Tenses in sentences with more than two verbs
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I´ve spent a fortune on swimming lessons. Next month I will have been training for three years and I don´t think I _______________(can) dive successfully when I go to Mexico this summer.
If I thought that somebody was in my house, I would call the police and I _________ (not confront) the intruder.
What tenses should be used in the blank spaces above? I know conditionals and future perfect pretty well but I always have a problem when there are more than two verbs in a sentence. So my question is what tense should be used in any conditional or a future perfect sentence when there are more than two verbs just as in the examples above?
tenses conditionals future sequence-of-tenses future-perfect
asked Apr 17 at 13:36
Batal96
62
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 1 hour ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I´ve spent a fortune on swimming lessons. Next month I will have been training for three years and I don´t think I _______________(can) dive successfully when I go to Mexico this summer.
If I thought that somebody was in my house, I would call the police and I _________ (not confront) the intruder.
What tenses should be used in the blank spaces above? I know conditionals and future perfect pretty well but I always have a problem when there are more than two verbs in a sentence. So my question is what tense should be used in any conditional or a future perfect sentence when there are more than two verbs just as in the examples above?
tenses conditionals future sequence-of-tenses future-perfect
asked Apr 17 at 13:36
Batal96
62
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 1 hour ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Those two sentences are very different. 2) is would. As for 1), the entire thing seem slightly odd. "But"sounds better to my ear there. In which case, you can say: But I don't think I can dive successfully when I go to Mexico etc.
– Lambie
Apr 17 at 14:13
Let's get one thing straight: that second sentence should read, "If I thought somebody were in my house, I would call the police and..."
– Billy
Jul 17 at 0:13
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I´ve spent a fortune on swimming lessons. Next month I will have been training for three years and I don´t think I _______________(can) dive successfully when I go to Mexico this summer.
If I thought that somebody was in my house, I would call the police and I _________ (not confront) the intruder.
What tenses should be used in the blank spaces above? I know conditionals and future perfect pretty well but I always have a problem when there are more than two verbs in a sentence. So my question is what tense should be used in any conditional or a future perfect sentence when there are more than two verbs just as in the examples above?
tenses conditionals future sequence-of-tenses future-perfect
asked Apr 17 at 13:36
Batal96
62
I´ve spent a fortune on swimming lessons. Next month I will have been training for three years and I don´t think I _______________(can) dive successfully when I go to Mexico this summer.
If I thought that somebody was in my house, I would call the police and I _________ (not confront) the intruder.
What tenses should be used in the blank spaces above? I know conditionals and future perfect pretty well but I always have a problem when there are more than two verbs in a sentence. So my question is what tense should be used in any conditional or a future perfect sentence when there are more than two verbs just as in the examples above?
tenses conditionals future sequence-of-tenses future-perfect
tenses conditionals future sequence-of-tenses future-perfect
asked Apr 17 at 13:36
Batal96
62
asked Apr 17 at 13:36
Batal96
62
asked Apr 17 at 13:36
Batal96
62
asked Apr 17 at 13:36
Batal96
62
asked Apr 17 at 13:36
Batal96
62
62
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 1 hour ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 1 hour ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Those two sentences are very different. 2) is would. As for 1), the entire thing seem slightly odd. "But"sounds better to my ear there. In which case, you can say: But I don't think I can dive successfully when I go to Mexico etc.
– Lambie
Apr 17 at 14:13
Let's get one thing straight: that second sentence should read, "If I thought somebody were in my house, I would call the police and..."
– Billy
Jul 17 at 0:13
add a comment |
Those two sentences are very different. 2) is would. As for 1), the entire thing seem slightly odd. "But"sounds better to my ear there. In which case, you can say: But I don't think I can dive successfully when I go to Mexico etc.
– Lambie
Apr 17 at 14:13
Let's get one thing straight: that second sentence should read, "If I thought somebody were in my house, I would call the police and..."
