How to limit the amount of columns in larger viewports with CSS Grid and auto-fill/fit?











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I'm starting to work with CSS Grid, I've been reading about the properties to help with responsiveness; so I'm trying to build a small grid with 6 elements; my intention is for them to show as 2 rows on larger devices like this:



enter image description here



And also to show them all stacked on smaller devices,so everything is good regarding the smaller devices, I'm using auto-fill so it stays responsive, however if I the view the page on a laptop screen or desktop it is able to fill one more column and ends up looking like this:



enter image description here
This is my grid layout code.



display: grid;
grid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fill, 260px);
justify-content: center;
row-gap: 18px;
column-gap: 18px;


Is there a way to keep the responsive behavior but setting a max number of columns as well? Any help is appreciated; If it can only be done with media-queries that's fine, but I'm first trying to look for ways to do it without using those. Also, I kinda made it work as intended by setting a horizontal padding to the whole grid container to compensate for the size of the additional column; but again, if there's a better way I'm all ears. Thank you!



Working Example
https://codepen.io/IvanS95/pen/NEYdxb










share|improve this question
























  • That and auto-fill doesn't really mean "responsive". I'm sure there are better options if you can actually demostrate the issue.
    – Paulie_D
    Nov 22 at 16:05










  • How they don't demonstrate the issue? Read again, I said I intend the grid to show the two rows as in the first picture, instead of filling another column and showing them like in the second picture, but thanks anyway
    – IvanS95
    Nov 22 at 16:10






  • 1




    I'm not entirely sure (I'm on mobile), but would: grid-template-columns: repeat(minmax(auto-fill, 3), 260px); address the issue? In my head - and bear in mind I've not tried this in code yet - it should use 3 as three maximum number of columns, and auto-fill otherwise.
    – David Thomas
    Nov 22 at 16:53








  • 1




    You can't use auto-fill with a set number of columns...it's not possible nor is it expected behaviour. If you know how many columns you want, just define them. auto-fill will do exactly that...fill the available space and then wrap.
    – Paulie_D
    Nov 22 at 17:22








  • 1




    As a trvial solution, you can set a max-width to the grid
    – vals
    Nov 22 at 20:40















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I'm starting to work with CSS Grid, I've been reading about the properties to help with responsiveness; so I'm trying to build a small grid with 6 elements; my intention is for them to show as 2 rows on larger devices like this:



enter image description here



And also to show them all stacked on smaller devices,so everything is good regarding the smaller devices, I'm using auto-fill so it stays responsive, however if I the view the page on a laptop screen or desktop it is able to fill one more column and ends up looking like this:



enter image description here
This is my grid layout code.



display: grid;
grid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fill, 260px);
justify-content: center;
row-gap: 18px;
column-gap: 18px;


Is there a way to keep the responsive behavior but setting a max number of columns as well? Any help is appreciated; If it can only be done with media-queries that's fine, but I'm first trying to look for ways to do it without using those. Also, I kinda made it work as intended by setting a horizontal padding to the whole grid container to compensate for the size of the additional column; but again, if there's a better way I'm all ears. Thank you!



Working Example
https://codepen.io/IvanS95/pen/NEYdxb










share|improve this question
























  • That and auto-fill doesn't really mean "responsive". I'm sure there are better options if you can actually demostrate the issue.
    – Paulie_D
    Nov 22 at 16:05










  • How they don't demonstrate the issue? Read again, I said I intend the grid to show the two rows as in the first picture, instead of filling another column and showing them like in the second picture, but thanks anyway
    – IvanS95
    Nov 22 at 16:10






  • 1




    I'm not entirely sure (I'm on mobile), but would: grid-template-columns: repeat(minmax(auto-fill, 3), 260px); address the issue? In my head - and bear in mind I've not tried this in code yet - it should use 3 as three maximum number of columns, and auto-fill otherwise.
    – David Thomas
    Nov 22 at 16:53








  • 1




    You can't use auto-fill with a set number of columns...it's not possible nor is it expected behaviour. If you know how many columns you want, just define them. auto-fill will do exactly that...fill the available space and then wrap.
    – Paulie_D
    Nov 22 at 17:22








