A synonym for “bastardized” without the evil slant?
With the following definition:
To lower in quality or character.
Synonyms found:
corrupt, pervert, subvert, demoralize, demoralise, debauch, debase, profane, vitiate, deprave, misdirect
However all of those have a very "intentionally evil" connotation. I would say more along the lines of "messed up", but it needs to portray that it's somewhat intentional, just not with the evil slant.
Intentionally done, but unintentionally wrong, is what I'm looking for.
Perfect Example:
My nick name on here is Aequitarum Custos, which is a "bastardized" Latin, it should have been Aequitatis Custos (the correct way to say what I wanted).
I intentionally created my nick like that, but had no intention to make it wrong.
Reason for desiring a synonym is due to the perceived obscenity of the word bastard by some people.
single-word-requests synonyms connotation
edited Mar 10 '11 at 0:07
Jimi Oke
24.5k265102
asked Mar 9 '11 at 15:56
Brett AllenBrett Allen
710410
add a comment |
With the following definition:
To lower in quality or character.
Synonyms found:
corrupt, pervert, subvert, demoralize, demoralise, debauch, debase, profane, vitiate, deprave, misdirect
However all of those have a very "intentionally evil" connotation. I would say more along the lines of "messed up", but it needs to portray that it's somewhat intentional, just not with the evil slant.
Intentionally done, but unintentionally wrong, is what I'm looking for.
Perfect Example:
My nick name on here is Aequitarum Custos, which is a "bastardized" Latin, it should have been Aequitatis Custos (the correct way to say what I wanted).
I intentionally created my nick like that, but had no intention to make it wrong.
Reason for desiring a synonym is due to the perceived obscenity of the word bastard by some people.
single-word-requests synonyms connotation
edited Mar 10 '11 at 0:07
Jimi Oke
24.5k265102
asked Mar 9 '11 at 15:56
Brett AllenBrett Allen
710410
2
Can you give an example of the sort of sentence/context you’d like to use it in?
– PLL
Mar 9 '11 at 16:06
@PLL example given
– Brett Allen
Mar 9 '11 at 16:20
3
I'd argue that you should use "bastardised", because it's the correct word; those who are (wrongly) offended will just have to learn.
– slim
Dec 19 '11 at 11:38
Daniel Webster stated in a letter just before the time of his death that the worst thing that he had ever done in his life was to do this to the English language. That the reason he did it was because he needed the money. What he did was to make all nouns verbs, adjectives and pronouns through modification. Modification is change, change is motion, motion is...
– user70974
Apr 3 '14 at 15:29
add a comment |
With the following definition:
To lower in quality or character.
Synonyms found:
corrupt, pervert, subvert, demoralize, demoralise, debauch, debase, profane, vitiate, deprave, misdirect
However all of those have a very "intentionally evil" connotation. I would say more along the lines of "messed up", but it needs to portray that it's somewhat intentional, just not with the evil slant.
Intentionally done, but unintentionally wrong, is what I'm looking for.
Perfect Example:
My nick name on here is Aequitarum Custos, which is a "bastardized" Latin, it should have been Aequitatis Custos (the correct way to say what I wanted).
I intentionally created my nick like that, but had no intention to make it wrong.
Reason for desiring a synonym is due to the perceived obscenity of the word bastard by some people.
single-word-requests synonyms connotation
edited Mar 10 '11 at 0:07
Jimi Oke
24.5k265102
asked Mar 9 '11 at 15:56
Brett AllenBrett Allen
710410
With the following definition:
To lower in quality or character.
Synonyms found:
corrupt, pervert, subvert, demoralize, demoralise, debauch, debase, profane, vitiate, deprave, misdirect
However all of those have a very "intentionally evil" connotation. I would say more along the lines of "messed up", but it needs to portray that it's somewhat intentional, just not with the evil slant.
Intentionally done, but unintentionally wrong, is what I'm looking for.
Perfect Example:
My nick name on here is Aequitarum Custos, which is a "bastardized" Latin, it should have been Aequitatis Custos (the correct way to say what I wanted).
