Why do ash (trees) and ash (burnt residue) have the same name?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}






up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1












I've often wondered why ash (trees) and ash (burnt residue) have the same name.





I've looked up the origin of both words, but I don't see anything that explains why the names are the same.



From the Online Etymology Dictionary:




ash (n.1)



"powdery remains of fire," Old English æsce "ash," from
Proto-Germanic * askon (source also of Old Norse and Swedish aska, Old
High German asca, German asche, Middle Dutch asche, Gothic azgo
"ashes"), from PIE root *as- "to burn, glow." Spanish and Portuguese
ascua "red-hot coal" are Germanic loan-words.



An ancient symbol of grief or repentance; hence Ash Wednesday (c.
1300), from custom introduced by Pope Gregory the Great of sprinkling
ashes on the heads of penitents on the first day of Lent. Ashes
meaning "mortal remains of a person" is late 13c., in reference to the
ancient custom of cremation. Meaning "Finely pulverized lava thrown
from a volcano" is from 1660s.



ash (n.2)



popular name of a common type of forest tree of Eurasia, North
America, and North Africa, Old English æsc "ash tree," from
Proto-Germanic * askaz, * askiz (source also of Old Norse askr, Old
Saxon ask, Middle Dutch esce, German Esche), from PIE root * os- "ash
tree" (source also of Armenian haci "ash tree," Albanian ah "beech,"
Greek oxya "beech," Latin ornus "wild mountain ash," Russian jasen,
Lithuanian uosis "ash").



The close-grained wood of the ash is tough and elastic, and it was the
preferred wood for spear-shafts, so Old English æsc sometimes meant
"spear," as in æsc-here "company armed with spears," æsc-plega "war,"
literally "spear-play." Æsc also was the name of the Old English runic
letter that begins the word.






I understand that words can be homonyms, which are words that have the same spelling but different meanings and origins.



However, the fact that both words are related to wood makes me think that it might not be a mere coincidence.



Is there a reason why ash (trees) and ash (burnt residue) have the same name?










share|improve this question




















  • 4




    I feel like you've answered your own question. It is probably just coincidence if the Online Etymology Dictionary has them coming from different PIE roots, and they are different words (though similar) in most other Germanic languages.
    – Tim Foster
    11 hours ago










  • @Wilson You might be be better off editing your question to use proper text for your quote rather than a screenshot image. It'll help people find your question... and possibly even answer it.
    – tmgr
    8 hours ago

















up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1












I've often wondered why ash (trees) and ash (burnt residue) have the same name.





I've looked up the origin of both words, but I don't see anything that explains why the names are the same.



From the Online Etymology Dictionary:




ash (n.1)



"powdery remains of fire," Old English æsce "ash," from
Proto-Germanic * askon (source also of Old Norse and Swedish aska, Old
High German asca, German asche, Middle Dutch asche, Gothic azgo
"ashes"), from PIE root *as- "to burn, glow." Spanish and Portuguese
ascua "red-hot coal" are Germanic loan-words.



An ancient symbol of grief or repentance; hence Ash Wednesday (c.
1300), from custom introduced by Pope Gregory the Great of sprinkling
ashes on the heads of penitents on the first day of Lent. Ashes
meaning "mortal remains of a person" is late 13c., in reference to the
ancient custom of cremation. Meaning "Finely pulverized lava thrown
from a volcano" is from 1660s.



ash (n.2)



popular name of a common type of forest tree of Eurasia, North
America, and North Africa, Old English æsc "ash tree," from
Proto-Germanic * askaz, * askiz (source also of Old Norse askr, Old
Saxon ask, Middle Dutch esce, German Esche), from PIE root * os- "ash
tree" (source also of Armenian haci "ash tree," Albanian ah "beech,"
Greek oxya "beech," Latin ornus "wild mountain ash," Russian jasen,
Lithuanian uosis "ash").



The close-grained wood of the ash is tough and elastic, and it was the
preferred wood for spear-shafts, so Old English æsc sometimes meant
"spear," as in æsc-here "company armed with spears," æsc-plega "war,"
literally "spear-play." Æsc also was the name of the Old English runic
letter that begins the word.






I understand that words can be homonyms, which are words that have the same spelling but different meanings and origins.



However, the fact that both words are related to wood makes me think that it might not be a mere coincidence.



Is there a reason why ash (trees) and ash (burnt residue) have the same name?










share|improve this question




















  • 4




    I feel like you've answered your own question. It is probably just coincidence if the Online Etymology Dictionary has them coming from different PIE roots, and they are different words (though similar) in most other Germanic languages.
    – Tim Foster
    11 hours ago










  • @Wilson You might be be better off editing your question to use proper text for your quote rather than a screenshot image. It'll help people find your question... and possibly even answer it.
    – tmgr
    8 hours ago













up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1






1





I've often wondered why ash (trees) and ash (burnt residue) have the same name.





I've looked up the origin of both words, but I don't see anything that explains why the names are the same.



From the Online Etymology Dictionary:




ash (n.1)



"powdery remains of fire," Old English æsce "ash," from
Proto-Germanic * askon (source also of Old Norse and Swedish aska, Old
High German asca, German asche, Middle Dutch asche, Gothic azgo
"ashes"), from PIE root *as- "to burn, glow." Spanish and Portuguese
ascua "red-hot coal" are Germanic loan-words.



An ancient symbol of grief or repentance; hence Ash Wednesday (c.
1300), from custom introduced by Pope Gregory the Great of sprinkling
ashes on the heads of penitents on the first day of Lent. Ashes
meaning "mortal remains of a person" is late 13c., in reference to the
ancient custom of cremation. Meaning "Finely pulverized lava thrown
from a volcano" is from 1660s.



ash (n.2)



popular name of a common type of forest tree of Eurasia, North
America, and North Africa, Old English æsc "ash tree," from
Proto-Germanic * askaz, * askiz (source also of Old Norse askr, Old
Saxon ask, Middle Dutch esce, German Esche), from PIE root * os- "ash
tree" (source also of Armenian haci "ash tree," Albanian ah "beech,"
Greek oxya "beech," Latin ornus "wild mountain ash," Russian jasen,
Lithuanian uosis "ash").



The close-grained wood of the ash is tough and elastic, and it was the
preferred wood for spear-shafts, so Old English æsc sometimes meant
"spear," as in æsc-here "company armed with spears," æsc-plega "war,"
literally "spear-play." Æsc also was the name of the Old English runic
letter that begins the word.






I understand that words can be homonyms, which are words that have the same spelling but different meanings and origins.



However, the fact that both words are related to wood makes me think that it might not be a mere coincidence.



Is there a reason why ash (trees) and ash (burnt residue) have the same name?










share|improve this question















I've often wondered why ash (trees) and ash (burnt residue) have the same name.





I've looked up the origin of both words, but I don't see anything that explains why the names are the same.



From the Online Etymology Dictionary:




ash (n.1)



"powdery remains of fire," Old English æsce "ash," from
Proto-Germanic * askon (source also of Old Norse and Swedish aska, Old
High German asca, German asche, Middle Dutch asche, Gothic azgo
"ashes"), from PIE root *as- "to burn, glow." Spanish and Portuguese
ascua "red-hot coal" are Germanic loan-words.



An ancient symbol of grief or repentance; hence Ash Wednesday (c.
1300), from custom introduced by Pope Gregory the Great of sprinkling
ashes on the heads of penitents on the first day of Lent. Ashes
meaning "mortal remains of a person" is late 13c., in reference to the
ancient custom of cremation. Meaning "Finely pulverized lava thrown
from a volcano" is from 1660s.



ash (n.2)



popular name of a common type of forest tree of Eurasia, North
America, and North Africa, Old English æsc "ash tree," from
Proto-Germanic * askaz, * askiz (source also of Old Norse askr, Old
Saxon ask, Middle Dutch esce, German Esche), from PIE root * os- "ash
tree" (source also of Armenian haci "ash tree," Albanian ah "beech,"
Greek oxya "beech," Latin ornus "wild mountain ash," Russian jasen,
Lithuanian uosis "ash").



The close-grained wood of the ash is tough and elastic, and it was the
preferred wood for spear-shafts, so Old English æsc sometimes meant
"spear," as in æsc-here "company armed with spears," æsc-plega "war,"
literally "spear-play." Æsc also was the name of the Old English runic
letter that begins the word.






I understand that words can be homonyms, which are words that have the same spelling but different meanings and origins.



However, the fact that both words are related to wood makes me think that it might not be a mere coincidence.



Is there a reason why ash (trees) and ash (burnt residue) have the same name?







etymology old-english homonyms plants






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 4 hours ago

























asked 12 hours ago









Wilson

3761313




3761313








  • 4




    I feel like you've answered your own question. It is probably just coincidence if the Online Etymology Dictionary has them coming from different PIE roots, and they are different words (though similar) in most other Germanic languages.
    – Tim Foster
    11 hours ago










  • @Wilson You might be be better off editing your question to use proper text for your quote rather than a screenshot image. It'll help people find your question... and possibly even answer it.
    – tmgr
    8 hours ago














  • 4




    I feel like you've answered your own question. It is probably just coincidence if the Online Etymology Dictionary has them coming from different PIE roots, and they are different words (though similar) in most other Germanic languages.
    – Tim Foster
    11 hours ago










  • @Wilson You might be be better off editing your question to use proper text for your quote rather than a screenshot image. It'll help people find your question... and possibly even answer it.
    – tmgr
    8 hours ago








4




4




I feel like you've answered your own question. It is probably just coincidence if the Online Etymology Dictionary has them coming from different PIE roots, and they are different words (though similar) in most other Germanic languages.
– Tim Foster
11 hours ago




I feel like you've answered your own question. It is probably just coincidence if the Online Etymology Dictionary has them coming from different PIE roots, and they are different words (though similar) in most other Germanic languages.
– Tim Foster
11 hours ago












@Wilson You might be be better off editing your question to use proper text for your quote rather than a screenshot image. It'll help people find your question... and possibly even answer it.
– tmgr
8 hours ago




@Wilson You might be be better off editing your question to use proper text for your quote rather than a screenshot image. It'll help people find your question... and possibly even answer it.
– tmgr
8 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote













The Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary says:




ash (ash), n.



[AS. æsce.] A timber and shade tree (genus Fraxinus) of the olive family, having pinnate leaves, thin furrowed bark, and ash-colored branchlets: also, its tough elastic wood. See SAMARA, Illust.




Photo of text.



I wonder if the ash tree got its name because ash tree branchlets resemble ashes in appearance.






share|improve this answer























  • Sorry. I don't have access to that dictionary right now (someone sent me the photos). So, I don't have any more information about the edition of the dictionary at this time.
    – Wilson
    12 hours ago








  • 1




    The wood of European ash trees had many uses, so there would be plenty of waste, and it burns easily but has poor fuel quality, so it might have been the main source of potash (ashes used to make soap). It also has plentiful seeds, related to the olive, but I don't know if that contributed to the quality of its potash (potassium).
    – AmI
    7 hours ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f475444%2fwhy-do-ash-trees-and-ash-burnt-residue-have-the-same-name%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
2
down vote













The Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary says:




ash (ash), n.



[AS. æsce.] A timber and shade tree (genus Fraxinus) of the olive family, having pinnate leaves, thin furrowed bark, and ash-colored branchlets: also, its tough elastic wood. See SAMARA, Illust.




Photo of text.



I wonder if the ash tree got its name because ash tree branchlets resemble ashes in appearance.






share|improve this answer























  • Sorry. I don't have access to that dictionary right now (someone sent me the photos). So, I don't have any more information about the edition of the dictionary at this time.
    – Wilson
    12 hours ago








  • 1




    The wood of European ash trees had many uses, so there would be plenty of waste, and it burns easily but has poor fuel quality, so it might have been the main source of potash (ashes used to make soap). It also has plentiful seeds, related to the olive, but I don't know if that contributed to the quality of its potash (potassium).
    – AmI
    7 hours ago















up vote
2
down vote













The Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary says:




ash (ash), n.



[AS. æsce.] A timber and shade tree (genus Fraxinus) of the olive family, having pinnate leaves, thin furrowed bark, and ash-colored branchlets: also, its tough elastic wood. See SAMARA, Illust.




Photo of text.



I wonder if the ash tree got its name because ash tree branchlets resemble ashes in appearance.






share|improve this answer























  • Sorry. I don't have access to that dictionary right now (someone sent me the photos). So, I don't have any more information about the edition of the dictionary at this time.
    – Wilson
    12 hours ago








  • 1




    The wood of European ash trees had many uses, so there would be plenty of waste, and it burns easily but has poor fuel quality, so it might have been the main source of potash (ashes used to make soap). It also has plentiful seeds, related to the olive, but I don't know if that contributed to the quality of its potash (potassium).
    – AmI
    7 hours ago













up vote
2
down vote










up vote
2
down vote









The Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary says:




ash (ash), n.



[AS. æsce.] A timber and shade tree (genus Fraxinus) of the olive family, having pinnate leaves, thin furrowed bark, and ash-colored branchlets: also, its tough elastic wood. See SAMARA, Illust.




Photo of text.



I wonder if the ash tree got its name because ash tree branchlets resemble ashes in appearance.






share|improve this answer














The Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary says:




ash (ash), n.



[AS. æsce.] A timber and shade tree (genus Fraxinus) of the olive family, having pinnate leaves, thin furrowed bark, and ash-colored branchlets: also, its tough elastic wood. See SAMARA, Illust.




Photo of text.



I wonder if the ash tree got its name because ash tree branchlets resemble ashes in appearance.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 7 hours ago

























answered 12 hours ago









Wilson

3761313




3761313












  • Sorry. I don't have access to that dictionary right now (someone sent me the photos). So, I don't have any more information about the edition of the dictionary at this time.
    – Wilson
    12 hours ago








  • 1




    The wood of European ash trees had many uses, so there would be plenty of waste, and it burns easily but has poor fuel quality, so it might have been the main source of potash (ashes used to make soap). It also has plentiful seeds, related to the olive, but I don't know if that contributed to the quality of its potash (potassium).
    – AmI
    7 hours ago


















  • Sorry. I don't have access to that dictionary right now (someone sent me the photos). So, I don't have any more information about the edition of the dictionary at this time.
    – Wilson
    12 hours ago








  • 1




    The wood of European ash trees had many uses, so there would be plenty of waste, and it burns easily but has poor fuel quality, so it might have been the main source of potash (ashes used to make soap). It also has plentiful seeds, related to the olive, but I don't know if that contributed to the quality of its potash (potassium).
    – AmI
    7 hours ago
















Sorry. I don't have access to that dictionary right now (someone sent me the photos). So, I don't have any more information about the edition of the dictionary at this time.
– Wilson
12 hours ago






Sorry. I don't have access to that dictionary right now (someone sent me the photos). So, I don't have any more information about the edition of the dictionary at this time.
– Wilson
12 hours ago






1




1




The wood of European ash trees had many uses, so there would be plenty of waste, and it burns easily but has poor fuel quality, so it might have been the main source of potash (ashes used to make soap). It also has plentiful seeds, related to the olive, but I don't know if that contributed to the quality of its potash (potassium).
– AmI
7 hours ago




The wood of European ash trees had many uses, so there would be plenty of waste, and it burns easily but has poor fuel quality, so it might have been the main source of potash (ashes used to make soap). It also has plentiful seeds, related to the olive, but I don't know if that contributed to the quality of its potash (potassium).
– AmI
7 hours ago


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f475444%2fwhy-do-ash-trees-and-ash-burnt-residue-have-the-same-name%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Trompette piccolo

Slow SSRS Report in dynamic grouping and multiple parameters

Simon Yates (cyclisme)