“Explain me” “Describe me” sound unidiomatic to me
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Sometimes while I am watching movies or YouTube videos I hear phrases like "Explain me what it is" or "Describe me the dish".
I feel that those phrases sound a bit unidiomatic to me. Are those phrases correct?
If so, are there other verbs that skip the preposition "to"?
grammar
asked Oct 21 at 17:48
Michael Frost
132
|
show 8 more comments
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Sometimes while I am watching movies or YouTube videos I hear phrases like "Explain me what it is" or "Describe me the dish".
I feel that those phrases sound a bit unidiomatic to me. Are those phrases correct?
If so, are there other verbs that skip the preposition "to"?
grammar
asked Oct 21 at 17:48
Michael Frost
132
7
They are unidiomatic. They're a giveaway (a shibboleth) that it's a non-native speaker of English. In my experience, "explain me" is endemic to speakers of Indian English; it may reflect a feature of their native language (as dropping articles does for Slavic speakers of English). Don't use these constructions.
– Dan Bron
Oct 21 at 17:52
Either it's a non-native speaker of you are not hearing the "to" in "explain to me".
– Hot Licks
Oct 21 at 17:54
4
Possible duplicate of Which one is correct? "Explain me" or "Explain to me"?
– user240918
Oct 21 at 18:42
1
@HotLicks This concept that there exist "lazy speakers" has apparently gone viral; the pathogen is spreading out of control. People who say "explain me" are not taking shortcuts; they're taking the wrong path, misled by signs in their own language. If there are native speakers who use it in their dialect, it is just that: their dialect. Not "lazy".
– Dan Bron
Oct 21 at 19:40
3
No, that doesn't actually happen.
– Dan Bron
Oct 21 at 20:03
|
show 8 more comments
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Sometimes while I am watching movies or YouTube videos I hear phrases like "Explain me what it is" or "Describe me the dish".
I feel that those phrases sound a bit unidiomatic to me. Are those phrases correct?
If so, are there other verbs that skip the preposition "to"?
grammar
asked Oct 21 at 17:48
Michael Frost
132
Sometimes while I am watching movies or YouTube videos I hear phrases like "Explain me what it is" or "Describe me the dish".
I feel that those phrases sound a bit unidiomatic to me. Are those phrases correct?
If so, are there other verbs that skip the preposition "to"?
grammar
grammar
asked Oct 21 at 17:48
Michael Frost
132
asked Oct 21 at 17:48
Michael Frost
132
asked Oct 21 at 17:48
Michael Frost
132
asked Oct 21 at 17:48
Michael Frost
132
asked Oct 21 at 17:48
Michael Frost
132
132
7
They are unidiomatic. They're a giveaway (a shibboleth) that it's a non-native speaker of English. In my experience, "explain me" is endemic to speakers of Indian English; it may reflect a feature of their native language (as dropping articles does for Slavic speakers of English). Don't use these constructions.
– Dan Bron
Oct 21 at 17:52
Either it's a non-native speaker of you are not hearing the "to" in "explain to me".
– Hot Licks
Oct 21 at 17:54
4
Possible duplicate of Which one is correct? "Explain me" or "Explain to me"?
– user240918
Oct 21 at 18:42
1
@HotLicks This concept that there exist "lazy speakers" has apparently gone viral; the pathogen is spreading out of control. People who say "explain me" are not taking shortcuts; they're taking the wrong path, misled by signs in their own language. If there are native speakers who use it in their dialect, it is just that: their dialect. Not "lazy".
– Dan Bron
Oct 21 at 19:40
3
No, that doesn't actually happen.
– Dan Bron
Oct 21 at 20:03
|
show 8 more comments
7
They are unidiomatic. They're a giveaway (a shibboleth) that it's a non-native speaker of English. In my experience, "explain me" is endemic to speakers of Indian English; it may reflect a feature of their native language (as dropping articles does for Slavic speakers of English). Don't use these constructions.
– Dan Bron
Oct 21 at 17:52
Either it's a non-native speaker of you are not hearing the "to" in "explain to me".
– Hot Licks
Oct 21 at 17:54
4
Possible duplicate of Which one is correct? "Explain me" or "Explain to me"?
– user240918
Oct 21 at 18:42
1
@HotLicks This concept that there exist "lazy speakers" has apparently gone viral; the pathogen is spreading out of control. People who say "explain me" are not taking shortcuts; they're taking the wrong path, misled by signs in their own language. If there are native speakers who use it in their dialect, it is just that: their dialect. Not "lazy".
– Dan Bron
Oct 21 at 19:40
3
No, that doesn't actually happen.