  • 1




    As a trvial solution, you can set a max-width to the grid
    – vals
    Nov 22 at 20:40













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











I'm starting to work with CSS Grid, I've been reading about the properties to help with responsiveness; so I'm trying to build a small grid with 6 elements; my intention is for them to show as 2 rows on larger devices like this:



enter image description here



And also to show them all stacked on smaller devices,so everything is good regarding the smaller devices, I'm using auto-fill so it stays responsive, however if I the view the page on a laptop screen or desktop it is able to fill one more column and ends up looking like this:



enter image description here
This is my grid layout code.



display: grid;
grid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fill, 260px);
justify-content: center;
row-gap: 18px;
column-gap: 18px;


Is there a way to keep the responsive behavior but setting a max number of columns as well? Any help is appreciated; If it can only be done with media-queries that's fine, but I'm first trying to look for ways to do it without using those. Also, I kinda made it work as intended by setting a horizontal padding to the whole grid container to compensate for the size of the additional column; but again, if there's a better way I'm all ears. Thank you!



Working Example
https://codepen.io/IvanS95/pen/NEYdxb










share|improve this question















I'm starting to work with CSS Grid, I've been reading about the properties to help with responsiveness; so I'm trying to build a small grid with 6 elements; my intention is for them to show as 2 rows on larger devices like this:



enter image description here



And also to show them all stacked on smaller devices,so everything is good regarding the smaller devices, I'm using auto-fill so it stays responsive, however if I the view the page on a laptop screen or desktop it is able to fill one more column and ends up looking like this:



enter image description here
This is my grid layout code.



display: grid;
grid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fill, 260px);
justify-content: center;
row-gap: 18px;
column-gap: 18px;


Is there a way to keep the responsive behavior but setting a max number of columns as well? Any help is appreciated; If it can only be done with media-queries that's fine, but I'm first trying to look for ways to do it without using those. Also, I kinda made it work as intended by setting a horizontal padding to the whole grid container to compensate for the size of the additional column; but again, if there's a better way I'm all ears. Thank you!



Working Example
https://codepen.io/IvanS95/pen/NEYdxb







html css css3 responsive-design css-grid






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 22 at 16:46

























asked Nov 22 at 15:21









IvanS95

496214




496214












  • That and auto-fill doesn't really mean "responsive". I'm sure there are better options if you can actually demostrate the issue.
    – Paulie_D
    Nov 22 at 16:05










  • How they don't demonstrate the issue? Read again, I said I intend the grid to show the two rows as in the first picture, instead of filling another column and showing them like in the second picture, but thanks anyway
    – IvanS95
    Nov 22 at 16:10






  • 1




    I'm not entirely sure (I'm on mobile), but would: grid-template-columns: repeat(minmax(auto-fill, 3), 260px); address the issue? In my head - and bear in mind I've not tried this in code yet - it should use 3 as three maximum number of columns, and auto-fill otherwise.
    – David Thomas
    Nov 22 at 16:53








  • 1




    You can't use auto-fill with a set number of columns...it's not possible nor is it expected behaviour. If you know how many columns you want, just define them. auto-fill will do exactly that...fill the available space and then wrap.
    – Paulie_D
    Nov 22 at 17:22








  • 1




    As a trvial solution, you can set a max-width to the grid
    – vals
    Nov 22 at 20:40


















  • That and auto-fill doesn't really mean "responsive". I'm sure there are better options if you can actually demostrate the issue.
    – Paulie_D
    Nov 22 at 16:05










  • How they don't demonstrate the issue? Read again, I said I intend the grid to show the two rows as in the first picture, instead of filling another column and showing them like in the second picture, but thanks anyway
    – IvanS95
    Nov 22 at 16:10






  • 1




    I'm not entirely sure (I'm on mobile), but would: grid-template-columns: repeat(minmax(auto-fill, 3), 260px); address the issue? In my head - and bear in mind I've not tried this in code yet - it should use 3 as three maximum number of columns, and auto-fill otherwise.
    – David Thomas
    Nov 22 at 16:53








