Under what logic are Republicans able to say that the current American government shutdown “the...
The President and other Republicans have been casting blame on the Democrats for being responsible for the current government shutdown.
If Republicans have a majority in the House and the Senate, and also have control over the executive branch, how could it be possible that the Democrats are responsible for the shutdown?
I’m sure there is something that I am missing (certain vote percentages, loopholes, who knows).
united-states government-shutdown
New contributor
Trent the Gent is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
The President and other Republicans have been casting blame on the Democrats for being responsible for the current government shutdown.
If Republicans have a majority in the House and the Senate, and also have control over the executive branch, how could it be possible that the Democrats are responsible for the shutdown?
I’m sure there is something that I am missing (certain vote percentages, loopholes, who knows).
united-states government-shutdown
New contributor
Trent the Gent is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
It's not the first time a funding gap has occurred when the president, the senate majority, and house majority, are of all of the same political party: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
– Andrew Grimm
2 hours ago
add a comment |
The President and other Republicans have been casting blame on the Democrats for being responsible for the current government shutdown.
If Republicans have a majority in the House and the Senate, and also have control over the executive branch, how could it be possible that the Democrats are responsible for the shutdown?
I’m sure there is something that I am missing (certain vote percentages, loopholes, who knows).
united-states government-shutdown
New contributor
Trent the Gent is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
The President and other Republicans have been casting blame on the Democrats for being responsible for the current government shutdown.
If Republicans have a majority in the House and the Senate, and also have control over the executive branch, how could it be possible that the Democrats are responsible for the shutdown?
I’m sure there is something that I am missing (certain vote percentages, loopholes, who knows).
united-states government-shutdown
united-states government-shutdown
New contributor
Trent the Gent is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Trent the Gent is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 2 hours ago
Sjoerd
2,3681917
2,3681917
New contributor
Trent the Gent is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 4 hours ago
Trent the Gent
444
444
New contributor
Trent the Gent is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Trent the Gent is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Trent the Gent is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
It's not the first time a funding gap has occurred when the president, the senate majority, and house majority, are of all of the same political party: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
– Andrew Grimm
2 hours ago
add a comment |
It's not the first time a funding gap has occurred when the president, the senate majority, and house majority, are of all of the same political party: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
– Andrew Grimm
2 hours ago
It's not the first time a funding gap has occurred when the president, the senate majority, and house majority, are of all of the same political party: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
– Andrew Grimm
2 hours ago
It's not the first time a funding gap has occurred when the president, the senate majority, and house majority, are of all of the same political party: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
– Andrew Grimm
2 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Rather than trying to address the claim of who is to blame, I will give you timeline of events and let you decide for yourself who deserves how much of the blame.
19th December, 2018:
Senate passes with a vote of 100-0 a bi-partisan short-term spending bill without funding for Trump's wall. Bill is expected to pass the House and be signed by the President. [1]
Fox and Friends, Rush Limbaugh, and Ann Coulter criticize Trump for "folding" on the wall. [2]
20th December, 2018:
The president informed us that he will not sign the bill that came up from the Senate last evening because of his legitimate concerns for border security.
-- Speaker of the House Paul Ryan (R)
Instead of voting on the bill the Senate passed, the House with Paul Ryan (R) as Speaker passes a spending bill with $5 billion in border wall funding. Bill is not expected to pass the Senate, and ultimately does fail in the Senate, where 60 votes is needed and Republicans only had 51 seats. [3] [4]
3rd January, 2019:
The new House of Representatives with Nancy Pelosi as Speaker (Democrat) passes a bill mirroring the one that passed the Senate. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnel (R) blocks the bill in the Senate, saying he will not bring a bill to vote without the president's approval. [5]
Thanks, this is the type of answer is was hoping for. The 60% vote is specific to funding votes?
– Trent the Gent
3 hours ago
@TBone see my answer below. "Also, almost all bills in the Senate require 60 senators to invoke "cloture" in order to end debate and vote. Bills that fail to receive cloture are "filibustered[.]""
– Andrew
3 hours ago
@Andrew only because there is bipartisan cowardice against forcing the opposing side to actually filibuster.
– Drunk Cynic
1 hour ago
add a comment |
I’m sure there is something that I am missing (certain vote percentages, loopholes, who knows), but to me the logic seems that if Republicans had the ability to pass the funding measure and then didn’t, wouldn’t the shutdown be the Republicans fault?
