Why would having more mages to conduct a spell not make it faster?
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Orgone is the measure of a person's connection with the cosmos. It is the conduit through which the power of the cosmos flows, focused through a sorcerer's will. Ritual practicioners must draw on this reserve of power to make a magic spell work. Spells require a constant infusion of Orgone through rituals. These rituals vary by time, and can last anywhere from 30 minutes to several hours depending on the spell.
Due to these parameters, casting can be both physically and mentally taxing on an individual. Most of the stronger spells will require more Orgone than one person can provide. It is possible to make the success of the ritual more likely by investing more power into the spell. This power would come from assisting practicioners, who add their own Orgone to the spell.
Most rituals are made up of a primary caster, followed by assisting casters adding to the spell. It stands to reason that a ritual should be quicker due to the influx of power from various people. However, the time frame of a ritual stays the same regardless of how many casters there are. Why would this be the case?
magic balancing-magic-systems
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Orgone is the measure of a person's connection with the cosmos. It is the conduit through which the power of the cosmos flows, focused through a sorcerer's will. Ritual practicioners must draw on this reserve of power to make a magic spell work. Spells require a constant infusion of Orgone through rituals. These rituals vary by time, and can last anywhere from 30 minutes to several hours depending on the spell.
Due to these parameters, casting can be both physically and mentally taxing on an individual. Most of the stronger spells will require more Orgone than one person can provide. It is possible to make the success of the ritual more likely by investing more power into the spell. This power would come from assisting practicioners, who add their own Orgone to the spell.
Most rituals are made up of a primary caster, followed by assisting casters adding to the spell. It stands to reason that a ritual should be quicker due to the influx of power from various people. However, the time frame of a ritual stays the same regardless of how many casters there are. Why would this be the case?
magic balancing-magic-systems
see @Giter's answer.
– Henry Taylor
54 mins ago
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Orgone is the measure of a person's connection with the cosmos. It is the conduit through which the power of the cosmos flows, focused through a sorcerer's will. Ritual practicioners must draw on this reserve of power to make a magic spell work. Spells require a constant infusion of Orgone through rituals. These rituals vary by time, and can last anywhere from 30 minutes to several hours depending on the spell.
Due to these parameters, casting can be both physically and mentally taxing on an individual. Most of the stronger spells will require more Orgone than one person can provide. It is possible to make the success of the ritual more likely by investing more power into the spell. This power would come from assisting practicioners, who add their own Orgone to the spell.
Most rituals are made up of a primary caster, followed by assisting casters adding to the spell. It stands to reason that a ritual should be quicker due to the influx of power from various people. However, the time frame of a ritual stays the same regardless of how many casters there are. Why would this be the case?
magic balancing-magic-systems
Orgone is the measure of a person's connection with the cosmos. It is the conduit through which the power of the cosmos flows, focused through a sorcerer's will. Ritual practicioners must draw on this reserve of power to make a magic spell work. Spells require a constant infusion of Orgone through rituals. These rituals vary by time, and can last anywhere from 30 minutes to several hours depending on the spell.
Due to these parameters, casting can be both physically and mentally taxing on an individual. Most of the stronger spells will require more Orgone than one person can provide. It is possible to make the success of the ritual more likely by investing more power into the spell. This power would come from assisting practicioners, who add their own Orgone to the spell.
Most rituals are made up of a primary caster, followed by assisting casters adding to the spell. It stands to reason that a ritual should be quicker due to the influx of power from various people. However, the time frame of a ritual stays the same regardless of how many casters there are. Why would this be the case?
magic balancing-magic-systems
magic balancing-magic-systems
asked 1 hour ago
Incognito
4,47864162
4,47864162
see @Giter's answer.
– Henry Taylor
54 mins ago
add a comment |
see @Giter's answer.
– Henry Taylor
54 mins ago
see @Giter's answer.
– Henry Taylor
54 mins ago
see @Giter's answer.
– Henry Taylor
54 mins ago
add a comment |
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
up vote
5
down vote
For the same reason nine women can't make a baby in one month.
The spells are full of components that simply can't be divided or done in parallel: each step requires a certain amount of time to complete and have to be done in a certain order.
Adding more resources can't make the steps go any faster, and more people may even cause it to take longer(which happens often in the world of software).
LOL! I just put that in the comments as a joke. It is better here as an answer, so I will go delete mine.
– Henry Taylor
52 mins ago
@HenryTaylor: I first heard that saying in some project management courses back in college (and has been a useful metaphor when explaining timelines to managers...), glad to see it's more common than I thought!
