Making a cube with images as sides in Three.js
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I have tried quite a bit of stuff but have not found anything online. When I run my program I get this error: XMLHttpRequest cannot load file:///C:/Users/winst/Documents/Programming%20Projects/Miner/textures/Dirt.jpg. Cross origin requests are only supported for protocol schemes: http, data, chrome, chrome-extension, https.
The file is a simple picture I made that looks kinda like dirt.
Here is the part of my code that is doing it:
// load texture
var textureLoader = new THREE.TextureLoader();
var texture0 = textureLoader.load( 'textures/Dirt.jpg' );
var texture1 = textureLoader.load( 'textures/Dirt.jpg' );
var texture2 = textureLoader.load( 'textures/Dirt.jpg' );
var texture3 = textureLoader.load( 'textures/Dirt.jpg' );
var texture4 = textureLoader.load( 'textures/Dirt.jpg' );
var texture5 = textureLoader.load( 'textures/Dirt.jpg' );
var materials = [
new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial( { map: texture0 } ),
new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial( { map: texture1 } ),
new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial( { map: texture2 } ),
new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial( { map: texture3 } ),
new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial( { map: texture4 } ),
new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial( { map: texture5 } )
];
var material = new THREE.MeshFaceMaterial( materials );
// Combine everything together
var mesh = new THREE.Mesh( geometry, new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial( { material } ));
The rest of the code ran perfectly well with simply doing colored cubes instead of images on the sides. I found most the code above from another Stack Overflow question but mine still dosen't work.
Please help me. :)
javascript three.js 3d
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I have tried quite a bit of stuff but have not found anything online. When I run my program I get this error: XMLHttpRequest cannot load file:///C:/Users/winst/Documents/Programming%20Projects/Miner/textures/Dirt.jpg. Cross origin requests are only supported for protocol schemes: http, data, chrome, chrome-extension, https.
The file is a simple picture I made that looks kinda like dirt.
Here is the part of my code that is doing it:
// load texture
var textureLoader = new THREE.TextureLoader();
var texture0 = textureLoader.load( 'textures/Dirt.jpg' );
var texture1 = textureLoader.load( 'textures/Dirt.jpg' );
var texture2 = textureLoader.load( 'textures/Dirt.jpg' );
var texture3 = textureLoader.load( 'textures/Dirt.jpg' );
var texture4 = textureLoader.load( 'textures/Dirt.jpg' );
var texture5 = textureLoader.load( 'textures/Dirt.jpg' );
var materials = [
new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial( { map: texture0 } ),
new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial( { map: texture1 } ),
new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial( { map: texture2 } ),
new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial( { map: texture3 } ),
new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial( { map: texture4 } ),
new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial( { map: texture5 } )
];
var material = new THREE.MeshFaceMaterial( materials );
// Combine everything together
var mesh = new THREE.Mesh( geometry, new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial( { material } ));
The rest of the code ran perfectly well with simply doing colored cubes instead of images on the sides. I found most the code above from another Stack Overflow question but mine still dosen't work.
Please help me. :)
javascript three.js 3d
Like this one? threejs.org/examples/?q=cube#webgl_geometry_cube
– Randy Casburn
Nov 22 at 1:32
Yes! like that one. (except maybe different images on each side) I have tried to do that but when I replace their img with mine it dosen't work.
– Wrogrsin
Nov 22 at 1:37
Great! Can you compare and identify the differences between the two? That will help to isolate the issue.
– Randy Casburn
Nov 22 at 1:41
the only difference is the images.
– Wrogrsin
Nov 22 at 1:41
1
Well, I should welcome you to stack overflow. But I have to tell you that you must take care to help yourself first. Otherwise you will get a bunch of blow back. For instance, I don't see a call to this methodnew THREE.MeshFaceMaterial( materials );
in the example code at all. Additionally, the call to this methodnew THREE.MeshBasicMaterial()
is done differently. So, there really are some differences, but you didn't even take the time to discover them. Hum... Next you should read about a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable Example
– Randy Casburn
Nov 22 at 1:51
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I have tried quite a bit of stuff but have not found anything online. When I run my program I get this error: XMLHttpRequest cannot load file:///C:/Users/winst/Documents/Programming%20Projects/Miner/textures/Dirt.jpg. Cross origin requests are only supported for protocol schemes: http, data, chrome, chrome-extension, https.
