Understanding why the domain of a distribution is defined to be smooth functions with compact support
I'm trying to understand the motivation for the definition of a distribution and am probably missing something basic. Why is the domain of distribution / generalized function defined to be the set of smooth functions with compact set support instead of the set of functions with some other property and compact support?
In particular why aren't "competitors" like the following used as the domain
- the set of differentiable functions from $mathbb{R} to mathbb{R}$ with compact support
- the set of piecewise linear functions with finitely many pieces with only removable discontinuities with compact support.
- the set of piecewise constant functions with finitely many pieces with compact support
I'm wondering how you would motivate the actual definition ... and in particular how you would motivate it by considering a couple of simpler ideas and then striking them down as unworkable.
A distribution / generalized function is defined as a map from $T to mathbb{R}$ where $T$, the set of test functions, is defined as follows
$$ T stackrel{def}{=} left{ x in mathbb{R} to mathbb{R} text { where $x$ is smooth and has compact support }right} tag{1} $$
I'm picturing the dirac delta function as a motivating example for a distribution that isn't a function $mathbb{R} to mathbb{R}$ .
Here's a strawman definition of $delta$ as a function $mathbb{R} to mathbb{R} cup left{ infty right}$ . ✱✱
is used here to mark an unacceptable definition.
$$ ✱✱ ;;;delta(x) stackrel{def}{=} text{if } x = 0 text{ then } infty text{ else } 0 tag{2} $$
The definition fails to capture that $int_{-infty}^{infty} delta(x) = 1$ .
But the distributional definition of the Dirac delta is:
$$ leftlangle delta, varphi rightrangle stackrel{def}{=} varphi left(0right) tag{3a} $$
$$ deltaleft(varphiright) stackrel{def}{=} varphi left(0right) tag{3b} $$
where (3a) is conventional notation and (3b) emphasis that $delta$ is a higher order function.
And there is where I get stuck. I don't know what arguments to make to suggest that $T$ as a domain for a generalized function is the natural/correct choice.
The Wikipedia article on distributions offers the following paragraph which briefly describes what you can say about distributions whose domain is a subset of $T$, which suggests that you are doing something nontrivial when you pick $T$ .
Distribution theory reinterprets functions as linear functionals
acting on a space of test functions. Standard functions act by
integration against a test function, but many other linear functionals
do not arise in this way, and these are the "generalized functions".
There are different possible choices for the space of test functions,
leading to different spaces of distributions. The basic space of test
function consists of smooth functions with compact support, leading to
standard distributions. Use of the space of smooth, rapidly (faster
than any polynomial increases) decreasing test functions (these
functions are called Schwartz functions) gives instead the tempered
distributions, which are important because they have a well-defined
distributional Fourier transform. Every tempered distribution is a
distribution in the normal sense, but the converse is not true: in
general the larger the space of test functions, the more restrictive
the notion of distribution. On the other hand, the use of spaces of
analytic test functions leads to Sato's theory of hyperfunctions; this
theory has a different character from the previous ones because there
are no analytic functions with non-empty compact support.
Emphasis mine.
distribution-theory
add a comment |
I'm trying to understand the motivation for the definition of a distribution and am probably missing something basic. Why is the domain of distribution / generalized function defined to be the set of smooth functions with compact set support instead of the set of functions with some other property and compact support?
In particular why aren't "competitors" like the following used as the domain
- the set of differentiable functions from $mathbb{R} to mathbb{R}$ with compact support
- the set of piecewise linear functions with finitely many pieces with only removable discontinuities with compact support.
- the set of piecewise constant functions with finitely many pieces with compact support
I'm wondering how you would motivate the actual definition ... and in particular how you would motivate it by considering a couple of simpler ideas and then striking them down as unworkable.
A distribution / generalized function is defined as a map from $T to mathbb{R}$ where $T$, the set of test functions, is defined as follows
$$ T stackrel{def}{=} left{ x in mathbb{R} to mathbb{R} text { where $x$ is smooth and has compact support }right} tag{1} $$
I'm picturing the dirac delta function as a motivating example for a distribution that isn't a function $mathbb{R} to mathbb{R}$ .
