Can I say eight-gon, nine-gon and ten-gon instead of octa-, nona-, and deca-gon?











up vote
3
down vote

favorite












As a non-native English speaker I struggle with Greek prefixes. Am I allowed to use just normal English numbers in place of them? Is it natural? Or do I have to learn how those Greek prefixes work at the end of the day?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Happy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • I've never heard these, but I think I would understand them if I heard them.
    – Colin Fine
    3 hours ago










  • @ColinFine up to how many Greek prefixes do you know?
    – Happy
    3 hours ago






  • 3




    You would call it an eight-sided polygon. Not eight-gon. And you could do that in a great many languages not just English. But maybe more to the point, you could also just say octagon in all these languages. So if you just learn that, you actually save yourself work in the end because everyone will understand you from New York to Paris to Berlin to Moscow. And also, those prefixes are incredibly useful for other things and pop up in all kinds of other places. Octopus, octave, October. Decade, decimal, December. You will end up learning all of them anyway. You already have.
    – RegDwigнt
    3 hours ago








  • 1




    A corollary of that is that if you do go with eight-gon and ten-gon, people won't take that to mean you're trying to make things easy for yourself. They wiill take that to mean you're trying to be difficult on purpose. Because everyone knows about the decade and the octopus. And everyone can draw the connection.
    – RegDwigнt
    2 hours ago












  • In the US, at least, you can say pretty much anything you want -- you (probably) won't be shot for it. The terms you suggest would be generally understood, and I think they are quite acceptable coming from someone who clearly has an incomplete command of the language. If, however, you will be talking in an academic environment you probably should take the effort to learn the correct terms. (Personally, I kind of detest the ordinals -- I think they should be "wonth", "tooth", "threeth", "forth", and "fifeth".)
    – Hot Licks
    2 hours ago















up vote
3
down vote

favorite












As a non-native English speaker I struggle with Greek prefixes. Am I allowed to use just normal English numbers in place of them? Is it natural? Or do I have to learn how those Greek prefixes work at the end of the day?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Happy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • I've never heard these, but I think I would understand them if I heard them.
    – Colin Fine
    3 hours ago










  • @ColinFine up to how many Greek prefixes do you know?
    – Happy
    3 hours ago






  • 3




    You would call it an eight-sided polygon. Not eight-gon. And you could do that in a great many languages not just English. But maybe more to the point, you could also just say octagon in all these languages. So if you just learn that, you actually save yourself work in the end because everyone will understand you from New York to Paris to Berlin to Moscow. And also, those prefixes are incredibly useful for other things and pop up in all kinds of other places. Octopus, octave, October. Decade, decimal, December. You will end up learning all of them anyway. You already have.
    – RegDwigнt
    3 hours ago








  • 1




    A corollary of that is that if you do go with eight-gon and ten-gon, people won't take that to mean you're trying to make things easy for yourself. They wiill take that to mean you're trying to be difficult on purpose. Because everyone knows about the decade and the octopus. And everyone can draw the connection.
    – RegDwigнt
    2 hours ago












  • In the US, at least, you can say pretty much anything you want -- you (probably) won't be shot for it. The terms you suggest would be generally understood, and I think they are quite acceptable coming from someone who clearly has an incomplete command of the language. If, however, you will be talking in an academic environment you probably should take the effort to learn the correct terms. (Personally, I kind of detest the ordinals -- I think they should be "wonth", "tooth", "threeth", "forth", and "fifeth".)
    – Hot Licks
    2 hours ago













up vote
3
down vote

favorite









up vote
3
down vote

favorite











As a non-native English speaker I struggle with Greek prefixes. Am I allowed to use just normal English numbers in place of them? Is it natural? Or do I have to learn how those Greek prefixes work at the end of the day?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Happy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











As a non-native English speaker I struggle with Greek prefixes. Am I allowed to use just normal English numbers in place of them? Is it natural? Or do I have to learn how those Greek prefixes work at the end of the day?







