Evaluating the limit using Taylor Series











up vote
3
down vote

favorite












We're asked to find the following limit by using Taylor expansions $$lim_{xto{}0}frac{e^{3x}-sin(x)-cos(x)+ln(1-2x)}{-1+cos(5x)}$$



My Attempt:



Expressing $e^{3x}$, $sin(x)$, $cos(x)$, $ln(1-2x)$ and $cos(5x)$ in their respective taylor expansions yielded the following monstrous fraction, https://imgur.com/a/xGyfIyL (Picture size too big to be uploaded here for some reason, plus fraction too large to be expressed in the space given :/) But anyways, I can't seem to factorize this thing and evaluate the limit as $xto{}0$, any help would be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question






















  • A hint is that only the leading terms are going to matter. Can you see what happens to the constant, $x$, and $x^2$ terms in the numerator and denominator?
    – user113102
    1 hour ago










  • As @gimusi notes, you do not need the explicit Taylor series for the fraction. You can answer the question with some algebra on the leading terms for numerator and denominator.
    – Ethan Bolker
    1 hour ago










  • The main point is to guess the correct order for the expansion. In the doubt we could decide to start with the first order to obtain $$frac{e^{3x}-sin(x)-cos(x)+ln(1-2x)}{-1+cos(5x)}=frac{1+3x-x-1-2x+o(x)}{-1+1+o(x)}$$ which is an indeterminate form $frac 0 0$. When this happen it means that the order used is not sufficient. Then we can try with the order $2$ which indeed works fine. Of course also all the orders greater than $2$ work fine. But the second order suffices, how we can easily guess looking at the denominator.
    – gimusi
    1 hour ago












  • I see now how I can go about evaluating the limit itself although I still find the concept a little bit vague, as in considering a specific order for the expansion and then applying it for all the functions while leaving the rest of the series behind, it'll probably start making more sense in a few more examples. Thanks for the help :)
    – kareem bokai
    1 hour ago










  • @kareembokai Yes of course you need only to practice to get confident with the method. The main rule is that all the function must be expanded to the same order. Note also that we can get an uncorrect evaluation when the order is too low than the minimum requested but not when the order is higher (but it requires more effort and work). Then you need to practice a lot with that in order to becomemore and more confident.
    – gimusi
    1 hour ago















up vote
3
down vote

favorite












We're asked to find the following limit by using Taylor expansions $$lim_{xto{}0}frac{e^{3x}-sin(x)-cos(x)+ln(1-2x)}{-1+cos(5x)}$$



My Attempt:



Expressing $e^{3x}$, $sin(x)$, $cos(x)$, $ln(1-2x)$ and $cos(5x)$ in their respective taylor expansions yielded the following monstrous fraction, https://imgur.com/a/xGyfIyL (Picture size too big to be uploaded here for some reason, plus fraction too large to be expressed in the space given :/) But anyways, I can't seem to factorize this thing and evaluate the limit as $xto{}0$, any help would be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question






















  • A hint is that only the leading terms are going to matter. Can you see what happens to the constant, $x$, and $x^2$ terms in the numerator and denominator?
    – user113102
    1 hour ago










  • As @gimusi notes, you do not need the explicit Taylor series for the fraction. You can answer the question with some algebra on the leading terms for numerator and denominator.
    – Ethan Bolker
    1 hour ago










  • The main point is to guess the correct order for the expansion. In the doubt we could decide to start with the first order to obtain $$frac{e^{3x}-sin(x)-cos(x)+ln(1-2x)}{-1+cos(5x)}=frac{1+3x-x-1-2x+o(x)}{-1+1+o(x)}$$ which is an indeterminate form $frac 0 0$. When this happen it means that the order used is not sufficient. Then we can try with the order $2$ which indeed works fine. Of course also all the orders greater than $2$ work fine. But the second order suffices, how we can easily guess looking at the denominator.
    – gimusi
    1 hour ago












