Index out of range exception in FieldNameLookup.GetOrdinal when running SqlQuery EF
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
We are getting eventually an IndexOutOfRange exception when running code like this:
result.Data = dbOptima.Database.ExecuteStoredProcedure(
task,
StoredProcedureValues.PROC_GET_TASKS).ToList();
,where ExecuteStoredProcedure does the following:
public static IEnumerable<TResult> ExecuteStoredProcedure<TResult>(this Database database, IStoredProcedure<TResult> procedure, string procedureName)
{
var parameters = CreateSqlParametersFromProperties(procedure);
var format = CreateSPCommand<TResult>(parameters, procedureName);
return database.SqlQuery<TResult>(format, parameters.Cast<object>).ToArray());
}
We cannot reproduce the problem locally, but using Application Insights the exception is registered quite often. The following is a call stack extract:
System.IndexOutOfRangeException:
at System.Data.ProviderBase.FieldNameLookup.GetOrdinal (System.Data, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlDataReader.GetOrdinal (System.Data, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Data.Entity.Core.Query.InternalTrees.ColumnMapFactory.TryGetColumnOrdinalFromReader (EntityFramework, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Data.Entity.Core.Query.InternalTrees.ColumnMapFactory.CreateColumnMapFromReaderAndClrType (EntityFramework, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Data.Entity.Core.Objects.ObjectContext.InternalTranslate (EntityFramework, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Data.Entity.Core.Objects.ObjectContext.ExecuteStoreQueryInternal (EntityFramework, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Data.Entity.Core.Objects.ObjectContext+<>c__DisplayClass65`1.<ExecuteStoreQueryReliably>b__64 (EntityFramework, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Data.Entity.Core.Objects.ObjectContext.ExecuteInTransaction (EntityFramework, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Data.Entity.Core.Objects.ObjectContext+<>c__DisplayClass65`1.<ExecuteStoreQueryReliably>b__63 (EntityFramework, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.DefaultSqlExecutionStrategy.Execute (EntityFramework.SqlServer, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Data.Entity.Core.Objects.ObjectContext.ExecuteStoreQueryReliably (EntityFramework, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Data.Entity.Core.Objects.ObjectContext.ExecuteStoreQuery (EntityFramework, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Data.Entity.Internal.LazyEnumerator`1.MoveNext (EntityFramework, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Collections.Generic.List`1..ctor (mscorlib, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Linq.Enumerable.ToList (System.Core, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
We've tried to reproduce the problem locally by:
- making the stored procedure fail.
- making the stored procedure return 0 results.
- causing a mapping problem by renaming some model property.
with no success.
Typically, this error happens due to a mapping error in the datareader when you use ADO.NET, but this is not the case since we use EF 6 and it does not happen always, so we cannot really find where the problem is.
c# .net asp.net-mvc entity-framework azure-application-insights
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
We are getting eventually an IndexOutOfRange exception when running code like this:
result.Data = dbOptima.Database.ExecuteStoredProcedure(
task,
StoredProcedureValues.PROC_GET_TASKS).ToList();
,where ExecuteStoredProcedure does the following:
public static IEnumerable<TResult> ExecuteStoredProcedure<TResult>(this Database database, IStoredProcedure<TResult> procedure, string procedureName)
{
var parameters = CreateSqlParametersFromProperties(procedure);
var format = CreateSPCommand<TResult>(parameters, procedureName);
return database.SqlQuery<TResult>(format, parameters.Cast<object>).ToArray());
}
We cannot reproduce the problem locally, but using Application Insights the exception is registered quite often. The following is a call stack extract:
System.IndexOutOfRangeException:
at System.Data.ProviderBase.FieldNameLookup.GetOrdinal (System.Data, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlDataReader.GetOrdinal (System.Data, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Data.Entity.Core.Query.InternalTrees.ColumnMapFactory.TryGetColumnOrdinalFromReader (EntityFramework, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Data.Entity.Core.Query.InternalTrees.ColumnMapFactory.CreateColumnMapFromReaderAndClrType (EntityFramework, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Data.Entity.Core.Objects.ObjectContext.InternalTranslate (EntityFramework, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Data.Entity.Core.Objects.ObjectContext.ExecuteStoreQueryInternal (EntityFramework, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Data.Entity.Core.Objects.ObjectContext+<>c__DisplayClass65`1.<ExecuteStoreQueryReliably>b__64 (EntityFramework, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Data.Entity.Core.Objects.ObjectContext.ExecuteInTransaction (EntityFramework, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Data.Entity.Core.Objects.ObjectContext+<>c__DisplayClass65`1.<ExecuteStoreQueryReliably>b__63 (EntityFramework, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.DefaultSqlExecutionStrategy.Execute (EntityFramework.SqlServer, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Data.Entity.Core.Objects.ObjectContext.ExecuteStoreQueryReliably (EntityFramework, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Data.Entity.Core.Objects.ObjectContext.ExecuteStoreQuery (EntityFramework, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Data.Entity.Internal.LazyEnumerator`1.MoveNext (EntityFramework, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Collections.Generic.List`1..ctor (mscorlib, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Linq.Enumerable.ToList (System.Core, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
We've tried to reproduce the problem locally by:
- making the stored procedure fail.
- making the stored procedure return 0 results.
- causing a mapping problem by renaming some model property.
with no success.
Typically, this error happens due to a mapping error in the datareader when you use ADO.NET, but this is not the case since we use EF 6 and it does not happen always, so we cannot really find where the problem is.
c# .net asp.net-mvc entity-framework azure-application-insights
Running into a similar issue; did you ever find a solution?
– cvocvo
Nov 20 at 22:45
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
We are getting eventually an IndexOutOfRange exception when running code like this:
result.Data = dbOptima.Database.ExecuteStoredProcedure(
task,
StoredProcedureValues.PROC_GET_TASKS).ToList();
,where ExecuteStoredProcedure does the following:
public static IEnumerable<TResult> ExecuteStoredProcedure<TResult>(this Database database, IStoredProcedure<TResult> procedure, string procedureName)
{
var parameters = CreateSqlParametersFromProperties(procedure);
var format = CreateSPCommand<TResult>(parameters, procedureName);
return database.SqlQuery<TResult>(format, parameters.Cast<object>).ToArray());
}
We cannot reproduce the problem locally, but using Application Insights the exception is registered quite often. The following is a call stack extract:
System.IndexOutOfRangeException:
at System.Data.ProviderBase.FieldNameLookup.GetOrdinal (System.Data, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlDataReader.GetOrdinal (System.Data, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Data.Entity.Core.Query.InternalTrees.ColumnMapFactory.TryGetColumnOrdinalFromReader (EntityFramework, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Data.Entity.Core.Query.InternalTrees.ColumnMapFactory.CreateColumnMapFromReaderAndClrType (EntityFramework, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Data.Entity.Core.Objects.ObjectContext.InternalTranslate (EntityFramework, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Data.Entity.Core.Objects.ObjectContext.ExecuteStoreQueryInternal (EntityFramework, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Data.Entity.Core.Objects.ObjectContext+<>c__DisplayClass65`1.<ExecuteStoreQueryReliably>b__64 (EntityFramework, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Data.Entity.Core.Objects.ObjectContext.ExecuteInTransaction (EntityFramework, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Data.Entity.Core.Objects.ObjectContext+<>c__DisplayClass65`1.<ExecuteStoreQueryReliably>b__63 (EntityFramework, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.DefaultSqlExecutionStrategy.Execute (EntityFramework.SqlServer, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Data.Entity.Core.Objects.ObjectContext.ExecuteStoreQueryReliably (EntityFramework, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Data.Entity.Core.Objects.ObjectContext.ExecuteStoreQuery (EntityFramework, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Data.Entity.Internal.LazyEnumerator`1.MoveNext (EntityFramework, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Collections.Generic.List`1..ctor (mscorlib, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Linq.Enumerable.ToList (System.Core, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
We've tried to reproduce the problem locally by:
- making the stored procedure fail.
- making the stored procedure return 0 results.
- causing a mapping problem by renaming some model property.
with no success.
Typically, this error happens due to a mapping error in the datareader when you use ADO.NET, but this is not the case since we use EF 6 and it does not happen always, so we cannot really find where the problem is.
c# .net asp.net-mvc entity-framework azure-application-insights
We are getting eventually an IndexOutOfRange exception when running code like this:
result.Data = dbOptima.Database.ExecuteStoredProcedure(
task,
StoredProcedureValues.PROC_GET_TASKS).ToList();
,where ExecuteStoredProcedure does the following:
public static IEnumerable<TResult> ExecuteStoredProcedure<TResult>(this Database database, IStoredProcedure<TResult> procedure, string procedureName)
{
var parameters = CreateSqlParametersFromProperties(procedure);
var format = CreateSPCommand<TResult>(parameters, procedureName);
return database.SqlQuery<TResult>(format, parameters.Cast<object>).ToArray());
}
We cannot reproduce the problem locally, but using Application Insights the exception is registered quite often. The following is a call stack extract:
System.IndexOutOfRangeException:
at System.Data.ProviderBase.FieldNameLookup.GetOrdinal (System.Data, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlDataReader.GetOrdinal (System.Data, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Data.Entity.Core.Query.InternalTrees.ColumnMapFactory.TryGetColumnOrdinalFromReader (EntityFramework, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Data.Entity.Core.Query.InternalTrees.ColumnMapFactory.CreateColumnMapFromReaderAndClrType (EntityFramework, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Data.Entity.Core.Objects.ObjectContext.InternalTranslate (EntityFramework, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Data.Entity.Core.Objects.ObjectContext.ExecuteStoreQueryInternal (EntityFramework, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Data.Entity.Core.Objects.ObjectContext+<>c__DisplayClass65`1.<ExecuteStoreQueryReliably>b__64 (EntityFramework, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Data.Entity.Core.Objects.ObjectContext.ExecuteInTransaction (EntityFramework, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Data.Entity.Core.Objects.ObjectContext+<>c__DisplayClass65`1.<ExecuteStoreQueryReliably>b__63 (EntityFramework, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.DefaultSqlExecutionStrategy.Execute (EntityFramework.SqlServer, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Data.Entity.Core.Objects.ObjectContext.ExecuteStoreQueryReliably (EntityFramework, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Data.Entity.Core.Objects.ObjectContext.ExecuteStoreQuery (EntityFramework, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Data.Entity.Internal.LazyEnumerator`1.MoveNext (EntityFramework, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Collections.Generic.List`1..ctor (mscorlib, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
at System.Linq.Enumerable.ToList (System.Core, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089)
We've tried to reproduce the problem locally by:
- making the stored procedure fail.
- making the stored procedure return 0 results.
- causing a mapping problem by renaming some model property.
with no success.
Typically, this error happens due to a mapping error in the datareader when you use ADO.NET, but this is not the case since we use EF 6 and it does not happen always, so we cannot really find where the problem is.
c# .net asp.net-mvc entity-framework azure-application-insights
c# .net asp.net-mvc entity-framework azure-application-insights
asked Jul 2 at 20:18
Luis
1,0391327
1,0391327
Running into a similar issue; did you ever find a solution?
– cvocvo
Nov 20 at 22:45
add a comment |
Running into a similar issue; did you ever find a solution?
– cvocvo
Nov 20 at 22:45
Running into a similar issue; did you ever find a solution?
– cvocvo
Nov 20 at 22:45
Running into a similar issue; did you ever find a solution?
– cvocvo
Nov 20 at 22:45
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
The problem is related to binding the result of the stored procedure with the model declared to be bound with the output of the stored procedure.
If the stored procedure retrieves more columns than the properties that the model has, even though the model is satisfied (because all the properties can be matched with columns of the stored procedure output), internally an exception is raised cause the model doesn't have properties to store some of the store procedure output values.
So, this can be fixed in two ways: either
- adding properties in the model to contain the columns of the stored
procedure, or - removing the unnecessary columns of the stored procedure output.
The second approach is normally better, since this issue is making evident that some data returned by the stored procedure is no longer required, so it would be cleaner and more performant to remove the unneeded code in the stored procedure.
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
The problem is related to binding the result of the stored procedure with the model declared to be bound with the output of the stored procedure.
If the stored procedure retrieves more columns than the properties that the model has, even though the model is satisfied (because all the properties can be matched with columns of the stored procedure output), internally an exception is raised cause the model doesn't have properties to store some of the store procedure output values.
So, this can be fixed in two ways: either
- adding properties in the model to contain the columns of the stored
procedure, or - removing the unnecessary columns of the stored procedure output.
The second approach is normally better, since this issue is making evident that some data returned by the stored procedure is no longer required, so it would be cleaner and more performant to remove the unneeded code in the stored procedure.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
The problem is related to binding the result of the stored procedure with the model declared to be bound with the output of the stored procedure.
If the stored procedure retrieves more columns than the properties that the model has, even though the model is satisfied (because all the properties can be matched with columns of the stored procedure output), internally an exception is raised cause the model doesn't have properties to store some of the store procedure output values.
So, this can be fixed in two ways: either
- adding properties in the model to contain the columns of the stored
procedure, or - removing the unnecessary columns of the stored procedure output.
The second approach is normally better, since this issue is making evident that some data returned by the stored procedure is no longer required, so it would be cleaner and more performant to remove the unneeded code in the stored procedure.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
The problem is related to binding the result of the stored procedure with the model declared to be bound with the output of the stored procedure.
If the stored procedure retrieves more columns than the properties that the model has, even though the model is satisfied (because all the properties can be matched with columns of the stored procedure output), internally an exception is raised cause the model doesn't have properties to store some of the store procedure output values.
So, this can be fixed in two ways: either
- adding properties in the model to contain the columns of the stored
procedure, or - removing the unnecessary columns of the stored procedure output.
The second approach is normally better, since this issue is making evident that some data returned by the stored procedure is no longer required, so it would be cleaner and more performant to remove the unneeded code in the stored procedure.
The problem is related to binding the result of the stored procedure with the model declared to be bound with the output of the stored procedure.
If the stored procedure retrieves more columns than the properties that the model has, even though the model is satisfied (because all the properties can be matched with columns of the stored procedure output), internally an exception is raised cause the model doesn't have properties to store some of the store procedure output values.
So, this can be fixed in two ways: either
- adding properties in the model to contain the columns of the stored
procedure, or - removing the unnecessary columns of the stored procedure output.
The second approach is normally better, since this issue is making evident that some data returned by the stored procedure is no longer required, so it would be cleaner and more performant to remove the unneeded code in the stored procedure.
answered Nov 21 at 19:55
Luis
1,0391327
1,0391327
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f51143207%2findex-out-of-range-exception-in-fieldnamelookup-getordinal-when-running-sqlquery%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Running into a similar issue; did you ever find a solution?
– cvocvo
Nov 20 at 22:45