Here's a strawman definition of $delta$ as a function $mathbb{R} to mathbb{R} cup left{ infty right}$ . ✱✱
is used here to mark an unacceptable definition.
$$ ✱✱ ;;;delta(x) stackrel{def}{=} text{if } x = 0 text{ then } infty text{ else } 0 tag{2} $$
The definition fails to capture that $int_{-infty}^{infty} delta(x) = 1$ .
But the distributional definition of the Dirac delta is:
$$ leftlangle delta, varphi rightrangle stackrel{def}{=} varphi left(0right) tag{3a} $$
$$ deltaleft(varphiright) stackrel{def}{=} varphi left(0right) tag{3b} $$
where (3a) is conventional notation and (3b) emphasis that $delta$ is a higher order function.
And there is where I get stuck. I don't know what arguments to make to suggest that $T$ as a domain for a generalized function is the natural/correct choice.
The Wikipedia article on distributions offers the following paragraph which briefly describes what you can say about distributions whose domain is a subset of $T$, which suggests that you are doing something nontrivial when you pick $T$ .
Distribution theory reinterprets functions as linear functionals
acting on a space of test functions. Standard functions act by
integration against a test function, but many other linear functionals
do not arise in this way, and these are the "generalized functions".
There are different possible choices for the space of test functions,
leading to different spaces of distributions. The basic space of test
function consists of smooth functions with compact support, leading to
standard distributions. Use of the space of smooth, rapidly (faster
than any polynomial increases) decreasing test functions (these
functions are called Schwartz functions) gives instead the tempered
distributions, which are important because they have a well-defined
distributional Fourier transform. Every tempered distribution is a
distribution in the normal sense, but the converse is not true: in
general the larger the space of test functions, the more restrictive
the notion of distribution. On the other hand, the use of spaces of
analytic test functions leads to Sato's theory of hyperfunctions; this
theory has a different character from the previous ones because there
are no analytic functions with non-empty compact support.
Emphasis mine.
distribution-theory
2
The derivative of a distribution is defined via $langle f',phirangle=-langle f,phi'rangle$ and to make sense of it we need $phi'$ to be in the domain.
– user8268
4 hours ago
add a comment |
I'm trying to understand the motivation for the definition of a distribution and am probably missing something basic. Why is the domain of distribution / generalized function defined to be the set of smooth functions with compact set support instead of the set of functions with some other property and compact support?
In particular why aren't "competitors" like the following used as the domain
- the set of differentiable functions from $mathbb{R} to mathbb{R}$ with compact support
- the set of piecewise linear functions with finitely many pieces with only removable discontinuities with compact support.
- the set of piecewise constant functions with finitely many pieces with compact support
I'm wondering how you would motivate the actual definition ... and in particular how you would motivate it by considering a couple of simpler ideas and then striking them down as unworkable.
A distribution / generalized function is defined as a map from $T to mathbb{R}$ where $T$, the set of test functions, is defined as follows
$$ T stackrel{def}{=} left{ x in mathbb{R} to mathbb{R} text { where $x$ is smooth and has compact support }right} tag{1} $$
I'm picturing the dirac delta function as a motivating example for a distribution that isn't a function $mathbb{R} to mathbb{R}$ .
Here's a strawman definition of $delta$ as a function $mathbb{R} to mathbb{R} cup left{ infty right}$ . ✱✱
is used here to mark an unacceptable definition.
$$ ✱✱ ;;;delta(x) stackrel{def}{=} text{if } x = 0 text{ then } infty text{ else } 0 tag{2} $$
The definition fails to capture that $int_{-infty}^{infty} delta(x) = 1$ .
But the distributional definition of the Dirac delta is:
$$ leftlangle delta, varphi rightrangle stackrel{def}{=} varphi left(0right) tag{3a} $$
$$ deltaleft(varphiright) stackrel{def}{=} varphi left(0right) tag{3b} $$
where (3a) is conventional notation and (3b) emphasis that $delta$ is a higher order function.
And there is where I get stuck. I don't know what arguments to make to suggest that $T$ as a domain for a generalized function is the natural/correct choice.
