Why would having more mages to conduct a spell not make it faster?











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












Orgone is the measure of a person's connection with the cosmos. It is the conduit through which the power of the cosmos flows, focused through a sorcerer's will. Ritual practicioners must draw on this reserve of power to make a magic spell work. Spells require a constant infusion of Orgone through rituals. These rituals vary by time, and can last anywhere from 30 minutes to several hours depending on the spell.



Due to these parameters, casting can be both physically and mentally taxing on an individual. Most of the stronger spells will require more Orgone than one person can provide. It is possible to make the success of the ritual more likely by investing more power into the spell. This power would come from assisting practicioners, who add their own Orgone to the spell.



Most rituals are made up of a primary caster, followed by assisting casters adding to the spell. It stands to reason that a ritual should be quicker due to the influx of power from various people. However, the time frame of a ritual stays the same regardless of how many casters there are. Why would this be the case?










share|improve this question






















  • see @Giter's answer.
    – Henry Taylor
    54 mins ago

















up vote
2
down vote

favorite












Orgone is the measure of a person's connection with the cosmos. It is the conduit through which the power of the cosmos flows, focused through a sorcerer's will. Ritual practicioners must draw on this reserve of power to make a magic spell work. Spells require a constant infusion of Orgone through rituals. These rituals vary by time, and can last anywhere from 30 minutes to several hours depending on the spell.



Due to these parameters, casting can be both physically and mentally taxing on an individual. Most of the stronger spells will require more Orgone than one person can provide. It is possible to make the success of the ritual more likely by investing more power into the spell. This power would come from assisting practicioners, who add their own Orgone to the spell.



Most rituals are made up of a primary caster, followed by assisting casters adding to the spell. It stands to reason that a ritual should be quicker due to the influx of power from various people. However, the time frame of a ritual stays the same regardless of how many casters there are. Why would this be the case?










share|improve this question






















  • see @Giter's answer.
    – Henry Taylor
    54 mins ago















up vote
2
down vote

favorite









up vote
2
down vote

favorite











Orgone is the measure of a person's connection with the cosmos. It is the conduit through which the power of the cosmos flows, focused through a sorcerer's will. Ritual practicioners must draw on this reserve of power to make a magic spell work. Spells require a constant infusion of Orgone through rituals. These rituals vary by time, and can last anywhere from 30 minutes to several hours depending on the spell.



Due to these parameters, casting can be both physically and mentally taxing on an individual. Most of the stronger spells will require more Orgone than one person can provide. It is possible to make the success of the ritual more likely by investing more power into the spell. This power would come from assisting practicioners, who add their own Orgone to the spell.



Most rituals are made up of a primary caster, followed by assisting casters adding to the spell. It stands to reason that a ritual should be quicker due to the influx of power from various people. However, the time frame of a ritual stays the same regardless of how many casters there are. Why would this be the case?










share|improve this question













Orgone is the measure of a person's connection with the cosmos. It is the conduit through which the power of the cosmos flows, focused through a sorcerer's will. Ritual practicioners must draw on this reserve of power to make a magic spell work. Spells require a constant infusion of Orgone through rituals. These rituals vary by time, and can last anywhere from 30 minutes to several hours depending on the spell.



Due to these parameters, casting can be both physically and mentally taxing on an individual. Most of the stronger spells will require more Orgone than one person can provide. It is possible to make the success of the ritual more likely by investing more power into the spell. This power would come from assisting practicioners, who add their own Orgone to the spell.



Most rituals are made up of a primary caster, followed by assisting casters adding to the spell. It stands to reason that a ritual should be quicker due to the influx of power from various people. However, the time frame of a ritual stays the same regardless of how many casters there are. Why would this be the case?







magic balancing-magic-systems






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 1 hour ago









Incognito

4,47864162




4,47864162












  • see @Giter's answer.
    – Henry Taylor
    54 mins ago




















  • see @Giter's answer.
    – Henry Taylor
    54 mins ago


















see @Giter's answer.
– Henry Taylor
54 mins ago






see @Giter's answer.
– Henry Taylor
54 mins ago












6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
5
down vote













For the same reason nine women can't make a baby in one month.



The spells are full of components that simply can't be divided or done in parallel: each step requires a certain amount of time to complete and have to be done in a certain order.