  • I see now how I can go about evaluating the limit itself although I still find the concept a little bit vague, as in considering a specific order for the expansion and then applying it for all the functions while leaving the rest of the series behind, it'll probably start making more sense in a few more examples. Thanks for the help :)
    – kareem bokai
    1 hour ago










  • @kareembokai Yes of course you need only to practice to get confident with the method. The main rule is that all the function must be expanded to the same order. Note also that we can get an uncorrect evaluation when the order is too low than the minimum requested but not when the order is higher (but it requires more effort and work). Then you need to practice a lot with that in order to becomemore and more confident.
    – gimusi
    1 hour ago













up vote
3
down vote

favorite









up vote
3
down vote

favorite











We're asked to find the following limit by using Taylor expansions $$lim_{xto{}0}frac{e^{3x}-sin(x)-cos(x)+ln(1-2x)}{-1+cos(5x)}$$



My Attempt:



Expressing $e^{3x}$, $sin(x)$, $cos(x)$, $ln(1-2x)$ and $cos(5x)$ in their respective taylor expansions yielded the following monstrous fraction, https://imgur.com/a/xGyfIyL (Picture size too big to be uploaded here for some reason, plus fraction too large to be expressed in the space given :/) But anyways, I can't seem to factorize this thing and evaluate the limit as $xto{}0$, any help would be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question













We're asked to find the following limit by using Taylor expansions $$lim_{xto{}0}frac{e^{3x}-sin(x)-cos(x)+ln(1-2x)}{-1+cos(5x)}$$



My Attempt:



Expressing $e^{3x}$, $sin(x)$, $cos(x)$, $ln(1-2x)$ and $cos(5x)$ in their respective taylor expansions yielded the following monstrous fraction, https://imgur.com/a/xGyfIyL (Picture size too big to be uploaded here for some reason, plus fraction too large to be expressed in the space given :/) But anyways, I can't seem to factorize this thing and evaluate the limit as $xto{}0$, any help would be appreciated.







calculus limits analysis taylor-expansion






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 1 hour ago









kareem bokai

272




272












  • A hint is that only the leading terms are going to matter. Can you see what happens to the constant, $x$, and $x^2$ terms in the numerator and denominator?
    – user113102
    1 hour ago










  • As @gimusi notes, you do not need the explicit Taylor series for the fraction. You can answer the question with some algebra on the leading terms for numerator and denominator.
    – Ethan Bolker
    1 hour ago










  • The main point is to guess the correct order for the expansion. In the doubt we could decide to start with the first order to obtain $$frac{e^{3x}-sin(x)-cos(x)+ln(1-2x)}{-1+cos(5x)}=frac{1+3x-x-1-2x+o(x)}{-1+1+o(x)}$$ which is an indeterminate form $frac 0 0$. When this happen it means that the order used is not sufficient. Then we can try with the order $2$ which indeed works fine. Of course also all the orders greater than $2$ work fine. But the second order suffices, how we can easily guess looking at the denominator.
    – gimusi
    1 hour ago












  • I see now how I can go about evaluating the limit itself although I still find the concept a little bit vague, as in considering a specific order for the expansion and then applying it for all the functions while leaving the rest of the series behind, it'll probably start making more sense in a few more examples. Thanks for the help :)
    – kareem bokai
    1 hour ago










  • @kareembokai Yes of course you need only to practice to get confident with the method. The main rule is that all the function must be expanded to the same order. Note also that we can get an uncorrect evaluation when the order is too low than the minimum requested but not when the order is higher (but it requires more effort and work). Then you need to practice a lot with that in order to becomemore and more confident.
    – gimusi
    1 hour ago


















  • A hint is that only the leading terms are going to matter. Can you see what happens to the constant, $x$, and $x^2$ terms in the numerator and denominator?
    – user113102
    1 hour ago










  • As @gimusi notes, you do not need the explicit Taylor series for the fraction. You can answer the question with some algebra on the leading terms for numerator and denominator.
    – Ethan Bolker
    1 hour ago










  • The main point is to guess the correct order for the expansion. In the doubt we could decide to start with the first order to obtain $$frac{e^{3x}-sin(x)-cos(x)+ln(1-2x)}{-1+cos(5x)}=frac{1+3x-x-1-2x+o(x)}{-1+1+o(x)}$$ which is an indeterminate form $frac 0 0$. When this happen it means that the order used is not sufficient. Then we can try with the order $2$ which indeed works fine. Of course also all the orders greater than $2$ work fine. But the second order suffices, how we can easily guess looking at the denominator.
    – gimusi
    1 hour ago












  • I see now how I can go about evaluating the limit itself although I still find the concept a little bit vague, as in considering a specific order for the expansion and then applying it for all the functions while leaving the rest of the series behind, it'll probably start making more sense in a few more examples. Thanks for the help :)
    – kareem bokai
    1 hour ago










  • @kareembokai Yes of course you need only to practice to get confident with the method. The main rule is that all the function must be expanded to the same order. Note also that we can get an uncorrect evaluation when the order is too low than the minimum requested but not when the order is higher (but it requires more effort and work). Then you need to practice a lot with that in order to becomemore and more confident.
    – gimusi
    1 hour ago
















A hint is that only the leading terms are going to matter. Can you see what happens to the constant, $x$, and $x^2$ terms in the numerator and denominator?
– user113102
1 hour ago




A hint is that only the leading terms are going to matter. Can you see what happens to the constant, $x$, and $x^2$ terms in the numerator and denominator?
– user113102
1 hour ago












As @gimusi notes, you do not need the explicit Taylor series for the fraction. You can answer the question with some algebra on the leading terms for numerator and denominator.
– Ethan Bolker
1 hour ago




As @gimusi notes, you do not need the explicit Taylor series for the fraction. You can answer the question with some algebra on the leading terms for numerator and denominator.
– Ethan Bolker
1 hour ago












The main point is to guess the correct order for the expansion. In the doubt we could decide to start with the first order to obtain $$frac{e^{3x}-sin(x)-cos(x)+ln(1-2x)}{-1+cos(5x)}=frac{1+3x-x-1-2x+o(x)}{-1+1+o(x)}$$ which is an indeterminate form $frac 0 0$. When this happen it means that the order used is not sufficient. Then we can try with the order $2$ which indeed works fine. Of course also all the orders greater than $2$ work fine. But the second order suffices, how we can easily guess looking at the denominator.
– gimusi
1 hour ago






The main point is to guess the correct order for the expansion. In the doubt we could decide to start with the first order to obtain $$frac{e^{3x}-sin(x)-cos(x)+ln(1-2x)}{-1+cos(5x)}=frac{1+3x-x-1-2x+o(x)}{-1+1+o(x)}$$ which is an indeterminate form $frac 0 0$. When this happen it means that the order used is not sufficient. Then we can try with the order $2$ which indeed works fine. Of course also all the orders greater than $2$ work fine. But the second order suffices, how we can easily guess looking at the denominator.
– gimusi
1 hour ago














I see now how I can go about evaluating the limit itself although I still find the concept a little bit vague, as in considering a specific order for the expansion and then applying it for all the functions while leaving the rest of the series behind, it'll probably start making more sense in a few more examples. Thanks for the help :)
– kareem bokai
1 hour ago




I see now how I can go about evaluating the limit itself although I still find the concept a little bit vague, as in considering a specific order for the expansion and then applying it for all the functions while leaving the rest of the series behind, it'll probably start making more sense in a few more examples. Thanks for the help :)
– kareem bokai
1 hour ago












@kareembokai Yes of course you need only to practice to get confident with the method. The main rule is that all the function must be expanded to the same order. Note also that we can get an uncorrect evaluation when the order is too low than the minimum requested but not when the order is higher (but it requires more effort and work). Then you need to practice a lot with that in order to becomemore and more confident.
– gimusi
1 hour ago




