LESS - using BEM selector with extra class on parent to deviate
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I have some markup that looks about like this -
<div class="card">
<div class="card__icon">Icon</div>
<div class="card__text">Text</div>
</div>
Which I am styling with a little LESS like so -
.card {
&__icon {
font-size: 1.75em;
@media (min-width: 992px) {
font-size: 2em;
}
}
&__text {
font-size: 1em;
}
}
This works great - however the parent is getting toggled a class .current
on it and I was trying to change one of the childrens styles using the same methods, but could not seem to get it working. I was trying this -
.card {
&__icon {
font-size: 1.75em;
@media (min-width: 992px) {
font-size: 2em;
}
}
&__text {
font-size: 1em;
}
&.current {
// this is not working
&__text {
color: red;
}
}
}
I can change the &__text
inside the &.current
to .card__text
and it works fine - however I was wondering if there was a way I could keep the &__text
syntax inside the &.current
with using LESS. Thanks!
css less
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I have some markup that looks about like this -
<div class="card">
<div class="card__icon">Icon</div>
<div class="card__text">Text</div>
</div>
Which I am styling with a little LESS like so -
.card {
&__icon {
font-size: 1.75em;
@media (min-width: 992px) {
font-size: 2em;
}
}
&__text {
font-size: 1em;
}
}
This works great - however the parent is getting toggled a class .current
on it and I was trying to change one of the childrens styles using the same methods, but could not seem to get it working. I was trying this -
.card {
&__icon {
font-size: 1.75em;
@media (min-width: 992px) {
font-size: 2em;
}
}
&__text {
font-size: 1em;
}
&.current {
// this is not working
&__text {
color: red;
}
}
}
I can change the &__text
inside the &.current
to .card__text
and it works fine - however I was wondering if there was a way I could keep the &__text
syntax inside the &.current
with using LESS. Thanks!
css less
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I have some markup that looks about like this -
<div class="card">
<div class="card__icon">Icon</div>
<div class="card__text">Text</div>
</div>
Which I am styling with a little LESS like so -
.card {
&__icon {
font-size: 1.75em;
@media (min-width: 992px) {
font-size: 2em;
}
}
&__text {
font-size: 1em;
}
}
This works great - however the parent is getting toggled a class .current
on it and I was trying to change one of the childrens styles using the same methods, but could not seem to get it working. I was trying this -
.card {
&__icon {
font-size: 1.75em;
@media (min-width: 992px) {
font-size: 2em;
}
}
&__text {
font-size: 1em;
}
&.current {
// this is not working
&__text {
color: red;
}
}
}
I can change the &__text
inside the &.current
to .card__text
and it works fine - however I was wondering if there was a way I could keep the &__text
syntax inside the &.current
with using LESS. Thanks!
css less
I have some markup that looks about like this -
<div class="card">
<div class="card__icon">Icon</div>
<div class="card__text">Text</div>
</div>
Which I am styling with a little LESS like so -
.card {
&__icon {
font-size: 1.75em;
@media (min-width: 992px) {
font-size: 2em;
}
}
&__text {
font-size: 1em;
}
}
This works great - however the parent is getting toggled a class .current
on it and I was trying to change one of the childrens styles using the same methods, but could not seem to get it working. I was trying this -
.card {
&__icon {
font-size: 1.75em;
@media (min-width: 992px) {
font-size: 2em;
}
}
&__text {
font-size: 1em;
}
&.current {
// this is not working
&__text {
color: red;
}
}
}
I can change the &__text
inside the &.current
to .card__text
and it works fine - however I was wondering if there was a way I could keep the &__text
syntax inside the &.current
with using LESS. Thanks!
css less
css less
asked yesterday
ajmajmajma
6,137125293
6,137125293
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
According to the documentation, the parent selector & expands to the whole parent nested rule, taking each nested rule parent as is and inserting it in place of `&, so in your case
.card {
&.current {
&__text {
color: red;
}
}
}
compiles to
.card.current__text {
color: red;
}
which is not what we want, because class current__text
does not exist. To avoid that you may rearrange the class selectors in your less rules like so:
.card {
.current & {
&__text {
color: red;
}
}
}
which compiles to:
.current .card__text {
color: red;
}
A working example can be found in this codepen
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
According to the documentation, the parent selector & expands to the whole parent nested rule, taking each nested rule parent as is and inserting it in place of `&, so in your case
.card {
&.current {
&__text {
color: red;
}
}
}
compiles to
.card.current__text {
color: red;
}
which is not what we want, because class current__text
does not exist. To avoid that you may rearrange the class selectors in your less rules like so:
.card {
.current & {
&__text {
color: red;
}
}
}
which compiles to:
.current .card__text {
color: red;
}
A working example can be found in this codepen
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
According to the documentation, the parent selector & expands to the whole parent nested rule, taking each nested rule parent as is and inserting it in place of `&, so in your case
.card {
&.current {
&__text {
color: red;
}
}
}
compiles to
.card.current__text {
color: red;
}
which is not what we want, because class current__text
does not exist. To avoid that you may rearrange the class selectors in your less rules like so:
.card {
.current & {
&__text {
color: red;
}
}
}
which compiles to:
.current .card__text {
color: red;
}
A working example can be found in this codepen
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
According to the documentation, the parent selector & expands to the whole parent nested rule, taking each nested rule parent as is and inserting it in place of `&, so in your case
.card {
&.current {
&__text {
color: red;
}
}
}
compiles to
.card.current__text {
color: red;
}
which is not what we want, because class current__text
does not exist. To avoid that you may rearrange the class selectors in your less rules like so:
.card {
.current & {
&__text {
color: red;
}
}
}
which compiles to:
.current .card__text {
color: red;
}
A working example can be found in this codepen
According to the documentation, the parent selector & expands to the whole parent nested rule, taking each nested rule parent as is and inserting it in place of `&, so in your case
.card {
&.current {
&__text {
color: red;
}
}
}
compiles to
.card.current__text {
color: red;
}
which is not what we want, because class current__text
does not exist. To avoid that you may rearrange the class selectors in your less rules like so:
.card {
.current & {
&__text {
color: red;
}
}
}
which compiles to:
.current .card__text {
color: red;
}
A working example can be found in this codepen
answered yesterday
Piotr Wicijowski
2264
2264
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53417169%2fless-using-bem-selector-with-extra-class-on-parent-to-deviate%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown