Type of filesystem to put on USB storage, that is compatible with most OSs [on hold]












6














I want to format a USB storage device from the terminal and I have found several formats to do it. It's the first time I'm going to do this and I have doubts. I want to do it well. I have these options and I want to know which one is convenient that is compatible with all operating systems.



# mkfs.vfat -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.ntfs -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.ext2 -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.ext3 -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.ext4 -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.msdos -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.vfat -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.xfs -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.bfs -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1










share|improve this question









New contributor




Stn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











put on hold as primarily opinion-based by jasonwryan, GAD3R, Stephen Harris, Christopher, Jeff Schaller 19 mins ago


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.











  • 1




    vfat is compatible with most OS (even Microsoft's Windows). I can't remember the difference between it and msdos.
    – ctrl-alt-delor
    7 hours ago










  • I did not know that this format is compatible with all. Thank you @ctrl-alt-delor
    – Stn
    7 hours ago










  • A secondary consideration is the maximum file-size you want to store ... different fs' have different limitations.
    – tink
    7 hours ago










  • I believe you duplicated vfat
    – Jeff Schaller
    7 hours ago










  • I usually save temporary programming data. I found this pendrive in my room and I want to use it. On my laptop, I use Manjaro, on my other laptop I have Raspbian and my brother uses Windows.
    – Stn
    7 hours ago
















6














I want to format a USB storage device from the terminal and I have found several formats to do it. It's the first time I'm going to do this and I have doubts. I want to do it well. I have these options and I want to know which one is convenient that is compatible with all operating systems.



# mkfs.vfat -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.ntfs -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.ext2 -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.ext3 -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.ext4 -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.msdos -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.vfat -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.xfs -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.bfs -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1










share|improve this question









New contributor




Stn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











put on hold as primarily opinion-based by jasonwryan, GAD3R, Stephen Harris, Christopher, Jeff Schaller 19 mins ago


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.











  • 1




    vfat is compatible with most OS (even Microsoft's Windows). I can't remember the difference between it and msdos.
    – ctrl-alt-delor
    7 hours ago










  • I did not know that this format is compatible with all. Thank you @ctrl-alt-delor
    – Stn
    7 hours ago










  • A secondary consideration is the maximum file-size you want to store ... different fs' have different limitations.
    – tink
    7 hours ago










  • I believe you duplicated vfat
    – Jeff Schaller
    7 hours ago










  • I usually save temporary programming data. I found this pendrive in my room and I want to use it. On my laptop, I use Manjaro, on my other laptop I have Raspbian and my brother uses Windows.
    – Stn
    7 hours ago














6












6








6







I want to format a USB storage device from the terminal and I have found several formats to do it. It's the first time I'm going to do this and I have doubts. I want to do it well. I have these options and I want to know which one is convenient that is compatible with all operating systems.



# mkfs.vfat -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.ntfs -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.ext2 -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.ext3 -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.ext4 -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.msdos -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.vfat -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.xfs -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.bfs -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1










share|improve this question









New contributor




Stn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I want to format a USB storage device from the terminal and I have found several formats to do it. It's the first time I'm going to do this and I have doubts. I want to do it well. I have these options and I want to know which one is convenient that is compatible with all operating systems.



# mkfs.vfat -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.ntfs -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.ext2 -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.ext3 -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.ext4 -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.msdos -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.vfat -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.xfs -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1



# mkfs.bfs -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1







linux filesystems usb






share|improve this question









New contributor




Stn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Stn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 5 hours ago









Jeff Schaller

38.7k1053125




38.7k1053125






New contributor




Stn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 7 hours ago









Stn

384




384




New contributor




Stn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Stn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Stn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




put on hold as primarily opinion-based by jasonwryan, GAD3R, Stephen Harris, Christopher, Jeff Schaller 19 mins ago


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.






put on hold as primarily opinion-based by jasonwryan, GAD3R, Stephen Harris, Christopher, Jeff Schaller 19 mins ago


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.










  • 1




    vfat is compatible with most OS (even Microsoft's Windows). I can't remember the difference between it and msdos.
    – ctrl-alt-delor
    7 hours ago










  • I did not know that this format is compatible with all. Thank you @ctrl-alt-delor
    – Stn
    7 hours ago










  • A secondary consideration is the maximum file-size you want to store ... different fs' have different limitations.
    – tink
    7 hours ago










  • I believe you duplicated vfat
    – Jeff Schaller
    7 hours ago










  • I usually save temporary programming data. I found this pendrive in my room and I want to use it. On my laptop, I use Manjaro, on my other laptop I have Raspbian and my brother uses Windows.
    – Stn
    7 hours ago














  • 1




    vfat is compatible with most OS (even Microsoft's Windows). I can't remember the difference between it and msdos.
    – ctrl-alt-delor
    7 hours ago










  • I did not know that this format is compatible with all. Thank you @ctrl-alt-delor
    – Stn
    7 hours ago










  • A secondary consideration is the maximum file-size you want to store ... different fs' have different limitations.
    – tink
    7 hours ago










  • I believe you duplicated vfat
    – Jeff Schaller
    7 hours ago










  • I usually save temporary programming data. I found this pendrive in my room and I want to use it. On my laptop, I use Manjaro, on my other laptop I have Raspbian and my brother uses Windows.
    – Stn
    7 hours ago








1




1




vfat is compatible with most OS (even Microsoft's Windows). I can't remember the difference between it and msdos.
– ctrl-alt-delor
7 hours ago




vfat is compatible with most OS (even Microsoft's Windows). I can't remember the difference between it and msdos.
– ctrl-alt-delor
7 hours ago












I did not know that this format is compatible with all. Thank you @ctrl-alt-delor
– Stn
7 hours ago




I did not know that this format is compatible with all. Thank you @ctrl-alt-delor
– Stn
7 hours ago












A secondary consideration is the maximum file-size you want to store ... different fs' have different limitations.
– tink
7 hours ago




A secondary consideration is the maximum file-size you want to store ... different fs' have different limitations.
– tink
7 hours ago












I believe you duplicated vfat
– Jeff Schaller
7 hours ago




I believe you duplicated vfat
– Jeff Schaller
7 hours ago












I usually save temporary programming data. I found this pendrive in my room and I want to use it. On my laptop, I use Manjaro, on my other laptop I have Raspbian and my brother uses Windows.
– Stn
7 hours ago




I usually save temporary programming data. I found this pendrive in my room and I want to use it. On my laptop, I use Manjaro, on my other laptop I have Raspbian and my brother uses Windows.
– Stn
7 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















10














The answer to your question¹ is simple:



mkfs.msdos -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1


Hoever, it comes with the following limitations:




  • Maximum file size is 4GB

  • Maximum partition size is 2TB


OS - File system compatibility (mini) matrix:



                   FAT  NTFS EXT[2..4] BTRFS  XFS HPFS
Amiga x
MS-DOS, Win95, 98 x
NT, W2K, ... W10 x x 2
MacOS x 3 x
Linux x x x x x x


Note 1: You asked for maximum OS compatibility and that's the only answer as it is compatible with most OSes as it's one of the oldest and least capable file systems. (Not ALL OSes! E.G. C64 does not support FAT!)
Note 2: Commercial Tryware if you want write capabilities.
Note 3: Commercial Software if you want write capabilities.






share|improve this answer























  • No worries @Stn : You're new here... All my other comments deleted (you should do the same as the answer stands all by itself) ;-) And now I'm going to sleep! :-)
    – Fabby
    1 hour ago












  • May be useful for some who try to mount ext4 on Mac OS X: apple.stackexchange.com/q/210198/297223 Also here's one for using NTFS there: apple.stackexchange.com/q/447/297223
    – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
    20 mins ago



















1














Use NTFS.



FAT can be also OK, but for large files (> 4GB) you need at least exFAT. Also FAT can end in having all your files on it marked as executable, when viewed from *nix systems.