@kareembokai Yes of course you need only to practice to get confident with the method. The main rule is that all the function must be expanded to the same order. Note also that we can get an uncorrect evaluation when the order is too low than the minimum requested but not when the order is higher (but it requires more effort and work). Then you need to practice a lot with that in order to becomemore and more confident.
– gimusi
1 hour ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
5
down vote



accepted










HINT



By Taylor's expansion, term by term, we have that




  • $e^{3x}=1+3x+frac92x^2+o(x^2)$

  • $sin x =x+o(x^2)$

  • $cos x = 1-frac12 x^2+o(x^2)$

  • $log(1-2x)=-2x-2x^2+o(x^2)$

  • $cos (5x) = 1-frac{25}2 x^2+o(x^2)$


and then



$$frac{e^{3x}-sin(x)-cos(x)+ln(1-2x)}{-1+cos(5x)}=frac{1+3x+frac92x^2-x-1+frac12x^2-2x-2x^2+o(x^2)}{-1+1-frac{25}2x^2+o(x^2)}$$



Can you conclude from here?





Edit for a remark



The main point with Taylor's expansion is to guess the correct order to use for the expansion and there is not general a rule to be sure about the order to use.



In the doubt, we could decide to start with the first order to obtain $$frac{e^{3x}-sin(x)-cos(x)+ln(1-2x)}{-1+cos(5x)}=frac{1+3x-x-1-2x+o(x)}{-1+1+o(x)}$$ which is an indeterminate form $frac 0 0$.



When this happen it means that the order used is not sufficient. Then we can try with the order $2$ which indeed works fine. Of course also all the orders greater than $2$ work fine. But the second order suffices, how we can easily guess, in that case, looking at the denominator which is in the form $cx^2+o(x^2)$.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • I do see that you've ended up with the leading terms, however I still don't see how you managed to get rid of all the other terms so quickly
    – kareem bokai
    1 hour ago










  • @kareembokai I add something on that!
    – gimusi
    1 hour ago










  • @kareembokai Let me know whether now it is clear or not. In case do not hesitate to ask for any clarification.
    – gimusi
    1 hour ago










  • In general it's better to start with the term that appears simpler, in this case the denominator, which is easily seen to have order $2$.
    – egreg
    49 mins ago










  • @egreg Yes I agree in that case is quite simple, is some other cases for a student new in the topic it can be not so straightforward to see, but after a while and some tons of limits it becomes a simple task for usual limits.
    – gimusi
    46 mins ago


















up vote
2
down vote













There is nothing monstrous in that computation. If you want a compact resolution, compute separately the coefficients in increasing order (numerator/denominator).




  • constant terms: $1-1=0 / -1+1=0$;


  • linear terms: $3-1-2=0 / 0$;


  • quadratic terms: $dfrac92+dfrac12-2=dfrac{6}{2} / -dfrac{25}2$.



As the first nonzero coefficients are of the same order, the limit is finite and is the ratio



$$-frac{6}{25}.$$





The trick is to obtain a fraction like



$$frac{ax^n+text{higher order terms}}{bx^m+text{higher order terms}}=x^{n-m}frac{a+text{higher order terms}}{b+text{higher order terms}}$$ which tends to $0,dfrac ab$ or $pminfty$ depending on the sign of $n-m$.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Nice way to simplify even if it requires a few of experience to be handle in that way.
    – gimusi
    1 hour ago


















up vote
1
down vote













From your picture, it seems an expansion at order $2$ will do. All functions should be expanded at the same order, using, say Taylor-Young's formula. Thus





  • $mathrm e^{3x}=1+3x+frac92x^2+o(x^2)$,


  • $sin x =x+o(x^2)$,


  • $cos x=1-frac12 x^2+o(x^2)$,


  • $ln(1-2x)=-2x-frac42 x^2+o(x^2)$
    Thus the numerator is
    $$N(x)=1+3x+frac92x^2-x-1+frac12 x^2-2x-2 x^2+o(x^2)=3 x^2+o(x^2).$$
    Can you proceed?