– Dan Bron
Oct 21 at 20:03
7
7
They are unidiomatic. They're a giveaway (a shibboleth) that it's a non-native speaker of English. In my experience, "explain me" is endemic to speakers of Indian English; it may reflect a feature of their native language (as dropping articles does for Slavic speakers of English). Don't use these constructions.
– Dan Bron
Oct 21 at 17:52
They are unidiomatic. They're a giveaway (a shibboleth) that it's a non-native speaker of English. In my experience, "explain me" is endemic to speakers of Indian English; it may reflect a feature of their native language (as dropping articles does for Slavic speakers of English). Don't use these constructions.
– Dan Bron
Oct 21 at 17:52
Either it's a non-native speaker of you are not hearing the "to" in "explain to me".
– Hot Licks
Oct 21 at 17:54
Either it's a non-native speaker of you are not hearing the "to" in "explain to me".
– Hot Licks
Oct 21 at 17:54
4
4
Possible duplicate of Which one is correct? "Explain me" or "Explain to me"?
– user240918
Oct 21 at 18:42
Possible duplicate of Which one is correct? "Explain me" or "Explain to me"?
– user240918
Oct 21 at 18:42
1
1
@HotLicks This concept that there exist "lazy speakers" has apparently gone viral; the pathogen is spreading out of control. People who say "explain me" are not taking shortcuts; they're taking the wrong path, misled by signs in their own language. If there are native speakers who use it in their dialect, it is just that: their dialect. Not "lazy".
– Dan Bron
Oct 21 at 19:40
@HotLicks This concept that there exist "lazy speakers" has apparently gone viral; the pathogen is spreading out of control. People who say "explain me" are not taking shortcuts; they're taking the wrong path, misled by signs in their own language. If there are native speakers who use it in their dialect, it is just that: their dialect. Not "lazy".
– Dan Bron
Oct 21 at 19:40
3
3
No, that doesn't actually happen.
– Dan Bron
Oct 21 at 20:03
No, that doesn't actually happen.
– Dan Bron
Oct 21 at 20:03
|
show 8 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
Are those phrases correct?
No. They are unidiomatic.
Correct:
Explain what it is to me.
Describe the dish to me.
Are there other verbs that skip the preposition “to”?
Yes. A lot of verbs that take both a direct object and an indirect object, allow the indirect object to appear first, without the preposition “to” (or sometimes “for”). That construct is called the dative alternation.
The term “alternation” suggests that the construct with the direct object first, followed by “to” (or sometimes “for”) + the indirect object, is the “standard” construct.
But when the stress in more on the direct object than on the indirect object, and when the indirect object is short (such as a simple personal pronoun or a name), I would say that the dative alternation constuct is the preferred form.
Examples:
Show me the money. (also correct: Show the money to me.)
Give her the toy. (also correct: Give the toy to her.)
Lend him some change. (also correct: Lend some change to him.)
Tell us the truth. (also correct: Tell the truth to us.)
Ask me anything. (also correct: Ask anything to me.)
Read them a story. (also correct: Read a story to them.)
Write him a letter. (also correct: Write a letter to him.)
Teach him a lesson. (also correct: Teach a lesson to him.)
Promise her the moon. (also correct: Promise the moon to her.)
Do me a favour. (also correct: Do a favour for me.)
Make me a sandwich. (also correct: Make a sandwich for me.)
Buy her a ring. (also correct: Buy a ring for her.)
The dative alternation constuct does not work with all verbs that take both a direct object and an indirect object. It’s unidiomatic to use it with the verbs announce, attribute, confess, convey, declare, dedicate, deliver, describe, explain, introduce, mention, narrate, present, propose, recommend, refer, return, reveal, say, sell, submit, suggest, transfer, …
(Or with the verbs accustom, answer, ascribe, compare, condemn, confine, contribute, exhibit, liken, …)
Counterexamples:
People might feel differently about some of these verbs. For instance, Jonathan Swift wrote to rev. dr. Thomas Sheridan:
If your worship will please to explain me this rebus, …
And Jordan Belfort, the Wolf of Wall Street, challenges a few audience members:
Sell me this pen.
answered Nov 5 at 0:04
Adhemar
43326
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
Are those phrases correct?
No. They are unidiomatic.
Correct:
Explain what it is to me.
Describe the dish to me.
Are there other verbs that skip the preposition “to”?
Yes. A lot of verbs that take both a direct object and an indirect object, allow the indirect object to appear first, without the preposition “to” (or sometimes “for”). That construct is called the dative alternation.
The term “alternation” suggests that the construct with the direct object first, followed by “to” (or sometimes “for”) + the indirect object, is the “standard” construct.