I intentionally created my nick like that, but had no intention to make it wrong.
Reason for desiring a synonym is due to the perceived obscenity of the word bastard by some people.
single-word-requests synonyms connotation
single-word-requests synonyms connotation
edited Mar 10 '11 at 0:07
Jimi Oke
24.5k265102
asked Mar 9 '11 at 15:56
Brett AllenBrett Allen
710410
edited Mar 10 '11 at 0:07
Jimi Oke
24.5k265102
asked Mar 9 '11 at 15:56
Brett AllenBrett Allen
710410
edited Mar 10 '11 at 0:07
Jimi Oke
24.5k265102
edited Mar 10 '11 at 0:07
Jimi Oke
24.5k265102
edited Mar 10 '11 at 0:07
Jimi Oke
24.5k265102
24.5k265102
asked Mar 9 '11 at 15:56
Brett AllenBrett Allen
710410
asked Mar 9 '11 at 15:56
Brett AllenBrett Allen
710410
asked Mar 9 '11 at 15:56
Brett AllenBrett Allen
710410
710410
2
Can you give an example of the sort of sentence/context you’d like to use it in?
– PLL
Mar 9 '11 at 16:06
@PLL example given
– Brett Allen
Mar 9 '11 at 16:20
3
I'd argue that you should use "bastardised", because it's the correct word; those who are (wrongly) offended will just have to learn.
– slim
Dec 19 '11 at 11:38
Daniel Webster stated in a letter just before the time of his death that the worst thing that he had ever done in his life was to do this to the English language. That the reason he did it was because he needed the money. What he did was to make all nouns verbs, adjectives and pronouns through modification. Modification is change, change is motion, motion is...
– user70974
Apr 3 '14 at 15:29
add a comment |
2
Can you give an example of the sort of sentence/context you’d like to use it in?
– PLL
Mar 9 '11 at 16:06
@PLL example given
– Brett Allen
Mar 9 '11 at 16:20
3
I'd argue that you should use "bastardised", because it's the correct word; those who are (wrongly) offended will just have to learn.
– slim
Dec 19 '11 at 11:38
Daniel Webster stated in a letter just before the time of his death that the worst thing that he had ever done in his life was to do this to the English language. That the reason he did it was because he needed the money. What he did was to make all nouns verbs, adjectives and pronouns through modification. Modification is change, change is motion, motion is...
– user70974
Apr 3 '14 at 15:29
2
2
Can you give an example of the sort of sentence/context you’d like to use it in?
– PLL
Mar 9 '11 at 16:06
Can you give an example of the sort of sentence/context you’d like to use it in?
– PLL
Mar 9 '11 at 16:06
@PLL example given
– Brett Allen
Mar 9 '11 at 16:20
@PLL example given
– Brett Allen
Mar 9 '11 at 16:20
3
3
I'd argue that you should use "bastardised", because it's the correct word; those who are (wrongly) offended will just have to learn.
– slim
Dec 19 '11 at 11:38
I'd argue that you should use "bastardised", because it's the correct word; those who are (wrongly) offended will just have to learn.
– slim
Dec 19 '11 at 11:38
Daniel Webster stated in a letter just before the time of his death that the worst thing that he had ever done in his life was to do this to the English language. That the reason he did it was because he needed the money. What he did was to make all nouns verbs, adjectives and pronouns through modification. Modification is change, change is motion, motion is...
– user70974
Apr 3 '14 at 15:29
Daniel Webster stated in a letter just before the time of his death that the worst thing that he had ever done in his life was to do this to the English language. That the reason he did it was because he needed the money. What he did was to make all nouns verbs, adjectives and pronouns through modification. Modification is change, change is motion, motion is...
– user70974
Apr 3 '14 at 15:29
add a comment |
12 Answers
12
active
oldest
votes
Most words which are synonymous with bastardized will probably have negative connotations, I would imagine. Several that have been suggested (adulterate, debase, contaminated, pollute) all sound negative to me. The reason is that most of these things are not desirable things. Nobody wants contamination or pollution or something that's been reduced to its base form.
Thus I'd suggest other words that don't imply so much destruction:
- twisted
- broken
- malformed
- defective
- unusual (as a euphemism)
answered Mar 9 '11 at 17:09
Mr. Shiny and New 安宇Mr. Shiny and New 安宇
24.2k657126
Malformed fits perfectly in my example, and those other suggestions are very good for different situations. Thanks!
– Brett Allen
Mar 9 '11 at 19:20
add a comment |
Adulterate might be useful. It still sounds dirty, but not as evil as contaminate and whatnot.
By far the best term for the specific situation of your username is Canis Latinicus. A less specific and fairly neutrally descriptive term for bastardized language is simply broken.
If you'd like to lampshade the fact that you're bowdlerizing the term "bastardized" in order to placate the squeamish, I would suggest illegitimized.
answered Mar 9 '11 at 16:14
chaoschaos
17.9k45584
That will work great for physical composition, and honestly would work better than bastardize in that situation.
– Brett Allen
Mar 9 '11 at 16:17
add a comment |
You might consider dilute or mitigate.
answered Mar 9 '11 at 18:10
RobustoRobusto
128k28303514
add a comment |
I don't think debase, contaminate and pollute necessarily express negative intent.
answered Mar 9 '11 at 16:01
F'xF'x
33.4k15123220
1
"He contaminated/polluted the water/food/air", is general usage of those words, a very negative connotation because of it. Debase now that I think about it is relatively neutral, but it applies more towards currency, morals and people, rather than something you can do to a random object, so doesn't really fit my needs unfortunately. +1 for pointing out debase.
– Brett Allen
Mar 9 '11 at 16:06
1
I think you can say “accidental contamination”, which makes it clear it does not have inherent negative intent implications... But, there is no accounting for taste
– F'x
Mar 9 '11 at 16:18
add a comment |
I like 'borked' or 'borken' but I'm not sure if that passes the bar or not :)
answered Jun 1 '11 at 6:59
BenjolBenjol
3,75522332
add a comment |
You fudged it: "to make or adjust in a false or clumsy way".
answered Jun 1 '11 at 16:11
JeffSaholJeffSahol
17.5k22872
add a comment |
botched, but that comes along with a connotation of carelessness.
answered Apr 3 '14 at 15:38
brendanbrendan
343
add a comment |
"Misuse"
"My nick name on here is Aequitarum Custos, which is a "misused" Latin"
answered Mar 9 '11 at 17:06
user5862user5862
1092
add a comment |
This particular example is dog-Latin (not to be confused with pig-Latin). The word has a long history (17th century if not earlier), and means 'Latin words, but without the correct grammar or agreement'; seems ideal.
answered Jul 30 '11 at 11:45
TimLymingtonTimLymington
32.5k875143
add a comment |
Dysmorphic I suppose. Though a basically a medical term exists with very narrow definition.
answered Dec 19 '11 at 11:46
KrisKris
32.5k541117
add a comment |
If your intention is to say that something follows on from something else and, though changed significantly, relies upon the previous work without any suggestion of negativity, I'd suggest "adapted."
Does, this have the connotation you are looking for? It kind of depends on the context and audience.
answered Apr 16 '14 at 18:49
Wes ModesWes Modes
2822310
add a comment |
The above suggestion of 'twisted' led me to warped, then to changed, then to distorted. I find distorted to be a fitting substitute for bastardized in the context I was looking for.
answered 42 mins ago
saafirebutterflysaafirebutterfly
1
New contributor
saafirebutterfly is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f15681%2fa-synonym-for-bastardized-without-the-evil-slant%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
12 Answers
12
active
oldest
votes
12 Answers
12
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Most words which are synonymous with bastardized will probably have negative connotations, I would imagine. Several that have been suggested (adulterate, debase, contaminated, pollute) all sound negative to me. The reason is that most of these things are not desirable things. Nobody wants contamination or pollution or something that's been reduced to its base form.
Thus I'd suggest other words that don't imply so much destruction:
- twisted
- broken
- malformed
- defective
- unusual (as a euphemism)
answered Mar 9 '11 at 17:09
Mr. Shiny and New 安宇Mr. Shiny and New 安宇
24.2k657126
Malformed fits perfectly in my example, and those other suggestions are very good for different situations. Thanks!
– Brett Allen
Mar 9 '11 at 19:20
add a comment |
Most words which are synonymous with bastardized will probably have negative connotations, I would imagine. Several that have been suggested (adulterate, debase, contaminated, pollute) all sound negative to me. The reason is that most of these things are not desirable things. Nobody wants contamination or pollution or something that's been reduced to its base form.
Thus I'd suggest other words that don't imply so much destruction:
- twisted
- broken
- malformed
- defective
- unusual (as a euphemism)
answered Mar 9 '11 at 17:09
Mr. Shiny and New 安宇Mr. Shiny and New 安宇
24.2k657126
Malformed fits perfectly in my example, and those other suggestions are very good for different situations. Thanks!
– Brett Allen
Mar 9 '11 at 19:20
add a comment |
Most words which are synonymous with bastardized will probably have negative connotations, I would imagine. Several that have been suggested (adulterate, debase, contaminated, pollute) all sound negative to me. The reason is that most of these things are not desirable things. Nobody wants contamination or pollution or something that's been reduced to its base form.
Thus I'd suggest other words that don't imply so much destruction:
- twisted
- broken
- malformed
- defective
- unusual (as a euphemism)
answered Mar 9 '11 at 17:09
Mr. Shiny and New 安宇Mr. Shiny and New 安宇
24.2k657126
Most words which are synonymous with bastardized will probably have negative connotations, I would imagine. Several that have been suggested (adulterate, debase, contaminated, pollute) all sound negative to me. The reason is that most of these things are not desirable things. Nobody wants contamination or pollution or something that's been reduced to its base form.
Thus I'd suggest other words that don't imply so much destruction:
- twisted
- broken
- malformed
- defective
- unusual (as a euphemism)
answered Mar 9 '11 at 17:09
Mr. Shiny and New 安宇Mr. Shiny and New 安宇
24.2k657126
answered Mar 9 '11 at 17:09
Mr. Shiny and New 安宇Mr. Shiny and New 安宇
24.2k657126
answered Mar 9 '11 at 17:09
Mr. Shiny and New 安宇Mr. Shiny and New 安宇
24.2k657126
answered Mar 9 '11 at 17:09
Mr. Shiny and New 安宇Mr. Shiny and New 安宇
24.2k657126
24.2k657126
Malformed fits perfectly in my example, and those other suggestions are very good for different situations. Thanks!
– Brett Allen
Mar 9 '11 at 19:20
add a comment |
Malformed fits perfectly in my example, and those other suggestions are very good for different situations. Thanks!
– Brett Allen
Mar 9 '11 at 19:20
Malformed fits perfectly in my example, and those other suggestions are very good for different situations. Thanks!
– Brett Allen
Mar 9 '11 at 19:20
Malformed fits perfectly in my example, and those other suggestions are very good for different situations. Thanks!
– Brett Allen
Mar 9 '11 at 19:20
add a comment |
Adulterate might be useful. It still sounds dirty, but not as evil as contaminate and whatnot.
By far the best term for the specific situation of your username is Canis Latinicus. A less specific and fairly neutrally descriptive term for bastardized language is simply broken.
If you'd like to lampshade the fact that you're bowdlerizing the term "bastardized" in order to placate the squeamish, I would suggest illegitimized.
answered Mar 9 '11 at 16:14
chaoschaos
17.9k45584
That will work great for physical composition, and honestly would work better than bastardize in that situation.
– Brett Allen
Mar 9 '11 at 16:17
add a comment |
Adulterate might be useful. It still sounds dirty, but not as evil as contaminate and whatnot.
By far the best term for the specific situation of your username is Canis Latinicus. A less specific and fairly neutrally descriptive term for bastardized language is simply broken.
If you'd like to lampshade the fact that you're bowdlerizing the term "bastardized" in order to placate the squeamish, I would suggest illegitimized.
answered Mar 9 '11 at 16:14
chaoschaos
17.9k45584
That will work great for physical composition, and honestly would work better than bastardize in that situation.