grammar grammaticality numbers mathematics






share|improve this question







New contributor




Happy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




Happy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




Happy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 3 hours ago









Happy

261




261




New contributor




Happy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Happy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Happy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • I've never heard these, but I think I would understand them if I heard them.
    – Colin Fine
    3 hours ago










  • @ColinFine up to how many Greek prefixes do you know?
    – Happy
    3 hours ago






  • 3




    You would call it an eight-sided polygon. Not eight-gon. And you could do that in a great many languages not just English. But maybe more to the point, you could also just say octagon in all these languages. So if you just learn that, you actually save yourself work in the end because everyone will understand you from New York to Paris to Berlin to Moscow. And also, those prefixes are incredibly useful for other things and pop up in all kinds of other places. Octopus, octave, October. Decade, decimal, December. You will end up learning all of them anyway. You already have.
    – RegDwigнt
    3 hours ago








  • 1




    A corollary of that is that if you do go with eight-gon and ten-gon, people won't take that to mean you're trying to make things easy for yourself. They wiill take that to mean you're trying to be difficult on purpose. Because everyone knows about the decade and the octopus. And everyone can draw the connection.
    – RegDwigнt
    2 hours ago












  • In the US, at least, you can say pretty much anything you want -- you (probably) won't be shot for it. The terms you suggest would be generally understood, and I think they are quite acceptable coming from someone who clearly has an incomplete command of the language. If, however, you will be talking in an academic environment you probably should take the effort to learn the correct terms. (Personally, I kind of detest the ordinals -- I think they should be "wonth", "tooth", "threeth", "forth", and "fifeth".)
    – Hot Licks
    2 hours ago


















  • I've never heard these, but I think I would understand them if I heard them.
    – Colin Fine
    3 hours ago










  • @ColinFine up to how many Greek prefixes do you know?
    – Happy
    3 hours ago






  • 3




    You would call it an eight-sided polygon. Not eight-gon. And you could do that in a great many languages not just English. But maybe more to the point, you could also just say octagon in all these languages. So if you just learn that, you actually save yourself work in the end because everyone will understand you from New York to Paris to Berlin to Moscow. And also, those prefixes are incredibly useful for other things and pop up in all kinds of other places. Octopus, octave, October. Decade, decimal, December. You will end up learning all of them anyway. You already have.
    – RegDwigнt
    3 hours ago








  • 1




    A corollary of that is that if you do go with eight-gon and ten-gon, people won't take that to mean you're trying to make things easy for yourself. They wiill take that to mean you're trying to be difficult on purpose. Because everyone knows about the decade and the octopus. And everyone can draw the connection.
    – RegDwigнt
    2 hours ago












  • In the US, at least, you can say pretty much anything you want -- you (probably) won't be shot for it. The terms you suggest would be generally understood, and I think they are quite acceptable coming from someone who clearly has an incomplete command of the language. If, however, you will be talking in an academic environment you probably should take the effort to learn the correct terms. (Personally, I kind of detest the ordinals -- I think they should be "wonth", "tooth", "threeth", "forth", and "fifeth".)
    – Hot Licks
    2 hours ago
















I've never heard these, but I think I would understand them if I heard them.
– Colin Fine
3 hours ago




I've never heard these, but I think I would understand them if I heard them.
– Colin Fine
3 hours ago












@ColinFine up to how many Greek prefixes do you know?
– Happy
3 hours ago




@ColinFine up to how many Greek prefixes do you know?
– Happy
3 hours ago




3




3




You would call it an eight-sided polygon. Not eight-gon. And you could do that in a great many languages not just English. But maybe more to the point, you could also just say octagon in all these languages. So if you just learn that, you actually save yourself work in the end because everyone will understand you from New York to Paris to Berlin to Moscow. And also, those prefixes are incredibly useful for other things and pop up in all kinds of other places. Octopus, octave, October. Decade, decimal, December. You will end up learning all of them anyway. You already have.
– RegDwigнt
3 hours ago