NTFS should be readable and writable by all major operating systems.
Only at some models of printers and scanners, which generally would support USB sticks as source/target, you can have bad luck with NTFS – these usually than need a msdos partition table (not GPT partition table) with the first primary partition formatted as FAT32.



So if you do not need printer/scanner support, use the whole stick as NTFS, else make a first small primary partition FAT32, and NTFS for the rest. To be on the safe side, use only msdos type partition table, not GPT, as GPT might only be supported by newer systems.






share|improve this answer

















  • 7




    I would never recommend NTFS as a "compatible" filesystem. It is not writable by macOS, nor is it even readable by default on most Linux installations. FAT32 is preferred by far. File too big? Just use split
    – Fox
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    Mac isn't in the practical list of "all systems" buried in the comments. And I've not had a problem reading (or writing) NTFS on a Linux-based system for years now.
    – roaima
    3 hours ago








  • 4




    "NTFS should be readable and writable", but in practise is often not. The only OS fully supporting NTFS out of the box is Windows, the rest sometimes can read it but definitely not write it without extra (possibly commercial) software; due to, among other things, lack of filesystem specification and aggressive patenting attitude from Microsoft. The same applies for exFAT.
    – ElementW
    3 hours ago



















1














I agree with this other answer. It's important to mention that Linux requires NTFS-3G to mount NTFS. It should be preinstalled/available in repositories for most distribution. But it's not very widespread in embedded systems.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




Михайло Оришич is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.


















  • This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
    – Stephen Harris
    2 hours ago


















3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









10














The answer to your question¹ is simple:



mkfs.msdos -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1


Hoever, it comes with the following limitations:




  • Maximum file size is 4GB

  • Maximum partition size is 2TB


OS - File system compatibility (mini) matrix:



                   FAT  NTFS EXT[2..4] BTRFS  XFS HPFS
Amiga x
MS-DOS, Win95, 98 x
NT, W2K, ... W10 x x 2
MacOS x 3 x
Linux x x x x x x


Note 1: You asked for maximum OS compatibility and that's the only answer as it is compatible with most OSes as it's one of the oldest and least capable file systems. (Not ALL OSes! E.G. C64 does not support FAT!)
Note 2: Commercial Tryware if you want write capabilities.
Note 3: Commercial Software if you want write capabilities.






share|improve this answer























  • No worries @Stn : You're new here... All my other comments deleted (you should do the same as the answer stands all by itself) ;-) And now I'm going to sleep! :-)
    – Fabby
    1 hour ago












  • May be useful for some who try to mount ext4 on Mac OS X: apple.stackexchange.com/q/210198/297223 Also here's one for using NTFS there: apple.stackexchange.com/q/447/297223
    – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
    20 mins ago
















10














The answer to your question¹ is simple:



mkfs.msdos -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1


Hoever, it comes with the following limitations:




  • Maximum file size is 4GB

  • Maximum partition size is 2TB


OS - File system compatibility (mini) matrix:



                   FAT  NTFS EXT[2..4] BTRFS  XFS HPFS
Amiga x
MS-DOS, Win95, 98 x
NT, W2K, ... W10 x x 2
MacOS x 3 x
Linux x x x x x x


Note 1: You asked for maximum OS compatibility and that's the only answer as it is compatible with most OSes as it's one of the oldest and least capable file systems. (Not ALL OSes! E.G. C64 does not support FAT!)
Note 2: Commercial Tryware if you want write capabilities.
Note 3: Commercial Software if you want write capabilities.






share|improve this answer























  • No worries @Stn : You're new here... All my other comments deleted (you should do the same as the answer stands all by itself) ;-) And now I'm going to sleep! :-)
    – Fabby
    1 hour ago












  • May be useful for some who try to mount ext4 on Mac OS X: apple.stackexchange.com/q/210198/297223 Also here's one for using NTFS there: apple.stackexchange.com/q/447/297223
    – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
    20 mins ago














10












10








10






The answer to your question¹ is simple:



mkfs.msdos -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1


Hoever, it comes with the following limitations:




