“Along with” but also “and”











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Here is the original sentence:




In early 1992, Wayne Calloway, PepsiCo’s chairman and CEO, along with the presidents of each of the company’s restaurants, and Ken Stevens, the senior vice president of strategic planning, was (they WERE evaluating?) evaluating two opportunities..




I think this is wrong because there is an "and" after the "along with" prepositional phrase.



So, if we break down the sentence:




In early 1992, {Wayne Calloway, PepsiCo’s chairman and CEO}, {along with the presidents of each of the company’s restaurants}, {and Ken Stevens, the senior vice president of strategic planning}, was evaluating two opportunities...




The "and" seems to leave us with the noun structure of:
“Wayne Calloway, PepsiCo’s chairman and CEO and Ken Stevens, the senior vice president of strategic planning were evaluating two opportunities...?



Thoughts?










share|improve this question
















bumped to the homepage by Community 1 hour ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.















  • How many presidents did each of their restaurants have?
    – Will Crawford
    Feb 25 at 2:22










  • Interesting question...more than 3 for sure.
    – LyLa_Austin
    Feb 26 at 5:10















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Here is the original sentence:




In early 1992, Wayne Calloway, PepsiCo’s chairman and CEO, along with the presidents of each of the company’s restaurants, and Ken Stevens, the senior vice president of strategic planning, was (they WERE evaluating?) evaluating two opportunities..




I think this is wrong because there is an "and" after the "along with" prepositional phrase.



So, if we break down the sentence:




In early 1992, {Wayne Calloway, PepsiCo’s chairman and CEO}, {along with the presidents of each of the company’s restaurants}, {and Ken Stevens, the senior vice president of strategic planning}, was evaluating two opportunities...




The "and" seems to leave us with the noun structure of:
“Wayne Calloway, PepsiCo’s chairman and CEO and Ken Stevens, the senior vice president of strategic planning were evaluating two opportunities...?



Thoughts?










share|improve this question
















bumped to the homepage by Community 1 hour ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.















  • How many presidents did each of their restaurants have?
    – Will Crawford
    Feb 25 at 2:22










  • Interesting question...more than 3 for sure.
    – LyLa_Austin
    Feb 26 at 5:10













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











Here is the original sentence:




In early 1992, Wayne Calloway, PepsiCo’s chairman and CEO, along with the presidents of each of the company’s restaurants, and Ken Stevens, the senior vice president of strategic planning, was (they WERE evaluating?) evaluating two opportunities..




I think this is wrong because there is an "and" after the "along with" prepositional phrase.



So, if we break down the sentence:




In early 1992, {Wayne Calloway, PepsiCo’s chairman and CEO}, {along with the presidents of each of the company’s restaurants}, {and Ken Stevens, the senior vice president of strategic planning}, was evaluating two opportunities...




The "and" seems to leave us with the noun structure of:
“Wayne Calloway, PepsiCo’s chairman and CEO and Ken Stevens, the senior vice president of strategic planning were evaluating two opportunities...?



Thoughts?










share|improve this question















Here is the original sentence:




In early 1992, Wayne Calloway, PepsiCo’s chairman and CEO, along with the presidents of each of the company’s restaurants, and Ken Stevens, the senior vice president of strategic planning, was (they WERE evaluating?) evaluating two opportunities..




I think this is wrong because there is an "and" after the "along with" prepositional phrase.



So, if we break down the sentence:




In early 1992, {Wayne Calloway, PepsiCo’s chairman and CEO}, {along with the presidents of each of the company’s restaurants}, {and Ken Stevens, the senior vice president of strategic planning}, was evaluating two opportunities...




The "and" seems to leave us with the noun structure of:
“Wayne Calloway, PepsiCo’s chairman and CEO and Ken Stevens, the senior vice president of strategic planning were evaluating two opportunities...?



Thoughts?







prepositional-phrases






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Feb 15 at 0:23









Let's stop villifying Iran

4,77421445




4,77421445










asked Feb 14 at 5:09









LyLa_Austin

1




1





bumped to the homepage by Community 1 hour ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.







bumped to the homepage by Community 1 hour ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.














  • How many presidents did each of their restaurants have?
    – Will Crawford
    Feb 25 at 2:22










  • Interesting question...more than 3 for sure.
    – LyLa_Austin
    Feb 26 at 5:10


















  • How many presidents did each of their restaurants have?
    – Will Crawford
    Feb 25 at 2:22










  • Interesting question...more than 3 for sure.
    – LyLa_Austin
    Feb 26 at 5:10
















How many presidents did each of their restaurants have?
– Will Crawford
Feb 25 at 2:22




How many presidents did each of their restaurants have?
– Will Crawford
Feb 25 at 2:22












Interesting question...more than 3 for sure.
– LyLa_Austin
Feb 26 at 5:10




Interesting question...more than 3 for sure.
– LyLa_Austin
Feb 26 at 5:10










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote













You're looking at that "and" from one perspective, partly because the original sentence was so loosely written.



Rather than interpreting the “and” as separating Wayne and the presidents from Ken, why not just as easily join the presidents with Ken, opposing the combination to Wayne?






share|improve this answer





















  • So true. I feel like the sentence is confusing to say the least. Is this one of those "gray" areas where were and was are both correct?
    – LyLa_Austin
    Feb 16 at 2:03










  • I see what you mean; I often struggle with "were" and "was" and I don't think this area is nearly so grey
    – Robbie Goodwin
    Feb 16 at 23:08




















up vote
0
down vote














In early 1992 Wayne Calloway, PepsiCo’s chairman and CEO, along with the presidents of each of the company’s restaurants and Ken Stevens, the senior vice president of strategic planning, were evaluating two opportunities.





  • In early 1992 Wayne Calloway, PepsiCo's chairman and CEO,

  • along with the presidents of each of the company's restaurants and Ken Stevens, the senior vice president of strategic planning,

  • were evaluating two opportunities.


All that was needed was two drop the first and fourth commas, and use were instead of was (for a compound subject).






share|improve this answer





















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "97"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f431041%2falong-with-but-also-and%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote













    You're looking at that "and" from one perspective, partly because the original sentence was so loosely written.



    Rather than interpreting the “and” as separating Wayne and the presidents from Ken, why not just as easily join the presidents with Ken, opposing the combination to Wayne?






    share|improve this answer





















    • So true. I feel like the sentence is confusing to say the least. Is this one of those "gray" areas where were and was are both correct?
      – LyLa_Austin
      Feb 16 at 2:03










    • I see what you mean; I often struggle with "were" and "was" and I don't think this area is nearly so grey
      – Robbie Goodwin
      Feb 16 at 23:08

















    up vote
    0
    down vote













    You're looking at that "and" from one perspective, partly because the original sentence was so loosely written.



    Rather than interpreting the “and” as separating Wayne and the presidents from Ken, why not just as easily join the presidents with Ken, opposing the combination to Wayne?






    share|improve this answer





















    • So true. I feel like the sentence is confusing to say the least. Is this one of those "gray" areas where were and was are both correct?
      – LyLa_Austin
      Feb 16 at 2:03










    • I see what you mean; I often struggle with "were" and "was" and I don't think this area is nearly so grey
      – Robbie Goodwin
      Feb 16 at 23:08















    up vote
    0
    down vote










    up vote
    0
    down vote









    You're looking at that "and" from one perspective, partly because the original sentence was so loosely written.



    Rather than interpreting the “and” as separating Wayne and the presidents from Ken, why not just as easily join the presidents with Ken, opposing the combination to Wayne?






    share|improve this answer












    You're looking at that "and" from one perspective, partly because the original sentence was so loosely written.



    Rather than interpreting the “and” as separating Wayne and the presidents from Ken, why not just as easily join the presidents with Ken, opposing the combination to Wayne?