You would call it an eight-sided polygon. Not eight-gon. And you could do that in a great many languages not just English. But maybe more to the point, you could also just say octagon in all these languages. So if you just learn that, you actually save yourself work in the end because everyone will understand you from New York to Paris to Berlin to Moscow. And also, those prefixes are incredibly useful for other things and pop up in all kinds of other places. Octopus, octave, October. Decade, decimal, December. You will end up learning all of them anyway. You already have.
– RegDwigнt
3 hours ago






1




1




A corollary of that is that if you do go with eight-gon and ten-gon, people won't take that to mean you're trying to make things easy for yourself. They wiill take that to mean you're trying to be difficult on purpose. Because everyone knows about the decade and the octopus. And everyone can draw the connection.
– RegDwigнt
2 hours ago






A corollary of that is that if you do go with eight-gon and ten-gon, people won't take that to mean you're trying to make things easy for yourself. They wiill take that to mean you're trying to be difficult on purpose. Because everyone knows about the decade and the octopus. And everyone can draw the connection.
– RegDwigнt
2 hours ago














In the US, at least, you can say pretty much anything you want -- you (probably) won't be shot for it. The terms you suggest would be generally understood, and I think they are quite acceptable coming from someone who clearly has an incomplete command of the language. If, however, you will be talking in an academic environment you probably should take the effort to learn the correct terms. (Personally, I kind of detest the ordinals -- I think they should be "wonth", "tooth", "threeth", "forth", and "fifeth".)
– Hot Licks
2 hours ago




In the US, at least, you can say pretty much anything you want -- you (probably) won't be shot for it. The terms you suggest would be generally understood, and I think they are quite acceptable coming from someone who clearly has an incomplete command of the language. If, however, you will be talking in an academic environment you probably should take the effort to learn the correct terms. (Personally, I kind of detest the ordinals -- I think they should be "wonth", "tooth", "threeth", "forth", and "fifeth".)
– Hot Licks
2 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote













Mathematicians do use this form for bigger numbers. The Wikipedia article Heptadecagon currently contains the phrase "a regular 51-gon, 85-gon or 255-gon and any regular n-gon with 2h times as many sides. "



And in that context, you may find mathematicians using the form for smaller numbers: in an article about polygons of different sizes, I would not be surprised to meet "5-gon" or "8-gon".



But outside mathematics, I've never heard anybody say "eight-gon" or any of the others.






share|improve this answer




























    up vote
    1
    down vote













    Short answer: no.



    Longer answer: you will probably be understood, but people will think it's strange. Almost all words in English have roots in other languages. For these words, you have correctly identified Greek as the original language. Curiously, you have taken exception with the prefixes, but not the suffix: -gon, which is also Greek.



    As a more interesting case, triangle uses the -angle suffix, which comes from Latin.
    ( tri- is both a Greek and Latin prefix.)






    share|improve this answer




























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      Older Germanic languages had very few nouns and adjectives to describe geometric shapes. English had native words for a circle, trendel and heing, an arch boga, cf. Ger. Bogen, and words for three- and four-cornered, _ þriscíte_ and, variously spelled, feoðerscéte , feðerscíte , fiðerscýte , fyðerscýte.



      Square, from Old French esquire, first entered English as a carpenter’s square mid 13th c., a square shape/area in the late 14th c., and finally as a rectangle with equal sides in the 1550s. This would suggest that a carpenter couldn’t use a square to draw the eponymous shape for well over a century.



      Triangle was borrowed directly from French in the late 13th c.



      The most common names for polygons with 5–8 sides entered English from Greek via Latin in the 1560s. This tells you a great deal about the systematic study of geometry in England as pentagonon and octagonon lost their endings to become what we call them today. You’re basically stuck with them. Such bizarre grecogermanic hybrids like *five-gon do not exist.



      Other Germanic languages went through a similar process, but the names of polygons were calqued into native words: Ger. Dreieck, lit. ‘three-corner’, just as Old English, but as nouns, Viereck, Achteck, etc. Cf. Dutch _driehoek, Danish and Norwegian trekant (same meaning, different root), but Swedish triangel.