– Giter
49 mins ago
1
I was writing my answer as you posted this. +1 for the ninja'ing of that joke.
– Renan
41 mins ago
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
It's like a water hose. There is a maximum volume of water that will flow through the hose, regardless of how large you make the tank it is attached to. In this scenario your primary caster is the end of the hose and the secondary casters are adding water to the tank.
New contributor
1
to take it further increasing the tank will increase the flow of water up to a point but if the tank is too large the pressure ruptures the hose or causes cavitation which only ruptures the hose if your are lucky.
– John
52 mins ago
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
If a ritual takes 30 minutes then it's going to take 30 minutes if one person does it or a hundred people.
If 100 people recite, for example, the Lord's Prayer, they won't recite it any faster than one person.
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
For much the same reason that nine pregnant women together are not going to bear a child in one month.
The speed of a ritual is not proportional to the amount of mana you put in. In cooking terms, mana is an ingredient, not the fire. In more scientific terms, mana is not a form of energy - you don't measure it in joules - but a field, measured in thaums.
So adding more people or magic materials to a spell is akin to adding more dough to a pizza. It will feed more people, but it will not cause the pizza to be ready faster; Might even take more time to get it ready.
If you want to accelerate a spell, change not the materials, but the setting. Go to a volcano for fire spells, or cast lunar-related spells under a full Moon.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
More power requires more control of said power.
These rituals are already taxing on an individual, adding more people for more power only increases the pool of power available. The primary caster acts like the control unit and may or may not actually contribute power to the spell at this point. There can't be multiple people controlling the spell because they might step on each others toes and create feedback. Therefore, the spell can only be cast at the speed of the person shaping it no matter how much power is required.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
The different mages perform different and concurrent parts of the spell, which are all needed together to make the spell effective.
Think of it like two pillars and a beam. The beam holds the pillars and the pillars support the beam. They can only work together, having one less will make the whole ensemble useless.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "579"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f132795%2fwhy-would-having-more-mages-to-conduct-a-spell-not-make-it-faster%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
5
down vote
For the same reason nine women can't make a baby in one month.
The spells are full of components that simply can't be divided or done in parallel: each step requires a certain amount of time to complete and have to be done in a certain order.
Adding more resources can't make the steps go any faster, and more people may even cause it to take longer(which happens often in the world of software).
LOL! I just put that in the comments as a joke. It is better here as an answer, so I will go delete mine.
– Henry Taylor
52 mins ago
@HenryTaylor: I first heard that saying in some project management courses back in college (and has been a useful metaphor when explaining timelines to managers...), glad to see it's more common than I thought!
– Giter
49 mins ago
1
I was writing my answer as you posted this. +1 for the ninja'ing of that joke.
– Renan
41 mins ago
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
For the same reason nine women can't make a baby in one month.
The spells are full of components that simply can't be divided or done in parallel: each step requires a certain amount of time to complete and have to be done in a certain order.
Adding more resources can't make the steps go any faster, and more people may even cause it to take longer(which happens often in the world of software).
LOL! I just put that in the comments as a joke. It is better here as an answer, so I will go delete mine.
– Henry Taylor
52 mins ago
@HenryTaylor: I first heard that saying in some project management courses back in college (and has been a useful metaphor when explaining timelines to managers...), glad to see it's more common than I thought!
– Giter
49 mins ago
1
I was writing my answer as you posted this. +1 for the ninja'ing of that joke.
– Renan
41 mins ago
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
up vote
5
down vote
For the same reason nine women can't make a baby in one month.
The spells are full of components that simply can't be divided or done in parallel: each step requires a certain amount of time to complete and have to be done in a certain order.
Adding more resources can't make the steps go any faster, and more people may even cause it to take longer(which happens often in the world of software).
For the same reason nine women can't make a baby in one month.
The spells are full of components that simply can't be divided or done in parallel: each step requires a certain amount of time to complete and have to be done in a certain order.
Adding more resources can't make the steps go any faster, and more people may even cause it to take longer(which happens often in the world of software).
edited 51 mins ago
answered 53 mins ago
Giter
11.6k42938
11.6k42938
LOL! I just put that in the comments as a joke. It is better here as an answer, so I will go delete mine.
– Henry Taylor
52 mins ago
@HenryTaylor: I first heard that saying in some project management courses back in college (and has been a useful metaphor when explaining timelines to managers...), glad to see it's more common than I thought!
– Giter
49 mins ago
1
I was writing my answer as you posted this. +1 for the ninja'ing of that joke.
– Renan
41 mins ago
add a comment |
LOL! I just put that in the comments as a joke. It is better here as an answer, so I will go delete mine.
