Collatz Conjecture program randomly stops being accurate at high digits












2














So while Wikipedia surfing, I stumbled onto the Collatz Conjecture So I decided to write a simple python program,



while True:
x = int(input("Enter a number: "))
n=0

while True:
if (x % 2) == 0:
x = x/2
n += 1
print(x)
else:
x = 3*x +1
n+=1
print(x)
if x == 1:
break
print("N = %d" %(n))


At first I played around with random numbers, and then I decided to test some of the larger numbers that the Wikipedia article represents. The program worked perfectly up until 75,128,138,247 on Wikipedia's " Examples" Section,previously it matched the number of steps exactly, and then it just randomly says "512" for N (the number of steps. I just don't understand why. Can anyone Help?










share|improve this question





























    2














    So while Wikipedia surfing, I stumbled onto the Collatz Conjecture So I decided to write a simple python program,



    while True:
    x = int(input("Enter a number: "))
    n=0

    while True:
    if (x % 2) == 0:
    x = x/2
    n += 1
    print(x)
    else:
    x = 3*x +1
    n+=1
    print(x)
    if x == 1:
    break
    print("N = %d" %(n))


    At first I played around with random numbers, and then I decided to test some of the larger numbers that the Wikipedia article represents. The program worked perfectly up until 75,128,138,247 on Wikipedia's " Examples" Section,previously it matched the number of steps exactly, and then it just randomly says "512" for N (the number of steps. I just don't understand why. Can anyone Help?










    share|improve this question



























      2












      2








      2







      So while Wikipedia surfing, I stumbled onto the Collatz Conjecture So I decided to write a simple python program,



      while True:
      x = int(input("Enter a number: "))
      n=0

      while True:
      if (x % 2) == 0:
      x = x/2
      n += 1
      print(x)
      else:
      x = 3*x +1
      n+=1
      print(x)
      if x == 1:
      break
      print("N = %d" %(n))


      At first I played around with random numbers, and then I decided to test some of the larger numbers that the Wikipedia article represents. The program worked perfectly up until 75,128,138,247 on Wikipedia's " Examples" Section,previously it matched the number of steps exactly, and then it just randomly says "512" for N (the number of steps. I just don't understand why. Can anyone Help?










      share|improve this question















      So while Wikipedia surfing, I stumbled onto the Collatz Conjecture So I decided to write a simple python program,



      while True:
      x = int(input("Enter a number: "))
      n=0

      while True:
      if (x % 2) == 0:
      x = x/2
      n += 1
      print(x)
      else:
      x = 3*x +1
      n+=1
      print(x)
      if x == 1:
      break
      print("N = %d" %(n))


      At first I played around with random numbers, and then I decided to test some of the larger numbers that the Wikipedia article represents. The program worked perfectly up until 75,128,138,247 on Wikipedia's " Examples" Section,previously it matched the number of steps exactly, and then it just randomly says "512" for N (the number of steps. I just don't understand why. Can anyone Help?







      python math






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Nov 23 '18 at 17:39

























      asked Nov 23 '18 at 4:29









      Misha

      133




      133
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          Float division might cause issues (note output as floats), so work in integers:



          change



          x = x/2  


          to integer division (your print correponds to Python 3, so it is available)



          x = x // 2





          share|improve this answer























          • Thank you! Worked perfectly.
            – Misha
            Nov 23 '18 at 17:57











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53440661%2fcollatz-conjecture-program-randomly-stops-being-accurate-at-high-digits%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2














          Float division might cause issues (note output as floats), so work in integers:



          change



          x = x/2  


          to integer division (your print correponds to Python 3, so it is available)



          x = x // 2





          share|improve this answer























          • Thank you! Worked perfectly.
            – Misha
            Nov 23 '18 at 17:57
















          2














          Float division might cause issues (note output as floats), so work in integers:



          change



          x = x/2  


          to integer division (your print correponds to Python 3, so it is available)



          x = x // 2





          share|improve this answer























          • Thank you! Worked perfectly.
            – Misha
            Nov 23 '18 at 17:57














          2












          2








          2






          Float division might cause issues (note output as floats), so work in integers:



          change



          x = x/2  


          to integer division (your print correponds to Python 3, so it is available)



          x = x // 2





          share|improve this answer














          Float division might cause issues (note output as floats), so work in integers:



          change



          x = x/2  


          to integer division (your print correponds to Python 3, so it is available)



          x = x // 2






          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Nov 23 '18 at 4:45

























          answered Nov 23 '18 at 4:34









          MBo

          47.1k22848




          47.1k22848












          • Thank you! Worked perfectly.
            – Misha
            Nov 23 '18 at 17:57


















          • Thank you! Worked perfectly.
            – Misha
            Nov 23 '18 at 17:57
















          Thank you! Worked perfectly.
          – Misha
          Nov 23 '18 at 17:57




          Thank you! Worked perfectly.
          – Misha
          Nov 23 '18 at 17:57


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53440661%2fcollatz-conjecture-program-randomly-stops-being-accurate-at-high-digits%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          What visual should I use to simply compare current year value vs last year in Power BI desktop

          Alexandru Averescu

          Trompette piccolo