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Feb 14 at 23:47









    Robbie Goodwin

    2,0591416




    2,0591416












    • So true. I feel like the sentence is confusing to say the least. Is this one of those "gray" areas where were and was are both correct?
      – LyLa_Austin
      Feb 16 at 2:03










    • I see what you mean; I often struggle with "were" and "was" and I don't think this area is nearly so grey
      – Robbie Goodwin
      Feb 16 at 23:08




















    • So true. I feel like the sentence is confusing to say the least. Is this one of those "gray" areas where were and was are both correct?
      – LyLa_Austin
      Feb 16 at 2:03










    • I see what you mean; I often struggle with "were" and "was" and I don't think this area is nearly so grey
      – Robbie Goodwin
      Feb 16 at 23:08


















    So true. I feel like the sentence is confusing to say the least. Is this one of those "gray" areas where were and was are both correct?
    – LyLa_Austin
    Feb 16 at 2:03




    So true. I feel like the sentence is confusing to say the least. Is this one of those "gray" areas where were and was are both correct?
    – LyLa_Austin
    Feb 16 at 2:03












    I see what you mean; I often struggle with "were" and "was" and I don't think this area is nearly so grey
    – Robbie Goodwin
    Feb 16 at 23:08






    I see what you mean; I often struggle with "were" and "was" and I don't think this area is nearly so grey
    – Robbie Goodwin
    Feb 16 at 23:08














    up vote
    0
    down vote














    In early 1992 Wayne Calloway, PepsiCo’s chairman and CEO, along with the presidents of each of the company’s restaurants and Ken Stevens, the senior vice president of strategic planning, were evaluating two opportunities.





    • In early 1992 Wayne Calloway, PepsiCo's chairman and CEO,

    • along with the presidents of each of the company's restaurants and Ken Stevens, the senior vice president of strategic planning,

    • were evaluating two opportunities.


    All that was needed was two drop the first and fourth commas, and use were instead of was (for a compound subject).






    share|improve this answer

























      up vote
      0
      down vote














      In early 1992 Wayne Calloway, PepsiCo’s chairman and CEO, along with the presidents of each of the company’s restaurants and Ken Stevens, the senior vice president of strategic planning, were evaluating two opportunities.





      • In early 1992 Wayne Calloway, PepsiCo's chairman and CEO,

      • along with the presidents of each of the company's restaurants and Ken Stevens, the senior vice president of strategic planning,

      • were evaluating two opportunities.


      All that was needed was two drop the first and fourth commas, and use were instead of was (for a compound subject).






      share|improve this answer























        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote










        In early 1992 Wayne Calloway, PepsiCo’s chairman and CEO, along with the presidents of each of the company’s restaurants and Ken Stevens, the senior vice president of strategic planning, were evaluating two opportunities.





        • In early 1992 Wayne Calloway, PepsiCo's chairman and CEO,

        • along with the presidents of each of the company's restaurants and Ken Stevens, the senior vice president of strategic planning,

        • were evaluating two opportunities.


        All that was needed was two drop the first and fourth commas, and use were instead of was (for a compound subject).






        share|improve this answer













        In early 1992 Wayne Calloway, PepsiCo’s chairman and CEO, along with the presidents of each of the company’s restaurants and Ken Stevens, the senior vice president of strategic planning, were evaluating two opportunities.





        • In early 1992 Wayne Calloway, PepsiCo's chairman and CEO,

        • along with the presidents of each of the company's restaurants and Ken Stevens, the senior vice president of strategic planning,

        • were evaluating two opportunities.


        All that was needed was two drop the first and fourth commas, and use were instead of was (for a compound subject).







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Mar 17 at 2:22









        Bread

        5,31721132




        5,31721132






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f431041%2falong-with-but-also-and%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Trompette piccolo

            Slow SSRS Report in dynamic grouping and multiple parameters

            Simon Yates (cyclisme)