Proving v1+v2 is not an eigenvector of A
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Let $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ be two distinct eigenvalues of an $n times n$ matrix $A$, $v_1$ and $v_2$ are the corresponding eigenvectors. Prove that $v_1 + v_2$ is not an eigenvector of $A$.
Is this how you set this up? Unsure where to begin.
$A(v_1+v_2) = Av_1 + Av_2$
$A(v_1+v_2) = lambda_1v_1 + lambda_2v_2$
...
linear-algebra matrices
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Let $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ be two distinct eigenvalues of an $n times n$ matrix $A$, $v_1$ and $v_2$ are the corresponding eigenvectors. Prove that $v_1 + v_2$ is not an eigenvector of $A$.
Is this how you set this up? Unsure where to begin.
$A(v_1+v_2) = Av_1 + Av_2$
$A(v_1+v_2) = lambda_1v_1 + lambda_2v_2$
...
linear-algebra matrices
New contributor
Have you already encountered a proof that with the same assumptions ($lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ are two distinct eigenvalues of an $ntimes n$ matrix $A$, $v_1$ and $v_2$ are their eigenvectors), $v_1$ and $v_2$ are linearly independent? If so, then use that. If not, then that is the place to start.
– Misha Lavrov
4 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Let $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ be two distinct eigenvalues of an $n times n$ matrix $A$, $v_1$ and $v_2$ are the corresponding eigenvectors. Prove that $v_1 + v_2$ is not an eigenvector of $A$.
Is this how you set this up? Unsure where to begin.
$A(v_1+v_2) = Av_1 + Av_2$
$A(v_1+v_2) = lambda_1v_1 + lambda_2v_2$
...
linear-algebra matrices
New contributor
Let $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ be two distinct eigenvalues of an $n times n$ matrix $A$, $v_1$ and $v_2$ are the corresponding eigenvectors. Prove that $v_1 + v_2$ is not an eigenvector of $A$.
Is this how you set this up? Unsure where to begin.
$A(v_1+v_2) = Av_1 + Av_2$
$A(v_1+v_2) = lambda_1v_1 + lambda_2v_2$
...
linear-algebra matrices
linear-algebra matrices
New contributor
New contributor
edited 3 hours ago
platty
1,687210
1,687210
New contributor
asked 4 hours ago
jake
161
161
New contributor
New contributor
Have you already encountered a proof that with the same assumptions ($lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ are two distinct eigenvalues of an $ntimes n$ matrix $A$, $v_1$ and $v_2$ are their eigenvectors), $v_1$ and $v_2$ are linearly independent? If so, then use that. If not, then that is the place to start.
– Misha Lavrov
4 hours ago
add a comment |
Have you already encountered a proof that with the same assumptions ($lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ are two distinct eigenvalues of an $ntimes n$ matrix $A$, $v_1$ and $v_2$ are their eigenvectors), $v_1$ and $v_2$ are linearly independent? If so, then use that. If not, then that is the place to start.
– Misha Lavrov
4 hours ago
Have you already encountered a proof that with the same assumptions ($lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ are two distinct eigenvalues of an $ntimes n$ matrix $A$, $v_1$ and $v_2$ are their eigenvectors), $v_1$ and $v_2$ are linearly independent? If so, then use that. If not, then that is the place to start.
– Misha Lavrov
4 hours ago
Have you already encountered a proof that with the same assumptions ($lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ are two distinct eigenvalues of an $ntimes n$ matrix $A$, $v_1$ and $v_2$ are their eigenvectors), $v_1$ and $v_2$ are linearly independent? If so, then use that. If not, then that is the place to start.
– Misha Lavrov
4 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
By contradiction:
If $v_1 + v_2$ is an eigenvector of A then there exists and eigenvalue $lambda$ so that $$ A(v_1 + v_2) = lambda(v_1 + v_2) = lambda v_1 + lambda v_2.$$
However since $v_1$ and $v_2$ are eigenvectors and $A$ is linear we have
$$ A(v_1 + v_2) = A(v_1) + A(v_2) = lambda_1 v_1 + lambda_2v_2.$$
Therefore
$$ lambda v_1 + lambda v_2 = lambda_1 v_1 + lambda_2v_2$$
$$ iff$$
$$ (lambda - lambda_1) v_1 + (lambda - lambda_2)v_2 = 0. $$
Since $lambda_1 neq lambda_2$, $v_1$ and $v_2$ are linearly independent so
$$ lambda - lambda_1 = 0 qquad lambda-lambda_2 = 0.$$
So $ lambda = lambda_1 = lambda_2 $ which is a contradiction.
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
What you have above is true. It may help to write $lambda_2 = lambda_1 + c$ where $c neq 0$. Then you can write $A(v_1 + v_2) = lambda_1 (v_1 + v_2) + cv_2$. From here, you should be able to argue that $v_2$ is not parallel to $v_1 + v_2$, based on the assumption that $lambda_1 neq lambda_2$, so $v_1 + v_2$ cannot be an eigenvector of $A$.
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
By contradiction:
If $v_1 + v_2$ is an eigenvector of A then there exists and eigenvalue $lambda$ so that $$ A(v_1 + v_2) = lambda(v_1 + v_2) = lambda v_1 + lambda v_2.$$
However since $v_1$ and $v_2$ are eigenvectors and $A$ is linear we have
$$ A(v_1 + v_2) = A(v_1) + A(v_2) = lambda_1 v_1 + lambda_2v_2.$$
Therefore
$$ lambda v_1 + lambda v_2 = lambda_1 v_1 + lambda_2v_2$$
$$ iff$$
$$ (lambda - lambda_1) v_1 + (lambda - lambda_2)v_2 = 0. $$
Since $lambda_1 neq lambda_2$, $v_1$ and $v_2$ are linearly independent so
$$ lambda - lambda_1 = 0 qquad lambda-lambda_2 = 0.$$
So $ lambda = lambda_1 = lambda_2 $ which is a contradiction.
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
By contradiction:
If $v_1 + v_2$ is an eigenvector of A then there exists and eigenvalue $lambda$ so that $$ A(v_1 + v_2) = lambda(v_1 + v_2) = lambda v_1 + lambda v_2.$$
However since $v_1$ and $v_2$ are eigenvectors and $A$ is linear we have
$$ A(v_1 + v_2) = A(v_1) + A(v_2) = lambda_1 v_1 + lambda_2v_2.$$
Therefore
$$ lambda v_1 + lambda v_2 = lambda_1 v_1 + lambda_2v_2$$
$$ iff$$
$$ (lambda - lambda_1) v_1 + (lambda - lambda_2)v_2 = 0. $$
Since $lambda_1 neq lambda_2$, $v_1$ and $v_2$ are linearly independent so
$$ lambda - lambda_1 = 0 qquad lambda-lambda_2 = 0.$$
So $ lambda = lambda_1 = lambda_2 $ which is a contradiction.
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
By contradiction:
If $v_1 + v_2$ is an eigenvector of A then there exists and eigenvalue $lambda$ so that $$ A(v_1 + v_2) = lambda(v_1 + v_2) = lambda v_1 + lambda v_2.$$
However since $v_1$ and $v_2$ are eigenvectors and $A$ is linear we have
$$ A(v_1 + v_2) = A(v_1) + A(v_2) = lambda_1 v_1 + lambda_2v_2.$$
Therefore
$$ lambda v_1 + lambda v_2 = lambda_1 v_1 + lambda_2v_2$$
$$ iff$$
$$ (lambda - lambda_1) v_1 + (lambda - lambda_2)v_2 = 0. $$
Since $lambda_1 neq lambda_2$, $v_1$ and $v_2$ are linearly independent so
$$ lambda - lambda_1 = 0 qquad lambda-lambda_2 = 0.$$
So $ lambda = lambda_1 = lambda_2 $ which is a contradiction.
By contradiction:
If $v_1 + v_2$ is an eigenvector of A then there exists and eigenvalue $lambda$ so that $$ A(v_1 + v_2) = lambda(v_1 + v_2) = lambda v_1 + lambda v_2.$$
However since $v_1$ and $v_2$ are eigenvectors and $A$ is linear we have
$$ A(v_1 + v_2) = A(v_1) + A(v_2) = lambda_1 v_1 + lambda_2v_2.$$
Therefore
$$ lambda v_1 + lambda v_2 = lambda_1 v_1 + lambda_2v_2$$
$$ iff$$
$$ (lambda - lambda_1) v_1 + (lambda - lambda_2)v_2 = 0. $$
Since $lambda_1 neq lambda_2$, $v_1$ and $v_2$ are linearly independent so
$$ lambda - lambda_1 = 0 qquad lambda-lambda_2 = 0.$$
So $ lambda = lambda_1 = lambda_2 $ which is a contradiction.
answered 3 hours ago
Digitalis
364114
364114
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
What you have above is true. It may help to write $lambda_2 = lambda_1 + c$ where $c neq 0$. Then you can write $A(v_1 + v_2) = lambda_1 (v_1 + v_2) + cv_2$. From here, you should be able to argue that $v_2$ is not parallel to $v_1 + v_2$, based on the assumption that $lambda_1 neq lambda_2$, so $v_1 + v_2$ cannot be an eigenvector of $A$.
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
What you have above is true. It may help to write $lambda_2 = lambda_1 + c$ where $c neq 0$. Then you can write $A(v_1 + v_2) = lambda_1 (v_1 + v_2) + cv_2$. From here, you should be able to argue that $v_2$ is not parallel to $v_1 + v_2$, based on the assumption that $lambda_1 neq lambda_2$, so $v_1 + v_2$ cannot be an eigenvector of $A$.
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
What you have above is true. It may help to write $lambda_2 = lambda_1 + c$ where $c neq 0$. Then you can write $A(v_1 + v_2) = lambda_1 (v_1 + v_2) + cv_2$. From here, you should be able to argue that $v_2$ is not parallel to $v_1 + v_2$, based on the assumption that $lambda_1 neq lambda_2$, so $v_1 + v_2$ cannot be an eigenvector of $A$.
What you have above is true. It may help to write $lambda_2 = lambda_1 + c$ where $c neq 0$. Then you can write $A(v_1 + v_2) = lambda_1 (v_1 + v_2) + cv_2$. From here, you should be able to argue that $v_2$ is not parallel to $v_1 + v_2$, based on the assumption that $lambda_1 neq lambda_2$, so $v_1 + v_2$ cannot be an eigenvector of $A$.
answered 4 hours ago
platty
1,687210
1,687210
add a comment |
add a comment |
jake is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
jake is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
jake is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
jake is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3016461%2fproving-v1v2-is-not-an-eigenvector-of-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Have you already encountered a proof that with the same assumptions ($lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ are two distinct eigenvalues of an $ntimes n$ matrix $A$, $v_1$ and $v_2$ are their eigenvectors), $v_1$ and $v_2$ are linearly independent? If so, then use that. If not, then that is the place to start.
– Misha Lavrov
4 hours ago