HttpClient very slow with Windows Authentication











up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1












I have an internal corporate API that I am calling via an HttpClient from a dotnet core website. The API is hosted in an IIS website that has Windows Authentication turned on. Authentication in the API is performed via this scheme. However the web requests are incredibly slow because the challenge-response process performed by the HttpClient contains large gaps of around 0.4 seconds between the 401 response being received from the API server and the HttpClient sending a subsequent (successful) request with the requisite Authorization header.



The HttpClient is normally injected via an HttpClientFactory but for the sake of clarity here is the equivalent inline code (the problem exists however the HttpClient is instantiated):



using (HttpClient httpClient = new HttpClient(new HttpClientHandler() { UseDefaultCredentials = true }, true))
{
httpClient.BaseAddress = new System.Uri( "https://localhost:60491/myapi/api/Internal/");
var response = await httpClient.PutAsync(uri, content);

await ValidateResponseAsync(response);
}


On the server the logs then show a 0.4 second gap between the 401 response to the initial request and the next request with the Authorization header:




15:56:09.80114 [INF]
HTTP "PUT" "/api/Internal/Documents/989898989" responded 401 in 1.4533 ms.
User null



15:56:10.17185 [INF] Request
starting HTTP/1.1 PUT
http://localhost:60491/myapi/api/Internal/Documents/989898989
application/json 750




This is not a network-related issue as the website is local. I have performed exactly the same request via a web browser and the difference between the 401 being received by the browser and the next request is .001 seconds. For the entire PUT request (incorporating both the 401 and 204 responses) from the browser it takes 0.05 seconds and from the HttpClient 0.4 seconds. The performance difference is entirely attributable to the gap in sending the request with the Authorization header.



I can't use the PreAuthenticate flag on the HttpClientHandler as this is Uri-specific and my requests contain IDs that will differ between each one.



Does anyone have any ideas why this would be occurring and, better still, how to get round it?










share|improve this question






















  • When you access via the browser, are you signed on the same way as the program that is using HttpClient (e.g. are you using the service account and not your personal login account)? There are a number of settings that might differ, e.g. proxy settings. Also, consider getting a certificate, as the TLS validation for localhost might be failing and falling back. Either that or use http:-- adding https for a localhost connection doesn't actually improve your security footing.
    – John Wu
    Nov 22 at 20:43










  • The logins are the same in both cases. I have set UseProxy on the HttpClientHandler to false (no proxy is set up for the browser). The localhost website uses the ISS Express Development Certificate which is trusted. In any event this same behaviour occurs on our test servers too so it's not specific to my local environment,
    – strickt01
    Nov 23 at 10:01






  • 1




    You may have to set up WIreshark and watch the traffic. Put them side by side and look for differences. The browser could be performing some sort of caching or have some other trick to improve throughput.
    – John Wu
    Nov 23 at 10:08















up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1












I have an internal corporate API that I am calling via an HttpClient from a dotnet core website. The API is hosted in an IIS website that has Windows Authentication turned on. Authentication in the API is performed via this scheme. However the web requests are incredibly slow because the challenge-response process performed by the HttpClient contains large gaps of around 0.4 seconds between the 401 response being received from the API server and the HttpClient sending a subsequent (successful) request with the requisite Authorization header.



The HttpClient is normally injected via an HttpClientFactory but for the sake of clarity here is the equivalent inline code (the problem exists however the HttpClient is instantiated):



using (HttpClient httpClient = new HttpClient(new HttpClientHandler() { UseDefaultCredentials = true }, true))
{
httpClient.BaseAddress = new System.Uri( "https://localhost:60491/myapi/api/Internal/");
var response = await httpClient.PutAsync(uri, content);

await ValidateResponseAsync(response);
}


On the server the logs then show a 0.4 second gap between the 401 response to the initial request and the next request with the Authorization header:




15:56:09.80114 [INF]
HTTP "PUT" "/api/Internal/Documents/989898989" responded 401 in 1.4533 ms.
User null



15:56:10.17185 [INF] Request
starting HTTP/1.1 PUT
http://localhost:60491/myapi/api/Internal/Documents/989898989
application/json 750




This is not a network-related issue as the website is local. I have performed exactly the same request via a web browser and the difference between the 401 being received by the browser and the next request is .001 seconds. For the entire PUT request (incorporating both the 401 and 204 responses) from the browser it takes 0.05 seconds and from the HttpClient 0.4 seconds. The performance difference is entirely attributable to the gap in sending the request with the Authorization header.