The file is a simple picture I made that looks kinda like dirt.
Here is the part of my code that is doing it:
// load texture
var textureLoader = new THREE.TextureLoader();
var texture0 = textureLoader.load( 'textures/Dirt.jpg' );
var texture1 = textureLoader.load( 'textures/Dirt.jpg' );
var texture2 = textureLoader.load( 'textures/Dirt.jpg' );
var texture3 = textureLoader.load( 'textures/Dirt.jpg' );
var texture4 = textureLoader.load( 'textures/Dirt.jpg' );
var texture5 = textureLoader.load( 'textures/Dirt.jpg' );
var materials = [
new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial( { map: texture0 } ),
new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial( { map: texture1 } ),
new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial( { map: texture2 } ),
new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial( { map: texture3 } ),
new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial( { map: texture4 } ),
new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial( { map: texture5 } )
];
var material = new THREE.MeshFaceMaterial( materials );
// Combine everything together
var mesh = new THREE.Mesh( geometry, new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial( { material } ));
The rest of the code ran perfectly well with simply doing colored cubes instead of images on the sides. I found most the code above from another Stack Overflow question but mine still dosen't work.
Please help me. :)
javascript three.js 3d
I have tried quite a bit of stuff but have not found anything online. When I run my program I get this error: XMLHttpRequest cannot load file:///C:/Users/winst/Documents/Programming%20Projects/Miner/textures/Dirt.jpg. Cross origin requests are only supported for protocol schemes: http, data, chrome, chrome-extension, https.
The file is a simple picture I made that looks kinda like dirt.
Here is the part of my code that is doing it:
// load texture
var textureLoader = new THREE.TextureLoader();
var texture0 = textureLoader.load( 'textures/Dirt.jpg' );
var texture1 = textureLoader.load( 'textures/Dirt.jpg' );
var texture2 = textureLoader.load( 'textures/Dirt.jpg' );
var texture3 = textureLoader.load( 'textures/Dirt.jpg' );
var texture4 = textureLoader.load( 'textures/Dirt.jpg' );
var texture5 = textureLoader.load( 'textures/Dirt.jpg' );
var materials = [
new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial( { map: texture0 } ),
new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial( { map: texture1 } ),
new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial( { map: texture2 } ),
new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial( { map: texture3 } ),
new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial( { map: texture4 } ),
new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial( { map: texture5 } )
];
var material = new THREE.MeshFaceMaterial( materials );
// Combine everything together
var mesh = new THREE.Mesh( geometry, new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial( { material } ));
The rest of the code ran perfectly well with simply doing colored cubes instead of images on the sides. I found most the code above from another Stack Overflow question but mine still dosen't work.
Please help me. :)
javascript three.js 3d
javascript three.js 3d
edited Nov 22 at 18:45
Rabbid76
30.8k112842
30.8k112842
asked Nov 22 at 1:28
Wrogrsin
14
14
Like this one? threejs.org/examples/?q=cube#webgl_geometry_cube
– Randy Casburn
Nov 22 at 1:32
Yes! like that one. (except maybe different images on each side) I have tried to do that but when I replace their img with mine it dosen't work.
– Wrogrsin
Nov 22 at 1:37
Great! Can you compare and identify the differences between the two? That will help to isolate the issue.
– Randy Casburn
Nov 22 at 1:41
the only difference is the images.
– Wrogrsin
Nov 22 at 1:41
1
Well, I should welcome you to stack overflow. But I have to tell you that you must take care to help yourself first. Otherwise you will get a bunch of blow back. For instance, I don't see a call to this methodnew THREE.MeshFaceMaterial( materials );
in the example code at all. Additionally, the call to this methodnew THREE.MeshBasicMaterial()
is done differently. So, there really are some differences, but you didn't even take the time to discover them. Hum... Next you should read about a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable Example
– Randy Casburn
Nov 22 at 1:51
|
show 1 more comment
Like this one? threejs.org/examples/?q=cube#webgl_geometry_cube
– Randy Casburn
Nov 22 at 1:32
Yes! like that one. (except maybe different images on each side) I have tried to do that but when I replace their img with mine it dosen't work.
