Power series and local minimum? [on hold]












-2














Let consider that $f(z)=sumlimits_{nge 0}a_nz^n$ in $mathcal{D}(O,R)$ with $0<Rle +infty$. If $mid fmid$ has a local minimum in $0$ then $fequiv 0$.



Is it linked to the maximum modulus principle ?



Thanks in advance !










share|cite|improve this question















put on hold as off-topic by José Carlos Santos, amWhy, user21820, RRL, Did 1 hour ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – José Carlos Santos, amWhy, user21820, RRL, Did

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









  • 3




    What does it mean for a complex-valued function to have a minimum? Do you mean $vert f vert$ has a minimum at 0? Cheers!
    – Robert Lewis
    11 hours ago






  • 1




    @RobertLewis Indeed my mistake !
    – Maman
    11 hours ago
















-2














Let consider that $f(z)=sumlimits_{nge 0}a_nz^n$ in $mathcal{D}(O,R)$ with $0<Rle +infty$. If $mid fmid$ has a local minimum in $0$ then $fequiv 0$.



Is it linked to the maximum modulus principle ?



Thanks in advance !










share|cite|improve this question















put on hold as off-topic by José Carlos Santos, amWhy, user21820, RRL, Did 1 hour ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – José Carlos Santos, amWhy, user21820, RRL, Did

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









  • 3




    What does it mean for a complex-valued function to have a minimum? Do you mean $vert f vert$ has a minimum at 0? Cheers!
    – Robert Lewis
    11 hours ago






  • 1




    @RobertLewis Indeed my mistake !
    – Maman
    11 hours ago














-2












-2








-2


1





Let consider that $f(z)=sumlimits_{nge 0}a_nz^n$ in $mathcal{D}(O,R)$ with $0<Rle +infty$. If $mid fmid$ has a local minimum in $0$ then $fequiv 0$.



Is it linked to the maximum modulus principle ?



Thanks in advance !










share|cite|improve this question















Let consider that $f(z)=sumlimits_{nge 0}a_nz^n$ in $mathcal{D}(O,R)$ with $0<Rle +infty$. If $mid fmid$ has a local minimum in $0$ then $fequiv 0$.



Is it linked to the maximum modulus principle ?



Thanks in advance !







complex-analysis power-series holomorphic-functions analytic-functions






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 11 hours ago

























asked 11 hours ago









Maman

1,141722




1,141722




put on hold as off-topic by José Carlos Santos, amWhy, user21820, RRL, Did 1 hour ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – José Carlos Santos, amWhy, user21820, RRL, Did

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




put on hold as off-topic by José Carlos Santos, amWhy, user21820, RRL, Did 1 hour ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – José Carlos Santos, amWhy, user21820, RRL, Did

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.








  • 3




    What does it mean for a complex-valued function to have a minimum? Do you mean $vert f vert$ has a minimum at 0? Cheers!
    – Robert Lewis
    11 hours ago






  • 1




    @RobertLewis Indeed my mistake !
    – Maman
    11 hours ago














  • 3




    What does it mean for a complex-valued function to have a minimum? Do you mean $vert f vert$ has a minimum at 0? Cheers!
    – Robert Lewis
    11 hours ago






  • 1




    @RobertLewis Indeed my mistake !
    – Maman
    11 hours ago








3




3




What does it mean for a complex-valued function to have a minimum? Do you mean $vert f vert$ has a minimum at 0? Cheers!
– Robert Lewis
11 hours ago




What does it mean for a complex-valued function to have a minimum? Do you mean $vert f vert$ has a minimum at 0? Cheers!
– Robert Lewis
11 hours ago




1




1




@RobertLewis Indeed my mistake !
– Maman
11 hours ago




@RobertLewis Indeed my mistake !
– Maman
11 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















5














The identity map $f : z mapsto z$ is such that $vert fvert$ has a local minimum at $0$. However $f$ is not the always vanishing map.



