Can you use Contingency to cast Lightning Bolt?











up vote
3
down vote

favorite












The Contingency spell allows you to "prepare" a spell of 5th level or lower that can target you and set a trigger for it to take effect. It can be any spell 5th or lower capable of targeting the caster, but it "takes effect only on you". Lightning Bolt has a range of "Self (100-foot line)". Would I be able to make it contingent on me being lunged at? I'd appreciate both RAW and RAI answers.










share|improve this question




























    up vote
    3
    down vote

    favorite












    The Contingency spell allows you to "prepare" a spell of 5th level or lower that can target you and set a trigger for it to take effect. It can be any spell 5th or lower capable of targeting the caster, but it "takes effect only on you". Lightning Bolt has a range of "Self (100-foot line)". Would I be able to make it contingent on me being lunged at? I'd appreciate both RAW and RAI answers.










    share|improve this question


























      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite











      The Contingency spell allows you to "prepare" a spell of 5th level or lower that can target you and set a trigger for it to take effect. It can be any spell 5th or lower capable of targeting the caster, but it "takes effect only on you". Lightning Bolt has a range of "Self (100-foot line)". Would I be able to make it contingent on me being lunged at? I'd appreciate both RAW and RAI answers.










      share|improve this question















      The Contingency spell allows you to "prepare" a spell of 5th level or lower that can target you and set a trigger for it to take effect. It can be any spell 5th or lower capable of targeting the caster, but it "takes effect only on you". Lightning Bolt has a range of "Self (100-foot line)". Would I be able to make it contingent on me being lunged at? I'd appreciate both RAW and RAI answers.







      dnd-5e spells






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 6 hours ago

























      asked 6 hours ago









      Duncan X Simpson

      2026




      2026






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          5
          down vote













          Contingency can cast Lightning Bolt, but it will only affect you



          Because Lightning Bolt has a range of "self", it should be compatible with the requirements of the spell:




          Choose a spell of 5th level or lower that you can cast, that has a casting time of 1 action, and that can target you.




          Since "self" is equivalent to targeting yourself, that criterion is fulfilled.



          However, you would not be able to use it to deal damage to anything else (like, say, a creature "lunging at you"). From a paragraph later in the spell's description,




          The contingent spell takes effect only on you, even if it can normally target others.




          Lightning Bolt dealing damage to anyone else would probably qualify it as "taking effect" on another creature, which the Contingency spell says will not happen.



          So while you can cause Lightning Bolt to be triggered by this spell, it won't have any kind of value as a defensive mechanism, being unable to affect anything that would be in its range. You might be able to use it as a kind of scare tactic, i.e. having it go off to trick oncoming enemies into thinking that you're more dangerous than they might otherwise be inclined to believe you would be. But the actual effects of Lightning Bolt won't be able to affect those creatures.






          share|improve this answer





















          • Thanks for the answer! I figured this was probably the case; I just wasn't sure whether "taking effect" was distinct from "targeting".
            – Duncan X Simpson
            6 hours ago










          • I'll accept this in a few hours if a better answer doesn't come in.
            – Duncan X Simpson
            6 hours ago










          • @DuncanXSimpson give it a day so that the whole world has a chance to answer.
            – Grosscol
            5 hours ago










          • @DuncanXSimpson Normal policy on this stack (not necessarily true of other stacks) is to give at least 24 hours before accepting an answer on a question. It's not always followed, but it is a good way to ensure everyone has a fair chance to provide their input on a question before said input gets buried by the vote system.
            – Xirema
            5 hours ago










          • @Grosscol (and Xirema) Will do.
            – Duncan X Simpson
            5 hours ago


















          up vote
          2
          down vote













          No, you can’t



          One of the prerequisites of the contingent spell is that it “... can target you.” Lightning Bolt does not target you, it “... blasts out from you in a direction you choose.”



          The range of Lightning Bolt is “Self (100-foot line)” so it is an area of effect spell - it has a point of origin (Self) [which you can include in the AoE] but you are not a target. Targets are “creatures, objects, or a point in space”, this is a “point in space” (where you are).






          share|improve this answer



















          • 1




            Do you want to address the edge case of "suicide by Contingency spell" being used for dramatic effect by the PC? Up to you.
            – KorvinStarmast
            6 hours ago






          • 1




            I'd argue that by definition it targets you, since its range is self.
            – Duncan X Simpson
            6 hours ago











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "122"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f137210%2fcan-you-use-contingency-to-cast-lightning-bolt%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          5
          down vote













          Contingency can cast Lightning Bolt, but it will only affect you



          Because Lightning Bolt has a range of "self", it should be compatible with the requirements of the spell:




          Choose a spell of 5th level or lower that you can cast, that has a casting time of 1 action, and that can target you.