I can't use the PreAuthenticate flag on the HttpClientHandler as this is Uri-specific and my requests contain IDs that will differ between each one.



Does anyone have any ideas why this would be occurring and, better still, how to get round it?










share|improve this question






















  • When you access via the browser, are you signed on the same way as the program that is using HttpClient (e.g. are you using the service account and not your personal login account)? There are a number of settings that might differ, e.g. proxy settings. Also, consider getting a certificate, as the TLS validation for localhost might be failing and falling back. Either that or use http:-- adding https for a localhost connection doesn't actually improve your security footing.
    – John Wu
    Nov 22 at 20:43










  • The logins are the same in both cases. I have set UseProxy on the HttpClientHandler to false (no proxy is set up for the browser). The localhost website uses the ISS Express Development Certificate which is trusted. In any event this same behaviour occurs on our test servers too so it's not specific to my local environment,
    – strickt01
    Nov 23 at 10:01






  • 1




    You may have to set up WIreshark and watch the traffic. Put them side by side and look for differences. The browser could be performing some sort of caching or have some other trick to improve throughput.
    – John Wu
    Nov 23 at 10:08













up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1






1





I have an internal corporate API that I am calling via an HttpClient from a dotnet core website. The API is hosted in an IIS website that has Windows Authentication turned on. Authentication in the API is performed via this scheme. However the web requests are incredibly slow because the challenge-response process performed by the HttpClient contains large gaps of around 0.4 seconds between the 401 response being received from the API server and the HttpClient sending a subsequent (successful) request with the requisite Authorization header.



The HttpClient is normally injected via an HttpClientFactory but for the sake of clarity here is the equivalent inline code (the problem exists however the HttpClient is instantiated):



using (HttpClient httpClient = new HttpClient(new HttpClientHandler() { UseDefaultCredentials = true }, true))
{
httpClient.BaseAddress = new System.Uri( "https://localhost:60491/myapi/api/Internal/");
var response = await httpClient.PutAsync(uri, content);

await ValidateResponseAsync(response);
}


On the server the logs then show a 0.4 second gap between the 401 response to the initial request and the next request with the Authorization header:




15:56:09.80114 [INF]
HTTP "PUT" "/api/Internal/Documents/989898989" responded 401 in 1.4533 ms.
User null



15:56:10.17185 [INF] Request
starting HTTP/1.1 PUT
http://localhost:60491/myapi/api/Internal/Documents/989898989
application/json 750




This is not a network-related issue as the website is local. I have performed exactly the same request via a web browser and the difference between the 401 being received by the browser and the next request is .001 seconds. For the entire PUT request (incorporating both the 401 and 204 responses) from the browser it takes 0.05 seconds and from the HttpClient 0.4 seconds. The performance difference is entirely attributable to the gap in sending the request with the Authorization header.



I can't use the PreAuthenticate flag on the HttpClientHandler as this is Uri-specific and my requests contain IDs that will differ between each one.



Does anyone have any ideas why this would be occurring and, better still, how to get round it?










share|improve this question













I have an internal corporate API that I am calling via an HttpClient from a dotnet core website. The API is hosted in an IIS website that has Windows Authentication turned on. Authentication in the API is performed via this scheme. However the web requests are incredibly slow because the challenge-response process performed by the HttpClient contains large gaps of around 0.4 seconds between the 401 response being received from the API server and the HttpClient sending a subsequent (successful) request with the requisite Authorization header.



The HttpClient is normally injected via an HttpClientFactory but for the sake of clarity here is the equivalent inline code (the problem exists however the HttpClient is instantiated):



using (HttpClient httpClient = new HttpClient(new HttpClientHandler() { UseDefaultCredentials = true }, true))
{
httpClient.BaseAddress = new System.Uri( "https://localhost:60491/myapi/api/Internal/");
var response = await httpClient.PutAsync(uri, content);

await ValidateResponseAsync(response);
}


On the server the logs then show a 0.4 second gap between the 401 response to the initial request and the next request with the Authorization header:




15:56:09.80114 [INF]
HTTP "PUT" "/api/Internal/Documents/989898989" responded 401 in 1.4533 ms.
User null



15:56:10.17185 [INF] Request
starting HTTP/1.1 PUT
http://localhost:60491/myapi/api/Internal/Documents/989898989
application/json 750




This is not a network-related issue as the website is local. I have performed exactly the same request via a web browser and the difference between the 401 being received by the browser and the next request is .001 seconds. For the entire PUT request (incorporating both the 401 and 204 responses) from the browser it takes 0.05 seconds and from the HttpClient 0.4 seconds. The performance difference is entirely attributable to the gap in sending the request with the Authorization header.