  • Maximum file size is 4GB

  • Maximum partition size is 2TB


OS - File system compatibility (mini) matrix:



                   FAT  NTFS EXT[2..4] BTRFS  XFS HPFS
Amiga x
MS-DOS, Win95, 98 x
NT, W2K, ... W10 x x 2
MacOS x 3 x
Linux x x x x x x


Note 1: You asked for maximum OS compatibility and that's the only answer as it is compatible with most OSes as it's one of the oldest and least capable file systems. (Not ALL OSes! E.G. C64 does not support FAT!)
Note 2: Commercial Tryware if you want write capabilities.
Note 3: Commercial Software if you want write capabilities.






share|improve this answer














The answer to your question¹ is simple:



mkfs.msdos -n 'dickEt' -I /dev/sdd1


Hoever, it comes with the following limitations:




  • Maximum file size is 4GB

  • Maximum partition size is 2TB


OS - File system compatibility (mini) matrix:



                   FAT  NTFS EXT[2..4] BTRFS  XFS HPFS
Amiga x
MS-DOS, Win95, 98 x
NT, W2K, ... W10 x x 2
MacOS x 3 x
Linux x x x x x x


Note 1: You asked for maximum OS compatibility and that's the only answer as it is compatible with most OSes as it's one of the oldest and least capable file systems. (Not ALL OSes! E.G. C64 does not support FAT!)
Note 2: Commercial Tryware if you want write capabilities.
Note 3: Commercial Software if you want write capabilities.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 1 hour ago

























answered 4 hours ago









Fabby

3,47111228




3,47111228












  • No worries @Stn : You're new here... All my other comments deleted (you should do the same as the answer stands all by itself) ;-) And now I'm going to sleep! :-)
    – Fabby
    1 hour ago












  • May be useful for some who try to mount ext4 on Mac OS X: apple.stackexchange.com/q/210198/297223 Also here's one for using NTFS there: apple.stackexchange.com/q/447/297223
    – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
    20 mins ago


















  • No worries @Stn : You're new here... All my other comments deleted (you should do the same as the answer stands all by itself) ;-) And now I'm going to sleep! :-)
    – Fabby
    1 hour ago












  • May be useful for some who try to mount ext4 on Mac OS X: apple.stackexchange.com/q/210198/297223 Also here's one for using NTFS there: apple.stackexchange.com/q/447/297223
    – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
    20 mins ago
















No worries @Stn : You're new here... All my other comments deleted (you should do the same as the answer stands all by itself) ;-) And now I'm going to sleep! :-)
– Fabby
1 hour ago






No worries @Stn : You're new here... All my other comments deleted (you should do the same as the answer stands all by itself) ;-) And now I'm going to sleep! :-)
– Fabby
1 hour ago














May be useful for some who try to mount ext4 on Mac OS X: apple.stackexchange.com/q/210198/297223 Also here's one for using NTFS there: apple.stackexchange.com/q/447/297223
– Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
20 mins ago




May be useful for some who try to mount ext4 on Mac OS X: apple.stackexchange.com/q/210198/297223 Also here's one for using NTFS there: apple.stackexchange.com/q/447/297223
– Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
20 mins ago













1














Use NTFS.



FAT can be also OK, but for large files (> 4GB) you need at least exFAT. Also FAT can end in having all your files on it marked as executable, when viewed from *nix systems.



NTFS should be readable and writable by all major operating systems.
Only at some models of printers and scanners, which generally would support USB sticks as source/target, you can have bad luck with NTFS – these usually than need a msdos partition table (not GPT partition table) with the first primary partition formatted as FAT32.



