Power series and local minimum? [on hold]

Multi tool use
Multi tool use












-2














Let consider that $f(z)=sumlimits_{nge 0}a_nz^n$ in $mathcal{D}(O,R)$ with $0<Rle +infty$. If $mid fmid$ has a local minimum in $0$ then $fequiv 0$.



Is it linked to the maximum modulus principle ?



Thanks in advance !










share|cite|improve this question















put on hold as off-topic by José Carlos Santos, amWhy, user21820, RRL, Did 1 hour ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – José Carlos Santos, amWhy, user21820, RRL, Did

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









  • 3




    What does it mean for a complex-valued function to have a minimum? Do you mean $vert f vert$ has a minimum at 0? Cheers!
    – Robert Lewis
    11 hours ago






  • 1




    @RobertLewis Indeed my mistake !
    – Maman
    11 hours ago
















-2














Let consider that $f(z)=sumlimits_{nge 0}a_nz^n$ in $mathcal{D}(O,R)$ with $0<Rle +infty$. If $mid fmid$ has a local minimum in $0$ then $fequiv 0$.



Is it linked to the maximum modulus principle ?



Thanks in advance !










share|cite|improve this question















put on hold as off-topic by José Carlos Santos, amWhy, user21820, RRL, Did 1 hour ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – José Carlos Santos, amWhy, user21820, RRL, Did

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









  • 3




    What does it mean for a complex-valued function to have a minimum? Do you mean $vert f vert$ has a minimum at 0? Cheers!
    – Robert Lewis
    11 hours ago






  • 1




    @RobertLewis Indeed my mistake !
    – Maman
    11 hours ago














-2












-2








-2


1





Let consider that $f(z)=sumlimits_{nge 0}a_nz^n$ in $mathcal{D}(O,R)$ with $0<Rle +infty$. If $mid fmid$ has a local minimum in $0$ then $fequiv 0$.



Is it linked to the maximum modulus principle ?



Thanks in advance !










share|cite|improve this question















Let consider that $f(z)=sumlimits_{nge 0}a_nz^n$ in $mathcal{D}(O,R)$ with $0<Rle +infty$. If $mid fmid$ has a local minimum in $0$ then $fequiv 0$.



Is it linked to the maximum modulus principle ?



Thanks in advance !







complex-analysis power-series holomorphic-functions analytic-functions






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 11 hours ago

























asked 11 hours ago









Maman

1,141722




1,141722




put on hold as off-topic by José Carlos Santos, amWhy, user21820, RRL, Did 1 hour ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – José Carlos Santos, amWhy, user21820, RRL, Did

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




put on hold as off-topic by José Carlos Santos, amWhy, user21820, RRL, Did 1 hour ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – José Carlos Santos, amWhy, user21820, RRL, Did

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.








  • 3




    What does it mean for a complex-valued function to have a minimum? Do you mean $vert f vert$ has a minimum at 0? Cheers!
    – Robert Lewis
    11 hours ago






  • 1




    @RobertLewis Indeed my mistake !
    – Maman
    11 hours ago














  • 3




    What does it mean for a complex-valued function to have a minimum? Do you mean $vert f vert$ has a minimum at 0? Cheers!
    – Robert Lewis
    11 hours ago






  • 1




    @RobertLewis Indeed my mistake !
    – Maman
    11 hours ago








3




3




What does it mean for a complex-valued function to have a minimum? Do you mean $vert f vert$ has a minimum at 0? Cheers!
– Robert Lewis
11 hours ago




What does it mean for a complex-valued function to have a minimum? Do you mean $vert f vert$ has a minimum at 0? Cheers!
– Robert Lewis
11 hours ago




1




1




@RobertLewis Indeed my mistake !
– Maman
11 hours ago




@RobertLewis Indeed my mistake !
– Maman
11 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















5














The identity map $f : z mapsto z$ is such that $vert fvert$ has a local minimum at $0$. However $f$ is not the always vanishing map.



Hence the statement of the initial question is wrong.






share|cite|improve this answer

















  • 1




    The assertion is true precisely when $f$ does not assume the value $0$ (just apply the maximum modulus principle to $1/f$).
    – Matemáticos Chibchas
    10 hours ago



















2














The assertion appears to be false.