share|cite|improve this answer






























    up vote
    1
    down vote













    We need only quote the numerator and denominator up to $x^2$ terms: $$lim_{xto 0}frac{1+3x+color{blue}{9x^2/2}-x-1+color{blue}{x^2/2}-2xcolor{blue}{-2x^2}+O(x^3)}{-1+1color{blue}{-25x^2/2}+O(x^3)}.$$You'll find only $x^2$ terms survive in each.






    share|cite|improve this answer























      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3030377%2fevaluating-the-limit-using-taylor-series%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes








      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      5
      down vote



      accepted










      HINT



      By Taylor's expansion, term by term, we have that




      • $e^{3x}=1+3x+frac92x^2+o(x^2)$

      • $sin x =x+o(x^2)$

      • $cos x = 1-frac12 x^2+o(x^2)$

      • $log(1-2x)=-2x-2x^2+o(x^2)$

      • $cos (5x) = 1-frac{25}2 x^2+o(x^2)$


      and then



      $$frac{e^{3x}-sin(x)-cos(x)+ln(1-2x)}{-1+cos(5x)}=frac{1+3x+frac92x^2-x-1+frac12x^2-2x-2x^2+o(x^2)}{-1+1-frac{25}2x^2+o(x^2)}$$



      Can you conclude from here?





      Edit for a remark



      The main point with Taylor's expansion is to guess the correct order to use for the expansion and there is not general a rule to be sure about the order to use.



      In the doubt, we could decide to start with the first order to obtain $$frac{e^{3x}-sin(x)-cos(x)+ln(1-2x)}{-1+cos(5x)}=frac{1+3x-x-1-2x+o(x)}{-1+1+o(x)}$$ which is an indeterminate form $frac 0 0$.



      When this happen it means that the order used is not sufficient. Then we can try with the order $2$ which indeed works fine. Of course also all the orders greater than $2$ work fine. But the second order suffices, how we can easily guess, in that case, looking at the denominator which is in the form $cx^2+o(x^2)$.






      share|cite|improve this answer























      • I do see that you've ended up with the leading terms, however I still don't see how you managed to get rid of all the other terms so quickly
        – kareem bokai
        1 hour ago










      • @kareembokai I add something on that!
        – gimusi
        1 hour ago










      • @kareembokai Let me know whether now it is clear or not. In case do not hesitate to ask for any clarification.
        – gimusi
        1 hour ago










      • In general it's better to start with the term that appears simpler, in this case the denominator, which is easily seen to have order $2$.
        – egreg
        49 mins ago










      • @egreg Yes I agree in that case is quite simple, is some other cases for a student new in the topic it can be not so straightforward to see, but after a while and some tons of limits it becomes a simple task for usual limits.
        – gimusi
        46 mins ago















      up vote
      5
      down vote



      accepted










      HINT



      By Taylor's expansion, term by term, we have that




      • $e^{3x}=1+3x+frac92x^2+o(x^2)$

      • $sin x =x+o(x^2)$

      • $cos x = 1-frac12 x^2+o(x^2)$

      • $log(1-2x)=-2x-2x^2+o(x^2)$

      • $cos (5x) = 1-frac{25}2 x^2+o(x^2)$


      and then



      $$frac{e^{3x}-sin(x)-cos(x)+ln(1-2x)}{-1+cos(5x)}=frac{1+3x+frac92x^2-x-1+frac12x^2-2x-2x^2+o(x^2)}{-1+1-frac{25}2x^2+o(x^2)}$$



      Can you conclude from here?





      Edit for a remark



      The main point with Taylor's expansion is to guess the correct order to use for the expansion and there is not general a rule to be sure about the order to use.