  • 1




    You can't use auto-fill with a set number of columns...it's not possible nor is it expected behaviour. If you know how many columns you want, just define them. auto-fill will do exactly that...fill the available space and then wrap.
    – Paulie_D
    Nov 22 at 17:22








  • 1




    As a trvial solution, you can set a max-width to the grid
    – vals
    Nov 22 at 20:40
















That and auto-fill doesn't really mean "responsive". I'm sure there are better options if you can actually demostrate the issue.
– Paulie_D
Nov 22 at 16:05




That and auto-fill doesn't really mean "responsive". I'm sure there are better options if you can actually demostrate the issue.
– Paulie_D
Nov 22 at 16:05












How they don't demonstrate the issue? Read again, I said I intend the grid to show the two rows as in the first picture, instead of filling another column and showing them like in the second picture, but thanks anyway
– IvanS95
Nov 22 at 16:10




How they don't demonstrate the issue? Read again, I said I intend the grid to show the two rows as in the first picture, instead of filling another column and showing them like in the second picture, but thanks anyway
– IvanS95
Nov 22 at 16:10




1




1




I'm not entirely sure (I'm on mobile), but would: grid-template-columns: repeat(minmax(auto-fill, 3), 260px); address the issue? In my head - and bear in mind I've not tried this in code yet - it should use 3 as three maximum number of columns, and auto-fill otherwise.
– David Thomas
Nov 22 at 16:53






I'm not entirely sure (I'm on mobile), but would: grid-template-columns: repeat(minmax(auto-fill, 3), 260px); address the issue? In my head - and bear in mind I've not tried this in code yet - it should use 3 as three maximum number of columns, and auto-fill otherwise.
– David Thomas
Nov 22 at 16:53






1




1




You can't use auto-fill with a set number of columns...it's not possible nor is it expected behaviour. If you know how many columns you want, just define them. auto-fill will do exactly that...fill the available space and then wrap.
– Paulie_D
Nov 22 at 17:22






You can't use auto-fill with a set number of columns...it's not possible nor is it expected behaviour. If you know how many columns you want, just define them. auto-fill will do exactly that...fill the available space and then wrap.
– Paulie_D
Nov 22 at 17:22






1




1




As a trvial solution, you can set a max-width to the grid
– vals
Nov 22 at 20:40




As a trvial solution, you can set a max-width to the grid
– vals
Nov 22 at 20:40












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










Use this syntax:




grid-template-columns: 260px 260px 260px;




Or




grid-template-columns: repeat(3,260px);




Instead of this:




grid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fill, 260px);




Use media queries to set less columns on smaller screens.



Also if the row and column gap is the same you can use grid-gap.



Documentation






.grid-container{
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: 260px 260px 260px;
grid-gap: 18px;
background-color: #fff;
color: #444;
justify-content: center;
}

.card {
border: 1px solid #000;
width: 260px;
height: 260px;
}

<div class="container">
<div class="grid-container">
<div class="grid-item">
<div class="card"></div>
</div>
<div class="grid-item">
<div class="card"></div>
</div>
<div class="grid-item">
<div class="card"></div>
</div>
<div class="grid-item">
<div class="card"></div>
</div>
<div class="grid-item">
<div class="card"></div>
</div>
<div class="grid-item">
<div class="card"></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>








share|improve this answer



















  • 1




    Will do, I'll just keep using the repeat() function though as it looks cleaner to me, as in repeat(3, 260px)
    – IvanS95
    Nov 23 at 14:12










  • Solid point @IvanS95, I'm going to edit it in for future reference :)
    – Wimanicesir
    Nov 23 at 14:15


















up vote
0
down vote













Add this code to your CSS:



grid-template-columns: auto auto auto;





share|improve this answer





















    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    });
    });
    }, "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53434024%2fhow-to-limit-the-amount-of-columns-in-larger-viewports-with-css-grid-and-auto-fi%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote



    accepted










    Use this syntax:




    grid-template-columns: 260px 260px 260px;




    Or




    grid-template-columns: repeat(3,260px);




    Instead of this:




    grid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fill, 260px);




    Use media queries to set less columns on smaller screens.



    Also if the row and column gap is the same you can use grid-gap.