Adding more resources can't make the steps go any faster, and more people may even cause it to take longer(which happens often in the world of software).






share|improve this answer























  • LOL! I just put that in the comments as a joke. It is better here as an answer, so I will go delete mine.
    – Henry Taylor
    52 mins ago










  • @HenryTaylor: I first heard that saying in some project management courses back in college (and has been a useful metaphor when explaining timelines to managers...), glad to see it's more common than I thought!
    – Giter
    49 mins ago






  • 1




    I was writing my answer as you posted this. +1 for the ninja'ing of that joke.
    – Renan
    41 mins ago


















up vote
2
down vote













It's like a water hose. There is a maximum volume of water that will flow through the hose, regardless of how large you make the tank it is attached to. In this scenario your primary caster is the end of the hose and the secondary casters are adding water to the tank.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




Rekamanon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 1




    to take it further increasing the tank will increase the flow of water up to a point but if the tank is too large the pressure ruptures the hose or causes cavitation which only ruptures the hose if your are lucky.
    – John
    52 mins ago


















up vote
2
down vote













If a ritual takes 30 minutes then it's going to take 30 minutes if one person does it or a hundred people.



If 100 people recite, for example, the Lord's Prayer, they won't recite it any faster than one person.






share|improve this answer




























    up vote
    2
    down vote













    For much the same reason that nine pregnant women together are not going to bear a child in one month.



    The speed of a ritual is not proportional to the amount of mana you put in. In cooking terms, mana is an ingredient, not the fire. In more scientific terms, mana is not a form of energy - you don't measure it in joules - but a field, measured in thaums.



    So adding more people or magic materials to a spell is akin to adding more dough to a pizza. It will feed more people, but it will not cause the pizza to be ready faster; Might even take more time to get it ready.



    If you want to accelerate a spell, change not the materials, but the setting. Go to a volcano for fire spells, or cast lunar-related spells under a full Moon.






    share|improve this answer




























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      More power requires more control of said power.



      These rituals are already taxing on an individual, adding more people for more power only increases the pool of power available. The primary caster acts like the control unit and may or may not actually contribute power to the spell at this point. There can't be multiple people controlling the spell because they might step on each others toes and create feedback. Therefore, the spell can only be cast at the speed of the person shaping it no matter how much power is required.






      share|improve this answer




























        up vote
        0
        down vote













        The different mages perform different and concurrent parts of the spell, which are all needed together to make the spell effective.



        Think of it like two pillars and a beam. The beam holds the pillars and the pillars support the beam. They can only work together, having one less will make the whole ensemble useless.






        share|improve this answer





















          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "579"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f132795%2fwhy-would-having-more-mages-to-conduct-a-spell-not-make-it-faster%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          6 Answers
          6






          active

          oldest

          votes








          6 Answers
          6






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          5
          down vote













          For the same reason nine women can't make a baby in one month.



          The spells are full of components that simply can't be divided or done in parallel: each step requires a certain amount of time to complete and have to be done in a certain order.



          Adding more resources can't make the steps go any faster, and more people may even cause it to take longer(which happens often in the world of software).






          share|improve this answer























          • LOL! I just put that in the comments as a joke. It is better here as an answer, so I will go delete mine.
            – Henry Taylor
            52 mins ago










          • @HenryTaylor: I first heard that saying in some project management courses back in college (and has been a useful metaphor when explaining timelines to managers...), glad to see it's more common than I thought!
            – Giter
            49 mins ago






          • 1




            I was writing my answer as you posted this. +1 for the ninja'ing of that joke.
            – Renan
            41 mins ago















          up vote
          5
          down vote













          For the same reason nine women can't make a baby in one month.



          The spells are full of components that simply can't be divided or done in parallel: each step requires a certain amount of time to complete and have to be done in a certain order.



          Adding more resources can't make the steps go any faster, and more people may even cause it to take longer(which happens often in the world of software).






          share|improve this answer























          • LOL! I just put that in the comments as a joke. It is better here as an answer, so I will go delete mine.
            – Henry Taylor
            52 mins ago










          • @HenryTaylor: I first heard that saying in some project management courses back in college (and has been a useful metaphor when explaining timelines to managers...), glad to see it's more common than I thought!
            – Giter
            49 mins ago






          • 1




            I was writing my answer as you posted this. +1 for the ninja'ing of that joke.
            – Renan
            41 mins ago













          up vote
          5
          down vote










          up vote
          5
          down vote









          For the same reason nine women can't make a baby in one month.



          The spells are full of components that simply can't be divided or done in parallel: each step requires a certain amount of time to complete and have to be done in a certain order.



          Adding more resources can't make the steps go any faster, and more people may even cause it to take longer(which happens often in the world of software).






          share|improve this answer














          For the same reason nine women can't make a baby in one month.



          The spells are full of components that simply can't be divided or done in parallel: each step requires a certain amount of time to complete and have to be done in a certain order.



          Adding more resources can't make the steps go any faster, and more people may even cause it to take longer(which happens often in the world of software).







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 51 mins ago

























          answered 53 mins ago









          Giter

          11.6k42938




          11.6k42938












          • LOL! I just put that in the comments as a joke. It is better here as an answer, so I will go delete mine.
            – Henry Taylor
            52 mins ago










          • @HenryTaylor: I first heard that saying in some project management courses back in college (and has been a useful metaphor when explaining timelines to managers...), glad to see it's more common than I thought!
            – Giter
            49 mins ago






          • 1




            I was writing my answer as you posted this. +1 for the ninja'ing of that joke.
            – Renan
            41 mins ago


















          • LOL! I just put that in the comments as a joke. It is better here as an answer, so I will go delete mine.
            – Henry Taylor
            52 mins ago










          • @HenryTaylor: I first heard that saying in some project management courses back in college (and has been a useful metaphor when explaining timelines to managers...), glad to see it's more common than I thought!
            – Giter
            49 mins ago






          • 1




            I was writing my answer as you posted this. +1 for the ninja'ing of that joke.
            – Renan
            41 mins ago
















          LOL! I just put that in the comments as a joke. It is better here as an answer, so I will go delete mine.
          – Henry Taylor
          52 mins ago




          LOL! I just put that in the comments as a joke. It is better here as an answer, so I will go delete mine.
          – Henry Taylor
          52 mins ago












          @HenryTaylor: I first heard that saying in some project management courses back in college (and has been a useful metaphor when explaining timelines to managers...), glad to see it's more common than I thought!
          – Giter
          49 mins ago




          @HenryTaylor: I first heard that saying in some project management courses back in college (and has been a useful metaphor when explaining timelines to managers...), glad to see it's more common than I thought!
          – Giter
          49 mins ago




          1




          1




          I was writing my answer as you posted this. +1 for the ninja'ing of that joke.
          – Renan
          41 mins ago




          I was writing my answer as you posted this. +1 for the ninja'ing of that joke.
          – Renan
          41 mins ago










          up vote
          2
          down vote













          It's like a water hose. There is a maximum volume of water that will flow through the hose, regardless of how large you make the tank it is attached to. In this scenario your primary caster is the end of the hose and the secondary casters are adding water to the tank.






          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          Rekamanon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.














          • 1




            to take it further increasing the tank will increase the flow of water up to a point but if the tank is too large the pressure ruptures the hose or causes cavitation which only ruptures the hose if your are lucky.
            – John
            52 mins ago















          up vote
          2
          down vote













          It's like a water hose. There is a maximum volume of water that will flow through the hose, regardless of how large you make the tank it is attached to. In this scenario your primary caster is the end of the hose and the secondary casters are adding water to the tank.






          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          Rekamanon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.














          • 1




            to take it further increasing the tank will increase the flow of water up to a point but if the tank is too large the pressure ruptures the hose or causes cavitation which only ruptures the hose if your are lucky.
            – John
            52 mins ago













          up vote
          2
          down vote










          up vote
          2
          down vote









          It's like a water hose. There is a maximum volume of water that will flow through the hose, regardless of how large you make the tank it is attached to. In this scenario your primary caster is the end of the hose and the secondary casters are adding water to the tank.






          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          Rekamanon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          It's like a water hose. There is a maximum volume of water that will flow through the hose, regardless of how large you make the tank it is attached to. In this scenario your primary caster is the end of the hose and the secondary casters are adding water to the tank.







          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          Rekamanon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer






          New contributor




          Rekamanon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          answered 1 hour ago









          Rekamanon

          1164




          1164




          New contributor




          Rekamanon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.





