Dynamic 2D array in C not reading first element
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
My uni tasked me with writing a program that reads the input and stores it into a dynamic 2D array, but we haven't covered that topic. I'm encountering a problem with my implementation, as it is skipping the first character in each line. I know the code is not top quality, but I just can't figure out why it skips the first char.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <assert.h>
#define MULT 3
#define DIV 2
char *read_line(int *col_size, int *max_c) {
char *line = NULL;
int size = *col_size;
int i, c;
line = malloc(size * sizeof *line);
for (i = 0; ((c = getchar()) != 'n') && (c != EOF); ++i) {
if (i == size) {
size = 1 + size * MULT / DIV;
line = realloc(line, size * sizeof *line);
assert(line != NULL);
}
line[i] = c;
}
if (i > *max_c)
*max_c = i;
if (size > *col_size)
*col_size = size;
return line;
}
char **read(int *row, int *col) {
char **input = NULL;
int row_size = 0;
int col_size = 0;
int i, c;
int max_c = 0;
for (i = 0; (c = getchar()) != EOF; ++i) {
if (i == row_size) {
row_size = 1 + row_size * MULT / DIV;
input = realloc(input, row_size * sizeof *input);
assert(input != NULL);
}
input[i] = read_line(&col_size, &max_c);
}
*row = i;
*col = max_c;
return input;
}
int main(void) {
int row_size, col_size, i, j;
char **board = read(&row_size, &col_size);
for (i = 0; i < row_size; ++i) {
for (j = 0; j < col_size; ++j)
putchar(board[i][j]);
putchar('n');
}
free(board);
return 0;
}
c
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
My uni tasked me with writing a program that reads the input and stores it into a dynamic 2D array, but we haven't covered that topic. I'm encountering a problem with my implementation, as it is skipping the first character in each line. I know the code is not top quality, but I just can't figure out why it skips the first char.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <assert.h>
#define MULT 3
#define DIV 2
char *read_line(int *col_size, int *max_c) {
char *line = NULL;
int size = *col_size;
int i, c;
line = malloc(size * sizeof *line);
for (i = 0; ((c = getchar()) != 'n') && (c != EOF); ++i) {
if (i == size) {
size = 1 + size * MULT / DIV;
line = realloc(line, size * sizeof *line);
assert(line != NULL);
}
line[i] = c;
}
if (i > *max_c)
*max_c = i;
if (size > *col_size)
*col_size = size;
return line;
}
char **read(int *row, int *col) {
char **input = NULL;
int row_size = 0;
int col_size = 0;
int i, c;
int max_c = 0;
for (i = 0; (c = getchar()) != EOF; ++i) {
if (i == row_size) {
row_size = 1 + row_size * MULT / DIV;
input = realloc(input, row_size * sizeof *input);
assert(input != NULL);
}
input[i] = read_line(&col_size, &max_c);
}
*row = i;
*col = max_c;
return input;
}
int main(void) {
int row_size, col_size, i, j;
char **board = read(&row_size, &col_size);
for (i = 0; i < row_size; ++i) {
for (j = 0; j < col_size; ++j)
putchar(board[i][j]);
putchar('n');
}
free(board);
return 0;
}
c
I've really only glanced at your code, but the one thing jumps out is you have ++i, not i++ in your for loops.
– whoasked
Nov 22 at 16:58
4
@whoasked It doesn't matter which one is used because that statement's value doesn't matter. It's not uncommon to use ++i because it may be slightly more efficient on some systems, depending on optimizations.