I think there are a couple things: first, the new Democratic majority; and second, the filibuster/cloture process in the Senate.
Yesterday (3 Jan.) was the first day of the 116th Congress. As of yesterday, the Democrats have a majority in the House (235 to 199, one disputed seat) and the Republicans have a majority in the Senate (53 to 47). At this point and going forward, both parties bear responsibility for passing or failing to pass spending bills.
However, before yesterday, the Republicans had a 236 to 196 majority in the House (three vacant seats) and a 51 to 49 majority in the Senate. In December, the (Republican) House passed a spending bill with funding for the president's proposed border wall. The Senate unanimously passed an alternative short-term spending measure without border wall funding, which the president then threatened to veto. Following that, the Senate Majority Leader stated that he would not support (or presumably schedule a vote for) any bill that the president threatened to veto.
Also, almost all bills in the Senate require 60 senators to invoke "cloture" in order to end debate and vote. Bills that fail to receive cloture are "filibustered," and given that Senate Republicans had an extremely slim majority in the last Congress, invoking cloture against a united Democratic conference was quite tough. Even in the new Congress, invoking cloture will be tricky for polarizing legislation (e.g. anything dealing with "the wall"), albeit marginally easier for the Republicans than in the last Congress.
In my opinion, anyone who assigns blame or responsibility for the shutdown to one party exclusively is trying to spin the facts to fit a partisan or ideological narrative. How you assign blame depends on your personal beliefs, what you think about the majorities in Congress and what you think about the filibuster.
New contributor
Andrew is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
If Republicans have a majority in the House and the Senate, and also have control over the executive branch, how could it be possible that the Democrats are responsible for the shutdown?
Answer: The Republicans' majority in the Senate isn't large enough.
In order to end debating a bill, 60 senators have to agree to start voting. Because the Republicans only held either 51 (just before the 2018 election) or 53 (after the 2018 election), the Democrats have enough votes to continue debating certain bills forever. This is known as 'filibusting' a bill.
As a result, the Republicans were not able to pass a bill that included the requested money for a border wall, even when they had majorities in both chambers of Congress.
1
This answer doesn't seem to add anything not covered by the existing answers.
– CrackpotCrocodile
1 hour ago
@CrackpotCrocodile It's much shorter than the other ones. Listing which bills have passed doesn't answer why funding for a wall hasn't passed yet.
– Sjoerd
3 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "475"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Trent the Gent is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f37680%2funder-what-logic-are-republicans-able-to-say-that-the-current-american-governmen%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Rather than trying to address the claim of who is to blame, I will give you timeline of events and let you decide for yourself who deserves how much of the blame.
19th December, 2018:
Senate passes with a vote of 100-0 a bi-partisan short-term spending bill without funding for Trump's wall. Bill is expected to pass the House and be signed by the President. [1]
Fox and Friends, Rush Limbaugh, and Ann Coulter criticize Trump for "folding" on the wall. [2]
20th December, 2018:
The president informed us that he will not sign the bill that came up from the Senate last evening because of his legitimate concerns for border security.
-- Speaker of the House Paul Ryan (R)
Instead of voting on the bill the Senate passed, the House with Paul Ryan (R) as Speaker passes a spending bill with $5 billion in border wall funding. Bill is not expected to pass the Senate, and ultimately does fail in the Senate, where 60 votes is needed and Republicans only had 51 seats. [3] [4]
3rd January, 2019:
The new House of Representatives with Nancy Pelosi as Speaker (Democrat) passes a bill mirroring the one that passed the Senate. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnel (R) blocks the bill in the Senate, saying he will not bring a bill to vote without the president's approval. [5]
Thanks, this is the type of answer is was hoping for. The 60% vote is specific to funding votes?
– Trent the Gent
3 hours ago
@TBone see my answer below. "Also, almost all bills in the Senate require 60 senators to invoke "cloture" in order to end debate and vote. Bills that fail to receive cloture are "filibustered[.]""
– Andrew
3 hours ago
@Andrew only because there is bipartisan cowardice against forcing the opposing side to actually filibuster.
– Drunk Cynic
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Rather than trying to address the claim of who is to blame, I will give you timeline of events and let you decide for yourself who deserves how much of the blame.
