Word for “almost comprehensive”











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I'm looking for a word that means roughly "almost comprehensive" or "nearly comprehensive."



The context: I've created an app that does a fairly complete suite of jobs (given its purpose), but clearly does not do all possible jobs that the app could do or that one might want it to do.




  • In other words, it does a suite of tasks that would be "complete" for most users, but surely some users might find certain abilities to be missing.










share|improve this question
















bumped to the homepage by Community 3 hours ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.











  • 3




    Most advertising copy writers would cheerfully use comprehensive even if they knew perfectly well it wasn't quite that all-embracing. But if you're worried about getting sued for making false claims when you promote your app, just say it has extensive functionality. You want to emphasise how much it does do, not call attention to the (hopefully small) number of things it doesn't do.
    – FumbleFingers
    Jan 23 at 17:54












  • A phrase like most tasks or all commonly required jobs would do. I would agree with @FumbleFingers though, comprehensive doers not need to mean all, nearly all would be sufficient for many people.
    – Lee Leon
    Jan 23 at 19:31










  • Maybe you like one of those: Near-comprehensive, near-exhaustive, extensive, ample, broad, wide, detailed, sweeping, thorough, thoroughgoing, far-reaching, large-scale, of wide scope.
    – Richard Z
    2 hours ago















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I'm looking for a word that means roughly "almost comprehensive" or "nearly comprehensive."



The context: I've created an app that does a fairly complete suite of jobs (given its purpose), but clearly does not do all possible jobs that the app could do or that one might want it to do.




  • In other words, it does a suite of tasks that would be "complete" for most users, but surely some users might find certain abilities to be missing.










share|improve this question
















bumped to the homepage by Community 3 hours ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.











  • 3




    Most advertising copy writers would cheerfully use comprehensive even if they knew perfectly well it wasn't quite that all-embracing. But if you're worried about getting sued for making false claims when you promote your app, just say it has extensive functionality. You want to emphasise how much it does do, not call attention to the (hopefully small) number of things it doesn't do.
    – FumbleFingers
    Jan 23 at 17:54












  • A phrase like most tasks or all commonly required jobs would do. I would agree with @FumbleFingers though, comprehensive doers not need to mean all, nearly all would be sufficient for many people.
    – Lee Leon
    Jan 23 at 19:31










  • Maybe you like one of those: Near-comprehensive, near-exhaustive, extensive, ample, broad, wide, detailed, sweeping, thorough, thoroughgoing, far-reaching, large-scale, of wide scope.
    – Richard Z
    2 hours ago













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I'm looking for a word that means roughly "almost comprehensive" or "nearly comprehensive."



The context: I've created an app that does a fairly complete suite of jobs (given its purpose), but clearly does not do all possible jobs that the app could do or that one might want it to do.




  • In other words, it does a suite of tasks that would be "complete" for most users, but surely some users might find certain abilities to be missing.










share|improve this question















I'm looking for a word that means roughly "almost comprehensive" or "nearly comprehensive."



The context: I've created an app that does a fairly complete suite of jobs (given its purpose), but clearly does not do all possible jobs that the app could do or that one might want it to do.




  • In other words, it does a suite of tasks that would be "complete" for most users, but surely some users might find certain abilities to be missing.







single-word-requests synonyms






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jan 23 at 17:54

























asked Jan 23 at 17:44









theforestecologist

315112




315112





bumped to the homepage by Community 3 hours ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.







bumped to the homepage by Community 3 hours ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.










  • 3




    Most advertising copy writers would cheerfully use comprehensive even if they knew perfectly well it wasn't quite that all-embracing. But if you're worried about getting sued for making false claims when you promote your app, just say it has extensive functionality. You want to emphasise how much it does do, not call attention to the (hopefully small) number of things it doesn't do.
    – FumbleFingers
    Jan 23 at 17:54












  • A phrase like most tasks or all commonly required jobs would do. I would agree with @FumbleFingers though, comprehensive doers not need to mean all, nearly all would be sufficient for many people.
    – Lee Leon
    Jan 23 at 19:31










  • Maybe you like one of those: Near-comprehensive, near-exhaustive, extensive, ample, broad, wide, detailed, sweeping, thorough, thoroughgoing, far-reaching, large-scale, of wide scope.
    – Richard Z
    2 hours ago