– Thomas Jager
Nov 22 at 17:08
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
My uni tasked me with writing a program that reads the input and stores it into a dynamic 2D array, but we haven't covered that topic. I'm encountering a problem with my implementation, as it is skipping the first character in each line. I know the code is not top quality, but I just can't figure out why it skips the first char.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <assert.h>
#define MULT 3
#define DIV 2
char *read_line(int *col_size, int *max_c) {
char *line = NULL;
int size = *col_size;
int i, c;
line = malloc(size * sizeof *line);
for (i = 0; ((c = getchar()) != 'n') && (c != EOF); ++i) {
if (i == size) {
size = 1 + size * MULT / DIV;
line = realloc(line, size * sizeof *line);
assert(line != NULL);
}
line[i] = c;
}
if (i > *max_c)
*max_c = i;
if (size > *col_size)
*col_size = size;
return line;
}
char **read(int *row, int *col) {
char **input = NULL;
int row_size = 0;
int col_size = 0;
int i, c;
int max_c = 0;
for (i = 0; (c = getchar()) != EOF; ++i) {
if (i == row_size) {
row_size = 1 + row_size * MULT / DIV;
input = realloc(input, row_size * sizeof *input);
assert(input != NULL);
}
input[i] = read_line(&col_size, &max_c);
}
*row = i;
*col = max_c;
return input;
}
int main(void) {
int row_size, col_size, i, j;
char **board = read(&row_size, &col_size);
for (i = 0; i < row_size; ++i) {
for (j = 0; j < col_size; ++j)
putchar(board[i][j]);
putchar('n');
}
free(board);
return 0;
}
c
My uni tasked me with writing a program that reads the input and stores it into a dynamic 2D array, but we haven't covered that topic. I'm encountering a problem with my implementation, as it is skipping the first character in each line. I know the code is not top quality, but I just can't figure out why it skips the first char.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <assert.h>
#define MULT 3
#define DIV 2
char *read_line(int *col_size, int *max_c) {
char *line = NULL;
int size = *col_size;
int i, c;
line = malloc(size * sizeof *line);
for (i = 0; ((c = getchar()) != 'n') && (c != EOF); ++i) {
if (i == size) {
size = 1 + size * MULT / DIV;
line = realloc(line, size * sizeof *line);
assert(line != NULL);
}
line[i] = c;
}
if (i > *max_c)
*max_c = i;
if (size > *col_size)
*col_size = size;
return line;
}
char **read(int *row, int *col) {
char **input = NULL;
int row_size = 0;
int col_size = 0;
int i, c;
int max_c = 0;
for (i = 0; (c = getchar()) != EOF; ++i) {
if (i == row_size) {
row_size = 1 + row_size * MULT / DIV;
input = realloc(input, row_size * sizeof *input);
assert(input != NULL);
}
input[i] = read_line(&col_size, &max_c);
}
*row = i;
*col = max_c;
return input;
}
int main(void) {
int row_size, col_size, i, j;
char **board = read(&row_size, &col_size);
for (i = 0; i < row_size; ++i) {
for (j = 0; j < col_size; ++j)
putchar(board[i][j]);
putchar('n');
}
free(board);
return 0;
}
c
c
asked Nov 22 at 16:54
guben
185
185
I've really only glanced at your code, but the one thing jumps out is you have ++i, not i++ in your for loops.
– whoasked
Nov 22 at 16:58
4
@whoasked It doesn't matter which one is used because that statement's value doesn't matter. It's not uncommon to use ++i because it may be slightly more efficient on some systems, depending on optimizations.
– Thomas Jager
Nov 22 at 17:08
add a comment |
I've really only glanced at your code, but the one thing jumps out is you have ++i, not i++ in your for loops.
– whoasked
Nov 22 at 16:58
4
@whoasked It doesn't matter which one is used because that statement's value doesn't matter. It's not uncommon to use ++i because it may be slightly more efficient on some systems, depending on optimizations.
– Thomas Jager
Nov 22 at 17:08
I've really only glanced at your code, but the one thing jumps out is you have ++i, not i++ in your for loops.
– whoasked
Nov 22 at 16:58
I've really only glanced at your code, but the one thing jumps out is you have ++i, not i++ in your for loops.
– whoasked
Nov 22 at 16:58
4
4
@whoasked It doesn't matter which one is used because that statement's value doesn't matter. It's not uncommon to use ++i because it may be slightly more efficient on some systems, depending on optimizations.
– Thomas Jager
Nov 22 at 17:08
@whoasked It doesn't matter which one is used because that statement's value doesn't matter. It's not uncommon to use ++i because it may be slightly more efficient on some systems, depending on optimizations.
– Thomas Jager
Nov 22 at 17:08
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
for (i = 0; (c = getchar()) != EOF; ++i) {
in read()
eats up the first character of a line before read_line()
gets to see it. You'll have to find some other way to check for EOF
. For example with
for (i = 0; !feof(stdin); ++i) {
Also, you don't zero-terminate your strings. Change your reading loop to
char *read_line(int *col_size, int *max_c) {
int size = *col_size ? *col_size : 1; // at least 1 for the terminating 0
char *line = malloc(size * sizeof *line);
if(!line)
return NULL;
int i, c;
for (i = 0; ((c = getchar()) != 'n') && (c != EOF); ++i) {
if(i == size) {
size = 2 + size * MULT / DIV; // note the 2
// ...