19th December, 2018:
Senate passes with a vote of 100-0 a bi-partisan short-term spending bill without funding for Trump's wall. Bill is expected to pass the House and be signed by the President. [1]
Fox and Friends, Rush Limbaugh, and Ann Coulter criticize Trump for "folding" on the wall. [2]
20th December, 2018:
The president informed us that he will not sign the bill that came up from the Senate last evening because of his legitimate concerns for border security.
-- Speaker of the House Paul Ryan (R)
Instead of voting on the bill the Senate passed, the House with Paul Ryan (R) as Speaker passes a spending bill with $5 billion in border wall funding. Bill is not expected to pass the Senate, and ultimately does fail in the Senate, where 60 votes is needed and Republicans only had 51 seats. [3] [4]
3rd January, 2019:
The new House of Representatives with Nancy Pelosi as Speaker (Democrat) passes a bill mirroring the one that passed the Senate. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnel (R) blocks the bill in the Senate, saying he will not bring a bill to vote without the president's approval. [5]
Thanks, this is the type of answer is was hoping for. The 60% vote is specific to funding votes?
– Trent the Gent
3 hours ago
@TBone see my answer below. "Also, almost all bills in the Senate require 60 senators to invoke "cloture" in order to end debate and vote. Bills that fail to receive cloture are "filibustered[.]""
– Andrew
3 hours ago
@Andrew only because there is bipartisan cowardice against forcing the opposing side to actually filibuster.
– Drunk Cynic
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Rather than trying to address the claim of who is to blame, I will give you timeline of events and let you decide for yourself who deserves how much of the blame.
19th December, 2018:
Senate passes with a vote of 100-0 a bi-partisan short-term spending bill without funding for Trump's wall. Bill is expected to pass the House and be signed by the President. [1]
Fox and Friends, Rush Limbaugh, and Ann Coulter criticize Trump for "folding" on the wall. [2]
20th December, 2018:
The president informed us that he will not sign the bill that came up from the Senate last evening because of his legitimate concerns for border security.
-- Speaker of the House Paul Ryan (R)
Instead of voting on the bill the Senate passed, the House with Paul Ryan (R) as Speaker passes a spending bill with $5 billion in border wall funding. Bill is not expected to pass the Senate, and ultimately does fail in the Senate, where 60 votes is needed and Republicans only had 51 seats. [3] [4]
3rd January, 2019:
The new House of Representatives with Nancy Pelosi as Speaker (Democrat) passes a bill mirroring the one that passed the Senate. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnel (R) blocks the bill in the Senate, saying he will not bring a bill to vote without the president's approval. [5]
Rather than trying to address the claim of who is to blame, I will give you timeline of events and let you decide for yourself who deserves how much of the blame.
19th December, 2018:
Senate passes with a vote of 100-0 a bi-partisan short-term spending bill without funding for Trump's wall. Bill is expected to pass the House and be signed by the President. [1]
Fox and Friends, Rush Limbaugh, and Ann Coulter criticize Trump for "folding" on the wall. [2]
20th December, 2018:
The president informed us that he will not sign the bill that came up from the Senate last evening because of his legitimate concerns for border security.
-- Speaker of the House Paul Ryan (R)
Instead of voting on the bill the Senate passed, the House with Paul Ryan (R) as Speaker passes a spending bill with $5 billion in border wall funding. Bill is not expected to pass the Senate, and ultimately does fail in the Senate, where 60 votes is needed and Republicans only had 51 seats. [3] [4]
3rd January, 2019:
The new House of Representatives with Nancy Pelosi as Speaker (Democrat) passes a bill mirroring the one that passed the Senate. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnel (R) blocks the bill in the Senate, saying he will not bring a bill to vote without the president's approval. [5]
edited 1 hour ago
Martin Tournoij
6,19133866
6,19133866
answered 3 hours ago
Alexander O'Mara
2,00511020
2,00511020
Thanks, this is the type of answer is was hoping for. The 60% vote is specific to funding votes?
– Trent the Gent
3 hours ago
@TBone see my answer below. "Also, almost all bills in the Senate require 60 senators to invoke "cloture" in order to end debate and vote. Bills that fail to receive cloture are "filibustered[.]""
– Andrew
3 hours ago
@Andrew only because there is bipartisan cowardice against forcing the opposing side to actually filibuster.
– Drunk Cynic
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Thanks, this is the type of answer is was hoping for. The 60% vote is specific to funding votes?
– Trent the Gent
3 hours ago
@TBone see my answer below. "Also, almost all bills in the Senate require 60 senators to invoke "cloture" in order to end debate and vote. Bills that fail to receive cloture are "filibustered[.]""
– Andrew
3 hours ago
@Andrew only because there is bipartisan cowardice against forcing the opposing side to actually filibuster.
– Drunk Cynic
1 hour ago
Thanks, this is the type of answer is was hoping for. The 60% vote is specific to funding votes?
– Trent the Gent
3 hours ago
Thanks, this is the type of answer is was hoping for. The 60% vote is specific to funding votes?
– Trent the Gent
3 hours ago
@TBone see my answer below. "Also, almost all bills in the Senate require 60 senators to invoke "cloture" in order to end debate and vote. Bills that fail to receive cloture are "filibustered[.]""
– Andrew
3 hours ago
@TBone see my answer below. "Also, almost all bills in the Senate require 60 senators to invoke "cloture" in order to end debate and vote. Bills that fail to receive cloture are "filibustered[.]""
– Andrew
3 hours ago
@Andrew only because there is bipartisan cowardice against forcing the opposing side to actually filibuster.
– Drunk Cynic
1 hour ago
@Andrew only because there is bipartisan cowardice against forcing the opposing side to actually filibuster.
– Drunk Cynic
1 hour ago
add a comment |
I’m sure there is something that I am missing (certain vote percentages, loopholes, who knows), but to me the logic seems that if Republicans had the ability to pass the funding measure and then didn’t, wouldn’t the shutdown be the Republicans fault?
I think there are a couple things: first, the new Democratic majority; and second, the filibuster/cloture process in the Senate.
Yesterday (3 Jan.) was the first day of the 116th Congress. As of yesterday, the Democrats have a majority in the House (235 to 199, one disputed seat) and the Republicans have a majority in the Senate (53 to 47). At this point and going forward, both parties bear responsibility for passing or failing to pass spending bills.
However, before yesterday, the Republicans had a 236 to 196 majority in the House (three vacant seats) and a 51 to 49 majority in the Senate. In December, the (Republican) House passed a spending bill with funding for the president's proposed border wall. The Senate unanimously passed an alternative short-term spending measure without border wall funding, which the president then threatened to veto. Following that, the Senate Majority Leader stated that he would not support (or presumably schedule a vote for) any bill that the president threatened to veto.
Also, almost all bills in the Senate require 60 senators to invoke "cloture" in order to end debate and vote. Bills that fail to receive cloture are "filibustered," and given that Senate Republicans had an extremely slim majority in the last Congress, invoking cloture against a united Democratic conference was quite tough. Even in the new Congress, invoking cloture will be tricky for polarizing legislation (e.g. anything dealing with "the wall"), albeit marginally easier for the Republicans than in the last Congress.
In my opinion, anyone who assigns blame or responsibility for the shutdown to one party exclusively is trying to spin the facts to fit a partisan or ideological narrative. How you assign blame depends on your personal beliefs, what you think about the majorities in Congress and what you think about the filibuster.
New contributor
Andrew is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
I’m sure there is something that I am missing (certain vote percentages, loopholes, who knows), but to me the logic seems that if Republicans had the ability to pass the funding measure and then didn’t, wouldn’t the shutdown be the Republicans fault?
I think there are a couple things: first, the new Democratic majority; and second, the filibuster/cloture process in the Senate.
Yesterday (3 Jan.) was the first day of the 116th Congress. As of yesterday, the Democrats have a majority in the House (235 to 199, one disputed seat) and the Republicans have a majority in the Senate (53 to 47). At this point and going forward, both parties bear responsibility for passing or failing to pass spending bills.
However, before yesterday, the Republicans had a 236 to 196 majority in the House (three vacant seats) and a 51 to 49 majority in the Senate. In December, the (Republican) House passed a spending bill with funding for the president's proposed border wall. The Senate unanimously passed an alternative short-term spending measure without border wall funding, which the president then threatened to veto. Following that, the Senate Majority Leader stated that he would not support (or presumably schedule a vote for) any bill that the president threatened to veto.
Also, almost all bills in the Senate require 60 senators to invoke "cloture" in order to end debate and vote. Bills that fail to receive cloture are "filibustered," and given that Senate Republicans had an extremely slim majority in the last Congress, invoking cloture against a united Democratic conference was quite tough. Even in the new Congress, invoking cloture will be tricky for polarizing legislation (e.g. anything dealing with "the wall"), albeit marginally easier for the Republicans than in the last Congress.
In my opinion, anyone who assigns blame or responsibility for the shutdown to one party exclusively is trying to spin the facts to fit a partisan or ideological narrative. How you assign blame depends on your personal beliefs, what you think about the majorities in Congress and what you think about the filibuster.
New contributor
Andrew is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
I’m sure there is something that I am missing (certain vote percentages, loopholes, who knows), but to me the logic seems that if Republicans had the ability to pass the funding measure and then didn’t, wouldn’t the shutdown be the Republicans fault?
I think there are a couple things: first, the new Democratic majority; and second, the filibuster/cloture process in the Senate.
Yesterday (3 Jan.) was the first day of the 116th Congress. As of yesterday, the Democrats have a majority in the House (235 to 199, one disputed seat) and the Republicans have a majority in the Senate (53 to 47). At this point and going forward, both parties bear responsibility for passing or failing to pass spending bills.
However, before yesterday, the Republicans had a 236 to 196 majority in the House (three vacant seats) and a 51 to 49 majority in the Senate. In December, the (Republican) House passed a spending bill with funding for the president's proposed border wall. The Senate unanimously passed an alternative short-term spending measure without border wall funding, which the president then threatened to veto. Following that, the Senate Majority Leader stated that he would not support (or presumably schedule a vote for) any bill that the president threatened to veto.
Also, almost all bills in the Senate require 60 senators to invoke "cloture" in order to end debate and vote. Bills that fail to receive cloture are "filibustered," and given that Senate Republicans had an extremely slim majority in the last Congress, invoking cloture against a united Democratic conference was quite tough. Even in the new Congress, invoking cloture will be tricky for polarizing legislation (e.g. anything dealing with "the wall"), albeit marginally easier for the Republicans than in the last Congress.
In my opinion, anyone who assigns blame or responsibility for the shutdown to one party exclusively is trying to spin the facts to fit a partisan or ideological narrative. How you assign blame depends on your personal beliefs, what you think about the majorities in Congress and what you think about the filibuster.
New contributor
Andrew is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I’m sure there is something that I am missing (certain vote percentages, loopholes, who knows), but to me the logic seems that if Republicans had the ability to pass the funding measure and then didn’t, wouldn’t the shutdown be the Republicans fault?
I think there are a couple things: first, the new Democratic majority; and second, the filibuster/cloture process in the Senate.
Yesterday (3 Jan.) was the first day of the 116th Congress. As of yesterday, the Democrats have a majority in the House (235 to 199, one disputed seat) and the Republicans have a majority in the Senate (53 to 47). At this point and going forward, both parties bear responsibility for passing or failing to pass spending bills.
However, before yesterday, the Republicans had a 236 to 196 majority in the House (three vacant seats) and a 51 to 49 majority in the Senate. In December, the (Republican) House passed a spending bill with funding for the president's proposed border wall. The Senate unanimously passed an alternative short-term spending measure without border wall funding, which the president then threatened to veto. Following that, the Senate Majority Leader stated that he would not support (or presumably schedule a vote for) any bill that the president threatened to veto.
Also, almost all bills in the Senate require 60 senators to invoke "cloture" in order to end debate and vote. Bills that fail to receive cloture are "filibustered," and given that Senate Republicans had an extremely slim majority in the last Congress, invoking cloture against a united Democratic conference was quite tough. Even in the new Congress, invoking cloture will be tricky for polarizing legislation (e.g. anything dealing with "the wall"), albeit marginally easier for the Republicans than in the last Congress.
In my opinion, anyone who assigns blame or responsibility for the shutdown to one party exclusively is trying to spin the facts to fit a partisan or ideological narrative. How you assign blame depends on your personal beliefs, what you think about the majorities in Congress and what you think about the filibuster.
New contributor
Andrew is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Andrew is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 3 hours ago
Andrew
43216
43216
New contributor
Andrew is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Andrew is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Andrew is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
If Republicans have a majority in the House and the Senate, and also have control over the executive branch, how could it be possible that the Democrats are responsible for the shutdown?