          New contributor





          Rekamanon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          Rekamanon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.








          • 1




            to take it further increasing the tank will increase the flow of water up to a point but if the tank is too large the pressure ruptures the hose or causes cavitation which only ruptures the hose if your are lucky.
            – John
            52 mins ago














          • 1




            to take it further increasing the tank will increase the flow of water up to a point but if the tank is too large the pressure ruptures the hose or causes cavitation which only ruptures the hose if your are lucky.
            – John
            52 mins ago








          1




          1




          to take it further increasing the tank will increase the flow of water up to a point but if the tank is too large the pressure ruptures the hose or causes cavitation which only ruptures the hose if your are lucky.
          – John
          52 mins ago




          to take it further increasing the tank will increase the flow of water up to a point but if the tank is too large the pressure ruptures the hose or causes cavitation which only ruptures the hose if your are lucky.
          – John
          52 mins ago










          up vote
          2
          down vote













          If a ritual takes 30 minutes then it's going to take 30 minutes if one person does it or a hundred people.



          If 100 people recite, for example, the Lord's Prayer, they won't recite it any faster than one person.






          share|improve this answer

























            up vote
            2
            down vote













            If a ritual takes 30 minutes then it's going to take 30 minutes if one person does it or a hundred people.



            If 100 people recite, for example, the Lord's Prayer, they won't recite it any faster than one person.






            share|improve this answer























              up vote
              2
              down vote










              up vote
              2
              down vote









              If a ritual takes 30 minutes then it's going to take 30 minutes if one person does it or a hundred people.



              If 100 people recite, for example, the Lord's Prayer, they won't recite it any faster than one person.






              share|improve this answer












              If a ritual takes 30 minutes then it's going to take 30 minutes if one person does it or a hundred people.



              If 100 people recite, for example, the Lord's Prayer, they won't recite it any faster than one person.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered 1 hour ago









              chasly from UK

              10.5k348101




              10.5k348101






















                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote













                  For much the same reason that nine pregnant women together are not going to bear a child in one month.



                  The speed of a ritual is not proportional to the amount of mana you put in. In cooking terms, mana is an ingredient, not the fire. In more scientific terms, mana is not a form of energy - you don't measure it in joules - but a field, measured in thaums.



                  So adding more people or magic materials to a spell is akin to adding more dough to a pizza. It will feed more people, but it will not cause the pizza to be ready faster; Might even take more time to get it ready.



                  If you want to accelerate a spell, change not the materials, but the setting. Go to a volcano for fire spells, or cast lunar-related spells under a full Moon.






                  share|improve this answer

























                    up vote
                    2
                    down vote













                    For much the same reason that nine pregnant women together are not going to bear a child in one month.



                    The speed of a ritual is not proportional to the amount of mana you put in. In cooking terms, mana is an ingredient, not the fire. In more scientific terms, mana is not a form of energy - you don't measure it in joules - but a field, measured in thaums.



                    So adding more people or magic materials to a spell is akin to adding more dough to a pizza. It will feed more people, but it will not cause the pizza to be ready faster; Might even take more time to get it ready.



                    If you want to accelerate a spell, change not the materials, but the setting. Go to a volcano for fire spells, or cast lunar-related spells under a full Moon.






                    share|improve this answer























                      up vote
                      2
                      down vote










                      up vote
                      2
                      down vote









                      For much the same reason that nine pregnant women together are not going to bear a child in one month.



                      The speed of a ritual is not proportional to the amount of mana you put in. In cooking terms, mana is an ingredient, not the fire. In more scientific terms, mana is not a form of energy - you don't measure it in joules - but a field, measured in thaums.



                      So adding more people or magic materials to a spell is akin to adding more dough to a pizza. It will feed more people, but it will not cause the pizza to be ready faster; Might even take more time to get it ready.



                      If you want to accelerate a spell, change not the materials, but the setting. Go to a volcano for fire spells, or cast lunar-related spells under a full Moon.






                      share|improve this answer












                      For much the same reason that nine pregnant women together are not going to bear a child in one month.



                      The speed of a ritual is not proportional to the amount of mana you put in. In cooking terms, mana is an ingredient, not the fire. In more scientific terms, mana is not a form of energy - you don't measure it in joules - but a field, measured in thaums.