      In the doubt, we could decide to start with the first order to obtain $$frac{e^{3x}-sin(x)-cos(x)+ln(1-2x)}{-1+cos(5x)}=frac{1+3x-x-1-2x+o(x)}{-1+1+o(x)}$$ which is an indeterminate form $frac 0 0$.



      When this happen it means that the order used is not sufficient. Then we can try with the order $2$ which indeed works fine. Of course also all the orders greater than $2$ work fine. But the second order suffices, how we can easily guess, in that case, looking at the denominator which is in the form $cx^2+o(x^2)$.






      share|cite|improve this answer























      • I do see that you've ended up with the leading terms, however I still don't see how you managed to get rid of all the other terms so quickly
        – kareem bokai
        1 hour ago










      • @kareembokai I add something on that!
        – gimusi
        1 hour ago










      • @kareembokai Let me know whether now it is clear or not. In case do not hesitate to ask for any clarification.
        – gimusi
        1 hour ago










      • In general it's better to start with the term that appears simpler, in this case the denominator, which is easily seen to have order $2$.
        – egreg
        49 mins ago










      • @egreg Yes I agree in that case is quite simple, is some other cases for a student new in the topic it can be not so straightforward to see, but after a while and some tons of limits it becomes a simple task for usual limits.
        – gimusi
        46 mins ago













      up vote
      5
      down vote



      accepted







      up vote
      5
      down vote



      accepted






      HINT



      By Taylor's expansion, term by term, we have that




      • $e^{3x}=1+3x+frac92x^2+o(x^2)$

      • $sin x =x+o(x^2)$

      • $cos x = 1-frac12 x^2+o(x^2)$

      • $log(1-2x)=-2x-2x^2+o(x^2)$

      • $cos (5x) = 1-frac{25}2 x^2+o(x^2)$


      and then



      $$frac{e^{3x}-sin(x)-cos(x)+ln(1-2x)}{-1+cos(5x)}=frac{1+3x+frac92x^2-x-1+frac12x^2-2x-2x^2+o(x^2)}{-1+1-frac{25}2x^2+o(x^2)}$$



      Can you conclude from here?





      Edit for a remark



      The main point with Taylor's expansion is to guess the correct order to use for the expansion and there is not general a rule to be sure about the order to use.



      In the doubt, we could decide to start with the first order to obtain $$frac{e^{3x}-sin(x)-cos(x)+ln(1-2x)}{-1+cos(5x)}=frac{1+3x-x-1-2x+o(x)}{-1+1+o(x)}$$ which is an indeterminate form $frac 0 0$.



      When this happen it means that the order used is not sufficient. Then we can try with the order $2$ which indeed works fine. Of course also all the orders greater than $2$ work fine. But the second order suffices, how we can easily guess, in that case, looking at the denominator which is in the form $cx^2+o(x^2)$.






      share|cite|improve this answer














      HINT



      By Taylor's expansion, term by term, we have that




      • $e^{3x}=1+3x+frac92x^2+o(x^2)$

      • $sin x =x+o(x^2)$

      • $cos x = 1-frac12 x^2+o(x^2)$

      • $log(1-2x)=-2x-2x^2+o(x^2)$

      • $cos (5x) = 1-frac{25}2 x^2+o(x^2)$


      and then



      $$frac{e^{3x}-sin(x)-cos(x)+ln(1-2x)}{-1+cos(5x)}=frac{1+3x+frac92x^2-x-1+frac12x^2-2x-2x^2+o(x^2)}{-1+1-frac{25}2x^2+o(x^2)}$$



      Can you conclude from here?





      Edit for a remark



      The main point with Taylor's expansion is to guess the correct order to use for the expansion and there is not general a rule to be sure about the order to use.



      In the doubt, we could decide to start with the first order to obtain $$frac{e^{3x}-sin(x)-cos(x)+ln(1-2x)}{-1+cos(5x)}=frac{1+3x-x-1-2x+o(x)}{-1+1+o(x)}$$ which is an indeterminate form $frac 0 0$.