Consider



$f(z) = z^n, 1 le n in Bbb N; tag 1$



writing



$z = re^{itheta}, tag 2$



we have



$z^n = r^n e^{i n theta}, tag 3$



whence



$vert f(z) vert = vert z^n vert = r^n; tag 4$



clearly then,



$vert f(0) vert = 0 tag 5$



so $0$ is an absolute minimum of $vert f(z) vert$; however,



$f(z) ne 0, ; text{for} ; z ne 0. tag 6$






share|cite|improve this answer

















  • 1




    Thank you maybe a hypothesis is missing...
    – Maman
    11 hours ago










  • That very well may be; but what?
    – Robert Lewis
    11 hours ago



















0














The correct version of the statement: if $|f|$ has a local minimum at zero, then either $f(0)=0$ or $f$ is constant.



Proof? $f$ is continuous; if it's not zero at zero, apply the maximum modulus principle to $frac1f$ on some suitably small neighborhood where it's bounded away from zero.






share|cite|improve this answer




























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5














    The identity map $f : z mapsto z$ is such that $vert fvert$ has a local minimum at $0$. However $f$ is not the always vanishing map.



    Hence the statement of the initial question is wrong.






    share|cite|improve this answer

















    • 1




      The assertion is true precisely when $f$ does not assume the value $0$ (just apply the maximum modulus principle to $1/f$).
      – Matemáticos Chibchas
      10 hours ago
















    5














    The identity map $f : z mapsto z$ is such that $vert fvert$ has a local minimum at $0$. However $f$ is not the always vanishing map.



    Hence the statement of the initial question is wrong.






    share|cite|improve this answer

















    • 1




      The assertion is true precisely when $f$ does not assume the value $0$ (just apply the maximum modulus principle to $1/f$).
      – Matemáticos Chibchas
      10 hours ago














    5












    5








    5






    The identity map $f : z mapsto z$ is such that $vert fvert$ has a local minimum at $0$. However $f$ is not the always vanishing map.



    Hence the statement of the initial question is wrong.






    share|cite|improve this answer












    The identity map $f : z mapsto z$ is such that $vert fvert$ has a local minimum at $0$. However $f$ is not the always vanishing map.



    Hence the statement of the initial question is wrong.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered 11 hours ago









    mathcounterexamples.net

    24.1k21753




    24.1k21753








    • 1




      The assertion is true precisely when $f$ does not assume the value $0$ (just apply the maximum modulus principle to $1/f$).
      – Matemáticos Chibchas
      10 hours ago














    • 1




      The assertion is true precisely when $f$ does not assume the value $0$ (just apply the maximum modulus principle to $1/f$).
      – Matemáticos Chibchas
      10 hours ago








    1




    1




    The assertion is true precisely when $f$ does not assume the value $0$ (just apply the maximum modulus principle to $1/f$).
    – Matemáticos Chibchas
    10 hours ago




    The assertion is true precisely when $f$ does not assume the value $0$ (just apply the maximum modulus principle to $1/f$).
    – Matemáticos Chibchas
    10 hours ago











    2














    The assertion appears to be false.



    Consider



    $f(z) = z^n, 1 le n in Bbb N; tag 1$



    writing



    $z = re^{itheta}, tag 2$



    we have



    $z^n = r^n e^{i n theta}, tag 3$



    whence



    $vert f(z) vert = vert z^n vert = r^n; tag 4$



    clearly then,



    $vert f(0) vert = 0 tag 5$



    so $0$ is an absolute minimum of $vert f(z) vert$; however,



    $f(z) ne 0, ; text{for} ; z ne 0. tag 6$






    share|cite|improve this answer

















    • 1




      Thank you maybe a hypothesis is missing...
      – Maman
      11 hours ago










    • That very well may be; but what?
      – Robert Lewis
      11 hours ago
















    2














    The assertion appears to be false.