– Billy
Jul 17 at 0:13
Those two sentences are very different. 2) is would. As for 1), the entire thing seem slightly odd. "But"sounds better to my ear there. In which case, you can say: But I don't think I can dive successfully when I go to Mexico etc.
– Lambie
Apr 17 at 14:13
Those two sentences are very different. 2) is would. As for 1), the entire thing seem slightly odd. "But"sounds better to my ear there. In which case, you can say: But I don't think I can dive successfully when I go to Mexico etc.
– Lambie
Apr 17 at 14:13
Let's get one thing straight: that second sentence should read, "If I thought somebody were in my house, I would call the police and..."
– Billy
Jul 17 at 0:13
Let's get one thing straight: that second sentence should read, "If I thought somebody were in my house, I would call the police and..."
– Billy
Jul 17 at 0:13
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
The number of verbs in a sentence is irrelevant. You simply need to decide for each verb which 'tense' conveys your intended meaning. This tense may or may not be the same as the tense used for the previous verb.
In sentence 2 the verb construction is the same (would [not] + infinitive) because you are saying what you would and would not do if you thought there was an intruder in your house.
In sentence 1 you start with the future perfect continuous to express how long your training will have lasted by the start of next month. You then go on to say what you nevertheless do not think you will be able to do at that point in time: I don't think I will be able to dive (simple future). The tense of the previous verb is irrelevant.
As Lewis points out in The English Verb: An Exploration of Structure and Meaning (p148):
It is the verb phrase not the sentence which is the fundamental unit
requiring analysis.
answered Apr 17 at 17:12
Shoe
24.9k43684
add a comment |
up vote
-2
down vote
On sentence 1, you are using the singular future perfect verb "will have been". You should therefore continue with that in the second half and use something like "will be (able to)".
On sentence 2, you use the past tense in the first clause, but then switch to a present tense, and so it sounds a bit funky. Depending upon the context, you could switch to present tense in the first clause, or continue with past tense in the second. Using present tense, "If I thought" could change to "If I think" and there would be no use for anything in the blank in the second clause. You could then remove the parentheses around "not confront". If, however, you change the second clause to past tense, then the verb in the second clause should be "would not have confronted".
My suggestions for tense are:
I´ve spent a fortune on swimming lessons. Next month I will have been training for three years and I don´t think I will be able to dive successfully when I go to Mexico this summer.
If I think somebody is in my house, I would call the police and I would not confront the intruder.
answered Apr 17 at 16:39
James Jensen
1071
It's not a past tense. It's a conditional where were has been replaced by was (as nearly all native English speakers do from time to time). "If I think ... I would ..." is not the way conditional clauses work in standard English.
– Peter Shor
Apr 17 at 17:21
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f442108%2ftenses-in-sentences-with-more-than-two-verbs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
The number of verbs in a sentence is irrelevant. You simply need to decide for each verb which 'tense' conveys your intended meaning. This tense may or may not be the same as the tense used for the previous verb.
In sentence 2 the verb construction is the same (would [not] + infinitive) because you are saying what you would and would not do if you thought there was an intruder in your house.
In sentence 1 you start with the future perfect continuous to express how long your training will have lasted by the start of next month. You then go on to say what you nevertheless do not think you will be able to do at that point in time: I don't think I will be able to dive (simple future). The tense of the previous verb is irrelevant.
As Lewis points out in The English Verb: An Exploration of Structure and Meaning (p148):
It is the verb phrase not the sentence which is the fundamental unit
requiring analysis.
answered Apr 17 at 17:12
Shoe
24.9k43684
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
The number of verbs in a sentence is irrelevant. You simply need to decide for each verb which 'tense' conveys your intended meaning. This tense may or may not be the same as the tense used for the previous verb.
In sentence 2 the verb construction is the same (would [not] + infinitive) because you are saying what you would and would not do if you thought there was an intruder in your house.
In sentence 1 you start with the future perfect continuous to express how long your training will have lasted by the start of next month. You then go on to say what you nevertheless do not think you will be able to do at that point in time: I don't think I will be able to dive (simple future). The tense of the previous verb is irrelevant.
As Lewis points out in The English Verb: An Exploration of Structure and Meaning (p148):
It is the verb phrase not the sentence which is the fundamental unit
requiring analysis.
answered Apr 17 at 17:12
Shoe
24.9k43684
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
The number of verbs in a sentence is irrelevant. You simply need to decide for each verb which 'tense' conveys your intended meaning. This tense may or may not be the same as the tense used for the previous verb.
In sentence 2 the verb construction is the same (would [not] + infinitive) because you are saying what you would and would not do if you thought there was an intruder in your house.
In sentence 1 you start with the future perfect continuous to express how long your training will have lasted by the start of next month. You then go on to say what you nevertheless do not think you will be able to do at that point in time: I don't think I will be able to dive (simple future). The tense of the previous verb is irrelevant.
As Lewis points out in The English Verb: An Exploration of Structure and Meaning (p148):
It is the verb phrase not the sentence which is the fundamental unit
requiring analysis.
answered Apr 17 at 17:12
Shoe
24.9k43684
The number of verbs in a sentence is irrelevant. You simply need to decide for each verb which 'tense' conveys your intended meaning. This tense may or may not be the same as the tense used for the previous verb.
In sentence 2 the verb construction is the same (would [not] + infinitive) because you are saying what you would and would not do if you thought there was an intruder in your house.
In sentence 1 you start with the future perfect continuous to express how long your training will have lasted by the start of next month. You then go on to say what you nevertheless do not think you will be able to do at that point in time: I don't think I will be able to dive (simple future). The tense of the previous verb is irrelevant.
As Lewis points out in The English Verb: An Exploration of Structure and Meaning (p148):
It is the verb phrase not the sentence which is the fundamental unit
requiring analysis.
answered Apr 17 at 17:12
Shoe
24.9k43684
answered Apr 17 at 17:12
Shoe
24.9k43684
answered Apr 17 at 17:12
Shoe
24.9k43684
answered Apr 17 at 17:12
Shoe
24.9k43684
24.9k43684
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
-2
down vote
On sentence 1, you are using the singular future perfect verb "will have been". You should therefore continue with that in the second half and use something like "will be (able to)".
On sentence 2, you use the past tense in the first clause, but then switch to a present tense, and so it sounds a bit funky. Depending upon the context, you could switch to present tense in the first clause, or continue with past tense in the second. Using present tense, "If I thought" could change to "If I think" and there would be no use for anything in the blank in the second clause. You could then remove the parentheses around "not confront". If, however, you change the second clause to past tense, then the verb in the second clause should be "would not have confronted".
My suggestions for tense are:
I´ve spent a fortune on swimming lessons. Next month I will have been training for three years and I don´t think I will be able to dive successfully when I go to Mexico this summer.
If I think somebody is in my house, I would call the police and I would not confront the intruder.
answered Apr 17 at 16:39
James Jensen
1071
It's not a past tense. It's a conditional where were has been replaced by was (as nearly all native English speakers do from time to time). "If I think ... I would ..." is not the way conditional clauses work in standard English.
– Peter Shor
Apr 17 at 17:21
add a comment |
up vote
-2
down vote
On sentence 1, you are using the singular future perfect verb "will have been". You should therefore continue with that in the second half and use something like "will be (able to)".
On sentence 2, you use the past tense in the first clause, but then switch to a present tense, and so it sounds a bit funky. Depending upon the context, you could switch to present tense in the first clause, or continue with past tense in the second. Using present tense, "If I thought" could change to "If I think" and there would be no use for anything in the blank in the second clause. You could then remove the parentheses around "not confront". If, however, you change the second clause to past tense, then the verb in the second clause should be "would not have confronted".