          Since "self" is equivalent to targeting yourself, that criterion is fulfilled.



          However, you would not be able to use it to deal damage to anything else (like, say, a creature "lunging at you"). From a paragraph later in the spell's description,




          The contingent spell takes effect only on you, even if it can normally target others.




          Lightning Bolt dealing damage to anyone else would probably qualify it as "taking effect" on another creature, which the Contingency spell says will not happen.



          So while you can cause Lightning Bolt to be triggered by this spell, it won't have any kind of value as a defensive mechanism, being unable to affect anything that would be in its range. You might be able to use it as a kind of scare tactic, i.e. having it go off to trick oncoming enemies into thinking that you're more dangerous than they might otherwise be inclined to believe you would be. But the actual effects of Lightning Bolt won't be able to affect those creatures.






          share|improve this answer





















          • Thanks for the answer! I figured this was probably the case; I just wasn't sure whether "taking effect" was distinct from "targeting".
            – Duncan X Simpson
            6 hours ago










          • I'll accept this in a few hours if a better answer doesn't come in.
            – Duncan X Simpson
            6 hours ago










          • @DuncanXSimpson give it a day so that the whole world has a chance to answer.
            – Grosscol
            5 hours ago










          • @DuncanXSimpson Normal policy on this stack (not necessarily true of other stacks) is to give at least 24 hours before accepting an answer on a question. It's not always followed, but it is a good way to ensure everyone has a fair chance to provide their input on a question before said input gets buried by the vote system.
            – Xirema
            5 hours ago










          • @Grosscol (and Xirema) Will do.
            – Duncan X Simpson
            5 hours ago















          up vote
          5
          down vote













          Contingency can cast Lightning Bolt, but it will only affect you



          Because Lightning Bolt has a range of "self", it should be compatible with the requirements of the spell:




          Choose a spell of 5th level or lower that you can cast, that has a casting time of 1 action, and that can target you.




          Since "self" is equivalent to targeting yourself, that criterion is fulfilled.



          However, you would not be able to use it to deal damage to anything else (like, say, a creature "lunging at you"). From a paragraph later in the spell's description,




          The contingent spell takes effect only on you, even if it can normally target others.




          Lightning Bolt dealing damage to anyone else would probably qualify it as "taking effect" on another creature, which the Contingency spell says will not happen.



          So while you can cause Lightning Bolt to be triggered by this spell, it won't have any kind of value as a defensive mechanism, being unable to affect anything that would be in its range. You might be able to use it as a kind of scare tactic, i.e. having it go off to trick oncoming enemies into thinking that you're more dangerous than they might otherwise be inclined to believe you would be. But the actual effects of Lightning Bolt won't be able to affect those creatures.






          share|improve this answer





















          • Thanks for the answer! I figured this was probably the case; I just wasn't sure whether "taking effect" was distinct from "targeting".
            – Duncan X Simpson
            6 hours ago










          • I'll accept this in a few hours if a better answer doesn't come in.
            – Duncan X Simpson
            6 hours ago










          • @DuncanXSimpson give it a day so that the whole world has a chance to answer.
            – Grosscol
            5 hours ago










          • @DuncanXSimpson Normal policy on this stack (not necessarily true of other stacks) is to give at least 24 hours before accepting an answer on a question. It's not always followed, but it is a good way to ensure everyone has a fair chance to provide their input on a question before said input gets buried by the vote system.
            – Xirema
            5 hours ago










          • @Grosscol (and Xirema) Will do.
            – Duncan X Simpson
            5 hours ago













          up vote
          5
          down vote










          up vote
          5
          down vote









          Contingency can cast Lightning Bolt, but it will only affect you



          Because Lightning Bolt has a range of "self", it should be compatible with the requirements of the spell:




          Choose a spell of 5th level or lower that you can cast, that has a casting time of 1 action, and that can target you.




          Since "self" is equivalent to targeting yourself, that criterion is fulfilled.



          However, you would not be able to use it to deal damage to anything else (like, say, a creature "lunging at you"). From a paragraph later in the spell's description,




          The contingent spell takes effect only on you, even if it can normally target others.




