Is it correct: “Let's suppose someone is trying to disarm you.”
I need help with the following sentence:
Let's assume that somebody tries to disarm it.
For example, at a demonstration for demonstration purposes on a quizlets product.
My first thought was that I put it like it was going to happen. Accordingly, I thought this option would be correct.
Let's suppose someone is trying to disarm you.
Would that be correct? Or would you formulate the sentence in a completely different way?
Thank you in advance.
grammaticality
asked Dec 21 at 8:56
Quizlet
32
New contributor
Quizlet is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
I need help with the following sentence:
Let's assume that somebody tries to disarm it.
For example, at a demonstration for demonstration purposes on a quizlets product.
My first thought was that I put it like it was going to happen. Accordingly, I thought this option would be correct.
Let's suppose someone is trying to disarm you.
Would that be correct? Or would you formulate the sentence in a completely different way?
Thank you in advance.
grammaticality
asked Dec 21 at 8:56
Quizlet
32
New contributor
Quizlet is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Both phrases are correct as stand alone phrases, why would you suppose they might not be?
– Duckisaduckisaduck
Dec 21 at 9:06
add a comment |
I need help with the following sentence:
Let's assume that somebody tries to disarm it.
For example, at a demonstration for demonstration purposes on a quizlets product.
My first thought was that I put it like it was going to happen. Accordingly, I thought this option would be correct.
Let's suppose someone is trying to disarm you.
Would that be correct? Or would you formulate the sentence in a completely different way?
Thank you in advance.
grammaticality
asked Dec 21 at 8:56
Quizlet
32
New contributor
Quizlet is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I need help with the following sentence:
Let's assume that somebody tries to disarm it.
For example, at a demonstration for demonstration purposes on a quizlets product.
My first thought was that I put it like it was going to happen. Accordingly, I thought this option would be correct.
Let's suppose someone is trying to disarm you.
Would that be correct? Or would you formulate the sentence in a completely different way?
Thank you in advance.
grammaticality
grammaticality
asked Dec 21 at 8:56
Quizlet
32
New contributor
Quizlet is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked Dec 21 at 8:56
Quizlet
32
New contributor
Quizlet is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 6 hours ago
asked Dec 21 at 8:56
Quizlet
32
New contributor
Quizlet is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked Dec 21 at 8:56
Quizlet
32
asked Dec 21 at 8:56
Quizlet
32
32
New contributor
Quizlet is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Quizlet is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Quizlet is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Both phrases are correct as stand alone phrases, why would you suppose they might not be?
– Duckisaduckisaduck
Dec 21 at 9:06
add a comment |
Both phrases are correct as stand alone phrases, why would you suppose they might not be?
– Duckisaduckisaduck
Dec 21 at 9:06
Both phrases are correct as stand alone phrases, why would you suppose they might not be?
– Duckisaduckisaduck
Dec 21 at 9:06
Both phrases are correct as stand alone phrases, why would you suppose they might not be?
– Duckisaduckisaduck
Dec 21 at 9:06
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The sentence is valid, and there are variants...
"Assume" is synonymous with "suppose to be true", which can be shortened to "suppose". So assume and suppose are synonymous.
The same goes for "somebody" and "someone", they are next to entirely interchangeable, although "someone" seems to be considered slightly more formal.
The sentence has two parts. First the speaker is enjoining the listener to make a thought experiment.
This can take several forms:
Assume that...
Assuming that...
If we make the assumption that...
Imagine that...
Let us suppose that...
If you picture that...
Posit that...
The second part of the sentence describes what the speaker wants the listener to imagine in this thought experiment, and that too can be expressed in many ways.
Let us assume that someone/somebody...
...is trying to disarm it
...is attempting to disarm it
...will try to disarm it
...will make an attempt to disarm it
...takes a shot at disarming it
...is disarming it, or at least trying to
...may try to disarm it
So there you have nearly 100 different ways (7 x 2 x 7) of expressing the exact same thing, and then we have not even nearly exhausted all possible permutations and variants of it.
P.S: "Assumption — my dear Mitzi — is the mother of all..."
answered Dec 21 at 9:39
MichaelK
1412
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Quizlet is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f478060%2fis-it-correct-lets-suppose-someone-is-trying-to-disarm-you%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The sentence is valid, and there are variants...
"Assume" is synonymous with "suppose to be true", which can be shortened to "suppose". So assume and suppose are synonymous.
The same goes for "somebody" and "someone", they are next to entirely interchangeable, although "someone" seems to be considered slightly more formal.
The sentence has two parts. First the speaker is enjoining the listener to make a thought experiment.
This can take several forms:
Assume that...
Assuming that...
