Is the p-adic Lindemann-Weierstrass Conjecture still open?











up vote
7
down vote

favorite












The p-adic Lindemann-Weierstrass Conjecture: Let $alpha_{1},ldots,alpha_{N}inoverline{mathbb{Q}_{p}}$
be $p$-adic algebraic numbers satisfying $left|alpha_{n}right|_{p}<p^{-frac{1}{p-1}}$
(so that $exp_{p}left(alpha_{n}right)inmathbb{C}_{p}$) for all $n$. Then, $exp_{p}left(alpha_{1}right),ldots,exp_{p}left(alpha_{N}right)$
are algebraically independent over $mathbb{Q}$.



I'm a graduate student who is considering taking on this problem for my doctoral dissertation



This article from 2008 by M. Waldschmidt says that the conjecture is still open (it lists it as conjecture 5.16).



I was wondering if that was still the case.






transcendental-number-theory p-adic







share|cite|improve this question


















  • 8




    The question does not ask for advise, but I wonder whether it is advisable to choose for a Ph.D. project a problem that for a decade has resisted solution by experts.
    – Carlo Beenakker
    6 hours ago















up vote
7
down vote

favorite












The p-adic Lindemann-Weierstrass Conjecture: Let $alpha_{1},ldots,alpha_{N}inoverline{mathbb{Q}_{p}}$
be $p$-adic algebraic numbers satisfying $left|alpha_{n}right|_{p}<p^{-frac{1}{p-1}}$
(so that $exp_{p}left(alpha_{n}right)inmathbb{C}_{p}$) for all $n$. Then, $exp_{p}left(alpha_{1}right),ldots,exp_{p}left(alpha_{N}right)$
are algebraically independent over $mathbb{Q}$.



I'm a graduate student who is considering taking on this problem for my doctoral dissertation



This article from 2008 by M. Waldschmidt says that the conjecture is still open (it lists it as conjecture 5.16).



I was wondering if that was still the case.






transcendental-number-theory p-adic







share|cite|improve this question


















  • 8




    The question does not ask for advise, but I wonder whether it is advisable to choose for a Ph.D. project a problem that for a decade has resisted solution by experts.
    – Carlo Beenakker
    6 hours ago













up vote
7
down vote

favorite









up vote
7
down vote

favorite











The p-adic Lindemann-Weierstrass Conjecture: Let $alpha_{1},ldots,alpha_{N}inoverline{mathbb{Q}_{p}}$
be $p$-adic algebraic numbers satisfying $left|alpha_{n}right|_{p}<p^{-frac{1}{p-1}}$
(so that $exp_{p}left(alpha_{n}right)inmathbb{C}_{p}$) for all $n$. Then, $exp_{p}left(alpha_{1}right),ldots,exp_{p}left(alpha_{N}right)$
are algebraically independent over $mathbb{Q}$.



I'm a graduate student who is considering taking on this problem for my doctoral dissertation



This article from 2008 by M. Waldschmidt says that the conjecture is still open (it lists it as conjecture 5.16).



I was wondering if that was still the case.






transcendental-number-theory p-adic







share|cite|improve this question













The p-adic Lindemann-Weierstrass Conjecture: Let $alpha_{1},ldots,alpha_{N}inoverline{mathbb{Q}_{p}}$
be $p$-adic algebraic numbers satisfying $left|alpha_{n}right|_{p}<p^{-frac{1}{p-1}}$
(so that $exp_{p}left(alpha_{n}right)inmathbb{C}_{p}$) for all $n$. Then, $exp_{p}left(alpha_{1}right),ldots,exp_{p}left(alpha_{N}right)$
are algebraically independent over $mathbb{Q}$.



I'm a graduate student who is considering taking on this problem for my doctoral dissertation



This article from 2008 by M. Waldschmidt says that the conjecture is still open (it lists it as conjecture 5.16).



I was wondering if that was still the case.






transcendental-number-theory p-adic




transcendental-number-theory p-adic






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 7 hours ago









MCS

1483




1483








  • 8




    The question does not ask for advise, but I wonder whether it is advisable to choose for a Ph.D. project a problem that for a decade has resisted solution by experts.
    – Carlo Beenakker
    6 hours ago














  • 8




    The question does not ask for advise, but I wonder whether it is advisable to choose for a Ph.D. project a problem that for a decade has resisted solution by experts.
    – Carlo Beenakker
    6 hours ago








8




8




The question does not ask for advise, but I wonder whether it is advisable to choose for a Ph.D. project a problem that for a decade has resisted solution by experts.
– Carlo Beenakker
6 hours ago




The question does not ask for advise, but I wonder whether it is advisable to choose for a Ph.D. project a problem that for a decade has resisted solution by experts.
– Carlo Beenakker
6 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
6
down vote













Here is a 2018 paper, A Note on One-dimensional Varieties Over the Complex p-adic Field, that still lists the "full" statement as a conjecture; "half" of the statement, meaning that at least $lfloor N/2rfloor$ of the exponents are independent, has been proven by Nesterenko.






share|cite|improve this answer























    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "504"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f317550%2fis-the-p-adic-lindemann-weierstrass-conjecture-still-open%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    6
    down vote













    Here is a 2018 paper, A Note on One-dimensional Varieties Over the Complex p-adic Field, that still lists the "full" statement as a conjecture; "half" of the statement, meaning that at least $lfloor N/2rfloor$ of the exponents are independent, has been proven by Nesterenko.






    share|cite|improve this answer



























      up vote
      6
      down vote













      Here is a 2018 paper, A Note on One-dimensional Varieties Over the Complex p-adic Field, that still lists the "full" statement as a conjecture; "half" of the statement, meaning that at least $lfloor N/2rfloor$ of the exponents are independent, has been proven by Nesterenko.






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        6
        down vote










        up vote
        6
        down vote









        Here is a 2018 paper, A Note on One-dimensional Varieties Over the Complex p-adic Field, that still lists the "full" statement as a conjecture; "half" of the statement, meaning that at least $lfloor N/2rfloor$ of the exponents are independent, has been proven by Nesterenko.






        share|cite|improve this answer














        Here is a 2018 paper, A Note on One-dimensional Varieties Over the Complex p-adic Field, that still lists the "full" statement as a conjecture; "half" of the statement, meaning that at least $lfloor N/2rfloor$ of the exponents are independent, has been proven by Nesterenko.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited 6 hours ago

























        answered 6 hours ago









        Carlo Beenakker

        72.2k9161269




        72.2k9161269






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f317550%2fis-the-p-adic-lindemann-weierstrass-conjecture-still-open%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            What visual should I use to simply compare current year value vs last year in Power BI desktop

            Image
            0 I have column SubToBind that shows current year ratio and column PY SubToBind which shows previous year ratio. How can I simply create a card that would be displaying them both in a nice way? Something like that: I cannot achieve that with regular card, I also tried Card with States by OKViz but also unable to see both values. In KPI visual - I dont like the word "Goal", it will confuse end users. Are there any cards or other visuals that would do the job? Thanks powerbi dax powerbi-embedded share | improve this question edited Jun 11 '18 at 20:11 Oleg ...
            Read more

            How to ignore python UserWarning in pytest?

            Image
            up vote 1 down vote favorite I am using openpyxl for parsing .xlsm files, and pytest for testing. When I open a file, I get the: OpenPyxl -> UserWarning: Data Validation extension is not supported and will be removed That is not really a problem bcs. program works and I can't change the .xlsm file to fix that. But... When I run pytest with something like: def test_wrong_file_format(): assert check_excel(open_excel('file.xlsm')) == True I will get the warning i mentioned altought check_excel(open_excel('file.xlsm')) returns True and the test should suceed... Is there a nice way to tell the pytest that "It's not a bug it's a feature" and tests should pass even when they get this warning? Is there other way than using something like: with pytest.warns(UserWarning): ...
            Read more

            Alexandru Averescu

            Image
            Alexandre Averescu Alexandru Averescu Naissance 3 avril 1859 Babele, Ismail  (ro) près de Izmaïl (principauté de Moldavie) Décès 2 octobre 1938 (à 79 ans) [ 1 ] Bucarest Origine   Roumanie Arme cavalerie Grade Maréchal Années de service 1901-1917 Commandement chef d'état-major général 2 e  armée 3 e  armée Groupe d'armée sud armée du Danube Conflits Guerre russo-turque de 1877-1878 Deuxième guerre balkanique Première Guerre mondiale Faits d'armes Bataille de Turtucaia/Tutrakan Bataille de Mărăști Distinctions Autres fonctions 3 fois président du Conseil des ministres ministre des Affaires étrangères ministre sans portefeuille conseiller de la Couronne modifier   Alexandre Averescu (en roumain : Alexandru Averescu .mw-parser-output .prononciation>a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/8a/Loudspeaker.svg/11px-Loudspeaker.svg.png")center ...
            Read more