The Wikipedia article on distributions offers the following paragraph which briefly describes what you can say about distributions whose domain is a subset of $T$, which suggests that you are doing something nontrivial when you pick $T$ .
Distribution theory reinterprets functions as linear functionals
acting on a space of test functions. Standard functions act by
integration against a test function, but many other linear functionals
do not arise in this way, and these are the "generalized functions".
There are different possible choices for the space of test functions,
leading to different spaces of distributions. The basic space of test
function consists of smooth functions with compact support, leading to
standard distributions. Use of the space of smooth, rapidly (faster
than any polynomial increases) decreasing test functions (these
functions are called Schwartz functions) gives instead the tempered
distributions, which are important because they have a well-defined
distributional Fourier transform. Every tempered distribution is a
distribution in the normal sense, but the converse is not true: in
general the larger the space of test functions, the more restrictive
the notion of distribution. On the other hand, the use of spaces of
analytic test functions leads to Sato's theory of hyperfunctions; this
theory has a different character from the previous ones because there
are no analytic functions with non-empty compact support.
Emphasis mine.
distribution-theory
I'm trying to understand the motivation for the definition of a distribution and am probably missing something basic. Why is the domain of distribution / generalized function defined to be the set of smooth functions with compact set support instead of the set of functions with some other property and compact support?
In particular why aren't "competitors" like the following used as the domain
- the set of differentiable functions from $mathbb{R} to mathbb{R}$ with compact support
- the set of piecewise linear functions with finitely many pieces with only removable discontinuities with compact support.
- the set of piecewise constant functions with finitely many pieces with compact support
I'm wondering how you would motivate the actual definition ... and in particular how you would motivate it by considering a couple of simpler ideas and then striking them down as unworkable.
A distribution / generalized function is defined as a map from $T to mathbb{R}$ where $T$, the set of test functions, is defined as follows
$$ T stackrel{def}{=} left{ x in mathbb{R} to mathbb{R} text { where $x$ is smooth and has compact support }right} tag{1} $$
I'm picturing the dirac delta function as a motivating example for a distribution that isn't a function $mathbb{R} to mathbb{R}$ .
Here's a strawman definition of $delta$ as a function $mathbb{R} to mathbb{R} cup left{ infty right}$ . ✱✱
is used here to mark an unacceptable definition.
$$ ✱✱ ;;;delta(x) stackrel{def}{=} text{if } x = 0 text{ then } infty text{ else } 0 tag{2} $$
The definition fails to capture that $int_{-infty}^{infty} delta(x) = 1$ .
But the distributional definition of the Dirac delta is:
$$ leftlangle delta, varphi rightrangle stackrel{def}{=} varphi left(0right) tag{3a} $$
$$ deltaleft(varphiright) stackrel{def}{=} varphi left(0right) tag{3b} $$
where (3a) is conventional notation and (3b) emphasis that $delta$ is a higher order function.
And there is where I get stuck. I don't know what arguments to make to suggest that $T$ as a domain for a generalized function is the natural/correct choice.
The Wikipedia article on distributions offers the following paragraph which briefly describes what you can say about distributions whose domain is a subset of $T$, which suggests that you are doing something nontrivial when you pick $T$ .
Distribution theory reinterprets functions as linear functionals
acting on a space of test functions. Standard functions act by
integration against a test function, but many other linear functionals
do not arise in this way, and these are the "generalized functions".
There are different possible choices for the space of test functions,
leading to different spaces of distributions. The basic space of test
function consists of smooth functions with compact support, leading to
standard distributions. Use of the space of smooth, rapidly (faster
than any polynomial increases) decreasing test functions (these
functions are called Schwartz functions) gives instead the tempered
distributions, which are important because they have a well-defined
distributional Fourier transform. Every tempered distribution is a
distribution in the normal sense, but the converse is not true: in
general the larger the space of test functions, the more restrictive
the notion of distribution. On the other hand, the use of spaces of
analytic test functions leads to Sato's theory of hyperfunctions; this
theory has a different character from the previous ones because there
are no analytic functions with non-empty compact support.
Emphasis mine.
distribution-theory
distribution-theory
asked 5 hours ago
Gregory Nisbet
522312
522312
2
The derivative of a distribution is defined via $langle f',phirangle=-langle f,phi'rangle$ and to make sense of it we need $phi'$ to be in the domain.
