What is the syntax for Function.prototype.call or Function.prototype.apply with an async function











up vote
-1
down vote

favorite












What is the syntax for using the call() or apply() methods to change this when dealing async functions?



So by way of example:



class Foo {
async someLongMethod(){
... Do stuff
}
}

class Bar {
async someOtherMethodThatWillWait(){
//Will the following work?
await Foo.prototype.someLongMethod.call(this);
}
}









share|improve this question


















  • 2




    Will the following work Why not just try it? It looks OK to me
    – CertainPerformance
    Nov 22 at 8:15






  • 1




    await acts on promises, so as that method returns a promise you're fine. It's certainly syntactically valid.
    – jonrsharpe
    Nov 22 at 8:16












  • @jonrsharpe Since it's an async function, it will necessarily return a Promise
    – CertainPerformance
    Nov 22 at 8:16










  • @CertainPerformance ah, hadn't spotted that it was also in the example, thanks!
    – jonrsharpe
    Nov 22 at 8:17






  • 1




    No, Promises in any form are not synchronous (except when calling the constructor, initially)
    – CertainPerformance
    Nov 22 at 8:33















up vote
-1
down vote

favorite












What is the syntax for using the call() or apply() methods to change this when dealing async functions?



So by way of example:



class Foo {
async someLongMethod(){
... Do stuff
}
}

class Bar {
async someOtherMethodThatWillWait(){
//Will the following work?
await Foo.prototype.someLongMethod.call(this);
}
}









share|improve this question


















  • 2




    Will the following work Why not just try it? It looks OK to me
    – CertainPerformance
    Nov 22 at 8:15






  • 1




    await acts on promises, so as that method returns a promise you're fine. It's certainly syntactically valid.
    – jonrsharpe
    Nov 22 at 8:16












  • @jonrsharpe Since it's an async function, it will necessarily return a Promise
    – CertainPerformance
    Nov 22 at 8:16










  • @CertainPerformance ah, hadn't spotted that it was also in the example, thanks!
    – jonrsharpe
    Nov 22 at 8:17






  • 1




    No, Promises in any form are not synchronous (except when calling the constructor, initially)
    – CertainPerformance
    Nov 22 at 8:33













up vote
-1
down vote

favorite









up vote
-1
down vote

favorite











What is the syntax for using the call() or apply() methods to change this when dealing async functions?



So by way of example:



class Foo {
async someLongMethod(){
... Do stuff
}
}

class Bar {
async someOtherMethodThatWillWait(){
//Will the following work?
await Foo.prototype.someLongMethod.call(this);
}
}









share|improve this question













What is the syntax for using the call() or apply() methods to change this when dealing async functions?



So by way of example:



class Foo {
async someLongMethod(){
... Do stuff
}
}

class Bar {
async someOtherMethodThatWillWait(){
//Will the following work?
await Foo.prototype.someLongMethod.call(this);
}
}






javascript async-await






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 22 at 8:14









Tom Maher

6771126




6771126








  • 2




    Will the following work Why not just try it? It looks OK to me
    – CertainPerformance
    Nov 22 at 8:15






  • 1




    await acts on promises, so as that method returns a promise you're fine. It's certainly syntactically valid.
    – jonrsharpe
    Nov 22 at 8:16












  • @jonrsharpe Since it's an async function, it will necessarily return a Promise
    – CertainPerformance
    Nov 22 at 8:16










  • @CertainPerformance ah, hadn't spotted that it was also in the example, thanks!
    – jonrsharpe
    Nov 22 at 8:17






  • 1




    No, Promises in any form are not synchronous (except when calling the constructor, initially)
    – CertainPerformance
    Nov 22 at 8:33














  • 2




    Will the following work Why not just try it? It looks OK to me
    – CertainPerformance
    Nov 22 at 8:15






  • 1




    await acts on promises, so as that method returns a promise you're fine. It's certainly syntactically valid.
    – jonrsharpe
    Nov 22 at 8:16












  • @jonrsharpe Since it's an async function, it will necessarily return a Promise
    – CertainPerformance
    Nov 22 at 8:16










  • @CertainPerformance ah, hadn't spotted that it was also in the example, thanks!
    – jonrsharpe
    Nov 22 at 8:17






  • 1




    No, Promises in any form are not synchronous (except when calling the constructor, initially)
    – CertainPerformance
    Nov 22 at 8:33








2




2




Will the following work Why not just try it? It looks OK to me
– CertainPerformance
Nov 22 at 8:15




Will the following work Why not just try it? It looks OK to me
– CertainPerformance
Nov 22 at 8:15




1




1




await acts on promises, so as that method returns a promise you're fine. It's certainly syntactically valid.
– jonrsharpe
Nov 22 at 8:16






await acts on promises, so as that method returns a promise you're fine. It's certainly syntactically valid.
– jonrsharpe
Nov 22 at 8:16














@jonrsharpe Since it's an async function, it will necessarily return a Promise
– CertainPerformance
Nov 22 at 8:16




@jonrsharpe Since it's an async function, it will necessarily return a Promise
– CertainPerformance
Nov 22 at 8:16












@CertainPerformance ah, hadn't spotted that it was also in the example, thanks!
– jonrsharpe
Nov 22 at 8:17




@CertainPerformance ah, hadn't spotted that it was also in the example, thanks!
– jonrsharpe
Nov 22 at 8:17




1




1




No, Promises in any form are not synchronous (except when calling the constructor, initially)
– CertainPerformance
Nov 22 at 8:33




No, Promises in any form are not synchronous (except when calling the constructor, initially)
– CertainPerformance
Nov 22 at 8:33












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










It's exactly the same as the syntax for calling normal functions, there is no difference. You cannot really distinguish an async function from any other function that returns a promise.






share|improve this answer





















  • I managed to test the call within protractor through node using a browser wait and it does indeed work. Thanks for everyone's input.
    – Tom Maher
    Nov 22 at 10:09











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53426463%2fwhat-is-the-syntax-for-function-prototype-call-or-function-prototype-apply-with%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
2
down vote



accepted










It's exactly the same as the syntax for calling normal functions, there is no difference. You cannot really distinguish an async function from any other function that returns a promise.






share|improve this answer





















  • I managed to test the call within protractor through node using a browser wait and it does indeed work. Thanks for everyone's input.
    – Tom Maher
    Nov 22 at 10:09















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










It's exactly the same as the syntax for calling normal functions, there is no difference. You cannot really distinguish an async function from any other function that returns a promise.






share|improve this answer





















  • I managed to test the call within protractor through node using a browser wait and it does indeed work. Thanks for everyone's input.
    – Tom Maher
    Nov 22 at 10:09













up vote
2
down vote



accepted







up vote
2
down vote



accepted






It's exactly the same as the syntax for calling normal functions, there is no difference. You cannot really distinguish an async function from any other function that returns a promise.






share|improve this answer












It's exactly the same as the syntax for calling normal functions, there is no difference. You cannot really distinguish an async function from any other function that returns a promise.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Nov 22 at 9:07









Bergi

359k55533850




359k55533850












  • I managed to test the call within protractor through node using a browser wait and it does indeed work. Thanks for everyone's input.
    – Tom Maher
    Nov 22 at 10:09


















  • I managed to test the call within protractor through node using a browser wait and it does indeed work. Thanks for everyone's input.
    – Tom Maher
    Nov 22 at 10:09
















I managed to test the call within protractor through node using a browser wait and it does indeed work. Thanks for everyone's input.
– Tom Maher
Nov 22 at 10:09




I managed to test the call within protractor through node using a browser wait and it does indeed work. Thanks for everyone's input.
– Tom Maher
Nov 22 at 10:09


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53426463%2fwhat-is-the-syntax-for-function-prototype-call-or-function-prototype-apply-with%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Trompette piccolo

Slow SSRS Report in dynamic grouping and multiple parameters

Simon Yates (cyclisme)