But when the stress in more on the direct object than on the indirect object, and when the indirect object is short (such as a simple personal pronoun or a name), I would say that the dative alternation constuct is the preferred form.
Examples:
Show me the money. (also correct: Show the money to me.)
Give her the toy. (also correct: Give the toy to her.)
Lend him some change. (also correct: Lend some change to him.)
Tell us the truth. (also correct: Tell the truth to us.)
Ask me anything. (also correct: Ask anything to me.)
Read them a story. (also correct: Read a story to them.)
Write him a letter. (also correct: Write a letter to him.)
Teach him a lesson. (also correct: Teach a lesson to him.)
Promise her the moon. (also correct: Promise the moon to her.)
Do me a favour. (also correct: Do a favour for me.)
Make me a sandwich. (also correct: Make a sandwich for me.)
Buy her a ring. (also correct: Buy a ring for her.)
The dative alternation constuct does not work with all verbs that take both a direct object and an indirect object. It’s unidiomatic to use it with the verbs announce, attribute, confess, convey, declare, dedicate, deliver, describe, explain, introduce, mention, narrate, present, propose, recommend, refer, return, reveal, say, sell, submit, suggest, transfer, …
(Or with the verbs accustom, answer, ascribe, compare, condemn, confine, contribute, exhibit, liken, …)
Counterexamples:
People might feel differently about some of these verbs. For instance, Jonathan Swift wrote to rev. dr. Thomas Sheridan:
If your worship will please to explain me this rebus, …
And Jordan Belfort, the Wolf of Wall Street, challenges a few audience members:
Sell me this pen.
answered Nov 5 at 0:04
Adhemar
43326
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
Are those phrases correct?
No. They are unidiomatic.
Correct:
Explain what it is to me.
Describe the dish to me.
Are there other verbs that skip the preposition “to”?
Yes. A lot of verbs that take both a direct object and an indirect object, allow the indirect object to appear first, without the preposition “to” (or sometimes “for”). That construct is called the dative alternation.
The term “alternation” suggests that the construct with the direct object first, followed by “to” (or sometimes “for”) + the indirect object, is the “standard” construct.
But when the stress in more on the direct object than on the indirect object, and when the indirect object is short (such as a simple personal pronoun or a name), I would say that the dative alternation constuct is the preferred form.
Examples:
Show me the money. (also correct: Show the money to me.)
Give her the toy. (also correct: Give the toy to her.)
Lend him some change. (also correct: Lend some change to him.)
Tell us the truth. (also correct: Tell the truth to us.)
Ask me anything. (also correct: Ask anything to me.)
Read them a story. (also correct: Read a story to them.)
Write him a letter. (also correct: Write a letter to him.)
Teach him a lesson. (also correct: Teach a lesson to him.)
Promise her the moon. (also correct: Promise the moon to her.)
Do me a favour. (also correct: Do a favour for me.)
Make me a sandwich. (also correct: Make a sandwich for me.)
Buy her a ring. (also correct: Buy a ring for her.)
The dative alternation constuct does not work with all verbs that take both a direct object and an indirect object. It’s unidiomatic to use it with the verbs announce, attribute, confess, convey, declare, dedicate, deliver, describe, explain, introduce, mention, narrate, present, propose, recommend, refer, return, reveal, say, sell, submit, suggest, transfer, …
(Or with the verbs accustom, answer, ascribe, compare, condemn, confine, contribute, exhibit, liken, …)
Counterexamples:
People might feel differently about some of these verbs. For instance, Jonathan Swift wrote to rev. dr. Thomas Sheridan:
If your worship will please to explain me this rebus, …
And Jordan Belfort, the Wolf of Wall Street, challenges a few audience members:
Sell me this pen.
answered Nov 5 at 0:04
Adhemar
43326
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
Are those phrases correct?
No. They are unidiomatic.
Correct:
Explain what it is to me.
Describe the dish to me.
Are there other verbs that skip the preposition “to”?
Yes. A lot of verbs that take both a direct object and an indirect object, allow the indirect object to appear first, without the preposition “to” (or sometimes “for”). That construct is called the dative alternation.
The term “alternation” suggests that the construct with the direct object first, followed by “to” (or sometimes “for”) + the indirect object, is the “standard” construct.
But when the stress in more on the direct object than on the indirect object, and when the indirect object is short (such as a simple personal pronoun or a name), I would say that the dative alternation constuct is the preferred form.
Examples:
Show me the money. (also correct: Show the money to me.)
Give her the toy. (also correct: Give the toy to her.)
Lend him some change. (also correct: Lend some change to him.)
Tell us the truth. (also correct: Tell the truth to us.)