– user8268
4 hours ago
add a comment |
2
The derivative of a distribution is defined via $langle f',phirangle=-langle f,phi'rangle$ and to make sense of it we need $phi'$ to be in the domain.
– user8268
4 hours ago
2
2
The derivative of a distribution is defined via $langle f',phirangle=-langle f,phi'rangle$ and to make sense of it we need $phi'$ to be in the domain.
– user8268
4 hours ago
The derivative of a distribution is defined via $langle f',phirangle=-langle f,phi'rangle$ and to make sense of it we need $phi'$ to be in the domain.
– user8268
4 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
As an quick answer, you want the test functions to which you apply your distribution to be defined over a compact interval to ensure that when you integrate this function with the integral definition of your distribution, the integral is guaranteed to be finite. After all, distributions are defined to be a class of bounded linear functionals. As far as being smooth ($c^{infty}$), this is a good requirement to ensure that every derivative of your test function is absolutely continuous, so that you are able to perform integration by parts and thus compute derivatives of any order of you distribution.
It is important to be able to differentiate distributions because this enables people to formulate weak solutions to partial differential equations, where the weak solution satisfies the differential equation in the sense of distributions.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3056326%2funderstanding-why-the-domain-of-a-distribution-is-defined-to-be-smooth-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
As an quick answer, you want the test functions to which you apply your distribution to be defined over a compact interval to ensure that when you integrate this function with the integral definition of your distribution, the integral is guaranteed to be finite. After all, distributions are defined to be a class of bounded linear functionals. As far as being smooth ($c^{infty}$), this is a good requirement to ensure that every derivative of your test function is absolutely continuous, so that you are able to perform integration by parts and thus compute derivatives of any order of you distribution.
It is important to be able to differentiate distributions because this enables people to formulate weak solutions to partial differential equations, where the weak solution satisfies the differential equation in the sense of distributions.
add a comment |
As an quick answer, you want the test functions to which you apply your distribution to be defined over a compact interval to ensure that when you integrate this function with the integral definition of your distribution, the integral is guaranteed to be finite. After all, distributions are defined to be a class of bounded linear functionals. As far as being smooth ($c^{infty}$), this is a good requirement to ensure that every derivative of your test function is absolutely continuous, so that you are able to perform integration by parts and thus compute derivatives of any order of you distribution.
It is important to be able to differentiate distributions because this enables people to formulate weak solutions to partial differential equations, where the weak solution satisfies the differential equation in the sense of distributions.
add a comment |
As an quick answer, you want the test functions to which you apply your distribution to be defined over a compact interval to ensure that when you integrate this function with the integral definition of your distribution, the integral is guaranteed to be finite. After all, distributions are defined to be a class of bounded linear functionals. As far as being smooth ($c^{infty}$), this is a good requirement to ensure that every derivative of your test function is absolutely continuous, so that you are able to perform integration by parts and thus compute derivatives of any order of you distribution.
It is important to be able to differentiate distributions because this enables people to formulate weak solutions to partial differential equations, where the weak solution satisfies the differential equation in the sense of distributions.
As an quick answer, you want the test functions to which you apply your distribution to be defined over a compact interval to ensure that when you integrate this function with the integral definition of your distribution, the integral is guaranteed to be finite. After all, distributions are defined to be a class of bounded linear functionals. As far as being smooth ($c^{infty}$), this is a good requirement to ensure that every derivative of your test function is absolutely continuous, so that you are able to perform integration by parts and thus compute derivatives of any order of you distribution.
It is important to be able to differentiate distributions because this enables people to formulate weak solutions to partial differential equations, where the weak solution satisfies the differential equation in the sense of distributions.
edited 4 hours ago
answered 4 hours ago
D.B.
9448
9448
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3056326%2funderstanding-why-the-domain-of-a-distribution-is-defined-to-be-smooth-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
The derivative of a distribution is defined via $langle f',phirangle=-langle f,phi'rangle$ and to make sense of it we need $phi'$ to be in the domain.
– user8268
4 hours ago