    Documentation






    .grid-container{
    display: grid;
    grid-template-columns: 260px 260px 260px;
    grid-gap: 18px;
    background-color: #fff;
    color: #444;
    justify-content: center;
    }

    .card {
    border: 1px solid #000;
    width: 260px;
    height: 260px;
    }

    <div class="container">
    <div class="grid-container">
    <div class="grid-item">
    <div class="card"></div>
    </div>
    <div class="grid-item">
    <div class="card"></div>
    </div>
    <div class="grid-item">
    <div class="card"></div>
    </div>
    <div class="grid-item">
    <div class="card"></div>
    </div>
    <div class="grid-item">
    <div class="card"></div>
    </div>
    <div class="grid-item">
    <div class="card"></div>
    </div>
    </div>
    </div>








    share|improve this answer



















    • 1




      Will do, I'll just keep using the repeat() function though as it looks cleaner to me, as in repeat(3, 260px)
      – IvanS95
      Nov 23 at 14:12










    • Solid point @IvanS95, I'm going to edit it in for future reference :)
      – Wimanicesir
      Nov 23 at 14:15















    up vote
    1
    down vote



    accepted










    Use this syntax:




    grid-template-columns: 260px 260px 260px;




    Or




    grid-template-columns: repeat(3,260px);




    Instead of this:




    grid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fill, 260px);




    Use media queries to set less columns on smaller screens.



    Also if the row and column gap is the same you can use grid-gap.



    Documentation






    .grid-container{
    display: grid;
    grid-template-columns: 260px 260px 260px;
    grid-gap: 18px;
    background-color: #fff;
    color: #444;
    justify-content: center;
    }

    .card {
    border: 1px solid #000;
    width: 260px;
    height: 260px;
    }

    <div class="container">
    <div class="grid-container">
    <div class="grid-item">
    <div class="card"></div>
    </div>
    <div class="grid-item">
    <div class="card"></div>
    </div>
    <div class="grid-item">
    <div class="card"></div>
    </div>
    <div class="grid-item">
    <div class="card"></div>
    </div>
    <div class="grid-item">
    <div class="card"></div>
    </div>
    <div class="grid-item">
    <div class="card"></div>
    </div>
    </div>
    </div>








    share|improve this answer



















    • 1




      Will do, I'll just keep using the repeat() function though as it looks cleaner to me, as in repeat(3, 260px)
      – IvanS95
      Nov 23 at 14:12










    • Solid point @IvanS95, I'm going to edit it in for future reference :)
      – Wimanicesir
      Nov 23 at 14:15













    up vote
    1
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    1
    down vote



    accepted






    Use this syntax:




    grid-template-columns: 260px 260px 260px;




    Or




    grid-template-columns: repeat(3,260px);




    Instead of this:




    grid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fill, 260px);




    Use media queries to set less columns on smaller screens.



    Also if the row and column gap is the same you can use grid-gap.



    Documentation






    .grid-container{
    display: grid;
    grid-template-columns: 260px 260px 260px;
    grid-gap: 18px;
    background-color: #fff;
    color: #444;
    justify-content: center;
    }

    .card {
    border: 1px solid #000;
    width: 260px;
    height: 260px;
    }

    <div class="container">
    <div class="grid-container">
    <div class="grid-item">
    <div class="card"></div>
    </div>
    <div class="grid-item">
    <div class="card"></div>
    </div>
    <div class="grid-item">
    <div class="card"></div>
    </div>
    <div class="grid-item">
    <div class="card"></div>
    </div>
    <div class="grid-item">
    <div class="card"></div>
    </div>
    <div class="grid-item">
    <div class="card"></div>
    </div>
    </div>
    </div>








    share|improve this answer














    Use this syntax:




    grid-template-columns: 260px 260px 260px;




    Or




    grid-template-columns: repeat(3,260px);




    Instead of this:




    grid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fill, 260px);




    Use media queries to set less columns on smaller screens.



    Also if the row and column gap is the same you can use grid-gap.