Hence the statement of the initial question is wrong.






share|cite|improve this answer

















  • 1




    The assertion is true precisely when $f$ does not assume the value $0$ (just apply the maximum modulus principle to $1/f$).
    – Matemáticos Chibchas
    10 hours ago



















2














The assertion appears to be false.



Consider



$f(z) = z^n, 1 le n in Bbb N; tag 1$



writing



$z = re^{itheta}, tag 2$



we have



$z^n = r^n e^{i n theta}, tag 3$



whence



$vert f(z) vert = vert z^n vert = r^n; tag 4$



clearly then,



$vert f(0) vert = 0 tag 5$



so $0$ is an absolute minimum of $vert f(z) vert$; however,



$f(z) ne 0, ; text{for} ; z ne 0. tag 6$






share|cite|improve this answer

















  • 1




    Thank you maybe a hypothesis is missing...
    – Maman
    11 hours ago










  • That very well may be; but what?
    – Robert Lewis
    11 hours ago



















0














The correct version of the statement: if $|f|$ has a local minimum at zero, then either $f(0)=0$ or $f$ is constant.



Proof? $f$ is continuous; if it's not zero at zero, apply the maximum modulus principle to $frac1f$ on some suitably small neighborhood where it's bounded away from zero.






share|cite|improve this answer




























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5














    The identity map $f : z mapsto z$ is such that $vert fvert$ has a local minimum at $0$. However $f$ is not the always vanishing map.



    Hence the statement of the initial question is wrong.






    share|cite|improve this answer

















    • 1




      The assertion is true precisely when $f$ does not assume the value $0$ (just apply the maximum modulus principle to $1/f$).
      – Matemáticos Chibchas
      10 hours ago
















    5














    The identity map $f : z mapsto z$ is such that $vert fvert$ has a local minimum at $0$. However $f$ is not the always vanishing map.



    Hence the statement of the initial question is wrong.






    share|cite|improve this answer

















    • 1




      The assertion is true precisely when $f$ does not assume the value $0$ (just apply the maximum modulus principle to $1/f$).
      – Matemáticos Chibchas
      10 hours ago














    5












    5








    5






    The identity map $f : z mapsto z$ is such that $vert fvert$ has a local minimum at $0$. However $f$ is not the always vanishing map.



    Hence the statement of the initial question is wrong.






    share|cite|improve this answer












    The identity map $f : z mapsto z$ is such that $vert fvert$ has a local minimum at $0$. However $f$ is not the always vanishing map.



    Hence the statement of the initial question is wrong.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered 11 hours ago









    mathcounterexamples.net

    24.1k21753




    24.1k21753








    • 1




      The assertion is true precisely when $f$ does not assume the value $0$ (just apply the maximum modulus principle to $1/f$).
      – Matemáticos Chibchas
      10 hours ago














    • 1




      The assertion is true precisely when $f$ does not assume the value $0$ (just apply the maximum modulus principle to $1/f$).
      – Matemáticos Chibchas
      10 hours ago








    1




    1




    The assertion is true precisely when $f$ does not assume the value $0$ (just apply the maximum modulus principle to $1/f$).
    – Matemáticos Chibchas
    10 hours ago




    The assertion is true precisely when $f$ does not assume the value $0$ (just apply the maximum modulus principle to $1/f$).
    – Matemáticos Chibchas
    10 hours ago











    2














    The assertion appears to be false.



    Consider



    $f(z) = z^n, 1 le n in Bbb N; tag 1$



    writing



    $z = re^{itheta}, tag 2$



    we have



    $z^n = r^n e^{i n theta}, tag 3$



    whence



    $vert f(z) vert = vert z^n vert = r^n; tag 4$



    clearly then,



    $vert f(0) vert = 0 tag 5$



    so $0$ is an absolute minimum of $vert f(z) vert$; however,



    $f(z) ne 0, ; text{for} ; z ne 0. tag 6$






    share|cite|improve this answer

















    • 1




      Thank you maybe a hypothesis is missing...
      – Maman
      11 hours ago










    • That very well may be; but what?
      – Robert Lewis
      11 hours ago
















    2














    The assertion appears to be false.