}
// ...
}
line[i] = '';
to do so.
for (i = 0; i < row_size; ++i) {
for (j = 0; j < col_size; ++j)
putchar(board[i][j]); // accesses memory that isn't yours
putchar('n'); // if not all rows are of the same length.
}
To avoid reading memory out-of-bounds, change that to
for (i = 0; i < row_size; ++i) {
for (j = 0; board[i][j] != ''; ++j)
putchar(board[i][j]);
putchar('n');
}
since you now have zero-terminated strings. Or why not just use puts()
?
for (i = 0; i < row_size; ++i)
puts(board[i]);
free(board);
That won't deallocate the memory you allocated for the rows. You'd have to
for (i = 0; i < row_size; ++i)
free(bard[i]);
free(board);
Thank you so much! I see there's a lot I have to learn yet ;)))
– guben
Nov 22 at 20:04
Altough, it's possible that the program is going to try to place the '' at an index that isn't allocated, since it's outside the loop that checks wether i is small enough.
– guben
Nov 22 at 20:14
@guben You are right.size = 1 + size * MULT / DIV;
should besize = 2 + size * MULT / DIV;
Where does that idea ofMULT / DIV
come from?
– Swordfish
Nov 22 at 20:19
From the example code given by my uni professor, who said that usually, it's multiplied by 2, but here it's better to multiply by 3/2. He didn't tell us why though xD
– guben
Nov 22 at 20:37
Actually, Valgrind throws an invalid write error, when given an empty row :/
– guben
Nov 22 at 21:11
|
show 5 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53435425%2fdynamic-2d-array-in-c-not-reading-first-element%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
for (i = 0; (c = getchar()) != EOF; ++i) {
in read()
eats up the first character of a line before read_line()
gets to see it. You'll have to find some other way to check for EOF
. For example with
for (i = 0; !feof(stdin); ++i) {
Also, you don't zero-terminate your strings. Change your reading loop to
char *read_line(int *col_size, int *max_c) {
int size = *col_size ? *col_size : 1; // at least 1 for the terminating 0
char *line = malloc(size * sizeof *line);
if(!line)
return NULL;
int i, c;
for (i = 0; ((c = getchar()) != 'n') && (c != EOF); ++i) {
if(i == size) {
size = 2 + size * MULT / DIV; // note the 2
// ...
}
// ...
}
line[i] = '';
to do so.
for (i = 0; i < row_size; ++i) {
for (j = 0; j < col_size; ++j)
putchar(board[i][j]); // accesses memory that isn't yours
putchar('n'); // if not all rows are of the same length.
}
To avoid reading memory out-of-bounds, change that to
for (i = 0; i < row_size; ++i) {
for (j = 0; board[i][j] != ''; ++j)
putchar(board[i][j]);
putchar('n');
}
since you now have zero-terminated strings. Or why not just use puts()
?
for (i = 0; i < row_size; ++i)
puts(board[i]);
free(board);
That won't deallocate the memory you allocated for the rows. You'd have to
for (i = 0; i < row_size; ++i)
free(bard[i]);
free(board);
Thank you so much! I see there's a lot I have to learn yet ;)))
– guben
Nov 22 at 20:04
Altough, it's possible that the program is going to try to place the '' at an index that isn't allocated, since it's outside the loop that checks wether i is small enough.
– guben
Nov 22 at 20:14
@guben You are right.size = 1 + size * MULT / DIV;
should besize = 2 + size * MULT / DIV;
Where does that idea ofMULT / DIV
come from?
– Swordfish
Nov 22 at 20:19
From the example code given by my uni professor, who said that usually, it's multiplied by 2, but here it's better to multiply by 3/2. He didn't tell us why though xD
– guben
Nov 22 at 20:37
Actually, Valgrind throws an invalid write error, when given an empty row :/
– guben
Nov 22 at 21:11
|
show 5 more comments
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
for (i = 0; (c = getchar()) != EOF; ++i) {
in read()
eats up the first character of a line before read_line()
gets to see it. You'll have to find some other way to check for EOF
. For example with
for (i = 0; !feof(stdin); ++i) {
Also, you don't zero-terminate your strings. Change your reading loop to
char *read_line(int *col_size, int *max_c) {
int size = *col_size ? *col_size : 1; // at least 1 for the terminating 0
char *line = malloc(size * sizeof *line);
if(!line)
return NULL;
int i, c;
for (i = 0; ((c = getchar()) != 'n') && (c != EOF); ++i) {
if(i == size) {
size = 2 + size * MULT / DIV; // note the 2
// ...