    Documentation






    .grid-container{
    display: grid;
    grid-template-columns: 260px 260px 260px;
    grid-gap: 18px;
    background-color: #fff;
    color: #444;
    justify-content: center;
    }

    .card {
    border: 1px solid #000;
    width: 260px;
    height: 260px;
    }

    <div class="container">
    <div class="grid-container">
    <div class="grid-item">
    <div class="card"></div>
    </div>
    <div class="grid-item">
    <div class="card"></div>
    </div>
    <div class="grid-item">
    <div class="card"></div>
    </div>
    <div class="grid-item">
    <div class="card"></div>
    </div>
    <div class="grid-item">
    <div class="card"></div>
    </div>
    <div class="grid-item">
    <div class="card"></div>
    </div>
    </div>
    </div>








    .grid-container{
    display: grid;
    grid-template-columns: 260px 260px 260px;
    grid-gap: 18px;
    background-color: #fff;
    color: #444;
    justify-content: center;
    }

    .card {
    border: 1px solid #000;
    width: 260px;
    height: 260px;
    }

    <div class="container">
    <div class="grid-container">
    <div class="grid-item">
    <div class="card"></div>
    </div>
    <div class="grid-item">
    <div class="card"></div>
    </div>
    <div class="grid-item">
    <div class="card"></div>
    </div>
    <div class="grid-item">
    <div class="card"></div>
    </div>
    <div class="grid-item">
    <div class="card"></div>
    </div>
    <div class="grid-item">
    <div class="card"></div>
    </div>
    </div>
    </div>





    .grid-container{
    display: grid;
    grid-template-columns: 260px 260px 260px;
    grid-gap: 18px;
    background-color: #fff;
    color: #444;
    justify-content: center;
    }

    .card {
    border: 1px solid #000;
    width: 260px;
    height: 260px;
    }

    <div class="container">
    <div class="grid-container">
    <div class="grid-item">
    <div class="card"></div>
    </div>
    <div class="grid-item">
    <div class="card"></div>
    </div>
    <div class="grid-item">
    <div class="card"></div>
    </div>
    <div class="grid-item">
    <div class="card"></div>
    </div>
    <div class="grid-item">
    <div class="card"></div>
    </div>
    <div class="grid-item">
    <div class="card"></div>
    </div>
    </div>
    </div>






    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Nov 23 at 14:16

























    answered Nov 23 at 0:25









    Wimanicesir

    41410




    41410








    • 1




      Will do, I'll just keep using the repeat() function though as it looks cleaner to me, as in repeat(3, 260px)
      – IvanS95
      Nov 23 at 14:12










    • Solid point @IvanS95, I'm going to edit it in for future reference :)
      – Wimanicesir
      Nov 23 at 14:15














    • 1




      Will do, I'll just keep using the repeat() function though as it looks cleaner to me, as in repeat(3, 260px)
      – IvanS95
      Nov 23 at 14:12










    • Solid point @IvanS95, I'm going to edit it in for future reference :)
      – Wimanicesir
      Nov 23 at 14:15








    1




    1




    Will do, I'll just keep using the repeat() function though as it looks cleaner to me, as in repeat(3, 260px)
    – IvanS95
    Nov 23 at 14:12




    Will do, I'll just keep using the repeat() function though as it looks cleaner to me, as in repeat(3, 260px)
    – IvanS95
    Nov 23 at 14:12












    Solid point @IvanS95, I'm going to edit it in for future reference :)
    – Wimanicesir
    Nov 23 at 14:15




    Solid point @IvanS95, I'm going to edit it in for future reference :)
    – Wimanicesir
    Nov 23 at 14:15












    up vote
    0
    down vote













    Add this code to your CSS:



    grid-template-columns: auto auto auto;





    share|improve this answer

























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      Add this code to your CSS:



      grid-template-columns: auto auto auto;





      share|improve this answer























        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        Add this code to your CSS:



        grid-template-columns: auto auto auto;





        share|improve this answer












        Add this code to your CSS:



        grid-template-columns: auto auto auto;






        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Nov 23 at 10:43









        Joykal Infotech

        1946




        1946






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53434024%2fhow-to-limit-the-amount-of-columns-in-larger-viewports-with-css-grid-and-auto-fi%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            What visual should I use to simply compare current year value vs last year in Power BI desktop

            Alexandru Averescu

            Trompette piccolo