          Lightning Bolt dealing damage to anyone else would probably qualify it as "taking effect" on another creature, which the Contingency spell says will not happen.



          So while you can cause Lightning Bolt to be triggered by this spell, it won't have any kind of value as a defensive mechanism, being unable to affect anything that would be in its range. You might be able to use it as a kind of scare tactic, i.e. having it go off to trick oncoming enemies into thinking that you're more dangerous than they might otherwise be inclined to believe you would be. But the actual effects of Lightning Bolt won't be able to affect those creatures.






          share|improve this answer












          Contingency can cast Lightning Bolt, but it will only affect you



          Because Lightning Bolt has a range of "self", it should be compatible with the requirements of the spell:




          Choose a spell of 5th level or lower that you can cast, that has a casting time of 1 action, and that can target you.




          Since "self" is equivalent to targeting yourself, that criterion is fulfilled.



          However, you would not be able to use it to deal damage to anything else (like, say, a creature "lunging at you"). From a paragraph later in the spell's description,




          The contingent spell takes effect only on you, even if it can normally target others.




          Lightning Bolt dealing damage to anyone else would probably qualify it as "taking effect" on another creature, which the Contingency spell says will not happen.



          So while you can cause Lightning Bolt to be triggered by this spell, it won't have any kind of value as a defensive mechanism, being unable to affect anything that would be in its range. You might be able to use it as a kind of scare tactic, i.e. having it go off to trick oncoming enemies into thinking that you're more dangerous than they might otherwise be inclined to believe you would be. But the actual effects of Lightning Bolt won't be able to affect those creatures.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 6 hours ago









          Xirema

          14.2k24087




          14.2k24087












          • Thanks for the answer! I figured this was probably the case; I just wasn't sure whether "taking effect" was distinct from "targeting".
            – Duncan X Simpson
            6 hours ago










          • I'll accept this in a few hours if a better answer doesn't come in.
            – Duncan X Simpson
            6 hours ago










          • @DuncanXSimpson give it a day so that the whole world has a chance to answer.
            – Grosscol
            5 hours ago










          • @DuncanXSimpson Normal policy on this stack (not necessarily true of other stacks) is to give at least 24 hours before accepting an answer on a question. It's not always followed, but it is a good way to ensure everyone has a fair chance to provide their input on a question before said input gets buried by the vote system.
            – Xirema
            5 hours ago










          • @Grosscol (and Xirema) Will do.
            – Duncan X Simpson
            5 hours ago


















          • Thanks for the answer! I figured this was probably the case; I just wasn't sure whether "taking effect" was distinct from "targeting".
            – Duncan X Simpson
            6 hours ago










          • I'll accept this in a few hours if a better answer doesn't come in.
            – Duncan X Simpson
            6 hours ago










          • @DuncanXSimpson give it a day so that the whole world has a chance to answer.
            – Grosscol
            5 hours ago










          • @DuncanXSimpson Normal policy on this stack (not necessarily true of other stacks) is to give at least 24 hours before accepting an answer on a question. It's not always followed, but it is a good way to ensure everyone has a fair chance to provide their input on a question before said input gets buried by the vote system.
            – Xirema
            5 hours ago










          • @Grosscol (and Xirema) Will do.
            – Duncan X Simpson
            5 hours ago
















          Thanks for the answer! I figured this was probably the case; I just wasn't sure whether "taking effect" was distinct from "targeting".
          – Duncan X Simpson
          6 hours ago




          Thanks for the answer! I figured this was probably the case; I just wasn't sure whether "taking effect" was distinct from "targeting".
          – Duncan X Simpson
          6 hours ago












          I'll accept this in a few hours if a better answer doesn't come in.
          – Duncan X Simpson
          6 hours ago




          I'll accept this in a few hours if a better answer doesn't come in.
          – Duncan X Simpson
          6 hours ago












          @DuncanXSimpson give it a day so that the whole world has a chance to answer.
          – Grosscol
          5 hours ago




          @DuncanXSimpson give it a day so that the whole world has a chance to answer.
          – Grosscol
          5 hours ago












          @DuncanXSimpson Normal policy on this stack (not necessarily true of other stacks) is to give at least 24 hours before accepting an answer on a question. It's not always followed, but it is a good way to ensure everyone has a fair chance to provide their input on a question before said input gets buried by the vote system.
          – Xirema
          5 hours ago




