Proof for this binomial coefficient's equation
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
For $k, l in mathbb N$
$$sum_{i=0}^ksum_{j=0}^lbinom{i+j}i=binom{k+l+2}{k+1}-1$$
How can I prove this?
I thought some ideas with Pascal's triangle, counting paths on the grid and simple deformation of the formula.
It can be checked here (wolframalpha).
If the proof is difficult, please let me know the main idea.
Sorry for my poor English.
Thank you.
EDIT:
I got the great and short proof using Hockey-stick identity by Anubhab Ghosal, but because of this form, I could also get the Robert Z's specialized answer.
Then I don't think it is fully duplicate.
combinatorics summation binomial-coefficients
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
For $k, l in mathbb N$
$$sum_{i=0}^ksum_{j=0}^lbinom{i+j}i=binom{k+l+2}{k+1}-1$$
How can I prove this?
I thought some ideas with Pascal's triangle, counting paths on the grid and simple deformation of the formula.
It can be checked here (wolframalpha).
If the proof is difficult, please let me know the main idea.
Sorry for my poor English.
Thank you.
EDIT:
I got the great and short proof using Hockey-stick identity by Anubhab Ghosal, but because of this form, I could also get the Robert Z's specialized answer.
Then I don't think it is fully duplicate.
combinatorics summation binomial-coefficients
New contributor
1
Possible duplicate of Prove $sumlimits_{i=0}^nbinom{i+k-1}{k-1}=binom{n+k}{k}$ (a.k.a. Hockey-Stick Identity)
– user10354138
5 hours ago
@user10354138 The double sum is related Hockey-Stick Identity but it is not a duplicate of the linked question. Moreover OP asks for a combinatorial proof (counting paths...)
– Robert Z
4 hours ago
@RobertZ The OP didn't ask for a combinatorial proof, only for a proof ("How can I prove this?" in the quote, not "How can I prove this combinatorially?"). It can be proved by applying the linked result twice, so it is a duplicate.
– user10354138
2 hours ago
@user10354138 Fine. So we have a different opinion on this matter. Have a nice day.
– Robert Z
17 mins ago
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
For $k, l in mathbb N$
$$sum_{i=0}^ksum_{j=0}^lbinom{i+j}i=binom{k+l+2}{k+1}-1$$
How can I prove this?
I thought some ideas with Pascal's triangle, counting paths on the grid and simple deformation of the formula.
It can be checked here (wolframalpha).
If the proof is difficult, please let me know the main idea.
Sorry for my poor English.
Thank you.
EDIT:
I got the great and short proof using Hockey-stick identity by Anubhab Ghosal, but because of this form, I could also get the Robert Z's specialized answer.
Then I don't think it is fully duplicate.
combinatorics summation binomial-coefficients
New contributor
For $k, l in mathbb N$
$$sum_{i=0}^ksum_{j=0}^lbinom{i+j}i=binom{k+l+2}{k+1}-1$$
How can I prove this?
I thought some ideas with Pascal's triangle, counting paths on the grid and simple deformation of the formula.
It can be checked here (wolframalpha).
If the proof is difficult, please let me know the main idea.
Sorry for my poor English.
Thank you.
EDIT:
I got the great and short proof using Hockey-stick identity by Anubhab Ghosal, but because of this form, I could also get the Robert Z's specialized answer.
Then I don't think it is fully duplicate.
combinatorics summation binomial-coefficients
combinatorics summation binomial-coefficients
New contributor
New contributor
edited 2 hours ago
Martin Sleziak
44.6k7115269
44.6k7115269
New contributor
asked 6 hours ago
るまし
235
235
New contributor
New contributor
1
Possible duplicate of Prove $sumlimits_{i=0}^nbinom{i+k-1}{k-1}=binom{n+k}{k}$ (a.k.a. Hockey-Stick Identity)
– user10354138
5 hours ago
@user10354138 The double sum is related Hockey-Stick Identity but it is not a duplicate of the linked question. Moreover OP asks for a combinatorial proof (counting paths...)
– Robert Z
4 hours ago
@RobertZ The OP didn't ask for a combinatorial proof, only for a proof ("How can I prove this?" in the quote, not "How can I prove this combinatorially?"). It can be proved by applying the linked result twice, so it is a duplicate.
– user10354138
2 hours ago
@user10354138 Fine. So we have a different opinion on this matter. Have a nice day.
– Robert Z
17 mins ago
add a comment |
1
Possible duplicate of Prove $sumlimits_{i=0}^nbinom{i+k-1}{k-1}=binom{n+k}{k}$ (a.k.a. Hockey-Stick Identity)
– user10354138
5 hours ago
@user10354138 The double sum is related Hockey-Stick Identity but it is not a duplicate of the linked question. Moreover OP asks for a combinatorial proof (counting paths...)
– Robert Z
4 hours ago
@RobertZ The OP didn't ask for a combinatorial proof, only for a proof ("How can I prove this?" in the quote, not "How can I prove this combinatorially?"). It can be proved by applying the linked result twice, so it is a duplicate.
– user10354138
2 hours ago
@user10354138 Fine. So we have a different opinion on this matter. Have a nice day.