– Brett Allen
Mar 9 '11 at 16:17
add a comment |
Adulterate might be useful. It still sounds dirty, but not as evil as contaminate and whatnot.
By far the best term for the specific situation of your username is Canis Latinicus. A less specific and fairly neutrally descriptive term for bastardized language is simply broken.
If you'd like to lampshade the fact that you're bowdlerizing the term "bastardized" in order to placate the squeamish, I would suggest illegitimized.
answered Mar 9 '11 at 16:14
chaoschaos
17.9k45584
Adulterate might be useful. It still sounds dirty, but not as evil as contaminate and whatnot.
By far the best term for the specific situation of your username is Canis Latinicus. A less specific and fairly neutrally descriptive term for bastardized language is simply broken.
If you'd like to lampshade the fact that you're bowdlerizing the term "bastardized" in order to placate the squeamish, I would suggest illegitimized.
answered Mar 9 '11 at 16:14
chaoschaos
17.9k45584
edited Mar 9 '11 at 17:51
answered Mar 9 '11 at 16:14
chaoschaos
17.9k45584
answered Mar 9 '11 at 16:14
chaoschaos
17.9k45584
answered Mar 9 '11 at 16:14
chaoschaos
17.9k45584
17.9k45584
That will work great for physical composition, and honestly would work better than bastardize in that situation.
– Brett Allen
Mar 9 '11 at 16:17
add a comment |
That will work great for physical composition, and honestly would work better than bastardize in that situation.
– Brett Allen
Mar 9 '11 at 16:17
That will work great for physical composition, and honestly would work better than bastardize in that situation.
– Brett Allen
Mar 9 '11 at 16:17
That will work great for physical composition, and honestly would work better than bastardize in that situation.
– Brett Allen
Mar 9 '11 at 16:17
add a comment |
You might consider dilute or mitigate.
answered Mar 9 '11 at 18:10
RobustoRobusto
128k28303514
add a comment |
You might consider dilute or mitigate.
answered Mar 9 '11 at 18:10
RobustoRobusto
128k28303514
add a comment |
You might consider dilute or mitigate.
answered Mar 9 '11 at 18:10
RobustoRobusto
128k28303514
You might consider dilute or mitigate.
answered Mar 9 '11 at 18:10
RobustoRobusto
128k28303514
answered Mar 9 '11 at 18:10
RobustoRobusto
128k28303514
answered Mar 9 '11 at 18:10
RobustoRobusto
128k28303514
answered Mar 9 '11 at 18:10
RobustoRobusto
128k28303514
128k28303514
add a comment |
add a comment |
I don't think debase, contaminate and pollute necessarily express negative intent.
answered Mar 9 '11 at 16:01
F'xF'x
33.4k15123220
1
"He contaminated/polluted the water/food/air", is general usage of those words, a very negative connotation because of it. Debase now that I think about it is relatively neutral, but it applies more towards currency, morals and people, rather than something you can do to a random object, so doesn't really fit my needs unfortunately. +1 for pointing out debase.
– Brett Allen
Mar 9 '11 at 16:06
1
I think you can say “accidental contamination”, which makes it clear it does not have inherent negative intent implications... But, there is no accounting for taste
– F'x
Mar 9 '11 at 16:18
add a comment |
I don't think debase, contaminate and pollute necessarily express negative intent.
answered Mar 9 '11 at 16:01
F'xF'x
33.4k15123220
1
"He contaminated/polluted the water/food/air", is general usage of those words, a very negative connotation because of it. Debase now that I think about it is relatively neutral, but it applies more towards currency, morals and people, rather than something you can do to a random object, so doesn't really fit my needs unfortunately. +1 for pointing out debase.
