Why is the phrase “why am I not” abbreviated “why aren't I” (i.e. a complete replacement of the...
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
The other day I saw the following (written) phrase being used in an American TV series episode:
"Why aren't I on the list?"
Even though I know this "sounds right" (I'm a relatively fluent, although not native, English speaker), this struck me as weird, since "am" is the normal form for "I" in all/most other situations ("I am", "you are", "he/she/it is" etc), i.e. without abbreviation being used, the correct phrasing would be "Why am I not on the list" (rather than "Why are I not on the list").
So, what is the origin of this strange special case, and are there also other similar ones like it in the English language (i.e. where the abbreviated word is at the same time replaced by a completely OTHER word or word form, effectively not just being abbreviated, but rather also substituted at the same time)?
abbreviations
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
The other day I saw the following (written) phrase being used in an American TV series episode:
"Why aren't I on the list?"
Even though I know this "sounds right" (I'm a relatively fluent, although not native, English speaker), this struck me as weird, since "am" is the normal form for "I" in all/most other situations ("I am", "you are", "he/she/it is" etc), i.e. without abbreviation being used, the correct phrasing would be "Why am I not on the list" (rather than "Why are I not on the list").
So, what is the origin of this strange special case, and are there also other similar ones like it in the English language (i.e. where the abbreviated word is at the same time replaced by a completely OTHER word or word form, effectively not just being abbreviated, but rather also substituted at the same time)?
abbreviations
New contributor
1
Possible duplicate of "I'm right, aren't I?"
– Robusto
3 hours ago
I don't think this is really a duplicate. That question doesn't ask about the origin of aren't I, only whether it's acceptable. Only one answer there addresses origin at all, and it merely quotes a brief passage from Wikipedia. It seems likely that this question could generate more comprehensive answers.
– 1006a
1 hour ago
"likely that this question could generate more comprehensive answers" provided it's backed by the asker's own homework.
– Kris
33 mins ago
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
The other day I saw the following (written) phrase being used in an American TV series episode:
"Why aren't I on the list?"
Even though I know this "sounds right" (I'm a relatively fluent, although not native, English speaker), this struck me as weird, since "am" is the normal form for "I" in all/most other situations ("I am", "you are", "he/she/it is" etc), i.e. without abbreviation being used, the correct phrasing would be "Why am I not on the list" (rather than "Why are I not on the list").
So, what is the origin of this strange special case, and are there also other similar ones like it in the English language (i.e. where the abbreviated word is at the same time replaced by a completely OTHER word or word form, effectively not just being abbreviated, but rather also substituted at the same time)?
abbreviations
New contributor
The other day I saw the following (written) phrase being used in an American TV series episode:
"Why aren't I on the list?"
Even though I know this "sounds right" (I'm a relatively fluent, although not native, English speaker), this struck me as weird, since "am" is the normal form for "I" in all/most other situations ("I am", "you are", "he/she/it is" etc), i.e. without abbreviation being used, the correct phrasing would be "Why am I not on the list" (rather than "Why are I not on the list").
So, what is the origin of this strange special case, and are there also other similar ones like it in the English language (i.e. where the abbreviated word is at the same time replaced by a completely OTHER word or word form, effectively not just being abbreviated, but rather also substituted at the same time)?
abbreviations
abbreviations
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 3 hours ago
QuestionOverflow
1091
1091
New contributor
New contributor
1
Possible duplicate of "I'm right, aren't I?"
– Robusto
3 hours ago
I don't think this is really a duplicate. That question doesn't ask about the origin of aren't I, only whether it's acceptable. Only one answer there addresses origin at all, and it merely quotes a brief passage from Wikipedia. It seems likely that this question could generate more comprehensive answers.
– 1006a
1 hour ago
"likely that this question could generate more comprehensive answers" provided it's backed by the asker's own homework.
– Kris
33 mins ago
add a comment |
1
Possible duplicate of "I'm right, aren't I?"
– Robusto
3 hours ago
I don't think this is really a duplicate. That question doesn't ask about the origin of aren't I, only whether it's acceptable. Only one answer there addresses origin at all, and it merely quotes a brief passage from Wikipedia. It seems likely that this question could generate more comprehensive answers.
– 1006a
1 hour ago
"likely that this question could generate more comprehensive answers" provided it's backed by the asker's own homework.
– Kris
33 mins ago
1
1
Possible duplicate of "I'm right, aren't I?"
– Robusto
3 hours ago
Possible duplicate of "I'm right, aren't I?"
– Robusto
3 hours ago
I don't think this is really a duplicate. That question doesn't ask about the origin of aren't I, only whether it's acceptable. Only one answer there addresses origin at all, and it merely quotes a brief passage from Wikipedia. It seems likely that this question could generate more comprehensive answers.
– 1006a
1 hour ago
I don't think this is really a duplicate. That question doesn't ask about the origin of aren't I, only whether it's acceptable. Only one answer there addresses origin at all, and it merely quotes a brief passage from Wikipedia. It seems likely that this question could generate more comprehensive answers.
– 1006a
1 hour ago
"likely that this question could generate more comprehensive answers" provided it's backed by the asker's own homework.
– Kris
33 mins ago
"likely that this question could generate more comprehensive answers" provided it's backed by the asker's own homework.
– Kris
33 mins ago
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
QuestionOverflow is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
QuestionOverflow is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
QuestionOverflow is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
QuestionOverflow is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f475663%2fwhy-is-the-phrase-why-am-i-not-abbreviated-why-arent-i-i-e-a-complete-rep%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Possible duplicate of "I'm right, aren't I?"
– Robusto
3 hours ago
I don't think this is really a duplicate. That question doesn't ask about the origin of aren't I, only whether it's acceptable. Only one answer there addresses origin at all, and it merely quotes a brief passage from Wikipedia. It seems likely that this question could generate more comprehensive answers.
– 1006a
1 hour ago
"likely that this question could generate more comprehensive answers" provided it's backed by the asker's own homework.
– Kris
33 mins ago