}
// ...
}
line[i] = '';
to do so.
for (i = 0; i < row_size; ++i) {
for (j = 0; j < col_size; ++j)
putchar(board[i][j]); // accesses memory that isn't yours
putchar('n'); // if not all rows are of the same length.
}
To avoid reading memory out-of-bounds, change that to
for (i = 0; i < row_size; ++i) {
for (j = 0; board[i][j] != ''; ++j)
putchar(board[i][j]);
putchar('n');
}
since you now have zero-terminated strings. Or why not just use puts()
?
for (i = 0; i < row_size; ++i)
puts(board[i]);
free(board);
That won't deallocate the memory you allocated for the rows. You'd have to
for (i = 0; i < row_size; ++i)
free(bard[i]);
free(board);
Thank you so much! I see there's a lot I have to learn yet ;)))
– guben
Nov 22 at 20:04
Altough, it's possible that the program is going to try to place the '' at an index that isn't allocated, since it's outside the loop that checks wether i is small enough.
– guben
Nov 22 at 20:14
@guben You are right.size = 1 + size * MULT / DIV;
should besize = 2 + size * MULT / DIV;
Where does that idea ofMULT / DIV
come from?
– Swordfish
Nov 22 at 20:19
From the example code given by my uni professor, who said that usually, it's multiplied by 2, but here it's better to multiply by 3/2. He didn't tell us why though xD
– guben
Nov 22 at 20:37
Actually, Valgrind throws an invalid write error, when given an empty row :/
– guben
Nov 22 at 21:11
|
show 5 more comments
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
for (i = 0; (c = getchar()) != EOF; ++i) {
in read()
eats up the first character of a line before read_line()
gets to see it. You'll have to find some other way to check for EOF
. For example with
for (i = 0; !feof(stdin); ++i) {
Also, you don't zero-terminate your strings. Change your reading loop to
char *read_line(int *col_size, int *max_c) {
int size = *col_size ? *col_size : 1; // at least 1 for the terminating 0
char *line = malloc(size * sizeof *line);
if(!line)
return NULL;
int i, c;
for (i = 0; ((c = getchar()) != 'n') && (c != EOF); ++i) {
if(i == size) {
size = 2 + size * MULT / DIV; // note the 2
// ...
}
// ...
}
line[i] = '';
to do so.
for (i = 0; i < row_size; ++i) {
for (j = 0; j < col_size; ++j)
putchar(board[i][j]); // accesses memory that isn't yours
putchar('n'); // if not all rows are of the same length.
}
To avoid reading memory out-of-bounds, change that to
for (i = 0; i < row_size; ++i) {
for (j = 0; board[i][j] != ''; ++j)
putchar(board[i][j]);
putchar('n');
}
since you now have zero-terminated strings. Or why not just use puts()
?
for (i = 0; i < row_size; ++i)
puts(board[i]);
free(board);
That won't deallocate the memory you allocated for the rows. You'd have to
for (i = 0; i < row_size; ++i)
free(bard[i]);
free(board);
for (i = 0; (c = getchar()) != EOF; ++i) {
in read()
eats up the first character of a line before read_line()
gets to see it. You'll have to find some other way to check for EOF
. For example with
for (i = 0; !feof(stdin); ++i) {
Also, you don't zero-terminate your strings. Change your reading loop to
char *read_line(int *col_size, int *max_c) {
int size = *col_size ? *col_size : 1; // at least 1 for the terminating 0
char *line = malloc(size * sizeof *line);
if(!line)
return NULL;
int i, c;
for (i = 0; ((c = getchar()) != 'n') && (c != EOF); ++i) {
if(i == size) {
size = 2 + size * MULT / DIV; // note the 2
// ...
}
// ...
