount1,
          COUNT(CASE WHEN cond = 'bb' THEN 1 END) val2,
          SUM(CASE WHEN cond = 'bb' THEN amount ELSE 0 END) amount2,
          FROM (SELECT cond,
          amount,
          CASE WHEN amount BETWEEN 0 AND 999 THEN 0
          WHEN amount BETWEEN 1000 AND 2999 THEN 1000
          END min_val,
          CASE WHEN amount BETWEEN 0 AND 999 THEN 999
          WHEN amount BETWEEN 1000 AND 2999 THEN 2999
          END max_val
          FROM mytable) -- using a subquery here to avoid repeating the case statement in both the select column list and the group by column list
          GROUP BY min_val,
          max_val;






          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Dec 16 '18 at 8:35









          marc_s

          571k12811031252




          571k12811031252










          answered Nov 23 '18 at 14:11









          BoneistBoneist

          18k11028




          18k11028

























              0














              To do what you're attempting you need to manifest the min/max groups into a table-like structure. You're already most of the way there: the easy way to do this is to use the WITH clause.



              WITH value_groups AS
              (SELECT 0 AS min_val, 999 AS max_val FROM DUAL
              UNION ALL
              SELECT 1000, 2999 FROM DUAL),
              q1 AS
              (SELECT *
              FROM my_table
              PIVOT
              (COUNT (*) FOR cond IN ('aa' AS aa, 'bb' AS bb)))
              SELECT min_val,
              max_val,
              COUNT (aa) as val1,
              SUM (aa * amount) as amount1,
              COUNT (bb) as val2,
              SUM (bb * amount) as amount2
              FROM q1 JOIN value_groups ON amount BETWEEN min_val AND max_val
              GROUP BY min_val, max_val


              I've also converted your CASE statements into a pivot. This will group matching sets of count/amount (i.e. if there are two 'aa' rows with an amount of 100, that will be returned as amount=100, count=2), which is why I'm multiplying the two to get the correct sum.






              share|improve this answer


























                0














                To do what you're attempting you need to manifest the min/max groups into a table-like structure. You're already most of the way there: the easy way to do this is to use the WITH clause.



                WITH value_groups AS
                (SELECT 0 AS min_val, 999 AS max_val FROM DUAL
                UNION ALL
                SELECT 1000, 2999 FROM DUAL),
                q1 AS
                (SELECT *
                FROM my_table
                PIVOT
                (COUNT (*) FOR cond IN ('aa' AS aa, 'bb' AS bb)))
                SELECT min_val,
                max_val,
                COUNT (aa) as val1,
                SUM (aa * amount) as amount1,
                COUNT (bb) as val2,
                SUM (bb * amount) as amount2
                FROM q1 JOIN value_groups ON amount BETWEEN min_val AND max_val
                GROUP BY min_val, max_val


                I've also converted your CASE statements into a pivot. This will group matching sets of count/amount (i.e. if there are two 'aa' rows with an amount of 100, that will be returned as amount=100, count=2), which is why I'm multiplying the two to get the correct sum.






                share|improve this answer
























                  0












                  0








                  0






                  To do what you're attempting you need to manifest the min/max groups into a table-like structure. You're already most of the way there: the easy way to do this is to use the WITH clause.



                  WITH value_groups AS
                  (SELECT 0 AS min_val, 999 AS max_val FROM DUAL
                  UNION ALL
                  SELECT 1000, 2999 FROM DUAL),
                  q1 AS
                  (SELECT *
                  FROM my_table
                  PIVOT
                  (COUNT (*) FOR cond IN ('aa' AS aa, 'bb' AS bb)))
                  SELECT min_val,
                  max_val,
                  COUNT (aa) as val1,
                  SUM (aa * amount) as amount1,
                  COUNT (bb) as val2,
                  SUM (bb * amount) as amount2
                  FROM q1 JOIN value_groups ON amount BETWEEN min_val AND max_val
                  GROUP BY min_val, max_val


                  I've also converted your CASE statements into a pivot. This will group matching sets of count/amount (i.e. if there are two 'aa' rows with an amount of 100, that will be returned as amount=100, count=2), which is why I'm multiplying the two to get the correct sum.






                  share|improve this answer












                  To do what you're attempting you need to manifest the min/max groups into a table-like structure. You're already most of the way there: the easy way to do this is to use the WITH clause.



                  WITH value_groups AS
                  (SELECT 0 AS min_val, 999 AS max_val FROM DUAL
                  UNION ALL
                  SELECT 1000, 2999 FROM DUAL),
                  q1 AS
                  (SELECT *
                  FROM my_table
                  PIVOT
                  (COUNT (*) FOR cond IN ('aa' AS aa, 'bb' AS bb)))
                  SELECT min_val,
                  max_val,
                  COUNT (aa) as val1,
                  SUM (aa * amount) as amount1,
                  COUNT (bb) as val2,
                  SUM (bb * amount) as amount2
                  FROM q1 JOIN value_groups ON amount BETWEEN min_val AND max_val
                  GROUP BY min_val, max_val


                  I've also converted your CASE statements into a pivot. This will group matching sets of count/amount (i.e. if there are two 'aa' rows with an amount of 100, that will be returned as amount=100, count=2), which is why I'm multiplying the two to get the correct sum.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Nov 23 '18 at 14:30









                  AllanAllan

                  14.7k34255




                  14.7k34255






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                      Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                      Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53446806%2fplsql-where-condition-outside-of-subquery%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      What visual should I use to simply compare current year value vs last year in Power BI desktop

                      Alexandru Averescu

                      Trompette piccolo