So if you do not need printer/scanner support, use the whole stick as NTFS, else make a first small primary partition FAT32, and NTFS for the rest. To be on the safe side, use only msdos type partition table, not GPT, as GPT might only be supported by newer systems.






share|improve this answer

















  • 7




    I would never recommend NTFS as a "compatible" filesystem. It is not writable by macOS, nor is it even readable by default on most Linux installations. FAT32 is preferred by far. File too big? Just use split
    – Fox
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    Mac isn't in the practical list of "all systems" buried in the comments. And I've not had a problem reading (or writing) NTFS on a Linux-based system for years now.
    – roaima
    3 hours ago








  • 4




    "NTFS should be readable and writable", but in practise is often not. The only OS fully supporting NTFS out of the box is Windows, the rest sometimes can read it but definitely not write it without extra (possibly commercial) software; due to, among other things, lack of filesystem specification and aggressive patenting attitude from Microsoft. The same applies for exFAT.
    – ElementW
    3 hours ago
















1














Use NTFS.



FAT can be also OK, but for large files (> 4GB) you need at least exFAT. Also FAT can end in having all your files on it marked as executable, when viewed from *nix systems.



NTFS should be readable and writable by all major operating systems.
Only at some models of printers and scanners, which generally would support USB sticks as source/target, you can have bad luck with NTFS – these usually than need a msdos partition table (not GPT partition table) with the first primary partition formatted as FAT32.



So if you do not need printer/scanner support, use the whole stick as NTFS, else make a first small primary partition FAT32, and NTFS for the rest. To be on the safe side, use only msdos type partition table, not GPT, as GPT might only be supported by newer systems.






share|improve this answer

















  • 7




    I would never recommend NTFS as a "compatible" filesystem. It is not writable by macOS, nor is it even readable by default on most Linux installations. FAT32 is preferred by far. File too big? Just use split
    – Fox
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    Mac isn't in the practical list of "all systems" buried in the comments. And I've not had a problem reading (or writing) NTFS on a Linux-based system for years now.
    – roaima
    3 hours ago








  • 4




    "NTFS should be readable and writable", but in practise is often not. The only OS fully supporting NTFS out of the box is Windows, the rest sometimes can read it but definitely not write it without extra (possibly commercial) software; due to, among other things, lack of filesystem specification and aggressive patenting attitude from Microsoft. The same applies for exFAT.
    – ElementW
    3 hours ago














1












1








1






Use NTFS.



FAT can be also OK, but for large files (> 4GB) you need at least exFAT. Also FAT can end in having all your files on it marked as executable, when viewed from *nix systems.



NTFS should be readable and writable by all major operating systems.
Only at some models of printers and scanners, which generally would support USB sticks as source/target, you can have bad luck with NTFS – these usually than need a msdos partition table (not GPT partition table) with the first primary partition formatted as FAT32.



So if you do not need printer/scanner support, use the whole stick as NTFS, else make a first small primary partition FAT32, and NTFS for the rest. To be on the safe side, use only msdos type partition table, not GPT, as GPT might only be supported by newer systems.






share|improve this answer












Use NTFS.



FAT can be also OK, but for large files (> 4GB) you need at least exFAT. Also FAT can end in having all your files on it marked as executable, when viewed from *nix systems.



NTFS should be readable and writable by all major operating systems.
Only at some models of printers and scanners, which generally would support USB sticks as source/target, you can have bad luck with NTFS – these usually than need a msdos partition table (not GPT partition table) with the first primary partition formatted as FAT32.



So if you do not need printer/scanner support, use the whole stick as NTFS, else make a first small primary partition FAT32, and NTFS for the rest. To be on the safe side, use only msdos type partition table, not GPT, as GPT might only be supported by newer systems.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 4 hours ago









Jaleks

1,384422




1,384422








  • 7




    I would never recommend NTFS as a "compatible" filesystem. It is not writable by macOS, nor is it even readable by default on most Linux installations. FAT32 is preferred by far. File too big? Just use split
    – Fox
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    Mac isn't in the practical list of "all systems" buried in the comments. And I've not had a problem reading (or writing) NTFS on a Linux-based system for years now.
    – roaima
    3 hours ago








  • 4




    "NTFS should be readable and writable", but in practise is often not. The only OS fully supporting NTFS out of the box is Windows, the rest sometimes can read it but definitely not write it without extra (possibly commercial) software; due to, among other things, lack of filesystem specification and aggressive patenting attitude from Microsoft. The same applies for exFAT.
    – ElementW
    3 hours ago