– Robert Z
17 mins ago
1
1
Possible duplicate of Prove $sumlimits_{i=0}^nbinom{i+k-1}{k-1}=binom{n+k}{k}$ (a.k.a. Hockey-Stick Identity)
– user10354138
5 hours ago
Possible duplicate of Prove $sumlimits_{i=0}^nbinom{i+k-1}{k-1}=binom{n+k}{k}$ (a.k.a. Hockey-Stick Identity)
– user10354138
5 hours ago
@user10354138 The double sum is related Hockey-Stick Identity but it is not a duplicate of the linked question. Moreover OP asks for a combinatorial proof (counting paths...)
– Robert Z
4 hours ago
@user10354138 The double sum is related Hockey-Stick Identity but it is not a duplicate of the linked question. Moreover OP asks for a combinatorial proof (counting paths...)
– Robert Z
4 hours ago
@RobertZ The OP didn't ask for a combinatorial proof, only for a proof ("How can I prove this?" in the quote, not "How can I prove this combinatorially?"). It can be proved by applying the linked result twice, so it is a duplicate.
– user10354138
2 hours ago
@RobertZ The OP didn't ask for a combinatorial proof, only for a proof ("How can I prove this?" in the quote, not "How can I prove this combinatorially?"). It can be proved by applying the linked result twice, so it is a duplicate.
– user10354138
2 hours ago
@user10354138 Fine. So we have a different opinion on this matter. Have a nice day.
– Robert Z
17 mins ago
@user10354138 Fine. So we have a different opinion on this matter. Have a nice day.
– Robert Z
17 mins ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
Your idea about a combinatorial proof which is related to counting paths in a grid is a good one!
The binomial $binom{i+j}i$
counts the paths on the grid from $(0,0)$ to $(i,j)$ moving only right or up. So the double sum
$$sum_{i=0}^ksum_{j=0}^lbinom{i+j}i-1$$
counts the number of all such paths from $(0,0)$ to any vertex inside the rectangle $(0,k)times (0,l)$ different from $(0,0)$.
Now consider the paths from $(0,0)$ to $(k+1,l+1)$ different from $$(0,0)to (0,l+1)to (k+1,l+1)quadtext{and}quad
(0,0)to (k+1,0)to (k+1,l+1)$$ which are
$$binom{k+l+2}{k+1}-2.$$
Now any path of the first kind can be completed to a path of the second kind by changing direction, going to the boundary of the rectangle
$(0,k+1)times(0,l+1)$ and then moving to the corner $(k+1,l+1)$ along the side.
Is this a bijection between the first set of paths and the second one?
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
$$displaystylesum_{i=0}^ksum_{j=0}^lbinom{i+j}i=sum_{i=0}^ksum_{j=i}^{i+l}binom{j}i=sum_{i=0}^kbinom{i+l+1}{i+1} ^{[1]}$$
$$=sum_{i=0}^kbinom{i+l+1}{l}=sum_{i=l}^{k+l+1}binom{i}{l}−1=binom{k+l+2}{k+1}-1 ^{[1]}$$
1. Hockey-Stick Identity
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
Your idea about a combinatorial proof which is related to counting paths in a grid is a good one!
The binomial $binom{i+j}i$
counts the paths on the grid from $(0,0)$ to $(i,j)$ moving only right or up. So the double sum
$$sum_{i=0}^ksum_{j=0}^lbinom{i+j}i-1$$
counts the number of all such paths from $(0,0)$ to any vertex inside the rectangle $(0,k)times (0,l)$ different from $(0,0)$.
Now consider the paths from $(0,0)$ to $(k+1,l+1)$ different from $$(0,0)to (0,l+1)to (k+1,l+1)quadtext{and}quad
(0,0)to (k+1,0)to (k+1,l+1)$$ which are
$$binom{k+l+2}{k+1}-2.$$
Now any path of the first kind can be completed to a path of the second kind by changing direction, going to the boundary of the rectangle
$(0,k+1)times(0,l+1)$ and then moving to the corner $(k+1,l+1)$ along the side.
Is this a bijection between the first set of paths and the second one?
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
Your idea about a combinatorial proof which is related to counting paths in a grid is a good one!
The binomial $binom{i+j}i$
counts the paths on the grid from $(0,0)$ to $(i,j)$ moving only right or up. So the double sum
$$sum_{i=0}^ksum_{j=0}^lbinom{i+j}i-1$$
counts the number of all such paths from $(0,0)$ to any vertex inside the rectangle $(0,k)times (0,l)$ different from $(0,0)$.
Now consider the paths from $(0,0)$ to $(k+1,l+1)$ different from $$(0,0)to (0,l+1)to (k+1,l+1)quadtext{and}quad
(0,0)to (k+1,0)to (k+1,l+1)$$ which are
$$binom{k+l+2}{k+1}-2.$$
Now any path of the first kind can be completed to a path of the second kind by changing direction, going to the boundary of the rectangle
$(0,k+1)times(0,l+1)$ and then moving to the corner $(k+1,l+1)$ along the side.
Is this a bijection between the first set of paths and the second one?
