Com­bining “who’ve” and “whom” to­ge­ther












0














I am try­ing to phrase a state­ment such as:




Based on the peo­ple I have seen and re­search that I have read
from them.




I was try­ing to shorten it as:




Based on the peo­ple I have seen and re­search whom I read.




But then it sounded like I wanted to com­bine who’ve and whom.



I am a
na­tive En­glish speaker but not good with gram­mar, so I
often have a strange in­stinct of some­thing sound­ing right or wrong, and
it is of­ten in­cor­rect.



Just for con­text, this was be­ing writ­ten in a space with a
char­ac­ter limit, which is why the fo­cus on short­en­ing it (it
wasn’t to shorten for clar­ity).



Is this type of sen­tence an ex­am­ple of some use or some rule
that ex­ists?






contractions syntactic-analysis relative-pronouns whom clipping







share|improve this question




















  • 2




    I would say "and whose research I have read". I can't see the relevance of "who've" at all.
    – Colin Fine
    3 hours ago










  • @ColinFine the 'who've' would be for, of "who I have" read. Does that not work?
    – user1938107
    3 hours ago










  • No, it doesn't. "Who've" is a contraction of "who have". I have never heard it for "Who I've", and I doubt I would understand it in that sense.
    – Colin Fine
    3 hours ago










  • @ColinFine , thanks for the clarification. I guess that is the answer... I can't make combined contractions of Who've and I've. I was hoping there was some way to do that.
    – user1938107
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    If you’re not interested in preserving the exact meaning then “... and their research” is shortest.
    – Laurel
    3 hours ago
















0














I am try­ing to phrase a state­ment such as:




Based on the peo­ple I have seen and re­search that I have read
from them.




I was try­ing to shorten it as:




Based on the peo­ple I have seen and re­search whom I read.




But then it sounded like I wanted to com­bine who’ve and whom.



I am a
na­tive En­glish speaker but not good with gram­mar, so I
often have a strange in­stinct of some­thing sound­ing right or wrong, and
it is of­ten in­cor­rect.



Just for con­text, this was be­ing writ­ten in a space with a
char­ac­ter limit, which is why the fo­cus on short­en­ing it (it
wasn’t to shorten for clar­ity).



Is this type of sen­tence an ex­am­ple of some use or some rule
that ex­ists?






contractions syntactic-analysis relative-pronouns whom clipping







share|improve this question




















  • 2




    I would say "and whose research I have read". I can't see the relevance of "who've" at all.
    – Colin Fine
    3 hours ago










  • @ColinFine the 'who've' would be for, of "who I have" read. Does that not work?
    – user1938107
    3 hours ago










  • No, it doesn't. "Who've" is a contraction of "who have". I have never heard it for "Who I've", and I doubt I would understand it in that sense.
    – Colin Fine
    3 hours ago










  • @ColinFine , thanks for the clarification. I guess that is the answer... I can't make combined contractions of Who've and I've. I was hoping there was some way to do that.
    – user1938107
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    If you’re not interested in preserving the exact meaning then “... and their research” is shortest.
    – Laurel
    3 hours ago














0












0








0


1





I am try­ing to phrase a state­ment such as:




Based on the peo­ple I have seen and re­search that I have read
from them.




I was try­ing to shorten it as:




Based on the peo­ple I have seen and re­search whom I read.




But then it sounded like I wanted to com­bine who’ve and whom.



I am a
na­tive En­glish speaker but not good with gram­mar, so I
often have a strange in­stinct of some­thing sound­ing right or wrong, and
it is of­ten in­cor­rect.



Just for con­text, this was be­ing writ­ten in a space with a
char­ac­ter limit, which is why the fo­cus on short­en­ing it (it
wasn’t to shorten for clar­ity).



Is this type of sen­tence an ex­am­ple of some use or some rule
that ex­ists?






contractions syntactic-analysis relative-pronouns whom clipping







share|improve this question















I am try­ing to phrase a state­ment such as:




Based on the peo­ple I have seen and re­search that I have read
from them.




I was try­ing to shorten it as:




Based on the peo­ple I have seen and re­search whom I read.




But then it sounded like I wanted to com­bine who’ve and whom.



I am a
na­tive En­glish speaker but not good with gram­mar, so I
often have a strange in­stinct of some­thing sound­ing right or wrong, and
it is of­ten in­cor­rect.



Just for con­text, this was be­ing writ­ten in a space with a
char­ac­ter limit, which is why the fo­cus on short­en­ing it (it
wasn’t to shorten for clar­ity).



