Filling spell lists for non- Core Books base classes!











up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1












I write with a serious problem regarding spell lists for classes such as:




  • Witch,

  • Shugenja,

  • Shaman,


...and many other base classes that were added outside of core rulebooks (countless basically). Problem is there are dozens of books that add new spells for core rulebooks base classes while none of them directly mention classes that were added in other books. This creates insane discrepancy between base classes with ones such as sorcerer or cleric seemingly having millions of spells available to them while ones such as witch or shugenja seem to have nearly nothing.



Is there any official or semi-official material that resolves this issue? If not how am I supposed to pick which spells are available to those classes (obviously leaving them in UP state with spell lists the size of a peanut is not an option)?



Each base class seem to have some theme to them (like witch even though arcane have access to healing spells but no access to battle magic, dread necromancer having everything death and harm-related with no damaging spells and no buffs or warmage having only battle magic and nothing else) but I strongly prefer hard rules to making decisions based on "feel".



As for my own research in the matter: I didn't find anything on that topic in books. I didn't find anything in WotC Indexes (only PH spells are mentioned for most of those base classes and some classes aren't even listed there at all).










share|improve this question


























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    I write with a serious problem regarding spell lists for classes such as:




    • Witch,

    • Shugenja,

    • Shaman,


    ...and many other base classes that were added outside of core rulebooks (countless basically). Problem is there are dozens of books that add new spells for core rulebooks base classes while none of them directly mention classes that were added in other books. This creates insane discrepancy between base classes with ones such as sorcerer or cleric seemingly having millions of spells available to them while ones such as witch or shugenja seem to have nearly nothing.



    Is there any official or semi-official material that resolves this issue? If not how am I supposed to pick which spells are available to those classes (obviously leaving them in UP state with spell lists the size of a peanut is not an option)?



    Each base class seem to have some theme to them (like witch even though arcane have access to healing spells but no access to battle magic, dread necromancer having everything death and harm-related with no damaging spells and no buffs or warmage having only battle magic and nothing else) but I strongly prefer hard rules to making decisions based on "feel".



    As for my own research in the matter: I didn't find anything on that topic in books. I didn't find anything in WotC Indexes (only PH spells are mentioned for most of those base classes and some classes aren't even listed there at all).










    share|improve this question
























      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      I write with a serious problem regarding spell lists for classes such as:




      • Witch,

      • Shugenja,

      • Shaman,


      ...and many other base classes that were added outside of core rulebooks (countless basically). Problem is there are dozens of books that add new spells for core rulebooks base classes while none of them directly mention classes that were added in other books. This creates insane discrepancy between base classes with ones such as sorcerer or cleric seemingly having millions of spells available to them while ones such as witch or shugenja seem to have nearly nothing.



      Is there any official or semi-official material that resolves this issue? If not how am I supposed to pick which spells are available to those classes (obviously leaving them in UP state with spell lists the size of a peanut is not an option)?



      Each base class seem to have some theme to them (like witch even though arcane have access to healing spells but no access to battle magic, dread necromancer having everything death and harm-related with no damaging spells and no buffs or warmage having only battle magic and nothing else) but I strongly prefer hard rules to making decisions based on "feel".



      As for my own research in the matter: I didn't find anything on that topic in books. I didn't find anything in WotC Indexes (only PH spells are mentioned for most of those base classes and some classes aren't even listed there at all).










      share|improve this question













      I write with a serious problem regarding spell lists for classes such as:




      • Witch,

      • Shugenja,

      • Shaman,


      ...and many other base classes that were added outside of core rulebooks (countless basically). Problem is there are dozens of books that add new spells for core rulebooks base classes while none of them directly mention classes that were added in other books. This creates insane discrepancy between base classes with ones such as sorcerer or cleric seemingly having millions of spells available to them while ones such as witch or shugenja seem to have nearly nothing.



      Is there any official or semi-official material that resolves this issue? If not how am I supposed to pick which spells are available to those classes (obviously leaving them in UP state with spell lists the size of a peanut is not an option)?



