Origin of expression 'at the double'











up vote
6
down vote

favorite












Me maw used to say to me 'at the double', meaning for me to come as quick as possible. Just wondering today: what was the origin of this saying? It seems to me that the words don't apply to anything really specifically, so can some one provide a feasible explanation?










share|improve this question




















  • 8




    I've heard "ON the double" in this context, but never "AT the double". (Same usage and likely military origin, though)
    – BradC
    Jun 22 '11 at 13:53












  • I've never heard "on the double" at all. Is it US?
    – Colin Fine
    Jun 22 '11 at 14:18










  • @Colin: It must be. I'm a Statesian and I've never heard "at the double".
    – user362
    Jun 22 '11 at 14:30










  • I've heard "on the double", but not "me maw" :)
    – horatio
    Jun 22 '11 at 19:56















up vote
6
down vote

favorite












Me maw used to say to me 'at the double', meaning for me to come as quick as possible. Just wondering today: what was the origin of this saying? It seems to me that the words don't apply to anything really specifically, so can some one provide a feasible explanation?










share|improve this question




















  • 8




    I've heard "ON the double" in this context, but never "AT the double". (Same usage and likely military origin, though)
    – BradC
    Jun 22 '11 at 13:53












  • I've never heard "on the double" at all. Is it US?
    – Colin Fine
    Jun 22 '11 at 14:18










  • @Colin: It must be. I'm a Statesian and I've never heard "at the double".
    – user362
    Jun 22 '11 at 14:30










  • I've heard "on the double", but not "me maw" :)
    – horatio
    Jun 22 '11 at 19:56













up vote
6
down vote

favorite









up vote
6
down vote

favorite











Me maw used to say to me 'at the double', meaning for me to come as quick as possible. Just wondering today: what was the origin of this saying? It seems to me that the words don't apply to anything really specifically, so can some one provide a feasible explanation?










share|improve this question















Me maw used to say to me 'at the double', meaning for me to come as quick as possible. Just wondering today: what was the origin of this saying? It seems to me that the words don't apply to anything really specifically, so can some one provide a feasible explanation?







meaning etymology






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 32 mins ago









Eddie Kal

468217




468217










asked Jun 22 '11 at 13:22









Thursagen

35k38144214




35k38144214








  • 8




    I've heard "ON the double" in this context, but never "AT the double". (Same usage and likely military origin, though)
    – BradC
    Jun 22 '11 at 13:53












  • I've never heard "on the double" at all. Is it US?
    – Colin Fine
    Jun 22 '11 at 14:18










  • @Colin: It must be. I'm a Statesian and I've never heard "at the double".
    – user362
    Jun 22 '11 at 14:30










  • I've heard "on the double", but not "me maw" :)
    – horatio
    Jun 22 '11 at 19:56














  • 8




    I've heard "ON the double" in this context, but never "AT the double". (Same usage and likely military origin, though)
    – BradC
    Jun 22 '11 at 13:53












  • I've never heard "on the double" at all. Is it US?
    – Colin Fine
    Jun 22 '11 at 14:18










  • @Colin: It must be. I'm a Statesian and I've never heard "at the double".
    – user362
    Jun 22 '11 at 14:30










  • I've heard "on the double", but not "me maw" :)
    – horatio
    Jun 22 '11 at 19:56








8




8




I've heard "ON the double" in this context, but never "AT the double". (Same usage and likely military origin, though)
– BradC
Jun 22 '11 at 13:53






I've heard "ON the double" in this context, but never "AT the double". (Same usage and likely military origin, though)
– BradC
Jun 22 '11 at 13:53














I've never heard "on the double" at all. Is it US?
– Colin Fine
Jun 22 '11 at 14:18




I've never heard "on the double" at all. Is it US?
– Colin Fine
Jun 22 '11 at 14:18












@Colin: It must be. I'm a Statesian and I've never heard "at the double".
– user362
Jun 22 '11 at 14:30




@Colin: It must be. I'm a Statesian and I've never heard "at the double".
– user362
Jun 22 '11 at 14:30












I've heard "on the double", but not "me maw" :)
– horatio
Jun 22 '11 at 19:56




I've heard "on the double", but not "me maw" :)
– horatio
Jun 22 '11 at 19:56










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
7
down vote



accepted










Just two points Ham and Bacon didn't make clear: double time (the command is "At the double" in the British Army and "On the double" in the American) is literally twice the speed of a normal march, so 72 paces a minute (Britsih Light Infantry pace and I believe also the norm in the USMC) becomes 144, which is pretty much a run. And it's not 'would give the command': the practice continues, and probably will as long as armed forces remain in being, so it's 'gives' or maybe 'will give'.






share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    I looks as though you're complementing an answer that no longer exists. I wonder what was in it.
    – Jacinto
    Sep 19 '15 at 21:24


















up vote
0
down vote













I was reading about gut strings for violins and various other stringed instuments and how they are made and saw this: "Once a group of five or so sets are stripped they are bunched and knotted in the center. This is known as handling the casing "on the double", that is, at the center. Such an arrangement makes it easier to handle the thirty yards of length and eases the strain on the material."






share|improve this answer




















    protected by RegDwigнt Mar 11 '14 at 3:20



    Thank you for your interest in this question.
    Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



    Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?