                      So adding more people or magic materials to a spell is akin to adding more dough to a pizza. It will feed more people, but it will not cause the pizza to be ready faster; Might even take more time to get it ready.



                      If you want to accelerate a spell, change not the materials, but the setting. Go to a volcano for fire spells, or cast lunar-related spells under a full Moon.







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered 42 mins ago









                      Renan

                      41.8k1194211




                      41.8k1194211






















                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote













                          More power requires more control of said power.



                          These rituals are already taxing on an individual, adding more people for more power only increases the pool of power available. The primary caster acts like the control unit and may or may not actually contribute power to the spell at this point. There can't be multiple people controlling the spell because they might step on each others toes and create feedback. Therefore, the spell can only be cast at the speed of the person shaping it no matter how much power is required.






                          share|improve this answer

























                            up vote
                            1
                            down vote













                            More power requires more control of said power.



                            These rituals are already taxing on an individual, adding more people for more power only increases the pool of power available. The primary caster acts like the control unit and may or may not actually contribute power to the spell at this point. There can't be multiple people controlling the spell because they might step on each others toes and create feedback. Therefore, the spell can only be cast at the speed of the person shaping it no matter how much power is required.






                            share|improve this answer























                              up vote
                              1
                              down vote










                              up vote
                              1
                              down vote









                              More power requires more control of said power.



                              These rituals are already taxing on an individual, adding more people for more power only increases the pool of power available. The primary caster acts like the control unit and may or may not actually contribute power to the spell at this point. There can't be multiple people controlling the spell because they might step on each others toes and create feedback. Therefore, the spell can only be cast at the speed of the person shaping it no matter how much power is required.






                              share|improve this answer












                              More power requires more control of said power.



                              These rituals are already taxing on an individual, adding more people for more power only increases the pool of power available. The primary caster acts like the control unit and may or may not actually contribute power to the spell at this point. There can't be multiple people controlling the spell because they might step on each others toes and create feedback. Therefore, the spell can only be cast at the speed of the person shaping it no matter how much power is required.







                              share|improve this answer












                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer










                              answered 1 hour ago









                              IT Alex

                              6488




                              6488






















                                  up vote
                                  0
                                  down vote













                                  The different mages perform different and concurrent parts of the spell, which are all needed together to make the spell effective.



                                  Think of it like two pillars and a beam. The beam holds the pillars and the pillars support the beam. They can only work together, having one less will make the whole ensemble useless.






                                  share|improve this answer

























                                    up vote
                                    0
                                    down vote













                                    The different mages perform different and concurrent parts of the spell, which are all needed together to make the spell effective.



                                    Think of it like two pillars and a beam. The beam holds the pillars and the pillars support the beam. They can only work together, having one less will make the whole ensemble useless.






                                    share|improve this answer























                                      up vote
                                      0
                                      down vote










                                      up vote
                                      0
                                      down vote









                                      The different mages perform different and concurrent parts of the spell, which are all needed together to make the spell effective.



                                      Think of it like two pillars and a beam. The beam holds the pillars and the pillars support the beam. They can only work together, having one less will make the whole ensemble useless.






                                      share|improve this answer












                                      The different mages perform different and concurrent parts of the spell, which are all needed together to make the spell effective.



                                      Think of it like two pillars and a beam. The beam holds the pillars and the pillars support the beam. They can only work together, having one less will make the whole ensemble useless.







                                      share|improve this answer












                                      share|improve this answer



                                      share|improve this answer










                                      answered 51 mins ago









                                      L.Dutch

                                      73.6k23178355




                                      73.6k23178355






























                                          draft saved

                                          draft discarded




















































                                          Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


                                          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                          But avoid



                                          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                                          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                                          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                                          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                          But avoid



                                          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                          draft saved


                                          draft discarded














                                          StackExchange.ready(
                                          function () {
                                          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f132795%2fwhy-would-having-more-mages-to-conduct-a-spell-not-make-it-faster%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                          }
                                          );

                                          Post as a guest















                                          Required, but never shown





















































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown

































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Popular posts from this blog

                                          Trompette piccolo

                                          Slow SSRS Report in dynamic grouping and multiple parameters

                                          Simon Yates (cyclisme)