I can't use the PreAuthenticate flag on the HttpClientHandler as this is Uri-specific and my requests contain IDs that will differ between each one.



Does anyone have any ideas why this would be occurring and, better still, how to get round it?







c# iis asp.net-core windows-authentication dotnet-httpclient






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 22 at 17:01









strickt01

1,9081418




1,9081418












  • When you access via the browser, are you signed on the same way as the program that is using HttpClient (e.g. are you using the service account and not your personal login account)? There are a number of settings that might differ, e.g. proxy settings. Also, consider getting a certificate, as the TLS validation for localhost might be failing and falling back. Either that or use http:-- adding https for a localhost connection doesn't actually improve your security footing.
    – John Wu
    Nov 22 at 20:43










  • The logins are the same in both cases. I have set UseProxy on the HttpClientHandler to false (no proxy is set up for the browser). The localhost website uses the ISS Express Development Certificate which is trusted. In any event this same behaviour occurs on our test servers too so it's not specific to my local environment,
    – strickt01
    Nov 23 at 10:01






  • 1




    You may have to set up WIreshark and watch the traffic. Put them side by side and look for differences. The browser could be performing some sort of caching or have some other trick to improve throughput.
    – John Wu
    Nov 23 at 10:08


















  • When you access via the browser, are you signed on the same way as the program that is using HttpClient (e.g. are you using the service account and not your personal login account)? There are a number of settings that might differ, e.g. proxy settings. Also, consider getting a certificate, as the TLS validation for localhost might be failing and falling back. Either that or use http:-- adding https for a localhost connection doesn't actually improve your security footing.
    – John Wu
    Nov 22 at 20:43










  • The logins are the same in both cases. I have set UseProxy on the HttpClientHandler to false (no proxy is set up for the browser). The localhost website uses the ISS Express Development Certificate which is trusted. In any event this same behaviour occurs on our test servers too so it's not specific to my local environment,
    – strickt01
    Nov 23 at 10:01






  • 1




    You may have to set up WIreshark and watch the traffic. Put them side by side and look for differences. The browser could be performing some sort of caching or have some other trick to improve throughput.
    – John Wu
    Nov 23 at 10:08
















When you access via the browser, are you signed on the same way as the program that is using HttpClient (e.g. are you using the service account and not your personal login account)? There are a number of settings that might differ, e.g. proxy settings. Also, consider getting a certificate, as the TLS validation for localhost might be failing and falling back. Either that or use http:-- adding https for a localhost connection doesn't actually improve your security footing.
– John Wu
Nov 22 at 20:43




When you access via the browser, are you signed on the same way as the program that is using HttpClient (e.g. are you using the service account and not your personal login account)? There are a number of settings that might differ, e.g. proxy settings. Also, consider getting a certificate, as the TLS validation for localhost might be failing and falling back. Either that or use http:-- adding https for a localhost connection doesn't actually improve your security footing.
– John Wu
Nov 22 at 20:43












The logins are the same in both cases. I have set UseProxy on the HttpClientHandler to false (no proxy is set up for the browser). The localhost website uses the ISS Express Development Certificate which is trusted. In any event this same behaviour occurs on our test servers too so it's not specific to my local environment,
– strickt01
Nov 23 at 10:01




The logins are the same in both cases. I have set UseProxy on the HttpClientHandler to false (no proxy is set up for the browser). The localhost website uses the ISS Express Development Certificate which is trusted. In any event this same behaviour occurs on our test servers too so it's not specific to my local environment,
– strickt01
Nov 23 at 10:01




1




1




You may have to set up WIreshark and watch the traffic. Put them side by side and look for differences. The browser could be performing some sort of caching or have some other trick to improve throughput.
– John Wu
Nov 23 at 10:08




You may have to set up WIreshark and watch the traffic. Put them side by side and look for differences. The browser could be performing some sort of caching or have some other trick to improve throughput.
– John Wu
Nov 23 at 10:08












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote













By default HttpClientHandler has the property UseProxy enabled by default. I have run in to similar situations where it was trying to find a proxy using the system default setting, set to "auto configue proxy", adding significant delay.



