How to find out the definition of the variable MAKE
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Haven't been using make
for a while. But just got a project from a 10 years old compiler using Ubuntu.
I am looking at the makefile and trying to find out which compiler it is using.
${MAKE}
is used in the file.
But where can I find out the definition of MAKE
.
Thanks
makefile gnu-make
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Haven't been using make
for a while. But just got a project from a 10 years old compiler using Ubuntu.
I am looking at the makefile and trying to find out which compiler it is using.
${MAKE}
is used in the file.
But where can I find out the definition of MAKE
.
Thanks
makefile gnu-make
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Haven't been using make
for a while. But just got a project from a 10 years old compiler using Ubuntu.
I am looking at the makefile and trying to find out which compiler it is using.
${MAKE}
is used in the file.
But where can I find out the definition of MAKE
.
Thanks
makefile gnu-make
Haven't been using make
for a while. But just got a project from a 10 years old compiler using Ubuntu.
I am looking at the makefile and trying to find out which compiler it is using.
${MAKE}
is used in the file.
But where can I find out the definition of MAKE
.
Thanks
makefile gnu-make
makefile gnu-make
edited Nov 22 at 15:47
ネロク
10.4k32039
10.4k32039
asked Nov 22 at 15:28
Paul
247211
247211
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
You could simply use both the info
and value
built-in functions inside your makefile:
$(info MAKE: $(value MAKE))
This will work if MAKE
is a recursively expanded variable, which it is by default. Otherwise, if MAKE
were a simply expanded variable, you will see the expansion that was done at the moment of evaluating MAKE
's definition (i.e., the same as $(MAKE)
).
A better approach, which is independent of the flavour of the variable, would be to run make
with the option -p
and look at the definition of MAKE
, e.g.:
make -p | grep 'MAKE ='
You will probably find out that MAKE
is defined as:
MAKE = $(MAKE_COMMAND)
and MAKE_COMMAND
, which is another variable (this time, a simply expanded one), may be in turn defined as:
MAKE_COMMAND := make
Thank you! Now I understand it better. I have the compiler and linker, the .exe file. I can just use Eclipse to build the project right? The whole purpose to get a "linux" installed on the computer is to run "make" because make is able to interpret the Makefile. And the Eclipse I installed with C/C++ support is able to interpret the Makefile.
– Paul
Nov 22 at 19:43
GNU Make is also available for Windows. Search for MinGW.
– ネロク
Nov 22 at 19:47
Thanks. So it doesn't make sense anymore to install linux (cygwin or WSL) on windows computer just for "make".
– Paul
Nov 22 at 21:23
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
You could simply use both the info
and value
built-in functions inside your makefile:
$(info MAKE: $(value MAKE))
This will work if MAKE
is a recursively expanded variable, which it is by default. Otherwise, if MAKE
were a simply expanded variable, you will see the expansion that was done at the moment of evaluating MAKE
's definition (i.e., the same as $(MAKE)
).
A better approach, which is independent of the flavour of the variable, would be to run make
with the option -p
and look at the definition of MAKE
, e.g.:
make -p | grep 'MAKE ='
You will probably find out that MAKE
is defined as:
MAKE = $(MAKE_COMMAND)
and MAKE_COMMAND
, which is another variable (this time, a simply expanded one), may be in turn defined as:
MAKE_COMMAND := make
Thank you! Now I understand it better. I have the compiler and linker, the .exe file. I can just use Eclipse to build the project right? The whole purpose to get a "linux" installed on the computer is to run "make" because make is able to interpret the Makefile. And the Eclipse I installed with C/C++ support is able to interpret the Makefile.
– Paul
Nov 22 at 19:43
GNU Make is also available for Windows. Search for MinGW.
– ネロク
Nov 22 at 19:47
Thanks. So it doesn't make sense anymore to install linux (cygwin or WSL) on windows computer just for "make".
– Paul
Nov 22 at 21:23
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
You could simply use both the info
and value
built-in functions inside your makefile:
$(info MAKE: $(value MAKE))
This will work if MAKE
is a recursively expanded variable, which it is by default. Otherwise, if MAKE
were a simply expanded variable, you will see the expansion that was done at the moment of evaluating MAKE
's definition (i.e., the same as $(MAKE)
).
A better approach, which is independent of the flavour of the variable, would be to run make
with the option -p
and look at the definition of MAKE
, e.g.:
make -p | grep 'MAKE ='
You will probably find out that MAKE
is defined as:
MAKE = $(MAKE_COMMAND)
and MAKE_COMMAND
, which is another variable (this time, a simply expanded one), may be in turn defined as:
MAKE_COMMAND := make
Thank you! Now I understand it better. I have the compiler and linker, the .exe file. I can just use Eclipse to build the project right? The whole purpose to get a "linux" installed on the computer is to run "make" because make is able to interpret the Makefile. And the Eclipse I installed with C/C++ support is able to interpret the Makefile.