      Each base class seem to have some theme to them (like witch even though arcane have access to healing spells but no access to battle magic, dread necromancer having everything death and harm-related with no damaging spells and no buffs or warmage having only battle magic and nothing else) but I strongly prefer hard rules to making decisions based on "feel".



      As for my own research in the matter: I didn't find anything on that topic in books. I didn't find anything in WotC Indexes (only PH spells are mentioned for most of those base classes and some classes aren't even listed there at all).







      spells dnd-3.5e class






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 2 hours ago









      Nec Xelos

      203




      203






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          4
          down vote













          Only in passing did Wizards of the Coast consider this



          The introduction to the Spell Compendium on Other Spellcasting Classes says




          Spell Compendium deals exclusively with spells used by the classes and prestige classes introduced in the Player’s Handbook and Dungeon Master’s Guide, but even if you’re playing a different spellcasting class, you can still use this book. The advice below should help you decide how to adopt spells for your character.



          If the spellcasting class or prestige class you’re playing isn’t mentioned here, find a similar class and follow its advice. Also, many new classes and prestige classes reference the spell lists of existing classes. If your spellcaster uses the spell list of a character class mentioned in Chapter 2, your character gains access to all the spells presented for that class.



          When deciding if other classes should have spells added to their spell lists, consider the advice below. (3)




          Then the Spell Compendium offers some advice for different classes, including, for example, the shugenja ("Add spells with strong elemental or weather themes[; t]he druid spell list is a good place to look" (4)) and the shaman:




          Shamans have a spell list that is a blend of druid and cleric, but they should not get all the spells clerics and druids do. Examine the spell lists of both those classes for good choices. Also, consider using the cleric domains presented in this book as shaman domains. (ibid.)




          In other words, the DM is supposed to—as is typical for D&D 3.5—use the blurbs provided in the Spell Compendium to inform his own decisions as to how to expand a particular class's spell list.






          share|improve this answer




























            up vote
            1
            down vote













            Spell Compendium is the only book that addresses the issue, and even then all it tells you is to have the DM figure it out.






            share|improve this answer

















            • 1




              Are there some "less official but generally agreed upon" lists out there maybe? I strongly dislike the idea of manually picking each spell for each class (for multitude of reasons, and "too much work" being only small fraction of that) and at the same time I prefer to play with everything DnD 3.5 has to offer.
              – Nec Xelos
              2 hours ago












            • @NecXelos Unfortunately, not that I know of. Sounds like the sort of thing that should exist, though, so if I get a chance I may do some digging for something like that.
              – KRyan
              1 hour ago











            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "122"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f136093%2ffilling-spell-lists-for-non-core-books-base-classes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            4
            down vote













            Only in passing did Wizards of the Coast consider this



            The introduction to the Spell Compendium on Other Spellcasting Classes says




            Spell Compendium deals exclusively with spells used by the classes and prestige classes introduced in the Player’s Handbook and Dungeon Master’s Guide, but even if you’re playing a different spellcasting class, you can still use this book. The advice below should help you decide how to adopt spells for your character.



            If the spellcasting class or prestige class you’re playing isn’t mentioned here, find a similar class and follow its advice. Also, many new classes and prestige classes reference the spell lists of existing classes. If your spellcaster uses the spell list of a character class mentioned in Chapter 2, your character gains access to all the spells presented for that class.



            When deciding if other classes should have spells added to their spell lists, consider the advice below. (3)




            Then the Spell Compendium offers some advice for different classes, including, for example, the shugenja ("Add spells with strong elemental or weather themes[; t]he druid spell list is a good place to look" (4)) and the shaman:




            Shamans have a spell list that is a blend of druid and cleric, but they should not get all the spells clerics and druids do. Examine the spell lists of both those classes for good choices. Also, consider using the cleric domains presented in this book as shaman domains. (ibid.)




