Power series and local minimum? [on hold]
Let consider that $f(z)=sumlimits_{nge 0}a_nz^n$ in $mathcal{D}(O,R)$ with $0<Rle +infty$. If $mid fmid$ has a local minimum in $0$ then $fequiv 0$.
Is it linked to the maximum modulus principle ?
Thanks in advance !
complex-analysis power-series holomorphic-functions analytic-functions
put on hold as off-topic by José Carlos Santos, amWhy, user21820, RRL, Did 1 hour ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – José Carlos Santos, amWhy, user21820, RRL, Did
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |
Let consider that $f(z)=sumlimits_{nge 0}a_nz^n$ in $mathcal{D}(O,R)$ with $0<Rle +infty$. If $mid fmid$ has a local minimum in $0$ then $fequiv 0$.
Is it linked to the maximum modulus principle ?
Thanks in advance !
complex-analysis power-series holomorphic-functions analytic-functions
put on hold as off-topic by José Carlos Santos, amWhy, user21820, RRL, Did 1 hour ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – José Carlos Santos, amWhy, user21820, RRL, Did
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
3
What does it mean for a complex-valued function to have a minimum? Do you mean $vert f vert$ has a minimum at 0? Cheers!
– Robert Lewis
11 hours ago
1
@RobertLewis Indeed my mistake !
– Maman
11 hours ago
add a comment |
Let consider that $f(z)=sumlimits_{nge 0}a_nz^n$ in $mathcal{D}(O,R)$ with $0<Rle +infty$. If $mid fmid$ has a local minimum in $0$ then $fequiv 0$.
Is it linked to the maximum modulus principle ?
Thanks in advance !
complex-analysis power-series holomorphic-functions analytic-functions
Let consider that $f(z)=sumlimits_{nge 0}a_nz^n$ in $mathcal{D}(O,R)$ with $0<Rle +infty$. If $mid fmid$ has a local minimum in $0$ then $fequiv 0$.
Is it linked to the maximum modulus principle ?
Thanks in advance !
complex-analysis power-series holomorphic-functions analytic-functions
complex-analysis power-series holomorphic-functions analytic-functions
edited 11 hours ago
asked 11 hours ago
Maman
1,141722
1,141722
put on hold as off-topic by José Carlos Santos, amWhy, user21820, RRL, Did 1 hour ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – José Carlos Santos, amWhy, user21820, RRL, Did
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
put on hold as off-topic by José Carlos Santos, amWhy, user21820, RRL, Did 1 hour ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – José Carlos Santos, amWhy, user21820, RRL, Did
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
3
What does it mean for a complex-valued function to have a minimum? Do you mean $vert f vert$ has a minimum at 0? Cheers!
– Robert Lewis
11 hours ago
1
@RobertLewis Indeed my mistake !
– Maman
11 hours ago
add a comment |
3
What does it mean for a complex-valued function to have a minimum? Do you mean $vert f vert$ has a minimum at 0? Cheers!
– Robert Lewis
11 hours ago
1
@RobertLewis Indeed my mistake !
– Maman
11 hours ago
3
3
What does it mean for a complex-valued function to have a minimum? Do you mean $vert f vert$ has a minimum at 0? Cheers!
– Robert Lewis
11 hours ago
What does it mean for a complex-valued function to have a minimum? Do you mean $vert f vert$ has a minimum at 0? Cheers!
– Robert Lewis
11 hours ago
1
1
@RobertLewis Indeed my mistake !
– Maman
11 hours ago
@RobertLewis Indeed my mistake !
– Maman
11 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
The identity map $f : z mapsto z$ is such that $vert fvert$ has a local minimum at $0$. However $f$ is not the always vanishing map.
Hence the statement of the initial question is wrong.
1
The assertion is true precisely when $f$ does not assume the value $0$ (just apply the maximum modulus principle to $1/f$).
– Matemáticos Chibchas
10 hours ago
add a comment |
The assertion appears to be false.
Consider
$f(z) = z^n, 1 le n in Bbb N; tag 1$
writing
$z = re^{itheta}, tag 2$
we have
$z^n = r^n e^{i n theta}, tag 3$
whence
$vert f(z) vert = vert z^n vert = r^n; tag 4$
clearly then,
$vert f(0) vert = 0 tag 5$
so $0$ is an absolute minimum of $vert f(z) vert$; however,
$f(z) ne 0, ; text{for} ; z ne 0. tag 6$
1
Thank you maybe a hypothesis is missing...
– Maman
11 hours ago
That very well may be; but what?
– Robert Lewis
11 hours ago
add a comment |
The correct version of the statement: if $|f|$ has a local minimum at zero, then either $f(0)=0$ or $f$ is constant.
Proof? $f$ is continuous; if it's not zero at zero, apply the maximum modulus principle to $frac1f$ on some suitably small neighborhood where it's bounded away from zero.
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The identity map $f : z mapsto z$ is such that $vert fvert$ has a local minimum at $0$. However $f$ is not the always vanishing map.
Hence the statement of the initial question is wrong.
1
The assertion is true precisely when $f$ does not assume the value $0$ (just apply the maximum modulus principle to $1/f$).
– Matemáticos Chibchas
10 hours ago
add a comment |
The identity map $f : z mapsto z$ is such that $vert fvert$ has a local minimum at $0$. However $f$ is not the always vanishing map.
Hence the statement of the initial question is wrong.
1
The assertion is true precisely when $f$ does not assume the value $0$ (just apply the maximum modulus principle to $1/f$).
– Matemáticos Chibchas
10 hours ago
add a comment |
The identity map $f : z mapsto z$ is such that $vert fvert$ has a local minimum at $0$. However $f$ is not the always vanishing map.
Hence the statement of the initial question is wrong.
The identity map $f : z mapsto z$ is such that $vert fvert$ has a local minimum at $0$. However $f$ is not the always vanishing map.
Hence the statement of the initial question is wrong.
answered 11 hours ago
mathcounterexamples.net
24.1k21753
24.1k21753
1
The assertion is true precisely when $f$ does not assume the value $0$ (just apply the maximum modulus principle to $1/f$).
– Matemáticos Chibchas
10 hours ago
add a comment |
1
The assertion is true precisely when $f$ does not assume the value $0$ (just apply the maximum modulus principle to $1/f$).
– Matemáticos Chibchas
10 hours ago
1
1
The assertion is true precisely when $f$ does not assume the value $0$ (just apply the maximum modulus principle to $1/f$).
– Matemáticos Chibchas
10 hours ago
The assertion is true precisely when $f$ does not assume the value $0$ (just apply the maximum modulus principle to $1/f$).
– Matemáticos Chibchas
10 hours ago
add a comment |
The assertion appears to be false.
Consider
$f(z) = z^n, 1 le n in Bbb N; tag 1$
writing
$z = re^{itheta}, tag 2$
we have
$z^n = r^n e^{i n theta}, tag 3$
whence
$vert f(z) vert = vert z^n vert = r^n; tag 4$
clearly then,
$vert f(0) vert = 0 tag 5$
so $0$ is an absolute minimum of $vert f(z) vert$; however,
$f(z) ne 0, ; text{for} ; z ne 0. tag 6$
1
Thank you maybe a hypothesis is missing...
– Maman
11 hours ago
That very well may be; but what?
– Robert Lewis
11 hours ago
add a comment |
The assertion appears to be false.
Consider
$f(z) = z^n, 1 le n in Bbb N; tag 1$
writing
$z = re^{itheta}, tag 2$
we have
$z^n = r^n e^{i n theta}, tag 3$
whence
$vert f(z) vert = vert z^n vert = r^n; tag 4$
clearly then,
$vert f(0) vert = 0 tag 5$
so $0$ is an absolute minimum of $vert f(z) vert$; however,
$f(z) ne 0, ; text{for} ; z ne 0. tag 6$
1
Thank you maybe a hypothesis is missing...
– Maman
11 hours ago
That very well may be; but what?
– Robert Lewis
11 hours ago
add a comment |
The assertion appears to be false.
Consider
$f(z) = z^n, 1 le n in Bbb N; tag 1$
writing
$z = re^{itheta}, tag 2$
we have
$z^n = r^n e^{i n theta}, tag 3$
whence
$vert f(z) vert = vert z^n vert = r^n; tag 4$
clearly then,
$vert f(0) vert = 0 tag 5$
so $0$ is an absolute minimum of $vert f(z) vert$; however,
$f(z) ne 0, ; text{for} ; z ne 0. tag 6$
The assertion appears to be false.
Consider
$f(z) = z^n, 1 le n in Bbb N; tag 1$
writing
$z = re^{itheta}, tag 2$
we have
$z^n = r^n e^{i n theta}, tag 3$
whence
$vert f(z) vert = vert z^n vert = r^n; tag 4$
clearly then,
$vert f(0) vert = 0 tag 5$
so $0$ is an absolute minimum of $vert f(z) vert$; however,
$f(z) ne 0, ; text{for} ; z ne 0. tag 6$
answered 11 hours ago
Robert Lewis
43.5k22863
43.5k22863
1
Thank you maybe a hypothesis is missing...
– Maman
11 hours ago
That very well may be; but what?
– Robert Lewis
11 hours ago
add a comment |
1
Thank you maybe a hypothesis is missing...
– Maman
11 hours ago
That very well may be; but what?
– Robert Lewis
11 hours ago
1
1
Thank you maybe a hypothesis is missing...
– Maman
11 hours ago
Thank you maybe a hypothesis is missing...
– Maman
11 hours ago
That very well may be; but what?
– Robert Lewis
11 hours ago
That very well may be; but what?
– Robert Lewis
11 hours ago
add a comment |
The correct version of the statement: if $|f|$ has a local minimum at zero, then either $f(0)=0$ or $f$ is constant.
Proof? $f$ is continuous; if it's not zero at zero, apply the maximum modulus principle to $frac1f$ on some suitably small neighborhood where it's bounded away from zero.
add a comment |
The correct version of the statement: if $|f|$ has a local minimum at zero, then either $f(0)=0$ or $f$ is constant.
Proof? $f$ is continuous; if it's not zero at zero, apply the maximum modulus principle to $frac1f$ on some suitably small neighborhood where it's bounded away from zero.
add a comment |
The correct version of the statement: if $|f|$ has a local minimum at zero, then either $f(0)=0$ or $f$ is constant.
Proof? $f$ is continuous; if it's not zero at zero, apply the maximum modulus principle to $frac1f$ on some suitably small neighborhood where it's bounded away from zero.
The correct version of the statement: if $|f|$ has a local minimum at zero, then either $f(0)=0$ or $f$ is constant.
Proof? $f$ is continuous; if it's not zero at zero, apply the maximum modulus principle to $frac1f$ on some suitably small neighborhood where it's bounded away from zero.
answered 10 hours ago
jmerry
1,16616
1,16616
add a comment |
add a comment |
3
What does it mean for a complex-valued function to have a minimum? Do you mean $vert f vert$ has a minimum at 0? Cheers!
– Robert Lewis
11 hours ago
1
@RobertLewis Indeed my mistake !
– Maman
11 hours ago