How to use Commas When an Introductory Clause Precedes a Dependent/Subordinate Clause
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I think we all agree that most introductory clauses are set off by commas. E.g.:
- In 1982, John Smith went to battle in Spain.
- Moreover, the monkeys all ate bread.
I think we also agree that conditional sentences require commas between the dependent clause and the main clause:
- If James goes to the store, then I want him to bring me some cheese.
- To avoid hitting the man, Debra aimed the other way.
But what happens when we combine an introductory clause with a conditional sentence? My instinct would be to include all the commas like this:
- Accordingly, if James goes to the store, then I want him to bring me some cheese.
But my editor looked at the sentence above and thought it looked weird. Indeed, now that "if James goes to the store" is separated by a comma on both sides it looks like its a parenthetical (which it isn't). I fixed the sentence by just changing the "Accordingly" to "So," which doesn't require a commma even though its an introductory clause (e.g.: "So if James goes to the store, then I want him to bring me some cheese."), but I'd like to know if my original formulation is correct or not.
Any thoughts?
punctuation commas subordinate-clauses dependent-clause parenthetical-commas
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 31 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I think we all agree that most introductory clauses are set off by commas. E.g.:
- In 1982, John Smith went to battle in Spain.
- Moreover, the monkeys all ate bread.
I think we also agree that conditional sentences require commas between the dependent clause and the main clause:
- If James goes to the store, then I want him to bring me some cheese.
- To avoid hitting the man, Debra aimed the other way.
But what happens when we combine an introductory clause with a conditional sentence? My instinct would be to include all the commas like this:
- Accordingly, if James goes to the store, then I want him to bring me some cheese.
But my editor looked at the sentence above and thought it looked weird. Indeed, now that "if James goes to the store" is separated by a comma on both sides it looks like its a parenthetical (which it isn't). I fixed the sentence by just changing the "Accordingly" to "So," which doesn't require a commma even though its an introductory clause (e.g.: "So if James goes to the store, then I want him to bring me some cheese."), but I'd like to know if my original formulation is correct or not.
Any thoughts?
punctuation commas subordinate-clauses dependent-clause parenthetical-commas
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 31 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
1
Your original looks good to me.
– S Conroy
Aug 13 at 16:10
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I think we all agree that most introductory clauses are set off by commas. E.g.:
- In 1982, John Smith went to battle in Spain.
- Moreover, the monkeys all ate bread.
I think we also agree that conditional sentences require commas between the dependent clause and the main clause:
- If James goes to the store, then I want him to bring me some cheese.
- To avoid hitting the man, Debra aimed the other way.
But what happens when we combine an introductory clause with a conditional sentence? My instinct would be to include all the commas like this:
- Accordingly, if James goes to the store, then I want him to bring me some cheese.
But my editor looked at the sentence above and thought it looked weird. Indeed, now that "if James goes to the store" is separated by a comma on both sides it looks like its a parenthetical (which it isn't). I fixed the sentence by just changing the "Accordingly" to "So," which doesn't require a commma even though its an introductory clause (e.g.: "So if James goes to the store, then I want him to bring me some cheese."), but I'd like to know if my original formulation is correct or not.
Any thoughts?
punctuation commas subordinate-clauses dependent-clause parenthetical-commas
I think we all agree that most introductory clauses are set off by commas. E.g.:
- In 1982, John Smith went to battle in Spain.
- Moreover, the monkeys all ate bread.
I think we also agree that conditional sentences require commas between the dependent clause and the main clause:
- If James goes to the store, then I want him to bring me some cheese.
- To avoid hitting the man, Debra aimed the other way.
But what happens when we combine an introductory clause with a conditional sentence? My instinct would be to include all the commas like this:
- Accordingly, if James goes to the store, then I want him to bring me some cheese.
But my editor looked at the sentence above and thought it looked weird. Indeed, now that "if James goes to the store" is separated by a comma on both sides it looks like its a parenthetical (which it isn't). I fixed the sentence by just changing the "Accordingly" to "So," which doesn't require a commma even though its an introductory clause (e.g.: "So if James goes to the store, then I want him to bring me some cheese."), but I'd like to know if my original formulation is correct or not.
Any thoughts?
punctuation commas subordinate-clauses dependent-clause parenthetical-commas
punctuation commas subordinate-clauses dependent-clause parenthetical-commas
asked Aug 13 at 15:16
Dimitri
111
111
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 31 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 31 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
1
Your original looks good to me.
– S Conroy
Aug 13 at 16:10
add a comment |
1
Your original looks good to me.
– S Conroy
Aug 13 at 16:10
1
1
Your original looks good to me.
– S Conroy
Aug 13 at 16:10
Your original looks good to me.
– S Conroy
Aug 13 at 16:10
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
There is nothing wrong with your use of commas. It follows normal guidelines, and should not have been questioned by your editor on those terms alone. (Many perfectly grammatical constructions use a number of commas.)
However, if there is an insistence on not using commas in such a way that they could be misinterpreted as parenthetical (there is some merit in reducing unnecessary parsing), then your sentence can rephrased by simply reversing the position of the conditional:
Accordingly, I want James to bring me some cheese if he goes to the store.
However, this is a matter of style rather than grammar.
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
There is nothing wrong with your use of commas. It follows normal guidelines, and should not have been questioned by your editor on those terms alone. (Many perfectly grammatical constructions use a number of commas.)
However, if there is an insistence on not using commas in such a way that they could be misinterpreted as parenthetical (there is some merit in reducing unnecessary parsing), then your sentence can rephrased by simply reversing the position of the conditional:
Accordingly, I want James to bring me some cheese if he goes to the store.
However, this is a matter of style rather than grammar.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
There is nothing wrong with your use of commas. It follows normal guidelines, and should not have been questioned by your editor on those terms alone. (Many perfectly grammatical constructions use a number of commas.)
However, if there is an insistence on not using commas in such a way that they could be misinterpreted as parenthetical (there is some merit in reducing unnecessary parsing), then your sentence can rephrased by simply reversing the position of the conditional:
Accordingly, I want James to bring me some cheese if he goes to the store.
However, this is a matter of style rather than grammar.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
There is nothing wrong with your use of commas. It follows normal guidelines, and should not have been questioned by your editor on those terms alone. (Many perfectly grammatical constructions use a number of commas.)
However, if there is an insistence on not using commas in such a way that they could be misinterpreted as parenthetical (there is some merit in reducing unnecessary parsing), then your sentence can rephrased by simply reversing the position of the conditional:
Accordingly, I want James to bring me some cheese if he goes to the store.
However, this is a matter of style rather than grammar.
There is nothing wrong with your use of commas. It follows normal guidelines, and should not have been questioned by your editor on those terms alone. (Many perfectly grammatical constructions use a number of commas.)
However, if there is an insistence on not using commas in such a way that they could be misinterpreted as parenthetical (there is some merit in reducing unnecessary parsing), then your sentence can rephrased by simply reversing the position of the conditional:
Accordingly, I want James to bring me some cheese if he goes to the store.
However, this is a matter of style rather than grammar.
answered Aug 13 at 17:23
Jason Bassford
15.1k31941
15.1k31941
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f459964%2fhow-to-use-commas-when-an-introductory-clause-precedes-a-dependent-subordinate-c%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Your original looks good to me.
– S Conroy
Aug 13 at 16:10