      The Greek and Latin cardinal and ordinal numbers pop up in so many English and international words that it pays to learn them, sextuplets, quad bike, bicycle, tricycle, mononucleosis, and on and on.






      share|improve this answer





















      • I should add that to my ear ‘85-angle’ (by analogy with ‘triangle’ sounds better and makes easier sense.
        – Tuffy
        13 mins ago











      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "97"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });






      Happy is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f476695%2fcan-i-say-eight-gon-nine-gon-and-ten-gon-instead-of-octa-nona-and-deca-gon%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      3
      down vote













      Mathematicians do use this form for bigger numbers. The Wikipedia article Heptadecagon currently contains the phrase "a regular 51-gon, 85-gon or 255-gon and any regular n-gon with 2h times as many sides. "



      And in that context, you may find mathematicians using the form for smaller numbers: in an article about polygons of different sizes, I would not be surprised to meet "5-gon" or "8-gon".



      But outside mathematics, I've never heard anybody say "eight-gon" or any of the others.






      share|improve this answer

























        up vote
        3
        down vote













        Mathematicians do use this form for bigger numbers. The Wikipedia article Heptadecagon currently contains the phrase "a regular 51-gon, 85-gon or 255-gon and any regular n-gon with 2h times as many sides. "



        And in that context, you may find mathematicians using the form for smaller numbers: in an article about polygons of different sizes, I would not be surprised to meet "5-gon" or "8-gon".



        But outside mathematics, I've never heard anybody say "eight-gon" or any of the others.






        share|improve this answer























          up vote
          3
          down vote










          up vote
          3
          down vote









          Mathematicians do use this form for bigger numbers. The Wikipedia article Heptadecagon currently contains the phrase "a regular 51-gon, 85-gon or 255-gon and any regular n-gon with 2h times as many sides. "



          And in that context, you may find mathematicians using the form for smaller numbers: in an article about polygons of different sizes, I would not be surprised to meet "5-gon" or "8-gon".



          But outside mathematics, I've never heard anybody say "eight-gon" or any of the others.






          share|improve this answer












          Mathematicians do use this form for bigger numbers. The Wikipedia article Heptadecagon currently contains the phrase "a regular 51-gon, 85-gon or 255-gon and any regular n-gon with 2h times as many sides. "



          And in that context, you may find mathematicians using the form for smaller numbers: in an article about polygons of different sizes, I would not be surprised to meet "5-gon" or "8-gon".



          But outside mathematics, I've never heard anybody say "eight-gon" or any of the others.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 2 hours ago









          Colin Fine

          62.5k167157




          62.5k167157
























              up vote
              1
              down vote













              Short answer: no.



              Longer answer: you will probably be understood, but people will think it's strange. Almost all words in English have roots in other languages. For these words, you have correctly identified Greek as the original language. Curiously, you have taken exception with the prefixes, but not the suffix: -gon, which is also Greek.



              As a more interesting case, triangle uses the -angle suffix, which comes from Latin.
              ( tri- is both a Greek and Latin prefix.)






              share|improve this answer

























                up vote
                1
                down vote













                Short answer: no.



                Longer answer: you will probably be understood, but people will think it's strange. Almost all words in English have roots in other languages. For these words, you have correctly identified Greek as the original language. Curiously, you have taken exception with the prefixes, but not the suffix: -gon, which is also Greek.



                As a more interesting case, triangle uses the -angle suffix, which comes from Latin.
                ( tri- is both a Greek and Latin prefix.)






                share|improve this answer























                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote









                  Short answer: no.



                  Longer answer: you will probably be understood, but people will think it's strange. Almost all words in English have roots in other languages. For these words, you have correctly identified Greek as the original language. Curiously, you have taken exception with the prefixes, but not the suffix: -gon, which is also Greek.



                  As a more interesting case, triangle uses the -angle suffix, which comes from Latin.
                  ( tri- is both a Greek and Latin prefix.)






                  share|improve this answer












                  Short answer: no.