– Wrogrsin
Nov 22 at 1:37
Great! Can you compare and identify the differences between the two? That will help to isolate the issue.
– Randy Casburn
Nov 22 at 1:41
the only difference is the images.
– Wrogrsin
Nov 22 at 1:41
1
Well, I should welcome you to stack overflow. But I have to tell you that you must take care to help yourself first. Otherwise you will get a bunch of blow back. For instance, I don't see a call to this methodnew THREE.MeshFaceMaterial( materials );
in the example code at all. Additionally, the call to this methodnew THREE.MeshBasicMaterial()
is done differently. So, there really are some differences, but you didn't even take the time to discover them. Hum... Next you should read about a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable Example
– Randy Casburn
Nov 22 at 1:51
Like this one? threejs.org/examples/?q=cube#webgl_geometry_cube
– Randy Casburn
Nov 22 at 1:32
Like this one? threejs.org/examples/?q=cube#webgl_geometry_cube
– Randy Casburn
Nov 22 at 1:32
Yes! like that one. (except maybe different images on each side) I have tried to do that but when I replace their img with mine it dosen't work.
– Wrogrsin
Nov 22 at 1:37
Yes! like that one. (except maybe different images on each side) I have tried to do that but when I replace their img with mine it dosen't work.
– Wrogrsin
Nov 22 at 1:37
Great! Can you compare and identify the differences between the two? That will help to isolate the issue.
– Randy Casburn
Nov 22 at 1:41
Great! Can you compare and identify the differences between the two? That will help to isolate the issue.
– Randy Casburn
Nov 22 at 1:41
the only difference is the images.
– Wrogrsin
Nov 22 at 1:41
the only difference is the images.
– Wrogrsin
Nov 22 at 1:41
1
1
Well, I should welcome you to stack overflow. But I have to tell you that you must take care to help yourself first. Otherwise you will get a bunch of blow back. For instance, I don't see a call to this method
new THREE.MeshFaceMaterial( materials );
in the example code at all. Additionally, the call to this method new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial()
is done differently. So, there really are some differences, but you didn't even take the time to discover them. Hum... Next you should read about a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable Example– Randy Casburn
Nov 22 at 1:51
Well, I should welcome you to stack overflow. But I have to tell you that you must take care to help yourself first. Otherwise you will get a bunch of blow back. For instance, I don't see a call to this method
new THREE.MeshFaceMaterial( materials );
in the example code at all. Additionally, the call to this method new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial()
is done differently. So, there really are some differences, but you didn't even take the time to discover them. Hum... Next you should read about a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable Example– Randy Casburn
Nov 22 at 1:51
|
show 1 more comment
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53422692%2fmaking-a-cube-with-images-as-sides-in-three-js%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Like this one? threejs.org/examples/?q=cube#webgl_geometry_cube
– Randy Casburn
Nov 22 at 1:32
Yes! like that one. (except maybe different images on each side) I have tried to do that but when I replace their img with mine it dosen't work.
– Wrogrsin
Nov 22 at 1:37
Great! Can you compare and identify the differences between the two? That will help to isolate the issue.
– Randy Casburn
Nov 22 at 1:41
the only difference is the images.
– Wrogrsin
Nov 22 at 1:41
1
Well, I should welcome you to stack overflow. But I have to tell you that you must take care to help yourself first. Otherwise you will get a bunch of blow back. For instance, I don't see a call to this method
new THREE.MeshFaceMaterial( materials );
in the example code at all. Additionally, the call to this methodnew THREE.MeshBasicMaterial()
is done differently. So, there really are some differences, but you didn't even take the time to discover them. Hum... Next you should read about a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable Example– Randy Casburn
Nov 22 at 1:51