    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    7
    down vote



    accepted










    Just two points Ham and Bacon didn't make clear: double time (the command is "At the double" in the British Army and "On the double" in the American) is literally twice the speed of a normal march, so 72 paces a minute (Britsih Light Infantry pace and I believe also the norm in the USMC) becomes 144, which is pretty much a run. And it's not 'would give the command': the practice continues, and probably will as long as armed forces remain in being, so it's 'gives' or maybe 'will give'.






    share|improve this answer

















    • 1




      I looks as though you're complementing an answer that no longer exists. I wonder what was in it.
      – Jacinto
      Sep 19 '15 at 21:24















    up vote
    7
    down vote



    accepted










    Just two points Ham and Bacon didn't make clear: double time (the command is "At the double" in the British Army and "On the double" in the American) is literally twice the speed of a normal march, so 72 paces a minute (Britsih Light Infantry pace and I believe also the norm in the USMC) becomes 144, which is pretty much a run. And it's not 'would give the command': the practice continues, and probably will as long as armed forces remain in being, so it's 'gives' or maybe 'will give'.






    share|improve this answer

















    • 1




      I looks as though you're complementing an answer that no longer exists. I wonder what was in it.
      – Jacinto
      Sep 19 '15 at 21:24













    up vote
    7
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    7
    down vote



    accepted






    Just two points Ham and Bacon didn't make clear: double time (the command is "At the double" in the British Army and "On the double" in the American) is literally twice the speed of a normal march, so 72 paces a minute (Britsih Light Infantry pace and I believe also the norm in the USMC) becomes 144, which is pretty much a run. And it's not 'would give the command': the practice continues, and probably will as long as armed forces remain in being, so it's 'gives' or maybe 'will give'.






    share|improve this answer












    Just two points Ham and Bacon didn't make clear: double time (the command is "At the double" in the British Army and "On the double" in the American) is literally twice the speed of a normal march, so 72 paces a minute (Britsih Light Infantry pace and I believe also the norm in the USMC) becomes 144, which is pretty much a run. And it's not 'would give the command': the practice continues, and probably will as long as armed forces remain in being, so it's 'gives' or maybe 'will give'.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Jun 22 '11 at 19:45









    TimLymington

    32.4k775142




    32.4k775142








    • 1




      I looks as though you're complementing an answer that no longer exists. I wonder what was in it.
      – Jacinto
      Sep 19 '15 at 21:24














    • 1




      I looks as though you're complementing an answer that no longer exists. I wonder what was in it.
      – Jacinto
      Sep 19 '15 at 21:24








    1




    1




    I looks as though you're complementing an answer that no longer exists. I wonder what was in it.
    – Jacinto
    Sep 19 '15 at 21:24




    I looks as though you're complementing an answer that no longer exists. I wonder what was in it.
    – Jacinto
    Sep 19 '15 at 21:24












    up vote
    0
    down vote













    I was reading about gut strings for violins and various other stringed instuments and how they are made and saw this: "Once a group of five or so sets are stripped they are bunched and knotted in the center. This is known as handling the casing "on the double", that is, at the center. Such an arrangement makes it easier to handle the thirty yards of length and eases the strain on the material."






    share|improve this answer

























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      I was reading about gut strings for violins and various other stringed instuments and how they are made and saw this: "Once a group of five or so sets are stripped they are bunched and knotted in the center. This is known as handling the casing "on the double", that is, at the center. Such an arrangement makes it easier to handle the thirty yards of length and eases the strain on the material."






      share|improve this answer























        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        I was reading about gut strings for violins and various other stringed instuments and how they are made and saw this: "Once a group of five or so sets are stripped they are bunched and knotted in the center. This is known as handling the casing "on the double", that is, at the center. Such an arrangement makes it easier to handle the thirty yards of length and eases the strain on the material."






        share|improve this answer












        I was reading about gut strings for violins and various other stringed instuments and how they are made and saw this: "Once a group of five or so sets are stripped they are bunched and knotted in the center. This is known as handling the casing "on the double", that is, at the center. Such an arrangement makes it easier to handle the thirty yards of length and eases the strain on the material."







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Jun 2 '13 at 2:29









        user45296

        1




        1

















            protected by RegDwigнt Mar 11 '14 at 3:20



            Thank you for your interest in this question.
            Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



            Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?



            Popular posts from this blog

            What visual should I use to simply compare current year value vs last year in Power BI desktop

            Alexandru Averescu

            Trompette piccolo