– Paul
Nov 22 at 19:43
GNU Make is also available for Windows. Search for MinGW.
– ネロク
Nov 22 at 19:47
Thanks. So it doesn't make sense anymore to install linux (cygwin or WSL) on windows computer just for "make".
– Paul
Nov 22 at 21:23
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
You could simply use both the info
and value
built-in functions inside your makefile:
$(info MAKE: $(value MAKE))
This will work if MAKE
is a recursively expanded variable, which it is by default. Otherwise, if MAKE
were a simply expanded variable, you will see the expansion that was done at the moment of evaluating MAKE
's definition (i.e., the same as $(MAKE)
).
A better approach, which is independent of the flavour of the variable, would be to run make
with the option -p
and look at the definition of MAKE
, e.g.:
make -p | grep 'MAKE ='
You will probably find out that MAKE
is defined as:
MAKE = $(MAKE_COMMAND)
and MAKE_COMMAND
, which is another variable (this time, a simply expanded one), may be in turn defined as:
MAKE_COMMAND := make
You could simply use both the info
and value
built-in functions inside your makefile:
$(info MAKE: $(value MAKE))
This will work if MAKE
is a recursively expanded variable, which it is by default. Otherwise, if MAKE
were a simply expanded variable, you will see the expansion that was done at the moment of evaluating MAKE
's definition (i.e., the same as $(MAKE)
).
A better approach, which is independent of the flavour of the variable, would be to run make
with the option -p
and look at the definition of MAKE
, e.g.:
make -p | grep 'MAKE ='
You will probably find out that MAKE
is defined as:
MAKE = $(MAKE_COMMAND)
and MAKE_COMMAND
, which is another variable (this time, a simply expanded one), may be in turn defined as:
MAKE_COMMAND := make
edited Nov 22 at 15:59
answered Nov 22 at 15:31
ネロク
10.4k32039
10.4k32039
Thank you! Now I understand it better. I have the compiler and linker, the .exe file. I can just use Eclipse to build the project right? The whole purpose to get a "linux" installed on the computer is to run "make" because make is able to interpret the Makefile. And the Eclipse I installed with C/C++ support is able to interpret the Makefile.
– Paul
Nov 22 at 19:43
GNU Make is also available for Windows. Search for MinGW.
– ネロク
Nov 22 at 19:47
Thanks. So it doesn't make sense anymore to install linux (cygwin or WSL) on windows computer just for "make".
– Paul
Nov 22 at 21:23
add a comment |
Thank you! Now I understand it better. I have the compiler and linker, the .exe file. I can just use Eclipse to build the project right? The whole purpose to get a "linux" installed on the computer is to run "make" because make is able to interpret the Makefile. And the Eclipse I installed with C/C++ support is able to interpret the Makefile.
– Paul
Nov 22 at 19:43
GNU Make is also available for Windows. Search for MinGW.
– ネロク
Nov 22 at 19:47
Thanks. So it doesn't make sense anymore to install linux (cygwin or WSL) on windows computer just for "make".
– Paul
Nov 22 at 21:23
Thank you! Now I understand it better. I have the compiler and linker, the .exe file. I can just use Eclipse to build the project right? The whole purpose to get a "linux" installed on the computer is to run "make" because make is able to interpret the Makefile. And the Eclipse I installed with C/C++ support is able to interpret the Makefile.
– Paul
Nov 22 at 19:43
Thank you! Now I understand it better. I have the compiler and linker, the .exe file. I can just use Eclipse to build the project right? The whole purpose to get a "linux" installed on the computer is to run "make" because make is able to interpret the Makefile. And the Eclipse I installed with C/C++ support is able to interpret the Makefile.
– Paul
Nov 22 at 19:43
GNU Make is also available for Windows. Search for MinGW.
– ネロク
Nov 22 at 19:47
GNU Make is also available for Windows. Search for MinGW.
– ネロク
Nov 22 at 19:47
Thanks. So it doesn't make sense anymore to install linux (cygwin or WSL) on windows computer just for "make".
– Paul
Nov 22 at 21:23
Thanks. So it doesn't make sense anymore to install linux (cygwin or WSL) on windows computer just for "make".
– Paul
Nov 22 at 21:23
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53434126%2fhow-to-find-out-the-definition-of-the-variable-make%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown