The Jackass Syndrome
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
Some years ago, I watched an episode of the show Just Shoot Me! where one of characters used the phrase "The Jackass Syndrome" to describe the situation were two people who are quite similar in some ways can really hate each other (it was followed by a short scene in which, after two people met for the first time, each of them walked away muttering "jackass" in reference to the other person).
Over the years I have noticed that sometimes people that are indeed similar in some aspects (that they may not be aware of) can not get along with one another. Is there another word for this situation?
single-word-requests neologisms
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
Some years ago, I watched an episode of the show Just Shoot Me! where one of characters used the phrase "The Jackass Syndrome" to describe the situation were two people who are quite similar in some ways can really hate each other (it was followed by a short scene in which, after two people met for the first time, each of them walked away muttering "jackass" in reference to the other person).
Over the years I have noticed that sometimes people that are indeed similar in some aspects (that they may not be aware of) can not get along with one another. Is there another word for this situation?
single-word-requests neologisms
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
Some years ago, I watched an episode of the show Just Shoot Me! where one of characters used the phrase "The Jackass Syndrome" to describe the situation were two people who are quite similar in some ways can really hate each other (it was followed by a short scene in which, after two people met for the first time, each of them walked away muttering "jackass" in reference to the other person).
Over the years I have noticed that sometimes people that are indeed similar in some aspects (that they may not be aware of) can not get along with one another. Is there another word for this situation?
single-word-requests neologisms
Some years ago, I watched an episode of the show Just Shoot Me! where one of characters used the phrase "The Jackass Syndrome" to describe the situation were two people who are quite similar in some ways can really hate each other (it was followed by a short scene in which, after two people met for the first time, each of them walked away muttering "jackass" in reference to the other person).
Over the years I have noticed that sometimes people that are indeed similar in some aspects (that they may not be aware of) can not get along with one another. Is there another word for this situation?
single-word-requests neologisms
single-word-requests neologisms
edited Dec 27 '11 at 15:02
Matt E. Эллен♦
25.2k1486150
25.2k1486150
asked Dec 26 '11 at 16:37
iddober
3912714
3912714
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
There are phrases relevant to the phenomenon, but I'm not familiar with any single word.
We hate most in others what we fear most in ourselves.*
and
The pot calling the kettle black
are both applicable in situations wherein one person finds objectionable in another an attribute that s/he, too, possesses.
The psychological concept of projection is not unrelated. People who project generally deny feelings or desires within themselves and ascribe them to others.
*Rather than fear most, you might also hear see or even can't see.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
"Quite to the contrary, "Jackass Syndrome," is the psychological term in Social Psychology that defines humanoid observations to be that of an armchair quarterback lack-of-forethought mentality in taking a seat on the bench, e.g., in the, "mall," to watch others go by and make errors in another Social Psychological term, "Fundamental Attribution Error," i.e., which is different as a minor facet of Fundamental Attribution Theory in and of itself. Fundamental Attribution Error is observing a person or thing, e.g., animal, adapting its conduct to the environment, yet attributing either personal feelings onto the individual thing, the object of consideration, and, as above, "projecting," a personal or individual character or schema of the objects intention singularly instead of taking proper consideration for the environment and the conditions of such examined conduct-behaviour. The error lies in not taking into consideration enough environmental factors and over-contributing assumptions as attributes of such individual. "Cognitive Dissonance," goes well with this erroneous process or lack of BONA FIDE method towards proper and correct analysis, of the effect, to such fictitious conclusions drawn by the mistaken lack-of-true perception, the misperception held by the observer, who misuses human capacity to an efficiency less than a, "Jackass," as trapped in, "Syndrome," behaviours. Enough mistakes could rightly lead to Agoraphobia that should keep that Jackass at home to examine themselves for their own mistakes to become introspective and realign those potential misconceptions in fine-tuning the egotistic sources of their own preoccupation culminating in misperception and common human error."
New contributor
This doesn't seem to answer the question, which is "Is there another word for this situation" (with the situation being "two people who are quite similar in some ways can really hate each other").
– Laurel
29 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f52811%2fthe-jackass-syndrome%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
There are phrases relevant to the phenomenon, but I'm not familiar with any single word.
We hate most in others what we fear most in ourselves.*
and
The pot calling the kettle black
are both applicable in situations wherein one person finds objectionable in another an attribute that s/he, too, possesses.
The psychological concept of projection is not unrelated. People who project generally deny feelings or desires within themselves and ascribe them to others.
*Rather than fear most, you might also hear see or even can't see.
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
There are phrases relevant to the phenomenon, but I'm not familiar with any single word.
We hate most in others what we fear most in ourselves.*
and
The pot calling the kettle black
are both applicable in situations wherein one person finds objectionable in another an attribute that s/he, too, possesses.
The psychological concept of projection is not unrelated. People who project generally deny feelings or desires within themselves and ascribe them to others.
*Rather than fear most, you might also hear see or even can't see.
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
There are phrases relevant to the phenomenon, but I'm not familiar with any single word.
We hate most in others what we fear most in ourselves.*
and
The pot calling the kettle black
are both applicable in situations wherein one person finds objectionable in another an attribute that s/he, too, possesses.
The psychological concept of projection is not unrelated. People who project generally deny feelings or desires within themselves and ascribe them to others.
*Rather than fear most, you might also hear see or even can't see.
There are phrases relevant to the phenomenon, but I'm not familiar with any single word.
We hate most in others what we fear most in ourselves.*
and
The pot calling the kettle black
are both applicable in situations wherein one person finds objectionable in another an attribute that s/he, too, possesses.
The psychological concept of projection is not unrelated. People who project generally deny feelings or desires within themselves and ascribe them to others.
*Rather than fear most, you might also hear see or even can't see.
answered Dec 26 '11 at 17:42
user13141
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
"Quite to the contrary, "Jackass Syndrome," is the psychological term in Social Psychology that defines humanoid observations to be that of an armchair quarterback lack-of-forethought mentality in taking a seat on the bench, e.g., in the, "mall," to watch others go by and make errors in another Social Psychological term, "Fundamental Attribution Error," i.e., which is different as a minor facet of Fundamental Attribution Theory in and of itself. Fundamental Attribution Error is observing a person or thing, e.g., animal, adapting its conduct to the environment, yet attributing either personal feelings onto the individual thing, the object of consideration, and, as above, "projecting," a personal or individual character or schema of the objects intention singularly instead of taking proper consideration for the environment and the conditions of such examined conduct-behaviour. The error lies in not taking into consideration enough environmental factors and over-contributing assumptions as attributes of such individual. "Cognitive Dissonance," goes well with this erroneous process or lack of BONA FIDE method towards proper and correct analysis, of the effect, to such fictitious conclusions drawn by the mistaken lack-of-true perception, the misperception held by the observer, who misuses human capacity to an efficiency less than a, "Jackass," as trapped in, "Syndrome," behaviours. Enough mistakes could rightly lead to Agoraphobia that should keep that Jackass at home to examine themselves for their own mistakes to become introspective and realign those potential misconceptions in fine-tuning the egotistic sources of their own preoccupation culminating in misperception and common human error."
New contributor
This doesn't seem to answer the question, which is "Is there another word for this situation" (with the situation being "two people who are quite similar in some ways can really hate each other").
– Laurel
29 mins ago
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
"Quite to the contrary, "Jackass Syndrome," is the psychological term in Social Psychology that defines humanoid observations to be that of an armchair quarterback lack-of-forethought mentality in taking a seat on the bench, e.g., in the, "mall," to watch others go by and make errors in another Social Psychological term, "Fundamental Attribution Error," i.e., which is different as a minor facet of Fundamental Attribution Theory in and of itself. Fundamental Attribution Error is observing a person or thing, e.g., animal, adapting its conduct to the environment, yet attributing either personal feelings onto the individual thing, the object of consideration, and, as above, "projecting," a personal or individual character or schema of the objects intention singularly instead of taking proper consideration for the environment and the conditions of such examined conduct-behaviour. The error lies in not taking into consideration enough environmental factors and over-contributing assumptions as attributes of such individual. "Cognitive Dissonance," goes well with this erroneous process or lack of BONA FIDE method towards proper and correct analysis, of the effect, to such fictitious conclusions drawn by the mistaken lack-of-true perception, the misperception held by the observer, who misuses human capacity to an efficiency less than a, "Jackass," as trapped in, "Syndrome," behaviours. Enough mistakes could rightly lead to Agoraphobia that should keep that Jackass at home to examine themselves for their own mistakes to become introspective and realign those potential misconceptions in fine-tuning the egotistic sources of their own preoccupation culminating in misperception and common human error."
New contributor
This doesn't seem to answer the question, which is "Is there another word for this situation" (with the situation being "two people who are quite similar in some ways can really hate each other").
– Laurel
29 mins ago
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
"Quite to the contrary, "Jackass Syndrome," is the psychological term in Social Psychology that defines humanoid observations to be that of an armchair quarterback lack-of-forethought mentality in taking a seat on the bench, e.g., in the, "mall," to watch others go by and make errors in another Social Psychological term, "Fundamental Attribution Error," i.e., which is different as a minor facet of Fundamental Attribution Theory in and of itself. Fundamental Attribution Error is observing a person or thing, e.g., animal, adapting its conduct to the environment, yet attributing either personal feelings onto the individual thing, the object of consideration, and, as above, "projecting," a personal or individual character or schema of the objects intention singularly instead of taking proper consideration for the environment and the conditions of such examined conduct-behaviour. The error lies in not taking into consideration enough environmental factors and over-contributing assumptions as attributes of such individual. "Cognitive Dissonance," goes well with this erroneous process or lack of BONA FIDE method towards proper and correct analysis, of the effect, to such fictitious conclusions drawn by the mistaken lack-of-true perception, the misperception held by the observer, who misuses human capacity to an efficiency less than a, "Jackass," as trapped in, "Syndrome," behaviours. Enough mistakes could rightly lead to Agoraphobia that should keep that Jackass at home to examine themselves for their own mistakes to become introspective and realign those potential misconceptions in fine-tuning the egotistic sources of their own preoccupation culminating in misperception and common human error."
New contributor
"Quite to the contrary, "Jackass Syndrome," is the psychological term in Social Psychology that defines humanoid observations to be that of an armchair quarterback lack-of-forethought mentality in taking a seat on the bench, e.g., in the, "mall," to watch others go by and make errors in another Social Psychological term, "Fundamental Attribution Error," i.e., which is different as a minor facet of Fundamental Attribution Theory in and of itself. Fundamental Attribution Error is observing a person or thing, e.g., animal, adapting its conduct to the environment, yet attributing either personal feelings onto the individual thing, the object of consideration, and, as above, "projecting," a personal or individual character or schema of the objects intention singularly instead of taking proper consideration for the environment and the conditions of such examined conduct-behaviour. The error lies in not taking into consideration enough environmental factors and over-contributing assumptions as attributes of such individual. "Cognitive Dissonance," goes well with this erroneous process or lack of BONA FIDE method towards proper and correct analysis, of the effect, to such fictitious conclusions drawn by the mistaken lack-of-true perception, the misperception held by the observer, who misuses human capacity to an efficiency less than a, "Jackass," as trapped in, "Syndrome," behaviours. Enough mistakes could rightly lead to Agoraphobia that should keep that Jackass at home to examine themselves for their own mistakes to become introspective and realign those potential misconceptions in fine-tuning the egotistic sources of their own preoccupation culminating in misperception and common human error."
New contributor
edited 19 mins ago
New contributor
answered 1 hour ago
AMERICANUM REX AUGUSTUS
12
12
New contributor
New contributor
This doesn't seem to answer the question, which is "Is there another word for this situation" (with the situation being "two people who are quite similar in some ways can really hate each other").
– Laurel
29 mins ago
add a comment |
This doesn't seem to answer the question, which is "Is there another word for this situation" (with the situation being "two people who are quite similar in some ways can really hate each other").
– Laurel
29 mins ago
This doesn't seem to answer the question, which is "Is there another word for this situation" (with the situation being "two people who are quite similar in some ways can really hate each other").
– Laurel
29 mins ago
This doesn't seem to answer the question, which is "Is there another word for this situation" (with the situation being "two people who are quite similar in some ways can really hate each other").
– Laurel
29 mins ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f52811%2fthe-jackass-syndrome%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown