Jackson: Property can be raw, arbitrary object or POJO












0














Let's say I use Jackson to serialize and deserialize POJOs. I have a number of classes like this:



class Foo {

    String field1;

    Bar field2;

    // ...

    Baz baz;

}


Where baz is a large JSON object that I receive from an external system. I want to use Foo in three different ways:




  1. Serialize Foo and include baz without even bothering to parse it, as if I had declared it as @JsonRawValue String baz.

  2. Pretty-print Foo and include baz just like I received it except pretty-printed, as if I had declared it as Map<String, Object> baz.

  3. Pass Foo to my business logic, with baz deserialized to a POJO, as in the code above.


One way to do this would be to declare three classes, with the baz field declared in three different ways. I could also combine 2) and 3) into a single class with @JsonAnySetter and @JsonAnyGetter to capture any properties I don't recognize.



But is there a clean way to support all the three use cases above while declaring just a single Foo class?






jackson







share|improve this question



























    0














    Let's say I use Jackson to serialize and deserialize POJOs. I have a number of classes like this:



    class Foo {
    
    String field1;
    
    Bar field2;
    
    // ...
    
    Baz baz;
    
}


    Where baz is a large JSON object that I receive from an external system. I want to use Foo in three different ways:




    1. Serialize Foo and include baz without even bothering to parse it, as if I had declared it as @JsonRawValue String baz.

    2. Pretty-print Foo and include baz just like I received it except pretty-printed, as if I had declared it as Map<String, Object> baz.

    3. Pass Foo to my business logic, with baz deserialized to a POJO, as in the code above.


    One way to do this would be to declare three classes, with the baz field declared in three different ways. I could also combine 2) and 3) into a single class with @JsonAnySetter and @JsonAnyGetter to capture any properties I don't recognize.



    But is there a clean way to support all the three use cases above while declaring just a single Foo class?






    jackson







    share|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0







      Let's say I use Jackson to serialize and deserialize POJOs. I have a number of classes like this:



      class Foo {
      
    String field1;
      
    Bar field2;
      
    // ...
      
    Baz baz;
      
}


      Where baz is a large JSON object that I receive from an external system. I want to use Foo in three different ways:




      1. Serialize Foo and include baz without even bothering to parse it, as if I had declared it as @JsonRawValue String baz.

      2. Pretty-print Foo and include baz just like I received it except pretty-printed, as if I had declared it as Map<String, Object> baz.

      3. Pass Foo to my business logic, with baz deserialized to a POJO, as in the code above.


      One way to do this would be to declare three classes, with the baz field declared in three different ways. I could also combine 2) and 3) into a single class with @JsonAnySetter and @JsonAnyGetter to capture any properties I don't recognize.



      But is there a clean way to support all the three use cases above while declaring just a single Foo class?






      jackson







      share|improve this question













      Let's say I use Jackson to serialize and deserialize POJOs. I have a number of classes like this:



      class Foo {
      
    String field1;
      
    Bar field2;
      
    // ...
      
    Baz baz;
      
}


      Where baz is a large JSON object that I receive from an external system. I want to use Foo in three different ways:




      1. Serialize Foo and include baz without even bothering to parse it, as if I had declared it as @JsonRawValue String baz.

      2. Pretty-print Foo and include baz just like I received it except pretty-printed, as if I had declared it as Map<String, Object> baz.

      3. Pass Foo to my business logic, with baz deserialized to a POJO, as in the code above.


      One way to do this would be to declare three classes, with the baz field declared in three different ways. I could also combine 2) and 3) into a single class with @JsonAnySetter and @JsonAnyGetter to capture any properties I don't recognize.



      But is there a clean way to support all the three use cases above while declaring just a single Foo class?






      jackson




      jackson






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 23 '18 at 8:35









      Aapo Laitinen

      371210




      371210
























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53443129%2fjackson-property-can-be-raw-arbitrary-object-or-pojo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid …



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid …



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53443129%2fjackson-property-can-be-raw-arbitrary-object-or-pojo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          -

          Popular posts from this blog

          Héron pourpré

          Image
          .mw-parser-output h1 #sous_titre_h1{display:block;font-size:0.7em;line-height:1.3em;margin:0.2em 0 0.1em 0.5em} Ardea purpurea Ardea purpurea Ardea purpurea - Tarn Classification (COI) Règne Animalia Embranchement Chordata Sous-embr. Vertebrata Classe Aves Ordre Pelecaniformes Famille Ardeidae Genre Ardea Nom binominal Ardea purpurea Linnaeus, 1766 Répartition géographique     ////   zone de nidification     ////   résident permanent     ////   non nicheur Statut de conservation UICN LC  : Préoccupation mineure Le Héron pourpré ( Ardea purpurea Linnaeus, 1766) est une espèce d'oiseaux de la famille des Ardeidae. C'est un oiseau migrateur présent et nicheur en Europe et Afrique du Nord, hivernant occasionnellement en Europe de l'Ouest et du sud, protégé. Chants et appels Enregistrement 1 : Enregistrement 2 : Écouter le Héron pourpré sur xeno-canto Sommaire 1 Description...
          Read more

          How to ignore python UserWarning in pytest?

          Image
          up vote 1 down vote favorite I am using openpyxl for parsing .xlsm files, and pytest for testing. When I open a file, I get the: OpenPyxl -> UserWarning: Data Validation extension is not supported and will be removed That is not really a problem bcs. program works and I can't change the .xlsm file to fix that. But... When I run pytest with something like: def test_wrong_file_format(): assert check_excel(open_excel('file.xlsm')) == True I will get the warning i mentioned altought check_excel(open_excel('file.xlsm')) returns True and the test should suceed... Is there a nice way to tell the pytest that "It's not a bug it's a feature" and tests should pass even when they get this warning? Is there other way than using something like: with pytest.warns(UserWarning): ...
          Read more

          What visual should I use to simply compare current year value vs last year in Power BI desktop

          Image
          0 I have column SubToBind that shows current year ratio and column PY SubToBind which shows previous year ratio. How can I simply create a card that would be displaying them both in a nice way? Something like that: I cannot achieve that with regular card, I also tried Card with States by OKViz but also unable to see both values. In KPI visual - I dont like the word "Goal", it will confuse end users. Are there any cards or other visuals that would do the job? Thanks powerbi dax powerbi-embedded share | improve this question edited Jun 11 '18 at 20:11 Oleg ...
          Read more