  • 3




    Most advertising copy writers would cheerfully use comprehensive even if they knew perfectly well it wasn't quite that all-embracing. But if you're worried about getting sued for making false claims when you promote your app, just say it has extensive functionality. You want to emphasise how much it does do, not call attention to the (hopefully small) number of things it doesn't do.
    – FumbleFingers
    Jan 23 at 17:54












  • A phrase like most tasks or all commonly required jobs would do. I would agree with @FumbleFingers though, comprehensive doers not need to mean all, nearly all would be sufficient for many people.
    – Lee Leon
    Jan 23 at 19:31










  • Maybe you like one of those: Near-comprehensive, near-exhaustive, extensive, ample, broad, wide, detailed, sweeping, thorough, thoroughgoing, far-reaching, large-scale, of wide scope.
    – Richard Z
    2 hours ago








3




3




Most advertising copy writers would cheerfully use comprehensive even if they knew perfectly well it wasn't quite that all-embracing. But if you're worried about getting sued for making false claims when you promote your app, just say it has extensive functionality. You want to emphasise how much it does do, not call attention to the (hopefully small) number of things it doesn't do.
– FumbleFingers
Jan 23 at 17:54






Most advertising copy writers would cheerfully use comprehensive even if they knew perfectly well it wasn't quite that all-embracing. But if you're worried about getting sued for making false claims when you promote your app, just say it has extensive functionality. You want to emphasise how much it does do, not call attention to the (hopefully small) number of things it doesn't do.
– FumbleFingers
Jan 23 at 17:54














A phrase like most tasks or all commonly required jobs would do. I would agree with @FumbleFingers though, comprehensive doers not need to mean all, nearly all would be sufficient for many people.
– Lee Leon
Jan 23 at 19:31




A phrase like most tasks or all commonly required jobs would do. I would agree with @FumbleFingers though, comprehensive doers not need to mean all, nearly all would be sufficient for many people.
– Lee Leon
Jan 23 at 19:31












Maybe you like one of those: Near-comprehensive, near-exhaustive, extensive, ample, broad, wide, detailed, sweeping, thorough, thoroughgoing, far-reaching, large-scale, of wide scope.
– Richard Z
2 hours ago




Maybe you like one of those: Near-comprehensive, near-exhaustive, extensive, ample, broad, wide, detailed, sweeping, thorough, thoroughgoing, far-reaching, large-scale, of wide scope.
– Richard Z
2 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote













Having thought more about this, I think FumbleFingers comment above is probably the best approach.



Extensive (i.e., having broad extent) appropriately defines "near-comprehensive" and still carries a strongly inclusive connotation.



Using comprehensive in a not-fully comprehensive way is likely also ok in most instances to emphasize the extensive quality of something.






share|improve this answer




























    up vote
    0
    down vote













    exhaustive TFD



    adj.
    1. Treating all parts or aspects without omission; thorough: an exhaustive study.






    share|improve this answer





















    • I don't think "exhaustive" is the word the OP is looking for. Exhaustive means, in part, no stone is un-turned. For example, the difference between a comprehensive concordance of words in the Bible, which includes the most salient words, and an exhaustive concordance (e.g., Strong's Exhaustive Concordance), is that the latter includes every single word found in the Bible (yes, every "a," "and," and "the" !). The OP's app is closer to being comprehensive than exhaustive, since s/he admits the app does not do all the possible jobs it could do or that a user could want it to do.
      – rhetorician
      Aug 13 at 3:21











    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "97"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f427711%2fword-for-almost-comprehensive%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote













    Having thought more about this, I think FumbleFingers comment above is probably the best approach.



    Extensive (i.e., having broad extent) appropriately defines "near-comprehensive" and still carries a strongly inclusive connotation.



    Using comprehensive in a not-fully comprehensive way is likely also ok in most instances to emphasize the extensive quality of something.






    share|improve this answer

























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      Having thought more about this, I think FumbleFingers comment above is probably the best approach.



      Extensive (i.e., having broad extent) appropriately defines "near-comprehensive" and still carries a strongly inclusive connotation.



      Using comprehensive in a not-fully comprehensive way is likely also ok in most instances to emphasize the extensive quality of something.






      share|improve this answer























        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        Having thought more about this, I think FumbleFingers comment above is probably the best approach.



        Extensive (i.e., having broad extent) appropriately defines "near-comprehensive" and still carries a strongly inclusive connotation.



        Using comprehensive in a not-fully comprehensive way is likely also ok in most instances to emphasize the extensive quality of something.






        share|improve this answer












        Having thought more about this, I think FumbleFingers comment above is probably the best approach.



