Is every SQL undo when it never reaches the point of COMMIT?











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I think I got the principle right I just want to make sure I get it right.



So when autocommit is enabled it means every command I do wont be executed directly, except whose who trigger the commit themselves.
So when I've for example a basic macro running like:



statement.executeUpdate("SET autocommit = 0;")

//some code
//SQL Queries
//SQL DELETEs
//SQL INSERTs

statement.executeUpdate("COMMIT;")


Then what would happen would be - If the script runs through without any problem the script goes to the point where every SQL Statement is executed and COMMITed at the end, if not and an error or exception happens the script breaks at that point never turns to the point where the COMMIT is going to happen and every change prior to that point is undo, so that every deleted information will still be there and every insertion is thrown away.



Is it that simple or did I get something wrong?










share|improve this question
























  • That is how transactions work. So, you are using them correctly.
    – Gordon Linoff
    Nov 22 at 16:02










  • Why not try and see what happens? ;)
    – Nico Haase
    Nov 22 at 16:06










  • If the COMMIT is not reached (due to an error or whatever), the transaction remains open. You should ROLLBACK to close the transaction.
    – Robert Kock
    Nov 22 at 16:09










  • @RobertKock Like having the ROLLBACK in something like a finally block?
    – vMysterion
    Nov 22 at 16:25










  • @vMysterion more like a catch block. Finally is executed also in case of success
    – Robert Kock
    Nov 22 at 16:28















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I think I got the principle right I just want to make sure I get it right.



So when autocommit is enabled it means every command I do wont be executed directly, except whose who trigger the commit themselves.
So when I've for example a basic macro running like:



statement.executeUpdate("SET autocommit = 0;")

//some code
//SQL Queries
//SQL DELETEs
//SQL INSERTs

statement.executeUpdate("COMMIT;")


Then what would happen would be - If the script runs through without any problem the script goes to the point where every SQL Statement is executed and COMMITed at the end, if not and an error or exception happens the script breaks at that point never turns to the point where the COMMIT is going to happen and every change prior to that point is undo, so that every deleted information will still be there and every insertion is thrown away.



Is it that simple or did I get something wrong?










share|improve this question
























  • That is how transactions work. So, you are using them correctly.
    – Gordon Linoff
    Nov 22 at 16:02










  • Why not try and see what happens? ;)
    – Nico Haase
    Nov 22 at 16:06










  • If the COMMIT is not reached (due to an error or whatever), the transaction remains open. You should ROLLBACK to close the transaction.
    – Robert Kock
    Nov 22 at 16:09










  • @RobertKock Like having the ROLLBACK in something like a finally block?
    – vMysterion
    Nov 22 at 16:25










  • @vMysterion more like a catch block. Finally is executed also in case of success
    – Robert Kock
    Nov 22 at 16:28













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I think I got the principle right I just want to make sure I get it right.



So when autocommit is enabled it means every command I do wont be executed directly, except whose who trigger the commit themselves.
So when I've for example a basic macro running like:



statement.executeUpdate("SET autocommit = 0;")

//some code
//SQL Queries
//SQL DELETEs
//SQL INSERTs

statement.executeUpdate("COMMIT;")


Then what would happen would be - If the script runs through without any problem the script goes to the point where every SQL Statement is executed and COMMITed at the end, if not and an error or exception happens the script breaks at that point never turns to the point where the COMMIT is going to happen and every change prior to that point is undo, so that every deleted information will still be there and every insertion is thrown away.



Is it that simple or did I get something wrong?










share|improve this question















I think I got the principle right I just want to make sure I get it right.



So when autocommit is enabled it means every command I do wont be executed directly, except whose who trigger the commit themselves.
So when I've for example a basic macro running like:



statement.executeUpdate("SET autocommit = 0;")

//some code
//SQL Queries
//SQL DELETEs
//SQL INSERTs

statement.executeUpdate("COMMIT;")


Then what would happen would be - If the script runs through without any problem the script goes to the point where every SQL Statement is executed and COMMITed at the end, if not and an error or exception happens the script breaks at that point never turns to the point where the COMMIT is going to happen and every change prior to that point is undo, so that every deleted information will still be there and every insertion is thrown away.



Is it that simple or did I get something wrong?







mysql sql






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 29 at 18:14









Jerry Stratton

2,2831622




2,2831622










asked Nov 22 at 16:00









vMysterion

136




136












  • That is how transactions work. So, you are using them correctly.
    – Gordon Linoff
    Nov 22 at 16:02










  • Why not try and see what happens? ;)
    – Nico Haase
    Nov 22 at 16:06










  • If the COMMIT is not reached (due to an error or whatever), the transaction remains open. You should ROLLBACK to close the transaction.
    – Robert Kock
    Nov 22 at 16:09










  • @RobertKock Like having the ROLLBACK in something like a finally block?
    – vMysterion
    Nov 22 at 16:25










  • @vMysterion more like a catch block. Finally is executed also in case of success
    – Robert Kock
    Nov 22 at 16:28


















  • That is how transactions work. So, you are using them correctly.
    – Gordon Linoff
    Nov 22 at 16:02










  • Why not try and see what happens? ;)
    – Nico Haase
    Nov 22 at 16:06










  • If the COMMIT is not reached (due to an error or whatever), the transaction remains open. You should ROLLBACK to close the transaction.
    – Robert Kock
    Nov 22 at 16:09










  • @RobertKock Like having the ROLLBACK in something like a finally block?
    – vMysterion
    Nov 22 at 16:25










  • @vMysterion more like a catch block. Finally is executed also in case of success
    – Robert Kock
    Nov 22 at 16:28
















That is how transactions work. So, you are using them correctly.
– Gordon Linoff
Nov 22 at 16:02




That is how transactions work. So, you are using them correctly.
– Gordon Linoff
Nov 22 at 16:02












Why not try and see what happens? ;)
– Nico Haase
Nov 22 at 16:06




Why not try and see what happens? ;)
– Nico Haase
Nov 22 at 16:06












If the COMMIT is not reached (due to an error or whatever), the transaction remains open. You should ROLLBACK to close the transaction.
– Robert Kock
Nov 22 at 16:09




If the COMMIT is not reached (due to an error or whatever), the transaction remains open. You should ROLLBACK to close the transaction.
– Robert Kock
Nov 22 at 16:09












@RobertKock Like having the ROLLBACK in something like a finally block?
– vMysterion
Nov 22 at 16:25




@RobertKock Like having the ROLLBACK in something like a finally block?
– vMysterion
Nov 22 at 16:25












@vMysterion more like a catch block. Finally is executed also in case of success
– Robert Kock
Nov 22 at 16:28




@vMysterion more like a catch block. Finally is executed also in case of success
– Robert Kock
Nov 22 at 16:28

















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53434606%2fis-every-sql-undo-when-it-never-reaches-the-point-of-commit%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53434606%2fis-every-sql-undo-when-it-never-reaches-the-point-of-commit%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

What visual should I use to simply compare current year value vs last year in Power BI desktop

Alexandru Averescu

Trompette piccolo