My suggestions for tense are:
I´ve spent a fortune on swimming lessons. Next month I will have been training for three years and I don´t think I will be able to dive successfully when I go to Mexico this summer.
If I think somebody is in my house, I would call the police and I would not confront the intruder.
answered Apr 17 at 16:39
James Jensen
1071
It's not a past tense. It's a conditional where were has been replaced by was (as nearly all native English speakers do from time to time). "If I think ... I would ..." is not the way conditional clauses work in standard English.
– Peter Shor
Apr 17 at 17:21
add a comment |
up vote
-2
down vote
up vote
-2
down vote
On sentence 1, you are using the singular future perfect verb "will have been". You should therefore continue with that in the second half and use something like "will be (able to)".
On sentence 2, you use the past tense in the first clause, but then switch to a present tense, and so it sounds a bit funky. Depending upon the context, you could switch to present tense in the first clause, or continue with past tense in the second. Using present tense, "If I thought" could change to "If I think" and there would be no use for anything in the blank in the second clause. You could then remove the parentheses around "not confront". If, however, you change the second clause to past tense, then the verb in the second clause should be "would not have confronted".
My suggestions for tense are:
I´ve spent a fortune on swimming lessons. Next month I will have been training for three years and I don´t think I will be able to dive successfully when I go to Mexico this summer.
If I think somebody is in my house, I would call the police and I would not confront the intruder.
answered Apr 17 at 16:39
James Jensen
1071
On sentence 1, you are using the singular future perfect verb "will have been". You should therefore continue with that in the second half and use something like "will be (able to)".
On sentence 2, you use the past tense in the first clause, but then switch to a present tense, and so it sounds a bit funky. Depending upon the context, you could switch to present tense in the first clause, or continue with past tense in the second. Using present tense, "If I thought" could change to "If I think" and there would be no use for anything in the blank in the second clause. You could then remove the parentheses around "not confront". If, however, you change the second clause to past tense, then the verb in the second clause should be "would not have confronted".
My suggestions for tense are:
I´ve spent a fortune on swimming lessons. Next month I will have been training for three years and I don´t think I will be able to dive successfully when I go to Mexico this summer.
If I think somebody is in my house, I would call the police and I would not confront the intruder.
answered Apr 17 at 16:39
James Jensen
1071
answered Apr 17 at 16:39
James Jensen
1071
answered Apr 17 at 16:39
James Jensen
1071
answered Apr 17 at 16:39
James Jensen
1071
1071
It's not a past tense. It's a conditional where were has been replaced by was (as nearly all native English speakers do from time to time). "If I think ... I would ..." is not the way conditional clauses work in standard English.
– Peter Shor
Apr 17 at 17:21
add a comment |
It's not a past tense. It's a conditional where were has been replaced by was (as nearly all native English speakers do from time to time). "If I think ... I would ..." is not the way conditional clauses work in standard English.
– Peter Shor
Apr 17 at 17:21
It's not a past tense. It's a conditional where were has been replaced by was (as nearly all native English speakers do from time to time). "If I think ... I would ..." is not the way conditional clauses work in standard English.
– Peter Shor
Apr 17 at 17:21
It's not a past tense. It's a conditional where were has been replaced by was (as nearly all native English speakers do from time to time). "If I think ... I would ..." is not the way conditional clauses work in standard English.
– Peter Shor
Apr 17 at 17:21
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f442108%2ftenses-in-sentences-with-more-than-two-verbs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Those two sentences are very different. 2) is would. As for 1), the entire thing seem slightly odd. "But"sounds better to my ear there. In which case, you can say: But I don't think I can dive successfully when I go to Mexico etc.
– Lambie
Apr 17 at 14:13
Let's get one thing straight: that second sentence should read, "If I thought somebody were in my house, I would call the police and..."
– Billy
Jul 17 at 0:13