Is this type of sen­tence an ex­am­ple of some use or some rule
that ex­ists?






contractions syntactic-analysis relative-pronouns whom clipping




contractions syntactic-analysis relative-pronouns whom clipping






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago









tchrist♦

108k28290463




108k28290463










asked 4 hours ago









user1938107

14713




14713








  • 2




    I would say "and whose research I have read". I can't see the relevance of "who've" at all.
    – Colin Fine
    3 hours ago










  • @ColinFine the 'who've' would be for, of "who I have" read. Does that not work?
    – user1938107
    3 hours ago










  • No, it doesn't. "Who've" is a contraction of "who have". I have never heard it for "Who I've", and I doubt I would understand it in that sense.
    – Colin Fine
    3 hours ago










  • @ColinFine , thanks for the clarification. I guess that is the answer... I can't make combined contractions of Who've and I've. I was hoping there was some way to do that.
    – user1938107
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    If you’re not interested in preserving the exact meaning then “... and their research” is shortest.
    – Laurel
    3 hours ago














  • 2




    I would say "and whose research I have read". I can't see the relevance of "who've" at all.
    – Colin Fine
    3 hours ago










  • @ColinFine the 'who've' would be for, of "who I have" read. Does that not work?
    – user1938107
    3 hours ago










  • No, it doesn't. "Who've" is a contraction of "who have". I have never heard it for "Who I've", and I doubt I would understand it in that sense.
    – Colin Fine
    3 hours ago










  • @ColinFine , thanks for the clarification. I guess that is the answer... I can't make combined contractions of Who've and I've. I was hoping there was some way to do that.
    – user1938107
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    If you’re not interested in preserving the exact meaning then “... and their research” is shortest.
    – Laurel
    3 hours ago








2




2




I would say "and whose research I have read". I can't see the relevance of "who've" at all.
– Colin Fine
3 hours ago




I would say "and whose research I have read". I can't see the relevance of "who've" at all.
– Colin Fine
3 hours ago












@ColinFine the 'who've' would be for, of "who I have" read. Does that not work?
– user1938107
3 hours ago




@ColinFine the 'who've' would be for, of "who I have" read. Does that not work?
– user1938107
3 hours ago












No, it doesn't. "Who've" is a contraction of "who have". I have never heard it for "Who I've", and I doubt I would understand it in that sense.
– Colin Fine
3 hours ago




No, it doesn't. "Who've" is a contraction of "who have". I have never heard it for "Who I've", and I doubt I would understand it in that sense.
– Colin Fine
3 hours ago












@ColinFine , thanks for the clarification. I guess that is the answer... I can't make combined contractions of Who've and I've. I was hoping there was some way to do that.
– user1938107
3 hours ago




@ColinFine , thanks for the clarification. I guess that is the answer... I can't make combined contractions of Who've and I've. I was hoping there was some way to do that.
– user1938107
3 hours ago




1




1




If you’re not interested in preserving the exact meaning then “... and their research” is shortest.
– Laurel
3 hours ago




If you’re not interested in preserving the exact meaning then “... and their research” is shortest.
– Laurel
3 hours ago















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f479148%2fcom-bining-who-ve-and-whom-to-ge-ther%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f479148%2fcom-bining-who-ve-and-whom-to-ge-ther%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

What visual should I use to simply compare current year value vs last year in Power BI desktop

Image
0 I have column SubToBind that shows current year ratio and column PY SubToBind which shows previous year ratio. How can I simply create a card that would be displaying them both in a nice way? Something like that: I cannot achieve that with regular card, I also tried Card with States by OKViz but also unable to see both values. In KPI visual - I dont like the word "Goal", it will confuse end users. Are there any cards or other visuals that would do the job? Thanks powerbi dax powerbi-embedded share | improve this question edited Jun 11 '18 at 20:11 Oleg ...
Read more

How to ignore python UserWarning in pytest?

Image
up vote 1 down vote favorite I am using openpyxl for parsing .xlsm files, and pytest for testing. When I open a file, I get the: OpenPyxl -> UserWarning: Data Validation extension is not supported and will be removed That is not really a problem bcs. program works and I can't change the .xlsm file to fix that. But... When I run pytest with something like: def test_wrong_file_format(): assert check_excel(open_excel('file.xlsm')) == True I will get the warning i mentioned altought check_excel(open_excel('file.xlsm')) returns True and the test should suceed... Is there a nice way to tell the pytest that "It's not a bug it's a feature" and tests should pass even when they get this warning? Is there other way than using something like: with pytest.warns(UserWarning): ...
Read more

Alexandru Averescu

Image
Alexandre Averescu Alexandru Averescu Naissance 3 avril 1859 Babele, Ismail  (ro) près de Izmaïl (principauté de Moldavie) Décès 2 octobre 1938 (à 79 ans) [ 1 ] Bucarest Origine   Roumanie Arme cavalerie Grade Maréchal Années de service 1901-1917 Commandement chef d'état-major général 2 e  armée 3 e  armée Groupe d'armée sud armée du Danube Conflits Guerre russo-turque de 1877-1878 Deuxième guerre balkanique Première Guerre mondiale Faits d'armes Bataille de Turtucaia/Tutrakan Bataille de Mărăști Distinctions Autres fonctions 3 fois président du Conseil des ministres ministre des Affaires étrangères ministre sans portefeuille conseiller de la Couronne modifier   Alexandre Averescu (en roumain : Alexandru Averescu .mw-parser-output .prononciation>a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/8a/Loudspeaker.svg/11px-Loudspeaker.svg.png")center ...
Read more