could not display ${out.body} at Log for external soap provider











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I already got reply from to uri which is external soap service provider. but why I could not see the response in log with ${out.body} i think soap is InOut exchangepattern, it should have out.body always. My code example looks like below.
Any hints are more than welcome!



<from uri="cxf://http://localhost:8080/myservice?dataFormat=MESSAGE&amp;wsdlURL=wsdl%2Fmyservice.wsdl" />

    <to uri="http4://localhost:8888/mockservice"/>

    <log message="##### After soap provider out.body ##### ${out.body}" loggingLevel="INFO" />`





apache-camel







share|improve this question




























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    I already got reply from to uri which is external soap service provider. but why I could not see the response in log with ${out.body} i think soap is InOut exchangepattern, it should have out.body always. My code example looks like below.
    Any hints are more than welcome!



    <from uri="cxf://http://localhost:8080/myservice?dataFormat=MESSAGE&amp;wsdlURL=wsdl%2Fmyservice.wsdl" />
    
    <to uri="http4://localhost:8888/mockservice"/>
    
    <log message="##### After soap provider out.body ##### ${out.body}" loggingLevel="INFO" />`





    apache-camel







    share|improve this question


























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      I already got reply from to uri which is external soap service provider. but why I could not see the response in log with ${out.body} i think soap is InOut exchangepattern, it should have out.body always. My code example looks like below.
      Any hints are more than welcome!



      <from uri="cxf://http://localhost:8080/myservice?dataFormat=MESSAGE&amp;wsdlURL=wsdl%2Fmyservice.wsdl" />
      
    <to uri="http4://localhost:8888/mockservice"/>
      
    <log message="##### After soap provider out.body ##### ${out.body}" loggingLevel="INFO" />`





      apache-camel







      share|improve this question















      I already got reply from to uri which is external soap service provider. but why I could not see the response in log with ${out.body} i think soap is InOut exchangepattern, it should have out.body always. My code example looks like below.
      Any hints are more than welcome!



      <from uri="cxf://http://localhost:8080/myservice?dataFormat=MESSAGE&amp;wsdlURL=wsdl%2Fmyservice.wsdl" />
      
    <to uri="http4://localhost:8888/mockservice"/>
      
    <log message="##### After soap provider out.body ##### ${out.body}" loggingLevel="INFO" />`





      apache-camel




      apache-camel






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited yesterday









      Francesco Montesano

      5,4752551




      5,4752551










      asked Nov 21 at 19:46









      stewchicken

      729




      729
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote













          The OUT message of a previous processor becomes the IN message of your log processor.



          I would recommend to simply not use the OUT message. As long as you only work with the IN message, Camel takes care of the out message (copies the IN message).



          Quote from the book Camel in Action:




          In many cases, processors don’t set an out message, so in this case
          the in message is reused.







          share|improve this answer





















            Your Answer






            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            });
            });
            }, "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "1"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53419500%2fcould-not-display-out-body-at-log-for-external-soap-provider%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            1
            down vote













            The OUT message of a previous processor becomes the IN message of your log processor.



            I would recommend to simply not use the OUT message. As long as you only work with the IN message, Camel takes care of the out message (copies the IN message).



            Quote from the book Camel in Action:




            In many cases, processors don’t set an out message, so in this case
            the in message is reused.







            share|improve this answer

























              up vote
              1
              down vote













              The OUT message of a previous processor becomes the IN message of your log processor.



              I would recommend to simply not use the OUT message. As long as you only work with the IN message, Camel takes care of the out message (copies the IN message).



              Quote from the book Camel in Action:




              In many cases, processors don’t set an out message, so in this case
              the in message is reused.







              share|improve this answer























                up vote
                1
                down vote










                up vote
                1
                down vote









                The OUT message of a previous processor becomes the IN message of your log processor.



                I would recommend to simply not use the OUT message. As long as you only work with the IN message, Camel takes care of the out message (copies the IN message).



                Quote from the book Camel in Action:




                In many cases, processors don’t set an out message, so in this case
                the in message is reused.







                share|improve this answer












                The OUT message of a previous processor becomes the IN message of your log processor.



                I would recommend to simply not use the OUT message. As long as you only work with the IN message, Camel takes care of the out message (copies the IN message).



                Quote from the book Camel in Action:




                In many cases, processors don’t set an out message, so in this case
                the in message is reused.








                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 2 days ago









                burki

                1,4521413




                1,4521413






























                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded



















































                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53419500%2fcould-not-display-out-body-at-log-for-external-soap-provider%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    -

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    What visual should I use to simply compare current year value vs last year in Power BI desktop

                    Image
                    0 I have column SubToBind that shows current year ratio and column PY SubToBind which shows previous year ratio. How can I simply create a card that would be displaying them both in a nice way? Something like that: I cannot achieve that with regular card, I also tried Card with States by OKViz but also unable to see both values. In KPI visual - I dont like the word "Goal", it will confuse end users. Are there any cards or other visuals that would do the job? Thanks powerbi dax powerbi-embedded share | improve this question edited Jun 11 '18 at 20:11 Oleg
                    Read more

                    Alexandru Averescu

                    Image
                    Alexandre Averescu Alexandru Averescu Naissance 3 avril 1859 Babele, Ismail  (ro) près de Izmaïl (principauté de Moldavie) Décès 2 octobre 1938 (à 79 ans) [ 1 ] Bucarest Origine   Roumanie Arme cavalerie Grade Maréchal Années de service 1901-1917 Commandement chef d'état-major général 2 e  armée 3 e  armée Groupe d'armée sud armée du Danube Conflits Guerre russo-turque de 1877-1878 Deuxième guerre balkanique Première Guerre mondiale Faits d'armes Bataille de Turtucaia/Tutrakan Bataille de Mărăști Distinctions Autres fonctions 3 fois président du Conseil des ministres ministre des Affaires étrangères ministre sans portefeuille conseiller de la Couronne modifier   Alexandre Averescu (en roumain : Alexandru Averescu .mw-parser-output .prononciation>a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/8a/Loudspeaker.svg/11px-Loudspeaker.svg.png")center
                    Read more

                    Trompette piccolo

                    Image
                    Ne doit pas être confondu avec trompette de poche. Trompette piccolo en si bémol, avec des branches d'embouchure différentes pour le si bémol (la plus courte) ou la (la plus longue) Trompette piccolo La trompette piccolo est la plus petite de la famille des trompettes. Elle joue une octave plus haut que la trompette standard en si bémol. La plupart des trompettes piccolo sont conçues pour jouer dans les deux tonalités de si bémol ou la, en utilisant une branche d'embouchure différente pour chaque tonalité. Le tube de la trompette piccolo en si bémol a une longueur moitié de celle de la trompette normale en si bémol. Des trompettes piccolo en sol, fa, ut sont également fabriquées, mais elles sont rares. La trompette soprano en ré, aussi connu comme la « trompette Bach », a été inventée vers 1890 par le facteur belge Victor-Charles Mahillon pour jouer les parties hautes de la trompette dans la musique de Bach et Haendel. La trompette piccolo moderne permet aux
                    Read more