          @DuncanXSimpson Normal policy on this stack (not necessarily true of other stacks) is to give at least 24 hours before accepting an answer on a question. It's not always followed, but it is a good way to ensure everyone has a fair chance to provide their input on a question before said input gets buried by the vote system.
          – Xirema
          5 hours ago












          @Grosscol (and Xirema) Will do.
          – Duncan X Simpson
          5 hours ago




          @Grosscol (and Xirema) Will do.
          – Duncan X Simpson
          5 hours ago












          up vote
          2
          down vote













          No, you can’t



          One of the prerequisites of the contingent spell is that it “... can target you.” Lightning Bolt does not target you, it “... blasts out from you in a direction you choose.”



          The range of Lightning Bolt is “Self (100-foot line)” so it is an area of effect spell - it has a point of origin (Self) [which you can include in the AoE] but you are not a target. Targets are “creatures, objects, or a point in space”, this is a “point in space” (where you are).






          share|improve this answer



















          • 1




            Do you want to address the edge case of "suicide by Contingency spell" being used for dramatic effect by the PC? Up to you.
            – KorvinStarmast
            6 hours ago






          • 1




            I'd argue that by definition it targets you, since its range is self.
            – Duncan X Simpson
            6 hours ago















          up vote
          2
          down vote













          No, you can’t



          One of the prerequisites of the contingent spell is that it “... can target you.” Lightning Bolt does not target you, it “... blasts out from you in a direction you choose.”



          The range of Lightning Bolt is “Self (100-foot line)” so it is an area of effect spell - it has a point of origin (Self) [which you can include in the AoE] but you are not a target. Targets are “creatures, objects, or a point in space”, this is a “point in space” (where you are).






          share|improve this answer



















          • 1




            Do you want to address the edge case of "suicide by Contingency spell" being used for dramatic effect by the PC? Up to you.
            – KorvinStarmast
            6 hours ago






          • 1




            I'd argue that by definition it targets you, since its range is self.
            – Duncan X Simpson
            6 hours ago













          up vote
          2
          down vote










          up vote
          2
          down vote









          No, you can’t



          One of the prerequisites of the contingent spell is that it “... can target you.” Lightning Bolt does not target you, it “... blasts out from you in a direction you choose.”



          The range of Lightning Bolt is “Self (100-foot line)” so it is an area of effect spell - it has a point of origin (Self) [which you can include in the AoE] but you are not a target. Targets are “creatures, objects, or a point in space”, this is a “point in space” (where you are).






          share|improve this answer














          No, you can’t



          One of the prerequisites of the contingent spell is that it “... can target you.” Lightning Bolt does not target you, it “... blasts out from you in a direction you choose.”



          The range of Lightning Bolt is “Self (100-foot line)” so it is an area of effect spell - it has a point of origin (Self) [which you can include in the AoE] but you are not a target. Targets are “creatures, objects, or a point in space”, this is a “point in space” (where you are).







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 6 hours ago

























          answered 6 hours ago









          Dale M

          99.9k19253446




          99.9k19253446








          • 1




            Do you want to address the edge case of "suicide by Contingency spell" being used for dramatic effect by the PC? Up to you.
            – KorvinStarmast
            6 hours ago






          • 1




            I'd argue that by definition it targets you, since its range is self.
            – Duncan X Simpson
            6 hours ago














          • 1




            Do you want to address the edge case of "suicide by Contingency spell" being used for dramatic effect by the PC? Up to you.
            – KorvinStarmast
            6 hours ago






          • 1




            I'd argue that by definition it targets you, since its range is self.
            – Duncan X Simpson
            6 hours ago








          1




          1




          Do you want to address the edge case of "suicide by Contingency spell" being used for dramatic effect by the PC? Up to you.
          – KorvinStarmast
          6 hours ago




          Do you want to address the edge case of "suicide by Contingency spell" being used for dramatic effect by the PC? Up to you.
          – KorvinStarmast
          6 hours ago




          1




          1




          I'd argue that by definition it targets you, since its range is self.
          – Duncan X Simpson
          6 hours ago




          I'd argue that by definition it targets you, since its range is self.
          – Duncan X Simpson
          6 hours ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f137210%2fcan-you-use-contingency-to-cast-lightning-bolt%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          What visual should I use to simply compare current year value vs last year in Power BI desktop

          How to ignore python UserWarning in pytest?

          Alexandru Averescu