– Brett Allen
Mar 9 '11 at 16:06
1
I think you can say “accidental contamination”, which makes it clear it does not have inherent negative intent implications... But, there is no accounting for taste
– F'x
Mar 9 '11 at 16:18
add a comment |
I don't think debase, contaminate and pollute necessarily express negative intent.
answered Mar 9 '11 at 16:01
F'xF'x
33.4k15123220
I don't think debase, contaminate and pollute necessarily express negative intent.
answered Mar 9 '11 at 16:01
F'xF'x
33.4k15123220
answered Mar 9 '11 at 16:01
F'xF'x
33.4k15123220
answered Mar 9 '11 at 16:01
F'xF'x
33.4k15123220
answered Mar 9 '11 at 16:01
F'xF'x
33.4k15123220
33.4k15123220
1
"He contaminated/polluted the water/food/air", is general usage of those words, a very negative connotation because of it. Debase now that I think about it is relatively neutral, but it applies more towards currency, morals and people, rather than something you can do to a random object, so doesn't really fit my needs unfortunately. +1 for pointing out debase.
– Brett Allen
Mar 9 '11 at 16:06
1
I think you can say “accidental contamination”, which makes it clear it does not have inherent negative intent implications... But, there is no accounting for taste
– F'x
Mar 9 '11 at 16:18
add a comment |
1
"He contaminated/polluted the water/food/air", is general usage of those words, a very negative connotation because of it. Debase now that I think about it is relatively neutral, but it applies more towards currency, morals and people, rather than something you can do to a random object, so doesn't really fit my needs unfortunately. +1 for pointing out debase.
– Brett Allen
Mar 9 '11 at 16:06
1
I think you can say “accidental contamination”, which makes it clear it does not have inherent negative intent implications... But, there is no accounting for taste
– F'x
Mar 9 '11 at 16:18
1
1
"He contaminated/polluted the water/food/air", is general usage of those words, a very negative connotation because of it. Debase now that I think about it is relatively neutral, but it applies more towards currency, morals and people, rather than something you can do to a random object, so doesn't really fit my needs unfortunately. +1 for pointing out debase.
– Brett Allen
Mar 9 '11 at 16:06
"He contaminated/polluted the water/food/air", is general usage of those words, a very negative connotation because of it. Debase now that I think about it is relatively neutral, but it applies more towards currency, morals and people, rather than something you can do to a random object, so doesn't really fit my needs unfortunately. +1 for pointing out debase.
– Brett Allen
Mar 9 '11 at 16:06
1
1
I think you can say “accidental contamination”, which makes it clear it does not have inherent negative intent implications... But, there is no accounting for taste
– F'x
Mar 9 '11 at 16:18
I think you can say “accidental contamination”, which makes it clear it does not have inherent negative intent implications... But, there is no accounting for taste
– F'x
Mar 9 '11 at 16:18
add a comment |
I like 'borked' or 'borken' but I'm not sure if that passes the bar or not :)
answered Jun 1 '11 at 6:59
BenjolBenjol
3,75522332
add a comment |
I like 'borked' or 'borken' but I'm not sure if that passes the bar or not :)
answered Jun 1 '11 at 6:59
BenjolBenjol
3,75522332
add a comment |
I like 'borked' or 'borken' but I'm not sure if that passes the bar or not :)
answered Jun 1 '11 at 6:59
BenjolBenjol
3,75522332
I like 'borked' or 'borken' but I'm not sure if that passes the bar or not :)
answered Jun 1 '11 at 6:59
BenjolBenjol
3,75522332
answered Jun 1 '11 at 6:59
BenjolBenjol
3,75522332
answered Jun 1 '11 at 6:59
BenjolBenjol
3,75522332
answered Jun 1 '11 at 6:59
BenjolBenjol
3,75522332
3,75522332
add a comment |
add a comment |
You fudged it: "to make or adjust in a false or clumsy way".
answered Jun 1 '11 at 16:11
JeffSaholJeffSahol
17.5k22872
add a comment |
You fudged it: "to make or adjust in a false or clumsy way".
answered Jun 1 '11 at 16:11
JeffSaholJeffSahol
17.5k22872
add a comment |
You fudged it: "to make or adjust in a false or clumsy way".
answered Jun 1 '11 at 16:11
JeffSaholJeffSahol
17.5k22872
You fudged it: "to make or adjust in a false or clumsy way".