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
Your idea about a combinatorial proof which is related to counting paths in a grid is a good one!
The binomial $binom{i+j}i$
counts the paths on the grid from $(0,0)$ to $(i,j)$ moving only right or up. So the double sum
$$sum_{i=0}^ksum_{j=0}^lbinom{i+j}i-1$$
counts the number of all such paths from $(0,0)$ to any vertex inside the rectangle $(0,k)times (0,l)$ different from $(0,0)$.
Now consider the paths from $(0,0)$ to $(k+1,l+1)$ different from $$(0,0)to (0,l+1)to (k+1,l+1)quadtext{and}quad
(0,0)to (k+1,0)to (k+1,l+1)$$ which are
$$binom{k+l+2}{k+1}-2.$$
Now any path of the first kind can be completed to a path of the second kind by changing direction, going to the boundary of the rectangle
$(0,k+1)times(0,l+1)$ and then moving to the corner $(k+1,l+1)$ along the side.
Is this a bijection between the first set of paths and the second one?
Your idea about a combinatorial proof which is related to counting paths in a grid is a good one!
The binomial $binom{i+j}i$
counts the paths on the grid from $(0,0)$ to $(i,j)$ moving only right or up. So the double sum
$$sum_{i=0}^ksum_{j=0}^lbinom{i+j}i-1$$
counts the number of all such paths from $(0,0)$ to any vertex inside the rectangle $(0,k)times (0,l)$ different from $(0,0)$.
Now consider the paths from $(0,0)$ to $(k+1,l+1)$ different from $$(0,0)to (0,l+1)to (k+1,l+1)quadtext{and}quad
(0,0)to (k+1,0)to (k+1,l+1)$$ which are
$$binom{k+l+2}{k+1}-2.$$
Now any path of the first kind can be completed to a path of the second kind by changing direction, going to the boundary of the rectangle
$(0,k+1)times(0,l+1)$ and then moving to the corner $(k+1,l+1)$ along the side.
Is this a bijection between the first set of paths and the second one?
edited 5 hours ago
answered 5 hours ago
Robert Z
91.9k1058129
91.9k1058129
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
$$displaystylesum_{i=0}^ksum_{j=0}^lbinom{i+j}i=sum_{i=0}^ksum_{j=i}^{i+l}binom{j}i=sum_{i=0}^kbinom{i+l+1}{i+1} ^{[1]}$$
$$=sum_{i=0}^kbinom{i+l+1}{l}=sum_{i=l}^{k+l+1}binom{i}{l}−1=binom{k+l+2}{k+1}-1 ^{[1]}$$
1. Hockey-Stick Identity
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
$$displaystylesum_{i=0}^ksum_{j=0}^lbinom{i+j}i=sum_{i=0}^ksum_{j=i}^{i+l}binom{j}i=sum_{i=0}^kbinom{i+l+1}{i+1} ^{[1]}$$
$$=sum_{i=0}^kbinom{i+l+1}{l}=sum_{i=l}^{k+l+1}binom{i}{l}−1=binom{k+l+2}{k+1}-1 ^{[1]}$$
1. Hockey-Stick Identity
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
up vote
5
down vote
$$displaystylesum_{i=0}^ksum_{j=0}^lbinom{i+j}i=sum_{i=0}^ksum_{j=i}^{i+l}binom{j}i=sum_{i=0}^kbinom{i+l+1}{i+1} ^{[1]}$$
$$=sum_{i=0}^kbinom{i+l+1}{l}=sum_{i=l}^{k+l+1}binom{i}{l}−1=binom{k+l+2}{k+1}-1 ^{[1]}$$
1. Hockey-Stick Identity
$$displaystylesum_{i=0}^ksum_{j=0}^lbinom{i+j}i=sum_{i=0}^ksum_{j=i}^{i+l}binom{j}i=sum_{i=0}^kbinom{i+l+1}{i+1} ^{[1]}$$
$$=sum_{i=0}^kbinom{i+l+1}{l}=sum_{i=l}^{k+l+1}binom{i}{l}−1=binom{k+l+2}{k+1}-1 ^{[1]}$$
1. Hockey-Stick Identity
edited 5 hours ago
answered 5 hours ago
Anubhab Ghosal
69512
69512
add a comment |
add a comment |
るまし is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
るまし is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
るまし is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
るまし is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3036489%2fproof-for-this-binomial-coefficients-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Possible duplicate of Prove $sumlimits_{i=0}^nbinom{i+k-1}{k-1}=binom{n+k}{k}$ (a.k.a. Hockey-Stick Identity)
– user10354138
5 hours ago
@user10354138 The double sum is related Hockey-Stick Identity but it is not a duplicate of the linked question. Moreover OP asks for a combinatorial proof (counting paths...)
– Robert Z
4 hours ago
@RobertZ The OP didn't ask for a combinatorial proof, only for a proof ("How can I prove this?" in the quote, not "How can I prove this combinatorially?"). It can be proved by applying the linked result twice, so it is a duplicate.
– user10354138
2 hours ago
@user10354138 Fine. So we have a different opinion on this matter. Have a nice day.
– Robert Z
17 mins ago