            In other words, the DM is supposed to—as is typical for D&D 3.5—use the blurbs provided in the Spell Compendium to inform his own decisions as to how to expand a particular class's spell list.






            share|improve this answer

























              up vote
              4
              down vote













              Only in passing did Wizards of the Coast consider this



              The introduction to the Spell Compendium on Other Spellcasting Classes says




              Spell Compendium deals exclusively with spells used by the classes and prestige classes introduced in the Player’s Handbook and Dungeon Master’s Guide, but even if you’re playing a different spellcasting class, you can still use this book. The advice below should help you decide how to adopt spells for your character.



              If the spellcasting class or prestige class you’re playing isn’t mentioned here, find a similar class and follow its advice. Also, many new classes and prestige classes reference the spell lists of existing classes. If your spellcaster uses the spell list of a character class mentioned in Chapter 2, your character gains access to all the spells presented for that class.



              When deciding if other classes should have spells added to their spell lists, consider the advice below. (3)




              Then the Spell Compendium offers some advice for different classes, including, for example, the shugenja ("Add spells with strong elemental or weather themes[; t]he druid spell list is a good place to look" (4)) and the shaman:




              Shamans have a spell list that is a blend of druid and cleric, but they should not get all the spells clerics and druids do. Examine the spell lists of both those classes for good choices. Also, consider using the cleric domains presented in this book as shaman domains. (ibid.)




              In other words, the DM is supposed to—as is typical for D&D 3.5—use the blurbs provided in the Spell Compendium to inform his own decisions as to how to expand a particular class's spell list.






              share|improve this answer























                up vote
                4
                down vote










                up vote
                4
                down vote









                Only in passing did Wizards of the Coast consider this



                The introduction to the Spell Compendium on Other Spellcasting Classes says




                Spell Compendium deals exclusively with spells used by the classes and prestige classes introduced in the Player’s Handbook and Dungeon Master’s Guide, but even if you’re playing a different spellcasting class, you can still use this book. The advice below should help you decide how to adopt spells for your character.



                If the spellcasting class or prestige class you’re playing isn’t mentioned here, find a similar class and follow its advice. Also, many new classes and prestige classes reference the spell lists of existing classes. If your spellcaster uses the spell list of a character class mentioned in Chapter 2, your character gains access to all the spells presented for that class.



                When deciding if other classes should have spells added to their spell lists, consider the advice below. (3)




                Then the Spell Compendium offers some advice for different classes, including, for example, the shugenja ("Add spells with strong elemental or weather themes[; t]he druid spell list is a good place to look" (4)) and the shaman:




                Shamans have a spell list that is a blend of druid and cleric, but they should not get all the spells clerics and druids do. Examine the spell lists of both those classes for good choices. Also, consider using the cleric domains presented in this book as shaman domains. (ibid.)




                In other words, the DM is supposed to—as is typical for D&D 3.5—use the blurbs provided in the Spell Compendium to inform his own decisions as to how to expand a particular class's spell list.






                share|improve this answer












                Only in passing did Wizards of the Coast consider this



                The introduction to the Spell Compendium on Other Spellcasting Classes says




                Spell Compendium deals exclusively with spells used by the classes and prestige classes introduced in the Player’s Handbook and Dungeon Master’s Guide, but even if you’re playing a different spellcasting class, you can still use this book. The advice below should help you decide how to adopt spells for your character.



                If the spellcasting class or prestige class you’re playing isn’t mentioned here, find a similar class and follow its advice. Also, many new classes and prestige classes reference the spell lists of existing classes. If your spellcaster uses the spell list of a character class mentioned in Chapter 2, your character gains access to all the spells presented for that class.



                When deciding if other classes should have spells added to their spell lists, consider the advice below. (3)




                Then the Spell Compendium offers some advice for different classes, including, for example, the shugenja ("Add spells with strong elemental or weather themes[; t]he druid spell list is a good place to look" (4)) and the shaman:




                Shamans have a spell list that is a blend of druid and cleric, but they should not get all the spells clerics and druids do. Examine the spell lists of both those classes for good choices. Also, consider using the cleric domains presented in this book as shaman domains. (ibid.)




