How to use Commas When an Introductory Clause Precedes a Dependent/Subordinate Clause











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












I think we all agree that most introductory clauses are set off by commas. E.g.:




  • In 1982, John Smith went to battle in Spain.

  • Moreover, the monkeys all ate bread.


I think we also agree that conditional sentences require commas between the dependent clause and the main clause:




  • If James goes to the store, then I want him to bring me some cheese.

  • To avoid hitting the man, Debra aimed the other way.


But what happens when we combine an introductory clause with a conditional sentence? My instinct would be to include all the commas like this:




  • Accordingly, if James goes to the store, then I want him to bring me some cheese.


But my editor looked at the sentence above and thought it looked weird. Indeed, now that "if James goes to the store" is separated by a comma on both sides it looks like its a parenthetical (which it isn't). I fixed the sentence by just changing the "Accordingly" to "So," which doesn't require a commma even though its an introductory clause (e.g.: "So if James goes to the store, then I want him to bring me some cheese."), but I'd like to know if my original formulation is correct or not.



Any thoughts?










share|improve this question














bumped to the homepage by Community 31 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.











  • 1




    Your original looks good to me.
    – S Conroy
    Aug 13 at 16:10















up vote
2
down vote

favorite












I think we all agree that most introductory clauses are set off by commas. E.g.:




  • In 1982, John Smith went to battle in Spain.

  • Moreover, the monkeys all ate bread.


I think we also agree that conditional sentences require commas between the dependent clause and the main clause:




  • If James goes to the store, then I want him to bring me some cheese.

  • To avoid hitting the man, Debra aimed the other way.


But what happens when we combine an introductory clause with a conditional sentence? My instinct would be to include all the commas like this:




  • Accordingly, if James goes to the store, then I want him to bring me some cheese.


But my editor looked at the sentence above and thought it looked weird. Indeed, now that "if James goes to the store" is separated by a comma on both sides it looks like its a parenthetical (which it isn't). I fixed the sentence by just changing the "Accordingly" to "So," which doesn't require a commma even though its an introductory clause (e.g.: "So if James goes to the store, then I want him to bring me some cheese."), but I'd like to know if my original formulation is correct or not.



Any thoughts?










share|improve this question














bumped to the homepage by Community 31 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.











  • 1




    Your original looks good to me.
    – S Conroy
    Aug 13 at 16:10













up vote
2
down vote

favorite









up vote
2
down vote

favorite











I think we all agree that most introductory clauses are set off by commas. E.g.:




  • In 1982, John Smith went to battle in Spain.

  • Moreover, the monkeys all ate bread.


I think we also agree that conditional sentences require commas between the dependent clause and the main clause:




  • If James goes to the store, then I want him to bring me some cheese.

  • To avoid hitting the man, Debra aimed the other way.


But what happens when we combine an introductory clause with a conditional sentence? My instinct would be to include all the commas like this:




  • Accordingly, if James goes to the store, then I want him to bring me some cheese.


But my editor looked at the sentence above and thought it looked weird. Indeed, now that "if James goes to the store" is separated by a comma on both sides it looks like its a parenthetical (which it isn't). I fixed the sentence by just changing the "Accordingly" to "So," which doesn't require a commma even though its an introductory clause (e.g.: "So if James goes to the store, then I want him to bring me some cheese."), but I'd like to know if my original formulation is correct or not.



Any thoughts?










share|improve this question













I think we all agree that most introductory clauses are set off by commas. E.g.:




  • In 1982, John Smith went to battle in Spain.

  • Moreover, the monkeys all ate bread.


I think we also agree that conditional sentences require commas between the dependent clause and the main clause:




  • If James goes to the store, then I want him to bring me some cheese.

  • To avoid hitting the man, Debra aimed the other way.


But what happens when we combine an introductory clause with a conditional sentence? My instinct would be to include all the commas like this:




  • Accordingly, if James goes to the store, then I want him to bring me some cheese.