}
line[i] = '';
to do so.
for (i = 0; i < row_size; ++i) {
for (j = 0; j < col_size; ++j)
putchar(board[i][j]); // accesses memory that isn't yours
putchar('n'); // if not all rows are of the same length.
}
To avoid reading memory out-of-bounds, change that to
for (i = 0; i < row_size; ++i) {
for (j = 0; board[i][j] != ''; ++j)
putchar(board[i][j]);
putchar('n');
}
since you now have zero-terminated strings. Or why not just use puts()
?
for (i = 0; i < row_size; ++i)
puts(board[i]);
free(board);
That won't deallocate the memory you allocated for the rows. You'd have to
for (i = 0; i < row_size; ++i)
free(bard[i]);
free(board);
edited Nov 22 at 20:24
answered Nov 22 at 17:18
Swordfish
1
1
Thank you so much! I see there's a lot I have to learn yet ;)))
– guben
Nov 22 at 20:04
Altough, it's possible that the program is going to try to place the '' at an index that isn't allocated, since it's outside the loop that checks wether i is small enough.
– guben
Nov 22 at 20:14
@guben You are right.size = 1 + size * MULT / DIV;
should besize = 2 + size * MULT / DIV;
Where does that idea ofMULT / DIV
come from?
– Swordfish
Nov 22 at 20:19
From the example code given by my uni professor, who said that usually, it's multiplied by 2, but here it's better to multiply by 3/2. He didn't tell us why though xD
– guben
Nov 22 at 20:37
Actually, Valgrind throws an invalid write error, when given an empty row :/
– guben
Nov 22 at 21:11
|
show 5 more comments
Thank you so much! I see there's a lot I have to learn yet ;)))
– guben
Nov 22 at 20:04
Altough, it's possible that the program is going to try to place the '' at an index that isn't allocated, since it's outside the loop that checks wether i is small enough.
– guben
Nov 22 at 20:14
@guben You are right.size = 1 + size * MULT / DIV;
should besize = 2 + size * MULT / DIV;
Where does that idea ofMULT / DIV
come from?
– Swordfish
Nov 22 at 20:19
From the example code given by my uni professor, who said that usually, it's multiplied by 2, but here it's better to multiply by 3/2. He didn't tell us why though xD
– guben
Nov 22 at 20:37
Actually, Valgrind throws an invalid write error, when given an empty row :/
– guben
Nov 22 at 21:11
Thank you so much! I see there's a lot I have to learn yet ;)))
– guben
Nov 22 at 20:04
Thank you so much! I see there's a lot I have to learn yet ;)))
– guben
Nov 22 at 20:04
Altough, it's possible that the program is going to try to place the '' at an index that isn't allocated, since it's outside the loop that checks wether i is small enough.
– guben
Nov 22 at 20:14
Altough, it's possible that the program is going to try to place the '' at an index that isn't allocated, since it's outside the loop that checks wether i is small enough.
– guben
Nov 22 at 20:14
@guben You are right.
size = 1 + size * MULT / DIV;
should be size = 2 + size * MULT / DIV;
Where does that idea of MULT / DIV
come from?– Swordfish
Nov 22 at 20:19
@guben You are right.
size = 1 + size * MULT / DIV;
should be size = 2 + size * MULT / DIV;
Where does that idea of MULT / DIV
come from?– Swordfish
Nov 22 at 20:19
From the example code given by my uni professor, who said that usually, it's multiplied by 2, but here it's better to multiply by 3/2. He didn't tell us why though xD
– guben
Nov 22 at 20:37
From the example code given by my uni professor, who said that usually, it's multiplied by 2, but here it's better to multiply by 3/2. He didn't tell us why though xD
– guben
Nov 22 at 20:37
Actually, Valgrind throws an invalid write error, when given an empty row :/
– guben
Nov 22 at 21:11
Actually, Valgrind throws an invalid write error, when given an empty row :/
– guben
Nov 22 at 21:11
|
show 5 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53435425%2fdynamic-2d-array-in-c-not-reading-first-element%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
I've really only glanced at your code, but the one thing jumps out is you have ++i, not i++ in your for loops.
– whoasked
Nov 22 at 16:58
4
@whoasked It doesn't matter which one is used because that statement's value doesn't matter. It's not uncommon to use ++i because it may be slightly more efficient on some systems, depending on optimizations.
– Thomas Jager
Nov 22 at 17:08