    Consider



    $f(z) = z^n, 1 le n in Bbb N; tag 1$



    writing



    $z = re^{itheta}, tag 2$



    we have



    $z^n = r^n e^{i n theta}, tag 3$



    whence



    $vert f(z) vert = vert z^n vert = r^n; tag 4$



    clearly then,



    $vert f(0) vert = 0 tag 5$



    so $0$ is an absolute minimum of $vert f(z) vert$; however,



    $f(z) ne 0, ; text{for} ; z ne 0. tag 6$






    share|cite|improve this answer

















    • 1




      Thank you maybe a hypothesis is missing...
      – Maman
      11 hours ago










    • That very well may be; but what?
      – Robert Lewis
      11 hours ago














    2












    2








    2






    The assertion appears to be false.



    Consider



    $f(z) = z^n, 1 le n in Bbb N; tag 1$



    writing



    $z = re^{itheta}, tag 2$



    we have



    $z^n = r^n e^{i n theta}, tag 3$



    whence



    $vert f(z) vert = vert z^n vert = r^n; tag 4$



    clearly then,



    $vert f(0) vert = 0 tag 5$



    so $0$ is an absolute minimum of $vert f(z) vert$; however,



    $f(z) ne 0, ; text{for} ; z ne 0. tag 6$






    share|cite|improve this answer












    The assertion appears to be false.



    Consider



    $f(z) = z^n, 1 le n in Bbb N; tag 1$



    writing



    $z = re^{itheta}, tag 2$



    we have



    $z^n = r^n e^{i n theta}, tag 3$



    whence



    $vert f(z) vert = vert z^n vert = r^n; tag 4$



    clearly then,



    $vert f(0) vert = 0 tag 5$



    so $0$ is an absolute minimum of $vert f(z) vert$; however,



    $f(z) ne 0, ; text{for} ; z ne 0. tag 6$







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered 11 hours ago









    Robert Lewis

    43.5k22863




    43.5k22863








    • 1




      Thank you maybe a hypothesis is missing...
      – Maman
      11 hours ago










    • That very well may be; but what?
      – Robert Lewis
      11 hours ago














    • 1




      Thank you maybe a hypothesis is missing...
      – Maman
      11 hours ago










    • That very well may be; but what?
      – Robert Lewis
      11 hours ago








    1




    1




    Thank you maybe a hypothesis is missing...
    – Maman
    11 hours ago




    Thank you maybe a hypothesis is missing...
    – Maman
    11 hours ago












    That very well may be; but what?
    – Robert Lewis
    11 hours ago




    That very well may be; but what?
    – Robert Lewis
    11 hours ago











    0














    The correct version of the statement: if $|f|$ has a local minimum at zero, then either $f(0)=0$ or $f$ is constant.



    Proof? $f$ is continuous; if it's not zero at zero, apply the maximum modulus principle to $frac1f$ on some suitably small neighborhood where it's bounded away from zero.






    share|cite|improve this answer


























      0














      The correct version of the statement: if $|f|$ has a local minimum at zero, then either $f(0)=0$ or $f$ is constant.



      Proof? $f$ is continuous; if it's not zero at zero, apply the maximum modulus principle to $frac1f$ on some suitably small neighborhood where it's bounded away from zero.






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        0












        0








        0






        The correct version of the statement: if $|f|$ has a local minimum at zero, then either $f(0)=0$ or $f$ is constant.



        Proof? $f$ is continuous; if it's not zero at zero, apply the maximum modulus principle to $frac1f$ on some suitably small neighborhood where it's bounded away from zero.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        The correct version of the statement: if $|f|$ has a local minimum at zero, then either $f(0)=0$ or $f$ is constant.



        Proof? $f$ is continuous; if it's not zero at zero, apply the maximum modulus principle to $frac1f$ on some suitably small neighborhood where it's bounded away from zero.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 10 hours ago









        jmerry

        1,16616




        1,16616















            4AEiY3M,E,yVpzT6FCNhr5s2p6DEjg4uKdMbw6IxJ YnzcA,NkXm RPa8 Eb21ap,rFedX5XodSCuKtR,A2ug,kVKri,li
            Q2eln8zubI1wiWvVeQPPB VV,Pn7Gs3JmYQ AnZaZNTC

            Popular posts from this blog

            How to ignore python UserWarning in pytest?

            What visual should I use to simply compare current year value vs last year in Power BI desktop

            Script to remove string up to first number