Outer Hodge groups of rationally connected fibrations












4














I believe the following is true and well known.



Theorem (?). Let $X$ and $Y$ be smooth, irreducible, projective varieties over $mathbb{C}$. Let
$$
fcolon Xrightarrow Y
$$

be a surjective map with generic fibers being irreducible and rationally connected. Then $H^0(X,wedge^kOmega_X)cong H^0(Y,wedge^kOmega_Y)$ for all $kge 0$.



I would appreciate a reference for this result or a simple proof (or, obviously, if this is wrong I would like to know that too).










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Duck Hunter is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

























    4














    I believe the following is true and well known.



    Theorem (?). Let $X$ and $Y$ be smooth, irreducible, projective varieties over $mathbb{C}$. Let
    $$
    fcolon Xrightarrow Y
    $$

    be a surjective map with generic fibers being irreducible and rationally connected. Then $H^0(X,wedge^kOmega_X)cong H^0(Y,wedge^kOmega_Y)$ for all $kge 0$.



    I would appreciate a reference for this result or a simple proof (or, obviously, if this is wrong I would like to know that too).










    share|cite|improve this question







    New contributor




    Duck Hunter is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.























      4












      4








      4







      I believe the following is true and well known.



      Theorem (?). Let $X$ and $Y$ be smooth, irreducible, projective varieties over $mathbb{C}$. Let
      $$
      fcolon Xrightarrow Y
      $$

      be a surjective map with generic fibers being irreducible and rationally connected. Then $H^0(X,wedge^kOmega_X)cong H^0(Y,wedge^kOmega_Y)$ for all $kge 0$.



      I would appreciate a reference for this result or a simple proof (or, obviously, if this is wrong I would like to know that too).










      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      Duck Hunter is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      I believe the following is true and well known.



      Theorem (?). Let $X$ and $Y$ be smooth, irreducible, projective varieties over $mathbb{C}$. Let
      $$
      fcolon Xrightarrow Y
      $$

      be a surjective map with generic fibers being irreducible and rationally connected. Then $H^0(X,wedge^kOmega_X)cong H^0(Y,wedge^kOmega_Y)$ for all $kge 0$.



      I would appreciate a reference for this result or a simple proof (or, obviously, if this is wrong I would like to know that too).







      ag.algebraic-geometry reference-request






      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      Duck Hunter is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      Duck Hunter is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question






      New contributor




      Duck Hunter is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 7 hours ago









      Duck HunterDuck Hunter

      232




      232




      New contributor




      Duck Hunter is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Duck Hunter is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Duck Hunter is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4














          By spectral sequence, we just need to prove that $R^if_*mathcal{O}_X=0$ for all $i>0$. This is a special case of Theorem 7.1 in [Kollár, Higher direct images of dualizing sheaves I].



          Actually the answer to you question is just Corollary 7.2 in [Kollár, Higher direct images of dualizing sheaves I].






          share|cite|improve this answer

















          • 1




            Thank you! I did not realize Kollár had proved this. What an excellent paper!
            – Duck Hunter
            6 hours ago











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "504"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });






          Duck Hunter is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f320426%2fouter-hodge-groups-of-rationally-connected-fibrations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          4














          By spectral sequence, we just need to prove that $R^if_*mathcal{O}_X=0$ for all $i>0$. This is a special case of Theorem 7.1 in [Kollár, Higher direct images of dualizing sheaves I].



          Actually the answer to you question is just Corollary 7.2 in [Kollár, Higher direct images of dualizing sheaves I].






          share|cite|improve this answer

















          • 1




            Thank you! I did not realize Kollár had proved this. What an excellent paper!
            – Duck Hunter
            6 hours ago
















          4














          By spectral sequence, we just need to prove that $R^if_*mathcal{O}_X=0$ for all $i>0$. This is a special case of Theorem 7.1 in [Kollár, Higher direct images of dualizing sheaves I].



          Actually the answer to you question is just Corollary 7.2 in [Kollár, Higher direct images of dualizing sheaves I].






          share|cite|improve this answer

















          • 1




            Thank you! I did not realize Kollár had proved this. What an excellent paper!
            – Duck Hunter
            6 hours ago














          4












          4








          4






          By spectral sequence, we just need to prove that $R^if_*mathcal{O}_X=0$ for all $i>0$. This is a special case of Theorem 7.1 in [Kollár, Higher direct images of dualizing sheaves I].



          Actually the answer to you question is just Corollary 7.2 in [Kollár, Higher direct images of dualizing sheaves I].






          share|cite|improve this answer












          By spectral sequence, we just need to prove that $R^if_*mathcal{O}_X=0$ for all $i>0$. This is a special case of Theorem 7.1 in [Kollár, Higher direct images of dualizing sheaves I].



          Actually the answer to you question is just Corollary 7.2 in [Kollár, Higher direct images of dualizing sheaves I].







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 7 hours ago









          Chen JiangChen Jiang

          934157




          934157








          • 1




            Thank you! I did not realize Kollár had proved this. What an excellent paper!
            – Duck Hunter
            6 hours ago














          • 1




            Thank you! I did not realize Kollár had proved this. What an excellent paper!
            – Duck Hunter
            6 hours ago








          1




          1




          Thank you! I did not realize Kollár had proved this. What an excellent paper!
          – Duck Hunter
          6 hours ago




          Thank you! I did not realize Kollár had proved this. What an excellent paper!
          – Duck Hunter
          6 hours ago










          Duck Hunter is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          Duck Hunter is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













          Duck Hunter is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          Duck Hunter is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















          Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f320426%2fouter-hodge-groups-of-rationally-connected-fibrations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          What visual should I use to simply compare current year value vs last year in Power BI desktop

          Alexandru Averescu

          Trompette piccolo