                  Longer answer: you will probably be understood, but people will think it's strange. Almost all words in English have roots in other languages. For these words, you have correctly identified Greek as the original language. Curiously, you have taken exception with the prefixes, but not the suffix: -gon, which is also Greek.



                  As a more interesting case, triangle uses the -angle suffix, which comes from Latin.
                  ( tri- is both a Greek and Latin prefix.)







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 3 hours ago









                  Ian MacDonald

                  2,684815




                  2,684815






















                      up vote
                      1
                      down vote













                      Older Germanic languages had very few nouns and adjectives to describe geometric shapes. English had native words for a circle, trendel and heing, an arch boga, cf. Ger. Bogen, and words for three- and four-cornered, _ þriscíte_ and, variously spelled, feoðerscéte , feðerscíte , fiðerscýte , fyðerscýte.



                      Square, from Old French esquire, first entered English as a carpenter’s square mid 13th c., a square shape/area in the late 14th c., and finally as a rectangle with equal sides in the 1550s. This would suggest that a carpenter couldn’t use a square to draw the eponymous shape for well over a century.



                      Triangle was borrowed directly from French in the late 13th c.



                      The most common names for polygons with 5–8 sides entered English from Greek via Latin in the 1560s. This tells you a great deal about the systematic study of geometry in England as pentagonon and octagonon lost their endings to become what we call them today. You’re basically stuck with them. Such bizarre grecogermanic hybrids like *five-gon do not exist.



                      Other Germanic languages went through a similar process, but the names of polygons were calqued into native words: Ger. Dreieck, lit. ‘three-corner’, just as Old English, but as nouns, Viereck, Achteck, etc. Cf. Dutch _driehoek, Danish and Norwegian trekant (same meaning, different root), but Swedish triangel.



                      The Greek and Latin cardinal and ordinal numbers pop up in so many English and international words that it pays to learn them, sextuplets, quad bike, bicycle, tricycle, mononucleosis, and on and on.






                      share|improve this answer





















                      • I should add that to my ear ‘85-angle’ (by analogy with ‘triangle’ sounds better and makes easier sense.
                        – Tuffy
                        13 mins ago















                      up vote
                      1
                      down vote













                      Older Germanic languages had very few nouns and adjectives to describe geometric shapes. English had native words for a circle, trendel and heing, an arch boga, cf. Ger. Bogen, and words for three- and four-cornered, _ þriscíte_ and, variously spelled, feoðerscéte , feðerscíte , fiðerscýte , fyðerscýte.



                      Square, from Old French esquire, first entered English as a carpenter’s square mid 13th c., a square shape/area in the late 14th c., and finally as a rectangle with equal sides in the 1550s. This would suggest that a carpenter couldn’t use a square to draw the eponymous shape for well over a century.



                      Triangle was borrowed directly from French in the late 13th c.



                      The most common names for polygons with 5–8 sides entered English from Greek via Latin in the 1560s. This tells you a great deal about the systematic study of geometry in England as pentagonon and octagonon lost their endings to become what we call them today. You’re basically stuck with them. Such bizarre grecogermanic hybrids like *five-gon do not exist.



                      Other Germanic languages went through a similar process, but the names of polygons were calqued into native words: Ger. Dreieck, lit. ‘three-corner’, just as Old English, but as nouns, Viereck, Achteck, etc. Cf. Dutch _driehoek, Danish and Norwegian trekant (same meaning, different root), but Swedish triangel.



                      The Greek and Latin cardinal and ordinal numbers pop up in so many English and international words that it pays to learn them, sextuplets, quad bike, bicycle, tricycle, mononucleosis, and on and on.






                      share|improve this answer





















                      • I should add that to my ear ‘85-angle’ (by analogy with ‘triangle’ sounds better and makes easier sense.
                        – Tuffy
                        13 mins ago













                      up vote
                      1
                      down vote










                      up vote
                      1
                      down vote









                      Older Germanic languages had very few nouns and adjectives to describe geometric shapes. English had native words for a circle, trendel and heing, an arch boga, cf. Ger. Bogen, and words for three- and four-cornered, _ þriscíte_ and, variously spelled, feoðerscéte , feðerscíte , fiðerscýte , fyðerscýte.