– Henry Taylor
52 mins ago
@HenryTaylor: I first heard that saying in some project management courses back in college (and has been a useful metaphor when explaining timelines to managers...), glad to see it's more common than I thought!
– Giter
49 mins ago
1
I was writing my answer as you posted this. +1 for the ninja'ing of that joke.
– Renan
41 mins ago
LOL! I just put that in the comments as a joke. It is better here as an answer, so I will go delete mine.
– Henry Taylor
52 mins ago
LOL! I just put that in the comments as a joke. It is better here as an answer, so I will go delete mine.
– Henry Taylor
52 mins ago
@HenryTaylor: I first heard that saying in some project management courses back in college (and has been a useful metaphor when explaining timelines to managers...), glad to see it's more common than I thought!
– Giter
49 mins ago
@HenryTaylor: I first heard that saying in some project management courses back in college (and has been a useful metaphor when explaining timelines to managers...), glad to see it's more common than I thought!
– Giter
49 mins ago
1
1
I was writing my answer as you posted this. +1 for the ninja'ing of that joke.
– Renan
41 mins ago
I was writing my answer as you posted this. +1 for the ninja'ing of that joke.
– Renan
41 mins ago
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
It's like a water hose. There is a maximum volume of water that will flow through the hose, regardless of how large you make the tank it is attached to. In this scenario your primary caster is the end of the hose and the secondary casters are adding water to the tank.
New contributor
1
to take it further increasing the tank will increase the flow of water up to a point but if the tank is too large the pressure ruptures the hose or causes cavitation which only ruptures the hose if your are lucky.
– John
52 mins ago
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
It's like a water hose. There is a maximum volume of water that will flow through the hose, regardless of how large you make the tank it is attached to. In this scenario your primary caster is the end of the hose and the secondary casters are adding water to the tank.
New contributor
1
to take it further increasing the tank will increase the flow of water up to a point but if the tank is too large the pressure ruptures the hose or causes cavitation which only ruptures the hose if your are lucky.
– John
52 mins ago
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
It's like a water hose. There is a maximum volume of water that will flow through the hose, regardless of how large you make the tank it is attached to. In this scenario your primary caster is the end of the hose and the secondary casters are adding water to the tank.
New contributor
It's like a water hose. There is a maximum volume of water that will flow through the hose, regardless of how large you make the tank it is attached to. In this scenario your primary caster is the end of the hose and the secondary casters are adding water to the tank.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 1 hour ago
Rekamanon
1164
1164
New contributor
New contributor
1
to take it further increasing the tank will increase the flow of water up to a point but if the tank is too large the pressure ruptures the hose or causes cavitation which only ruptures the hose if your are lucky.
– John
52 mins ago
add a comment |
1
to take it further increasing the tank will increase the flow of water up to a point but if the tank is too large the pressure ruptures the hose or causes cavitation which only ruptures the hose if your are lucky.
– John
52 mins ago
1
1
to take it further increasing the tank will increase the flow of water up to a point but if the tank is too large the pressure ruptures the hose or causes cavitation which only ruptures the hose if your are lucky.
– John
52 mins ago
to take it further increasing the tank will increase the flow of water up to a point but if the tank is too large the pressure ruptures the hose or causes cavitation which only ruptures the hose if your are lucky.
– John
52 mins ago
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
If a ritual takes 30 minutes then it's going to take 30 minutes if one person does it or a hundred people.
If 100 people recite, for example, the Lord's Prayer, they won't recite it any faster than one person.
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
If a ritual takes 30 minutes then it's going to take 30 minutes if one person does it or a hundred people.
If 100 people recite, for example, the Lord's Prayer, they won't recite it any faster than one person.
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
If a ritual takes 30 minutes then it's going to take 30 minutes if one person does it or a hundred people.
If 100 people recite, for example, the Lord's Prayer, they won't recite it any faster than one person.
If a ritual takes 30 minutes then it's going to take 30 minutes if one person does it or a hundred people.
If 100 people recite, for example, the Lord's Prayer, they won't recite it any faster than one person.
answered 1 hour ago
chasly from UK
10.5k348101
10.5k348101
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
For much the same reason that nine pregnant women together are not going to bear a child in one month.
The speed of a ritual is not proportional to the amount of mana you put in. In cooking terms, mana is an ingredient, not the fire. In more scientific terms, mana is not a form of energy - you don't measure it in joules - but a field, measured in thaums.
So adding more people or magic materials to a spell is akin to adding more dough to a pizza. It will feed more people, but it will not cause the pizza to be ready faster; Might even take more time to get it ready.
If you want to accelerate a spell, change not the materials, but the setting. Go to a volcano for fire spells, or cast lunar-related spells under a full Moon.
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
For much the same reason that nine pregnant women together are not going to bear a child in one month.
The speed of a ritual is not proportional to the amount of mana you put in. In cooking terms, mana is an ingredient, not the fire. In more scientific terms, mana is not a form of energy - you don't measure it in joules - but a field, measured in thaums.
So adding more people or magic materials to a spell is akin to adding more dough to a pizza. It will feed more people, but it will not cause the pizza to be ready faster; Might even take more time to get it ready.
If you want to accelerate a spell, change not the materials, but the setting. Go to a volcano for fire spells, or cast lunar-related spells under a full Moon.
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
For much the same reason that nine pregnant women together are not going to bear a child in one month.
The speed of a ritual is not proportional to the amount of mana you put in. In cooking terms, mana is an ingredient, not the fire. In more scientific terms, mana is not a form of energy - you don't measure it in joules - but a field, measured in thaums.
So adding more people or magic materials to a spell is akin to adding more dough to a pizza. It will feed more people, but it will not cause the pizza to be ready faster; Might even take more time to get it ready.
If you want to accelerate a spell, change not the materials, but the setting. Go to a volcano for fire spells, or cast lunar-related spells under a full Moon.
For much the same reason that nine pregnant women together are not going to bear a child in one month.
The speed of a ritual is not proportional to the amount of mana you put in. In cooking terms, mana is an ingredient, not the fire. In more scientific terms, mana is not a form of energy - you don't measure it in joules - but a field, measured in thaums.
So adding more people or magic materials to a spell is akin to adding more dough to a pizza. It will feed more people, but it will not cause the pizza to be ready faster; Might even take more time to get it ready.
If you want to accelerate a spell, change not the materials, but the setting. Go to a volcano for fire spells, or cast lunar-related spells under a full Moon.
answered 42 mins ago
Renan
41.8k1194211
41.8k1194211
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
More power requires more control of said power.
These rituals are already taxing on an individual, adding more people for more power only increases the pool of power available. The primary caster acts like the control unit and may or may not actually contribute power to the spell at this point. There can't be multiple people controlling the spell because they might step on each others toes and create feedback. Therefore, the spell can only be cast at the speed of the person shaping it no matter how much power is required.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
More power requires more control of said power.
These rituals are already taxing on an individual, adding more people for more power only increases the pool of power available. The primary caster acts like the control unit and may or may not actually contribute power to the spell at this point. There can't be multiple people controlling the spell because they might step on each others toes and create feedback. Therefore, the spell can only be cast at the speed of the person shaping it no matter how much power is required.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
More power requires more control of said power.
These rituals are already taxing on an individual, adding more people for more power only increases the pool of power available. The primary caster acts like the control unit and may or may not actually contribute power to the spell at this point. There can't be multiple people controlling the spell because they might step on each others toes and create feedback. Therefore, the spell can only be cast at the speed of the person shaping it no matter how much power is required.
More power requires more control of said power.
These rituals are already taxing on an individual, adding more people for more power only increases the pool of power available. The primary caster acts like the control unit and may or may not actually contribute power to the spell at this point. There can't be multiple people controlling the spell because they might step on each others toes and create feedback. Therefore, the spell can only be cast at the speed of the person shaping it no matter how much power is required.
answered 1 hour ago
IT Alex
6488
6488
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
The different mages perform different and concurrent parts of the spell, which are all needed together to make the spell effective.
Think of it like two pillars and a beam. The beam holds the pillars and the pillars support the beam. They can only work together, having one less will make the whole ensemble useless.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
The different mages perform different and concurrent parts of the spell, which are all needed together to make the spell effective.
Think of it like two pillars and a beam. The beam holds the pillars and the pillars support the beam. They can only work together, having one less will make the whole ensemble useless.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
The different mages perform different and concurrent parts of the spell, which are all needed together to make the spell effective.
Think of it like two pillars and a beam. The beam holds the pillars and the pillars support the beam. They can only work together, having one less will make the whole ensemble useless.
The different mages perform different and concurrent parts of the spell, which are all needed together to make the spell effective.
Think of it like two pillars and a beam. The beam holds the pillars and the pillars support the beam. They can only work together, having one less will make the whole ensemble useless.
answered 51 mins ago
L.Dutch♦
73.6k23178355
73.6k23178355
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f132795%2fwhy-would-having-more-mages-to-conduct-a-spell-not-make-it-faster%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
see @Giter's answer.
– Henry Taylor
54 mins ago