Ask me anything. (also correct: Ask anything to me.)
Read them a story. (also correct: Read a story to them.)
Write him a letter. (also correct: Write a letter to him.)
Teach him a lesson. (also correct: Teach a lesson to him.)
Promise her the moon. (also correct: Promise the moon to her.)
Do me a favour. (also correct: Do a favour for me.)
Make me a sandwich. (also correct: Make a sandwich for me.)
Buy her a ring. (also correct: Buy a ring for her.)
The dative alternation constuct does not work with all verbs that take both a direct object and an indirect object. It’s unidiomatic to use it with the verbs announce, attribute, confess, convey, declare, dedicate, deliver, describe, explain, introduce, mention, narrate, present, propose, recommend, refer, return, reveal, say, sell, submit, suggest, transfer, …
(Or with the verbs accustom, answer, ascribe, compare, condemn, confine, contribute, exhibit, liken, …)
Counterexamples:
People might feel differently about some of these verbs. For instance, Jonathan Swift wrote to rev. dr. Thomas Sheridan:
If your worship will please to explain me this rebus, …
And Jordan Belfort, the Wolf of Wall Street, challenges a few audience members:
Sell me this pen.
answered Nov 5 at 0:04
Adhemar
43326
Are those phrases correct?
No. They are unidiomatic.
Correct:
Explain what it is to me.
Describe the dish to me.
Are there other verbs that skip the preposition “to”?
Yes. A lot of verbs that take both a direct object and an indirect object, allow the indirect object to appear first, without the preposition “to” (or sometimes “for”). That construct is called the dative alternation.
The term “alternation” suggests that the construct with the direct object first, followed by “to” (or sometimes “for”) + the indirect object, is the “standard” construct.
But when the stress in more on the direct object than on the indirect object, and when the indirect object is short (such as a simple personal pronoun or a name), I would say that the dative alternation constuct is the preferred form.
Examples:
Show me the money. (also correct: Show the money to me.)
Give her the toy. (also correct: Give the toy to her.)
Lend him some change. (also correct: Lend some change to him.)
Tell us the truth. (also correct: Tell the truth to us.)
Ask me anything. (also correct: Ask anything to me.)
Read them a story. (also correct: Read a story to them.)
Write him a letter. (also correct: Write a letter to him.)
Teach him a lesson. (also correct: Teach a lesson to him.)
Promise her the moon. (also correct: Promise the moon to her.)
Do me a favour. (also correct: Do a favour for me.)
Make me a sandwich. (also correct: Make a sandwich for me.)
Buy her a ring. (also correct: Buy a ring for her.)
The dative alternation constuct does not work with all verbs that take both a direct object and an indirect object. It’s unidiomatic to use it with the verbs announce, attribute, confess, convey, declare, dedicate, deliver, describe, explain, introduce, mention, narrate, present, propose, recommend, refer, return, reveal, say, sell, submit, suggest, transfer, …
(Or with the verbs accustom, answer, ascribe, compare, condemn, confine, contribute, exhibit, liken, …)
Counterexamples:
People might feel differently about some of these verbs. For instance, Jonathan Swift wrote to rev. dr. Thomas Sheridan:
If your worship will please to explain me this rebus, …
And Jordan Belfort, the Wolf of Wall Street, challenges a few audience members:
Sell me this pen.
answered Nov 5 at 0:04
Adhemar
43326
edited 53 mins ago
answered Nov 5 at 0:04
Adhemar
43326
answered Nov 5 at 0:04
Adhemar
43326
answered Nov 5 at 0:04
Adhemar
43326
43326
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f469408%2fexplain-me-describe-me-sound-unidiomatic-to-me%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
7
They are unidiomatic. They're a giveaway (a shibboleth) that it's a non-native speaker of English. In my experience, "explain me" is endemic to speakers of Indian English; it may reflect a feature of their native language (as dropping articles does for Slavic speakers of English). Don't use these constructions.
– Dan Bron
Oct 21 at 17:52
Either it's a non-native speaker of you are not hearing the "to" in "explain to me".
– Hot Licks
Oct 21 at 17:54
4
Possible duplicate of Which one is correct? "Explain me" or "Explain to me"?
– user240918
Oct 21 at 18:42
1
@HotLicks This concept that there exist "lazy speakers" has apparently gone viral; the pathogen is spreading out of control. People who say "explain me" are not taking shortcuts; they're taking the wrong path, misled by signs in their own language. If there are native speakers who use it in their dialect, it is just that: their dialect. Not "lazy".
– Dan Bron
Oct 21 at 19:40
3
No, that doesn't actually happen.
– Dan Bron
Oct 21 at 20:03