But my editor looked at the sentence above and thought it looked weird. Indeed, now that "if James goes to the store" is separated by a comma on both sides it looks like its a parenthetical (which it isn't). I fixed the sentence by just changing the "Accordingly" to "So," which doesn't require a commma even though its an introductory clause (e.g.: "So if James goes to the store, then I want him to bring me some cheese."), but I'd like to know if my original formulation is correct or not.



Any thoughts?







punctuation commas subordinate-clauses dependent-clause parenthetical-commas






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Aug 13 at 15:16









Dimitri

111




111





bumped to the homepage by Community 31 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.







bumped to the homepage by Community 31 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.










  • 1




    Your original looks good to me.
    – S Conroy
    Aug 13 at 16:10














  • 1




    Your original looks good to me.
    – S Conroy
    Aug 13 at 16:10








1




1




Your original looks good to me.
– S Conroy
Aug 13 at 16:10




Your original looks good to me.
– S Conroy
Aug 13 at 16:10










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote













There is nothing wrong with your use of commas. It follows normal guidelines, and should not have been questioned by your editor on those terms alone. (Many perfectly grammatical constructions use a number of commas.)



However, if there is an insistence on not using commas in such a way that they could be misinterpreted as parenthetical (there is some merit in reducing unnecessary parsing), then your sentence can rephrased by simply reversing the position of the conditional:




Accordingly, I want James to bring me some cheese if he goes to the store.




However, this is a matter of style rather than grammar.






share|improve this answer





















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "97"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f459964%2fhow-to-use-commas-when-an-introductory-clause-precedes-a-dependent-subordinate-c%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote













    There is nothing wrong with your use of commas. It follows normal guidelines, and should not have been questioned by your editor on those terms alone. (Many perfectly grammatical constructions use a number of commas.)



    However, if there is an insistence on not using commas in such a way that they could be misinterpreted as parenthetical (there is some merit in reducing unnecessary parsing), then your sentence can rephrased by simply reversing the position of the conditional:




    Accordingly, I want James to bring me some cheese if he goes to the store.




    However, this is a matter of style rather than grammar.






    share|improve this answer

























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      There is nothing wrong with your use of commas. It follows normal guidelines, and should not have been questioned by your editor on those terms alone. (Many perfectly grammatical constructions use a number of commas.)



      However, if there is an insistence on not using commas in such a way that they could be misinterpreted as parenthetical (there is some merit in reducing unnecessary parsing), then your sentence can rephrased by simply reversing the position of the conditional:




      Accordingly, I want James to bring me some cheese if he goes to the store.




      However, this is a matter of style rather than grammar.






      share|improve this answer























        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        There is nothing wrong with your use of commas. It follows normal guidelines, and should not have been questioned by your editor on those terms alone. (Many perfectly grammatical constructions use a number of commas.)



        However, if there is an insistence on not using commas in such a way that they could be misinterpreted as parenthetical (there is some merit in reducing unnecessary parsing), then your sentence can rephrased by simply reversing the position of the conditional:




        Accordingly, I want James to bring me some cheese if he goes to the store.




        However, this is a matter of style rather than grammar.






        share|improve this answer












        There is nothing wrong with your use of commas. It follows normal guidelines, and should not have been questioned by your editor on those terms alone. (Many perfectly grammatical constructions use a number of commas.)



        However, if there is an insistence on not using commas in such a way that they could be misinterpreted as parenthetical (there is some merit in reducing unnecessary parsing), then your sentence can rephrased by simply reversing the position of the conditional:




        Accordingly, I want James to bring me some cheese if he goes to the store.




        However, this is a matter of style rather than grammar.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Aug 13 at 17:23









        Jason Bassford

        15.1k31941




        15.1k31941






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f459964%2fhow-to-use-commas-when-an-introductory-clause-precedes-a-dependent-subordinate-c%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Trompette piccolo

            How do I get these specific pathlines to nodes?

            What visual should I use to simply compare current year value vs last year in Power BI desktop