If we make the assumption that...
Imagine that...
Let us suppose that...
If you picture that...
Posit that...
The second part of the sentence describes what the speaker wants the listener to imagine in this thought experiment, and that too can be expressed in many ways.
Let us assume that someone/somebody...
...is trying to disarm it
...is attempting to disarm it
...will try to disarm it
...will make an attempt to disarm it
...takes a shot at disarming it
...is disarming it, or at least trying to
...may try to disarm it
So there you have nearly 100 different ways (7 x 2 x 7) of expressing the exact same thing, and then we have not even nearly exhausted all possible permutations and variants of it.
P.S: "Assumption — my dear Mitzi — is the mother of all..."
answered Dec 21 at 9:39
MichaelK
1412
add a comment |
The sentence is valid, and there are variants...
"Assume" is synonymous with "suppose to be true", which can be shortened to "suppose". So assume and suppose are synonymous.
The same goes for "somebody" and "someone", they are next to entirely interchangeable, although "someone" seems to be considered slightly more formal.
The sentence has two parts. First the speaker is enjoining the listener to make a thought experiment.
This can take several forms:
Assume that...
Assuming that...
If we make the assumption that...
Imagine that...
Let us suppose that...
If you picture that...
Posit that...
The second part of the sentence describes what the speaker wants the listener to imagine in this thought experiment, and that too can be expressed in many ways.
Let us assume that someone/somebody...
...is trying to disarm it
...is attempting to disarm it
...will try to disarm it
...will make an attempt to disarm it
...takes a shot at disarming it
...is disarming it, or at least trying to
...may try to disarm it
So there you have nearly 100 different ways (7 x 2 x 7) of expressing the exact same thing, and then we have not even nearly exhausted all possible permutations and variants of it.
P.S: "Assumption — my dear Mitzi — is the mother of all..."
answered Dec 21 at 9:39
MichaelK
1412
add a comment |
The sentence is valid, and there are variants...
"Assume" is synonymous with "suppose to be true", which can be shortened to "suppose". So assume and suppose are synonymous.
The same goes for "somebody" and "someone", they are next to entirely interchangeable, although "someone" seems to be considered slightly more formal.
The sentence has two parts. First the speaker is enjoining the listener to make a thought experiment.
This can take several forms:
Assume that...
Assuming that...
If we make the assumption that...
Imagine that...
Let us suppose that...
If you picture that...
Posit that...
The second part of the sentence describes what the speaker wants the listener to imagine in this thought experiment, and that too can be expressed in many ways.
Let us assume that someone/somebody...
...is trying to disarm it
...is attempting to disarm it
...will try to disarm it
...will make an attempt to disarm it
...takes a shot at disarming it
...is disarming it, or at least trying to
...may try to disarm it
So there you have nearly 100 different ways (7 x 2 x 7) of expressing the exact same thing, and then we have not even nearly exhausted all possible permutations and variants of it.
P.S: "Assumption — my dear Mitzi — is the mother of all..."
answered Dec 21 at 9:39
MichaelK
1412
The sentence is valid, and there are variants...
"Assume" is synonymous with "suppose to be true", which can be shortened to "suppose". So assume and suppose are synonymous.
The same goes for "somebody" and "someone", they are next to entirely interchangeable, although "someone" seems to be considered slightly more formal.
The sentence has two parts. First the speaker is enjoining the listener to make a thought experiment.
This can take several forms:
Assume that...
Assuming that...
If we make the assumption that...
Imagine that...
Let us suppose that...
If you picture that...
Posit that...
The second part of the sentence describes what the speaker wants the listener to imagine in this thought experiment, and that too can be expressed in many ways.
Let us assume that someone/somebody...
...is trying to disarm it
...is attempting to disarm it
...will try to disarm it
...will make an attempt to disarm it
...takes a shot at disarming it
...is disarming it, or at least trying to
...may try to disarm it
So there you have nearly 100 different ways (7 x 2 x 7) of expressing the exact same thing, and then we have not even nearly exhausted all possible permutations and variants of it.
P.S: "Assumption — my dear Mitzi — is the mother of all..."
answered Dec 21 at 9:39
MichaelK
1412
answered Dec 21 at 9:39
MichaelK
1412
answered Dec 21 at 9:39
MichaelK
1412
answered Dec 21 at 9:39
MichaelK
1412
1412
add a comment |
add a comment |
Quizlet is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Quizlet is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Quizlet is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Quizlet is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f478060%2fis-it-correct-lets-suppose-someone-is-trying-to-disarm-you%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Both phrases are correct as stand alone phrases, why would you suppose they might not be?
– Duckisaduckisaduck
Dec 21 at 9:06