Answer: The Republicans' majority in the Senate isn't large enough.
In order to end debating a bill, 60 senators have to agree to start voting. Because the Republicans only held either 51 (just before the 2018 election) or 53 (after the 2018 election), the Democrats have enough votes to continue debating certain bills forever. This is known as 'filibusting' a bill.
As a result, the Republicans were not able to pass a bill that included the requested money for a border wall, even when they had majorities in both chambers of Congress.
1
This answer doesn't seem to add anything not covered by the existing answers.
– CrackpotCrocodile
1 hour ago
@CrackpotCrocodile It's much shorter than the other ones. Listing which bills have passed doesn't answer why funding for a wall hasn't passed yet.
– Sjoerd
3 mins ago
add a comment |
If Republicans have a majority in the House and the Senate, and also have control over the executive branch, how could it be possible that the Democrats are responsible for the shutdown?
Answer: The Republicans' majority in the Senate isn't large enough.
In order to end debating a bill, 60 senators have to agree to start voting. Because the Republicans only held either 51 (just before the 2018 election) or 53 (after the 2018 election), the Democrats have enough votes to continue debating certain bills forever. This is known as 'filibusting' a bill.
As a result, the Republicans were not able to pass a bill that included the requested money for a border wall, even when they had majorities in both chambers of Congress.
1
This answer doesn't seem to add anything not covered by the existing answers.
– CrackpotCrocodile
1 hour ago
@CrackpotCrocodile It's much shorter than the other ones. Listing which bills have passed doesn't answer why funding for a wall hasn't passed yet.
– Sjoerd
3 mins ago
add a comment |
If Republicans have a majority in the House and the Senate, and also have control over the executive branch, how could it be possible that the Democrats are responsible for the shutdown?
Answer: The Republicans' majority in the Senate isn't large enough.
In order to end debating a bill, 60 senators have to agree to start voting. Because the Republicans only held either 51 (just before the 2018 election) or 53 (after the 2018 election), the Democrats have enough votes to continue debating certain bills forever. This is known as 'filibusting' a bill.
As a result, the Republicans were not able to pass a bill that included the requested money for a border wall, even when they had majorities in both chambers of Congress.
If Republicans have a majority in the House and the Senate, and also have control over the executive branch, how could it be possible that the Democrats are responsible for the shutdown?
Answer: The Republicans' majority in the Senate isn't large enough.
In order to end debating a bill, 60 senators have to agree to start voting. Because the Republicans only held either 51 (just before the 2018 election) or 53 (after the 2018 election), the Democrats have enough votes to continue debating certain bills forever. This is known as 'filibusting' a bill.
As a result, the Republicans were not able to pass a bill that included the requested money for a border wall, even when they had majorities in both chambers of Congress.
answered 2 hours ago
Sjoerd
2,3681917
2,3681917
1
This answer doesn't seem to add anything not covered by the existing answers.
– CrackpotCrocodile
1 hour ago
@CrackpotCrocodile It's much shorter than the other ones. Listing which bills have passed doesn't answer why funding for a wall hasn't passed yet.
– Sjoerd
3 mins ago
add a comment |
1
This answer doesn't seem to add anything not covered by the existing answers.
– CrackpotCrocodile
1 hour ago
@CrackpotCrocodile It's much shorter than the other ones. Listing which bills have passed doesn't answer why funding for a wall hasn't passed yet.
– Sjoerd
3 mins ago
1
1
This answer doesn't seem to add anything not covered by the existing answers.
– CrackpotCrocodile
1 hour ago
This answer doesn't seem to add anything not covered by the existing answers.
– CrackpotCrocodile
1 hour ago
@CrackpotCrocodile It's much shorter than the other ones. Listing which bills have passed doesn't answer why funding for a wall hasn't passed yet.
– Sjoerd
3 mins ago
@CrackpotCrocodile It's much shorter than the other ones. Listing which bills have passed doesn't answer why funding for a wall hasn't passed yet.
– Sjoerd
3 mins ago
add a comment |
Trent the Gent is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Trent the Gent is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Trent the Gent is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Trent the Gent is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Politics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f37680%2funder-what-logic-are-republicans-able-to-say-that-the-current-american-governmen%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
It's not the first time a funding gap has occurred when the president, the senate majority, and house majority, are of all of the same political party: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
– Andrew Grimm
2 hours ago