                      Square, from Old French esquire, first entered English as a carpenter’s square mid 13th c., a square shape/area in the late 14th c., and finally as a rectangle with equal sides in the 1550s. This would suggest that a carpenter couldn’t use a square to draw the eponymous shape for well over a century.



                      Triangle was borrowed directly from French in the late 13th c.



                      The most common names for polygons with 5–8 sides entered English from Greek via Latin in the 1560s. This tells you a great deal about the systematic study of geometry in England as pentagonon and octagonon lost their endings to become what we call them today. You’re basically stuck with them. Such bizarre grecogermanic hybrids like *five-gon do not exist.



                      Other Germanic languages went through a similar process, but the names of polygons were calqued into native words: Ger. Dreieck, lit. ‘three-corner’, just as Old English, but as nouns, Viereck, Achteck, etc. Cf. Dutch _driehoek, Danish and Norwegian trekant (same meaning, different root), but Swedish triangel.



                      The Greek and Latin cardinal and ordinal numbers pop up in so many English and international words that it pays to learn them, sextuplets, quad bike, bicycle, tricycle, mononucleosis, and on and on.






                      share|improve this answer












                      Older Germanic languages had very few nouns and adjectives to describe geometric shapes. English had native words for a circle, trendel and heing, an arch boga, cf. Ger. Bogen, and words for three- and four-cornered, _ þriscíte_ and, variously spelled, feoðerscéte , feðerscíte , fiðerscýte , fyðerscýte.



                      Square, from Old French esquire, first entered English as a carpenter’s square mid 13th c., a square shape/area in the late 14th c., and finally as a rectangle with equal sides in the 1550s. This would suggest that a carpenter couldn’t use a square to draw the eponymous shape for well over a century.



                      Triangle was borrowed directly from French in the late 13th c.



                      The most common names for polygons with 5–8 sides entered English from Greek via Latin in the 1560s. This tells you a great deal about the systematic study of geometry in England as pentagonon and octagonon lost their endings to become what we call them today. You’re basically stuck with them. Such bizarre grecogermanic hybrids like *five-gon do not exist.



                      Other Germanic languages went through a similar process, but the names of polygons were calqued into native words: Ger. Dreieck, lit. ‘three-corner’, just as Old English, but as nouns, Viereck, Achteck, etc. Cf. Dutch _driehoek, Danish and Norwegian trekant (same meaning, different root), but Swedish triangel.



                      The Greek and Latin cardinal and ordinal numbers pop up in so many English and international words that it pays to learn them, sextuplets, quad bike, bicycle, tricycle, mononucleosis, and on and on.







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered 26 mins ago









                      KarlG

                      18.7k52753




                      18.7k52753












                      • I should add that to my ear ‘85-angle’ (by analogy with ‘triangle’ sounds better and makes easier sense.
                        – Tuffy
                        13 mins ago


















                      • I should add that to my ear ‘85-angle’ (by analogy with ‘triangle’ sounds better and makes easier sense.
                        – Tuffy
                        13 mins ago
















                      I should add that to my ear ‘85-angle’ (by analogy with ‘triangle’ sounds better and makes easier sense.
                      – Tuffy
                      13 mins ago




                      I should add that to my ear ‘85-angle’ (by analogy with ‘triangle’ sounds better and makes easier sense.
                      – Tuffy
                      13 mins ago










                      Happy is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      Happy is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                      Happy is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      Happy is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                      Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                      Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                      Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f476695%2fcan-i-say-eight-gon-nine-gon-and-ten-gon-instead-of-octa-nona-and-deca-gon%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      What visual should I use to simply compare current year value vs last year in Power BI desktop

                      How to ignore python UserWarning in pytest?

                      Alexandru Averescu