                In other words, the DM is supposed to—as is typical for D&D 3.5—use the blurbs provided in the Spell Compendium to inform his own decisions as to how to expand a particular class's spell list.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 2 hours ago









                Hey I Can Chan

                139k12244590




                139k12244590
























                    up vote
                    1
                    down vote













                    Spell Compendium is the only book that addresses the issue, and even then all it tells you is to have the DM figure it out.






                    share|improve this answer

















                    • 1




                      Are there some "less official but generally agreed upon" lists out there maybe? I strongly dislike the idea of manually picking each spell for each class (for multitude of reasons, and "too much work" being only small fraction of that) and at the same time I prefer to play with everything DnD 3.5 has to offer.
                      – Nec Xelos
                      2 hours ago












                    • @NecXelos Unfortunately, not that I know of. Sounds like the sort of thing that should exist, though, so if I get a chance I may do some digging for something like that.
                      – KRyan
                      1 hour ago















                    up vote
                    1
                    down vote













                    Spell Compendium is the only book that addresses the issue, and even then all it tells you is to have the DM figure it out.






                    share|improve this answer

















                    • 1




                      Are there some "less official but generally agreed upon" lists out there maybe? I strongly dislike the idea of manually picking each spell for each class (for multitude of reasons, and "too much work" being only small fraction of that) and at the same time I prefer to play with everything DnD 3.5 has to offer.
                      – Nec Xelos
                      2 hours ago












                    • @NecXelos Unfortunately, not that I know of. Sounds like the sort of thing that should exist, though, so if I get a chance I may do some digging for something like that.
                      – KRyan
                      1 hour ago













                    up vote
                    1
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    1
                    down vote









                    Spell Compendium is the only book that addresses the issue, and even then all it tells you is to have the DM figure it out.






                    share|improve this answer












                    Spell Compendium is the only book that addresses the issue, and even then all it tells you is to have the DM figure it out.







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered 2 hours ago









                    KRyan

                    214k27537924




                    214k27537924








                    • 1




                      Are there some "less official but generally agreed upon" lists out there maybe? I strongly dislike the idea of manually picking each spell for each class (for multitude of reasons, and "too much work" being only small fraction of that) and at the same time I prefer to play with everything DnD 3.5 has to offer.
                      – Nec Xelos
                      2 hours ago












                    • @NecXelos Unfortunately, not that I know of. Sounds like the sort of thing that should exist, though, so if I get a chance I may do some digging for something like that.
                      – KRyan
                      1 hour ago














                    • 1




                      Are there some "less official but generally agreed upon" lists out there maybe? I strongly dislike the idea of manually picking each spell for each class (for multitude of reasons, and "too much work" being only small fraction of that) and at the same time I prefer to play with everything DnD 3.5 has to offer.
                      – Nec Xelos
                      2 hours ago












                    • @NecXelos Unfortunately, not that I know of. Sounds like the sort of thing that should exist, though, so if I get a chance I may do some digging for something like that.
                      – KRyan
                      1 hour ago








                    1




                    1




                    Are there some "less official but generally agreed upon" lists out there maybe? I strongly dislike the idea of manually picking each spell for each class (for multitude of reasons, and "too much work" being only small fraction of that) and at the same time I prefer to play with everything DnD 3.5 has to offer.
                    – Nec Xelos
                    2 hours ago






                    Are there some "less official but generally agreed upon" lists out there maybe? I strongly dislike the idea of manually picking each spell for each class (for multitude of reasons, and "too much work" being only small fraction of that) and at the same time I prefer to play with everything DnD 3.5 has to offer.
                    – Nec Xelos
                    2 hours ago














                    @NecXelos Unfortunately, not that I know of. Sounds like the sort of thing that should exist, though, so if I get a chance I may do some digging for something like that.
                    – KRyan
                    1 hour ago




                    @NecXelos Unfortunately, not that I know of. Sounds like the sort of thing that should exist, though, so if I get a chance I may do some digging for something like that.
                    – KRyan
                    1 hour ago


















                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded



















































                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f136093%2ffilling-spell-lists-for-non-core-books-base-classes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    What visual should I use to simply compare current year value vs last year in Power BI desktop

                    Alexandru Averescu

                    Trompette piccolo