answered Jun 1 '11 at 16:11
JeffSaholJeffSahol
17.5k22872
answered Jun 1 '11 at 16:11
JeffSaholJeffSahol
17.5k22872
answered Jun 1 '11 at 16:11
JeffSaholJeffSahol
17.5k22872
answered Jun 1 '11 at 16:11
JeffSaholJeffSahol
17.5k22872
17.5k22872
add a comment |
add a comment |
botched, but that comes along with a connotation of carelessness.
answered Apr 3 '14 at 15:38
brendanbrendan
343
add a comment |
botched, but that comes along with a connotation of carelessness.
answered Apr 3 '14 at 15:38
brendanbrendan
343
add a comment |
botched, but that comes along with a connotation of carelessness.
answered Apr 3 '14 at 15:38
brendanbrendan
343
botched, but that comes along with a connotation of carelessness.
answered Apr 3 '14 at 15:38
brendanbrendan
343
answered Apr 3 '14 at 15:38
brendanbrendan
343
answered Apr 3 '14 at 15:38
brendanbrendan
343
answered Apr 3 '14 at 15:38
brendanbrendan
343
343
add a comment |
add a comment |
"Misuse"
"My nick name on here is Aequitarum Custos, which is a "misused" Latin"
answered Mar 9 '11 at 17:06
user5862user5862
1092
add a comment |
"Misuse"
"My nick name on here is Aequitarum Custos, which is a "misused" Latin"
answered Mar 9 '11 at 17:06
user5862user5862
1092
add a comment |
"Misuse"
"My nick name on here is Aequitarum Custos, which is a "misused" Latin"
answered Mar 9 '11 at 17:06
user5862user5862
1092
"Misuse"
"My nick name on here is Aequitarum Custos, which is a "misused" Latin"
answered Mar 9 '11 at 17:06
user5862user5862
1092
answered Mar 9 '11 at 17:06
user5862user5862
1092
answered Mar 9 '11 at 17:06
user5862user5862
1092
answered Mar 9 '11 at 17:06
user5862user5862
1092
1092
add a comment |
add a comment |
This particular example is dog-Latin (not to be confused with pig-Latin). The word has a long history (17th century if not earlier), and means 'Latin words, but without the correct grammar or agreement'; seems ideal.
answered Jul 30 '11 at 11:45
TimLymingtonTimLymington
32.5k875143
add a comment |
This particular example is dog-Latin (not to be confused with pig-Latin). The word has a long history (17th century if not earlier), and means 'Latin words, but without the correct grammar or agreement'; seems ideal.
answered Jul 30 '11 at 11:45
TimLymingtonTimLymington
32.5k875143
add a comment |
This particular example is dog-Latin (not to be confused with pig-Latin). The word has a long history (17th century if not earlier), and means 'Latin words, but without the correct grammar or agreement'; seems ideal.
answered Jul 30 '11 at 11:45
TimLymingtonTimLymington
32.5k875143
This particular example is dog-Latin (not to be confused with pig-Latin). The word has a long history (17th century if not earlier), and means 'Latin words, but without the correct grammar or agreement'; seems ideal.
answered Jul 30 '11 at 11:45
TimLymingtonTimLymington
32.5k875143
edited Dec 19 '11 at 11:34
answered Jul 30 '11 at 11:45
TimLymingtonTimLymington
32.5k875143
answered Jul 30 '11 at 11:45
TimLymingtonTimLymington
32.5k875143
answered Jul 30 '11 at 11:45
TimLymingtonTimLymington
32.5k875143
32.5k875143
add a comment |
add a comment |
Dysmorphic I suppose. Though a basically a medical term exists with very narrow definition.
answered Dec 19 '11 at 11:46
KrisKris
32.5k541117
add a comment |
Dysmorphic I suppose. Though a basically a medical term exists with very narrow definition.
answered Dec 19 '11 at 11:46
KrisKris
32.5k541117
add a comment |
Dysmorphic I suppose. Though a basically a medical term exists with very narrow definition.
answered Dec 19 '11 at 11:46
KrisKris
32.5k541117
Dysmorphic I suppose. Though a basically a medical term exists with very narrow definition.
answered Dec 19 '11 at 11:46
KrisKris
32.5k541117
answered Dec 19 '11 at 11:46
KrisKris
32.5k541117
answered Dec 19 '11 at 11:46
KrisKris
32.5k541117
answered Dec 19 '11 at 11:46
KrisKris
32.5k541117
32.5k541117
add a comment |
add a comment |
If your intention is to say that something follows on from something else and, though changed significantly, relies upon the previous work without any suggestion of negativity, I'd suggest "adapted."
Does, this have the connotation you are looking for? It kind of depends on the context and audience.
answered Apr 16 '14 at 18:49
Wes ModesWes Modes
2822310
add a comment |
If your intention is to say that something follows on from something else and, though changed significantly, relies upon the previous work without any suggestion of negativity, I'd suggest "adapted."
Does, this have the connotation you are looking for? It kind of depends on the context and audience.
answered Apr 16 '14 at 18:49
Wes ModesWes Modes
2822310
add a comment |
If your intention is to say that something follows on from something else and, though changed significantly, relies upon the previous work without any suggestion of negativity, I'd suggest "adapted."
Does, this have the connotation you are looking for? It kind of depends on the context and audience.
answered Apr 16 '14 at 18:49
Wes ModesWes Modes
2822310
If your intention is to say that something follows on from something else and, though changed significantly, relies upon the previous work without any suggestion of negativity, I'd suggest "adapted."
Does, this have the connotation you are looking for? It kind of depends on the context and audience.
answered Apr 16 '14 at 18:49
Wes ModesWes Modes
2822310
answered Apr 16 '14 at 18:49
Wes ModesWes Modes
2822310
answered Apr 16 '14 at 18:49
Wes ModesWes Modes
2822310
answered Apr 16 '14 at 18:49
Wes ModesWes Modes
2822310
2822310
add a comment |
add a comment |
The above suggestion of 'twisted' led me to warped, then to changed, then to distorted. I find distorted to be a fitting substitute for bastardized in the context I was looking for.
answered 42 mins ago
saafirebutterflysaafirebutterfly
1
New contributor
saafirebutterfly is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
The above suggestion of 'twisted' led me to warped, then to changed, then to distorted. I find distorted to be a fitting substitute for bastardized in the context I was looking for.
answered 42 mins ago
saafirebutterflysaafirebutterfly
1
New contributor
saafirebutterfly is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
The above suggestion of 'twisted' led me to warped, then to changed, then to distorted. I find distorted to be a fitting substitute for bastardized in the context I was looking for.
answered 42 mins ago
saafirebutterflysaafirebutterfly
1
New contributor
saafirebutterfly is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
The above suggestion of 'twisted' led me to warped, then to changed, then to distorted. I find distorted to be a fitting substitute for bastardized in the context I was looking for.
answered 42 mins ago
saafirebutterflysaafirebutterfly
1
New contributor
saafirebutterfly is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 42 mins ago
saafirebutterflysaafirebutterfly
1
New contributor
saafirebutterfly is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 42 mins ago
saafirebutterflysaafirebutterfly
1
answered 42 mins ago
saafirebutterflysaafirebutterfly
1
1
New contributor
saafirebutterfly is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
saafirebutterfly is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
saafirebutterfly is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f15681%2fa-synonym-for-bastardized-without-the-evil-slant%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
Can you give an example of the sort of sentence/context you’d like to use it in?
– PLL
Mar 9 '11 at 16:06
@PLL example given
– Brett Allen
Mar 9 '11 at 16:20
3
I'd argue that you should use "bastardised", because it's the correct word; those who are (wrongly) offended will just have to learn.
– slim
Dec 19 '11 at 11:38
Daniel Webster stated in a letter just before the time of his death that the worst thing that he had ever done in his life was to do this to the English language. That the reason he did it was because he needed the money. What he did was to make all nouns verbs, adjectives and pronouns through modification. Modification is change, change is motion, motion is...
– user70974
Apr 3 '14 at 15:29