  • 7




    I would never recommend NTFS as a "compatible" filesystem. It is not writable by macOS, nor is it even readable by default on most Linux installations. FAT32 is preferred by far. File too big? Just use split
    – Fox
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    Mac isn't in the practical list of "all systems" buried in the comments. And I've not had a problem reading (or writing) NTFS on a Linux-based system for years now.
    – roaima
    3 hours ago








  • 4




    "NTFS should be readable and writable", but in practise is often not. The only OS fully supporting NTFS out of the box is Windows, the rest sometimes can read it but definitely not write it without extra (possibly commercial) software; due to, among other things, lack of filesystem specification and aggressive patenting attitude from Microsoft. The same applies for exFAT.
    – ElementW
    3 hours ago








7




7




I would never recommend NTFS as a "compatible" filesystem. It is not writable by macOS, nor is it even readable by default on most Linux installations. FAT32 is preferred by far. File too big? Just use split
– Fox
4 hours ago




I would never recommend NTFS as a "compatible" filesystem. It is not writable by macOS, nor is it even readable by default on most Linux installations. FAT32 is preferred by far. File too big? Just use split
– Fox
4 hours ago




1




1




Mac isn't in the practical list of "all systems" buried in the comments. And I've not had a problem reading (or writing) NTFS on a Linux-based system for years now.
– roaima
3 hours ago






Mac isn't in the practical list of "all systems" buried in the comments. And I've not had a problem reading (or writing) NTFS on a Linux-based system for years now.
– roaima
3 hours ago






4




4




"NTFS should be readable and writable", but in practise is often not. The only OS fully supporting NTFS out of the box is Windows, the rest sometimes can read it but definitely not write it without extra (possibly commercial) software; due to, among other things, lack of filesystem specification and aggressive patenting attitude from Microsoft. The same applies for exFAT.
– ElementW
3 hours ago




"NTFS should be readable and writable", but in practise is often not. The only OS fully supporting NTFS out of the box is Windows, the rest sometimes can read it but definitely not write it without extra (possibly commercial) software; due to, among other things, lack of filesystem specification and aggressive patenting attitude from Microsoft. The same applies for exFAT.
– ElementW
3 hours ago











1














I agree with this other answer. It's important to mention that Linux requires NTFS-3G to mount NTFS. It should be preinstalled/available in repositories for most distribution. But it's not very widespread in embedded systems.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




Михайло Оришич is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.


















  • This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
    – Stephen Harris
    2 hours ago
















1














I agree with this other answer. It's important to mention that Linux requires NTFS-3G to mount NTFS. It should be preinstalled/available in repositories for most distribution. But it's not very widespread in embedded systems.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




Михайло Оришич is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.


















  • This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
    – Stephen Harris
    2 hours ago














1












1








1






I agree with this other answer. It's important to mention that Linux requires NTFS-3G to mount NTFS. It should be preinstalled/available in repositories for most distribution. But it's not very widespread in embedded systems.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




Михайло Оришич is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









I agree with this other answer. It's important to mention that Linux requires NTFS-3G to mount NTFS. It should be preinstalled/available in repositories for most distribution. But it's not very widespread in embedded systems.







share|improve this answer










New contributor




Михайло Оришич is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 4 hours ago









Fabby

3,47111228




3,47111228






New contributor




Михайло Оришич is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









answered 4 hours ago









Михайло Оришич

213




213




New contributor




Михайло Оришич is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Михайло Оришич is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Михайло Оришич is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
    – Stephen Harris
    2 hours ago


















  • This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
    – Stephen Harris
    2 hours ago
















This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
– Stephen Harris
2 hours ago




This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
– Stephen Harris
2 hours ago



Popular posts from this blog

What visual should I use to simply compare current year value vs last year in Power BI desktop

How to ignore python UserWarning in pytest?

Alexandru Averescu