When you initialize HttpClientHandler set UseProxy to false and it may make the problem go away.






share|improve this answer





















  • Hi Scott, thanks I thought this had fixed it but then saw that a flag had been set to authorize any request in the development environment so no 401 was being sent back upon the initial request. When I removed this and the 401 was returned then the 0.4 second delay occurred again between receiving the 401 and issuing the successful request with the Authorization header.
    – strickt01
    Nov 23 at 9:23


















up vote
0
down vote













Can't you just set a faster timeout?
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.net.http.httpclient.timeout?redirectedfrom=MSDN&view=netframework-4.7.2



I'm assuming somehow this gets encoded in the request as well as used internally in the client. I have read that .net Core httpClient is very slow in 2.0, much faster in 2.1, you could also check the proxy settings as this can be a problem in .Net Core httpClient.






share|improve this answer























  • It's not timing out though so I can't see how changing the Timeout property can help? The request is successful, just slow. I am using core 2.1 so it's not that either.
    – strickt01
    Nov 23 at 9:17










  • Can you see what's happening on the network with Telerik Fiddler or Wireshark?
    – Jeff Davies
    Nov 24 at 10:30


















up vote
-1
down vote













You should not be creating a new HttpClient per request, which is what your using statement is doing.



https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/web-api/overview/advanced/calling-a-web-api-from-a-net-client




HttpClient is intended to be instantiated once and reused throughout the life of an application.







share|improve this answer





















  • As I mention in my question, that is not the actual code that is running in the website. The HttpClient is in fact injected via an IHttpClientFactory set up by the DI and thus is not instantiated each time. I have merely used that code snippet for clarity to show the properties set up against the HttpClientHandler. Whether it is instantiated each time as per the code block or via the factory results in the same performance issue anyway.
    – strickt01
    Nov 22 at 17:47












  • My hunch would be try using Post instead of a Put, I've had similar issue with using PUT. Hope this helps
    – Utkarsh Bais
    Nov 22 at 23:16











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53435516%2fhttpclient-very-slow-with-windows-authentication%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
1
down vote













By default HttpClientHandler has the property UseProxy enabled by default. I have run in to similar situations where it was trying to find a proxy using the system default setting, set to "auto configue proxy", adding significant delay.



When you initialize HttpClientHandler set UseProxy to false and it may make the problem go away.






share|improve this answer





















  • Hi Scott, thanks I thought this had fixed it but then saw that a flag had been set to authorize any request in the development environment so no 401 was being sent back upon the initial request. When I removed this and the 401 was returned then the 0.4 second delay occurred again between receiving the 401 and issuing the successful request with the Authorization header.
    – strickt01
    Nov 23 at 9:23















up vote
1
down vote













By default HttpClientHandler has the property UseProxy enabled by default. I have run in to similar situations where it was trying to find a proxy using the system default setting, set to "auto configue proxy", adding significant delay.



When you initialize HttpClientHandler set UseProxy to false and it may make the problem go away.






share|improve this answer





















  • Hi Scott, thanks I thought this had fixed it but then saw that a flag had been set to authorize any request in the development environment so no 401 was being sent back upon the initial request. When I removed this and the 401 was returned then the 0.4 second delay occurred again between receiving the 401 and issuing the successful request with the Authorization header.
    – strickt01
    Nov 23 at 9:23













up vote
1
down vote










up vote
1
down vote









By default HttpClientHandler has the property UseProxy enabled by default. I have run in to similar situations where it was trying to find a proxy using the system default setting, set to "auto configue proxy", adding significant delay.



When you initialize HttpClientHandler set UseProxy to false and it may make the problem go away.






share|improve this answer












By default HttpClientHandler has the property UseProxy enabled by default. I have run in to similar situations where it was trying to find a proxy using the system default setting, set to "auto configue proxy", adding significant delay.



When you initialize HttpClientHandler set UseProxy to false and it may make the problem go away.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Nov 22 at 20:12









Scott Chamberlain

97.5k24177317




97.5k24177317












  • Hi Scott, thanks I thought this had fixed it but then saw that a flag had been set to authorize any request in the development environment so no 401 was being sent back upon the initial request. When I removed this and the 401 was returned then the 0.4 second delay occurred again between receiving the 401 and issuing the successful request with the Authorization header.
    – strickt01
    Nov 23 at 9:23


















  • Hi Scott, thanks I thought this had fixed it but then saw that a flag had been set to authorize any request in the development environment so no 401 was being sent back upon the initial request. When I removed this and the 401 was returned then the 0.4 second delay occurred again between receiving the 401 and issuing the successful request with the Authorization header.
    – strickt01
    Nov 23 at 9:23
















Hi Scott, thanks I thought this had fixed it but then saw that a flag had been set to authorize any request in the development environment so no 401 was being sent back upon the initial request. When I removed this and the 401 was returned then the 0.4 second delay occurred again between receiving the 401 and issuing the successful request with the Authorization header.
– strickt01
Nov 23 at 9:23




Hi Scott, thanks I thought this had fixed it but then saw that a flag had been set to authorize any request in the development environment so no 401 was being sent back upon the initial request. When I removed this and the 401 was returned then the 0.4 second delay occurred again between receiving the 401 and issuing the successful request with the Authorization header.
– strickt01
Nov 23 at 9:23












up vote
0
down vote













Can't you just set a faster timeout?
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.net.http.httpclient.timeout?redirectedfrom=MSDN&view=netframework-4.7.2



I'm assuming somehow this gets encoded in the request as well as used internally in the client. I have read that .net Core httpClient is very slow in 2.0, much faster in 2.1, you could also check the proxy settings as this can be a problem in .Net Core httpClient.






share|improve this answer























  • It's not timing out though so I can't see how changing the Timeout property can help? The request is successful, just slow. I am using core 2.1 so it's not that either.
    – strickt01
    Nov 23 at 9:17










  • Can you see what's happening on the network with Telerik Fiddler or Wireshark?
    – Jeff Davies
    Nov 24 at 10:30















up vote
0
down vote













Can't you just set a faster timeout?
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.net.http.httpclient.timeout?redirectedfrom=MSDN&view=netframework-4.7.2



I'm assuming somehow this gets encoded in the request as well as used internally in the client. I have read that .net Core httpClient is very slow in 2.0, much faster in 2.1, you could also check the proxy settings as this can be a problem in .Net Core httpClient.






share|improve this answer























  • It's not timing out though so I can't see how changing the Timeout property can help? The request is successful, just slow. I am using core 2.1 so it's not that either.
    – strickt01
    Nov 23 at 9:17










  • Can you see what's happening on the network with Telerik Fiddler or Wireshark?
    – Jeff Davies
    Nov 24 at 10:30













up vote
0
down vote










up vote
0
down vote









Can't you just set a faster timeout?
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.net.http.httpclient.timeout?redirectedfrom=MSDN&view=netframework-4.7.2



I'm assuming somehow this gets encoded in the request as well as used internally in the client. I have read that .net Core httpClient is very slow in 2.0, much faster in 2.1, you could also check the proxy settings as this can be a problem in .Net Core httpClient.






share|improve this answer














Can't you just set a faster timeout?
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.net.http.httpclient.timeout?redirectedfrom=MSDN&view=netframework-4.7.2



I'm assuming somehow this gets encoded in the request as well as used internally in the client. I have read that .net Core httpClient is very slow in 2.0, much faster in 2.1, you could also check the proxy settings as this can be a problem in .Net Core httpClient.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Nov 22 at 18:18

























answered Nov 22 at 18:06









Jeff Davies

458411




458411












  • It's not timing out though so I can't see how changing the Timeout property can help? The request is successful, just slow. I am using core 2.1 so it's not that either.
    – strickt01
    Nov 23 at 9:17










  • Can you see what's happening on the network with Telerik Fiddler or Wireshark?
    – Jeff Davies
    Nov 24 at 10:30


















  • It's not timing out though so I can't see how changing the Timeout property can help? The request is successful, just slow. I am using core 2.1 so it's not that either.
    – strickt01
    Nov 23 at 9:17










  • Can you see what's happening on the network with Telerik Fiddler or Wireshark?
    – Jeff Davies
    Nov 24 at 10:30
















It's not timing out though so I can't see how changing the Timeout property can help? The request is successful, just slow. I am using core 2.1 so it's not that either.
– strickt01
Nov 23 at 9:17




It's not timing out though so I can't see how changing the Timeout property can help? The request is successful, just slow. I am using core 2.1 so it's not that either.
– strickt01
Nov 23 at 9:17












Can you see what's happening on the network with Telerik Fiddler or Wireshark?
– Jeff Davies
Nov 24 at 10:30




Can you see what's happening on the network with Telerik Fiddler or Wireshark?
– Jeff Davies
Nov 24 at 10:30










up vote
-1
down vote













You should not be creating a new HttpClient per request, which is what your using statement is doing.



https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/web-api/overview/advanced/calling-a-web-api-from-a-net-client




HttpClient is intended to be instantiated once and reused throughout the life of an application.







share|improve this answer





















  • As I mention in my question, that is not the actual code that is running in the website. The HttpClient is in fact injected via an IHttpClientFactory set up by the DI and thus is not instantiated each time. I have merely used that code snippet for clarity to show the properties set up against the HttpClientHandler. Whether it is instantiated each time as per the code block or via the factory results in the same performance issue anyway.
    – strickt01
    Nov 22 at 17:47












  • My hunch would be try using Post instead of a Put, I've had similar issue with using PUT. Hope this helps
    – Utkarsh Bais
    Nov 22 at 23:16















up vote
-1
down vote













You should not be creating a new HttpClient per request, which is what your using statement is doing.



https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/web-api/overview/advanced/calling-a-web-api-from-a-net-client




HttpClient is intended to be instantiated once and reused throughout the life of an application.







share|improve this answer





















  • As I mention in my question, that is not the actual code that is running in the website. The HttpClient is in fact injected via an IHttpClientFactory set up by the DI and thus is not instantiated each time. I have merely used that code snippet for clarity to show the properties set up against the HttpClientHandler. Whether it is instantiated each time as per the code block or via the factory results in the same performance issue anyway.
    – strickt01
    Nov 22 at 17:47












  • My hunch would be try using Post instead of a Put, I've had similar issue with using PUT. Hope this helps
    – Utkarsh Bais
    Nov 22 at 23:16













up vote
-1
down vote










up vote
-1
down vote









You should not be creating a new HttpClient per request, which is what your using statement is doing.



https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/web-api/overview/advanced/calling-a-web-api-from-a-net-client




HttpClient is intended to be instantiated once and reused throughout the life of an application.







share|improve this answer












You should not be creating a new HttpClient per request, which is what your using statement is doing.



https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/web-api/overview/advanced/calling-a-web-api-from-a-net-client




HttpClient is intended to be instantiated once and reused throughout the life of an application.








share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Nov 22 at 17:34









Deepak

242




242












  • As I mention in my question, that is not the actual code that is running in the website. The HttpClient is in fact injected via an IHttpClientFactory set up by the DI and thus is not instantiated each time. I have merely used that code snippet for clarity to show the properties set up against the HttpClientHandler. Whether it is instantiated each time as per the code block or via the factory results in the same performance issue anyway.
    – strickt01
    Nov 22 at 17:47












  • My hunch would be try using Post instead of a Put, I've had similar issue with using PUT. Hope this helps
    – Utkarsh Bais
    Nov 22 at 23:16


















  • As I mention in my question, that is not the actual code that is running in the website. The HttpClient is in fact injected via an IHttpClientFactory set up by the DI and thus is not instantiated each time. I have merely used that code snippet for clarity to show the properties set up against the HttpClientHandler. Whether it is instantiated each time as per the code block or via the factory results in the same performance issue anyway.
    – strickt01
    Nov 22 at 17:47












  • My hunch would be try using Post instead of a Put, I've had similar issue with using PUT. Hope this helps
    – Utkarsh Bais
    Nov 22 at 23:16
















As I mention in my question, that is not the actual code that is running in the website. The HttpClient is in fact injected via an IHttpClientFactory set up by the DI and thus is not instantiated each time. I have merely used that code snippet for clarity to show the properties set up against the HttpClientHandler. Whether it is instantiated each time as per the code block or via the factory results in the same performance issue anyway.
– strickt01
Nov 22 at 17:47






As I mention in my question, that is not the actual code that is running in the website. The HttpClient is in fact injected via an IHttpClientFactory set up by the DI and thus is not instantiated each time. I have merely used that code snippet for clarity to show the properties set up against the HttpClientHandler. Whether it is instantiated each time as per the code block or via the factory results in the same performance issue anyway.
– strickt01
Nov 22 at 17:47














My hunch would be try using Post instead of a Put, I've had similar issue with using PUT. Hope this helps
– Utkarsh Bais
Nov 22 at 23:16




My hunch would be try using Post instead of a Put, I've had similar issue with using PUT. Hope this helps
– Utkarsh Bais
Nov 22 at 23:16


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53435516%2fhttpclient-very-slow-with-windows-authentication%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

What visual should I use to simply compare current year value vs last year in Power BI desktop

Alexandru Averescu

Trompette piccolo