    Consider



    $f(z) = z^n, 1 le n in Bbb N; tag 1$



    writing



    $z = re^{itheta}, tag 2$



    we have



    $z^n = r^n e^{i n theta}, tag 3$



    whence



    $vert f(z) vert = vert z^n vert = r^n; tag 4$



    clearly then,



    $vert f(0) vert = 0 tag 5$



    so $0$ is an absolute minimum of $vert f(z) vert$; however,



    $f(z) ne 0, ; text{for} ; z ne 0. tag 6$






    share|cite|improve this answer

















    • 1




      Thank you maybe a hypothesis is missing...
      – Maman
      11 hours ago










    • That very well may be; but what?
      – Robert Lewis
      11 hours ago














    2












    2








    2






    The assertion appears to be false.



    Consider



    $f(z) = z^n, 1 le n in Bbb N; tag 1$



    writing



    $z = re^{itheta}, tag 2$



    we have



    $z^n = r^n e^{i n theta}, tag 3$



    whence



    $vert f(z) vert = vert z^n vert = r^n; tag 4$



    clearly then,



    $vert f(0) vert = 0 tag 5$



    so $0$ is an absolute minimum of $vert f(z) vert$; however,



    $f(z) ne 0, ; text{for} ; z ne 0. tag 6$






    share|cite|improve this answer












    The assertion appears to be false.



    Consider



    $f(z) = z^n, 1 le n in Bbb N; tag 1$



    writing



    $z = re^{itheta}, tag 2$



    we have



    $z^n = r^n e^{i n theta}, tag 3$



    whence



    $vert f(z) vert = vert z^n vert = r^n; tag 4$



    clearly then,



    $vert f(0) vert = 0 tag 5$



    so $0$ is an absolute minimum of $vert f(z) vert$; however,



    $f(z) ne 0, ; text{for} ; z ne 0. tag 6$







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered 11 hours ago









    Robert Lewis

    43.5k22863




    43.5k22863








    • 1




      Thank you maybe a hypothesis is missing...
      – Maman
      11 hours ago










    • That very well may be; but what?
      – Robert Lewis
      11 hours ago














    • 1




      Thank you maybe a hypothesis is missing...
      – Maman
      11 hours ago










    • That very well may be; but what?
      – Robert Lewis
      11 hours ago








    1




    1




    Thank you maybe a hypothesis is missing...
    – Maman
    11 hours ago




    Thank you maybe a hypothesis is missing...
    – Maman
    11 hours ago












    That very well may be; but what?
    – Robert Lewis
    11 hours ago




    That very well may be; but what?
    – Robert Lewis
    11 hours ago











    0














    The correct version of the statement: if $|f|$ has a local minimum at zero, then either $f(0)=0$ or $f$ is constant.



    Proof? $f$ is continuous; if it's not zero at zero, apply the maximum modulus principle to $frac1f$ on some suitably small neighborhood where it's bounded away from zero.






    share|cite|improve this answer


























      0














      The correct version of the statement: if $|f|$ has a local minimum at zero, then either $f(0)=0$ or $f$ is constant.



      Proof? $f$ is continuous; if it's not zero at zero, apply the maximum modulus principle to $frac1f$ on some suitably small neighborhood where it's bounded away from zero.






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        0












        0








        0






        The correct version of the statement: if $|f|$ has a local minimum at zero, then either $f(0)=0$ or $f$ is constant.



        Proof? $f$ is continuous; if it's not zero at zero, apply the maximum modulus principle to $frac1f$ on some suitably small neighborhood where it's bounded away from zero.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        The correct version of the statement: if $|f|$ has a local minimum at zero, then either $f(0)=0$ or $f$ is constant.



        Proof? $f$ is continuous; if it's not zero at zero, apply the maximum modulus principle to $frac1f$ on some suitably small neighborhood where it's bounded away from zero.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 10 hours ago









        jmerry

        1,16616




        1,16616















            Popular posts from this blog

            What visual should I use to simply compare current year value vs last year in Power BI desktop

            Alexandru Averescu

            Trompette piccolo