        Extensive (i.e., having broad extent) appropriately defines "near-comprehensive" and still carries a strongly inclusive connotation.



        Using comprehensive in a not-fully comprehensive way is likely also ok in most instances to emphasize the extensive quality of something.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Mar 15 at 19:27









        theforestecologist

        315112




        315112
























            up vote
            0
            down vote













            exhaustive TFD



            adj.
            1. Treating all parts or aspects without omission; thorough: an exhaustive study.






            share|improve this answer





















            • I don't think "exhaustive" is the word the OP is looking for. Exhaustive means, in part, no stone is un-turned. For example, the difference between a comprehensive concordance of words in the Bible, which includes the most salient words, and an exhaustive concordance (e.g., Strong's Exhaustive Concordance), is that the latter includes every single word found in the Bible (yes, every "a," "and," and "the" !). The OP's app is closer to being comprehensive than exhaustive, since s/he admits the app does not do all the possible jobs it could do or that a user could want it to do.
              – rhetorician
              Aug 13 at 3:21















            up vote
            0
            down vote













            exhaustive TFD



            adj.
            1. Treating all parts or aspects without omission; thorough: an exhaustive study.






            share|improve this answer





















            • I don't think "exhaustive" is the word the OP is looking for. Exhaustive means, in part, no stone is un-turned. For example, the difference between a comprehensive concordance of words in the Bible, which includes the most salient words, and an exhaustive concordance (e.g., Strong's Exhaustive Concordance), is that the latter includes every single word found in the Bible (yes, every "a," "and," and "the" !). The OP's app is closer to being comprehensive than exhaustive, since s/he admits the app does not do all the possible jobs it could do or that a user could want it to do.
              – rhetorician
              Aug 13 at 3:21













            up vote
            0
            down vote










            up vote
            0
            down vote









            exhaustive TFD



            adj.
            1. Treating all parts or aspects without omission; thorough: an exhaustive study.






            share|improve this answer












            exhaustive TFD



            adj.
            1. Treating all parts or aspects without omission; thorough: an exhaustive study.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Apr 15 at 1:24









            lbf

            16.8k21561




            16.8k21561












            • I don't think "exhaustive" is the word the OP is looking for. Exhaustive means, in part, no stone is un-turned. For example, the difference between a comprehensive concordance of words in the Bible, which includes the most salient words, and an exhaustive concordance (e.g., Strong's Exhaustive Concordance), is that the latter includes every single word found in the Bible (yes, every "a," "and," and "the" !). The OP's app is closer to being comprehensive than exhaustive, since s/he admits the app does not do all the possible jobs it could do or that a user could want it to do.
              – rhetorician
              Aug 13 at 3:21


















            • I don't think "exhaustive" is the word the OP is looking for. Exhaustive means, in part, no stone is un-turned. For example, the difference between a comprehensive concordance of words in the Bible, which includes the most salient words, and an exhaustive concordance (e.g., Strong's Exhaustive Concordance), is that the latter includes every single word found in the Bible (yes, every "a," "and," and "the" !). The OP's app is closer to being comprehensive than exhaustive, since s/he admits the app does not do all the possible jobs it could do or that a user could want it to do.
              – rhetorician
              Aug 13 at 3:21
















            I don't think "exhaustive" is the word the OP is looking for. Exhaustive means, in part, no stone is un-turned. For example, the difference between a comprehensive concordance of words in the Bible, which includes the most salient words, and an exhaustive concordance (e.g., Strong's Exhaustive Concordance), is that the latter includes every single word found in the Bible (yes, every "a," "and," and "the" !). The OP's app is closer to being comprehensive than exhaustive, since s/he admits the app does not do all the possible jobs it could do or that a user could want it to do.
            – rhetorician
            Aug 13 at 3:21




            I don't think "exhaustive" is the word the OP is looking for. Exhaustive means, in part, no stone is un-turned. For example, the difference between a comprehensive concordance of words in the Bible, which includes the most salient words, and an exhaustive concordance (e.g., Strong's Exhaustive Concordance), is that the latter includes every single word found in the Bible (yes, every "a," "and," and "the" !). The OP's app is closer to being comprehensive than exhaustive, since s/he admits the app does not do all the possible jobs it could do or that a user could want it to do.
            – rhetorician
            Aug 13 at 3:21


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f427711%2fword-for-almost-comprehensive%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            What visual should I use to simply compare current year value vs last year in Power BI desktop

            Alexandru Averescu

            Trompette piccolo