      When this happen it means that the order used is not sufficient. Then we can try with the order $2$ which indeed works fine. Of course also all the orders greater than $2$ work fine. But the second order suffices, how we can easily guess, in that case, looking at the denominator which is in the form $cx^2+o(x^2)$.







      share|cite|improve this answer














      share|cite|improve this answer



      share|cite|improve this answer








      edited 1 hour ago

























      answered 1 hour ago









      gimusi

      90.4k74495




      90.4k74495












      • I do see that you've ended up with the leading terms, however I still don't see how you managed to get rid of all the other terms so quickly
        – kareem bokai
        1 hour ago










      • @kareembokai I add something on that!
        – gimusi
        1 hour ago










      • @kareembokai Let me know whether now it is clear or not. In case do not hesitate to ask for any clarification.
        – gimusi
        1 hour ago










      • In general it's better to start with the term that appears simpler, in this case the denominator, which is easily seen to have order $2$.
        – egreg
        49 mins ago










      • @egreg Yes I agree in that case is quite simple, is some other cases for a student new in the topic it can be not so straightforward to see, but after a while and some tons of limits it becomes a simple task for usual limits.
        – gimusi
        46 mins ago


















      • I do see that you've ended up with the leading terms, however I still don't see how you managed to get rid of all the other terms so quickly
        – kareem bokai
        1 hour ago










      • @kareembokai I add something on that!
        – gimusi
        1 hour ago










      • @kareembokai Let me know whether now it is clear or not. In case do not hesitate to ask for any clarification.
        – gimusi
        1 hour ago










      • In general it's better to start with the term that appears simpler, in this case the denominator, which is easily seen to have order $2$.
        – egreg
        49 mins ago










      • @egreg Yes I agree in that case is quite simple, is some other cases for a student new in the topic it can be not so straightforward to see, but after a while and some tons of limits it becomes a simple task for usual limits.
        – gimusi
        46 mins ago
















      I do see that you've ended up with the leading terms, however I still don't see how you managed to get rid of all the other terms so quickly
      – kareem bokai
      1 hour ago




      I do see that you've ended up with the leading terms, however I still don't see how you managed to get rid of all the other terms so quickly
      – kareem bokai
      1 hour ago












      @kareembokai I add something on that!
      – gimusi
      1 hour ago




      @kareembokai I add something on that!
      – gimusi
      1 hour ago












      @kareembokai Let me know whether now it is clear or not. In case do not hesitate to ask for any clarification.
      – gimusi
      1 hour ago




      @kareembokai Let me know whether now it is clear or not. In case do not hesitate to ask for any clarification.
      – gimusi
      1 hour ago












      In general it's better to start with the term that appears simpler, in this case the denominator, which is easily seen to have order $2$.
      – egreg
      49 mins ago




      In general it's better to start with the term that appears simpler, in this case the denominator, which is easily seen to have order $2$.
      – egreg
      49 mins ago












      @egreg Yes I agree in that case is quite simple, is some other cases for a student new in the topic it can be not so straightforward to see, but after a while and some tons of limits it becomes a simple task for usual limits.
      – gimusi
      46 mins ago




      @egreg Yes I agree in that case is quite simple, is some other cases for a student new in the topic it can be not so straightforward to see, but after a while and some tons of limits it becomes a simple task for usual limits.
      – gimusi
      46 mins ago










      up vote
      2
      down vote













      There is nothing monstrous in that computation. If you want a compact resolution, compute separately the coefficients in increasing order (numerator/denominator).




      • constant terms: $1-1=0 / -1+1=0$;


      • linear terms: $3-1-2=0 / 0$;


      • quadratic terms: $dfrac92+dfrac12-2=dfrac{6}{2} / -dfrac{25}2$.



      As the first nonzero coefficients are of the same order, the limit is finite and is the ratio



      $$-frac{6}{25}.$$





      The trick is to obtain a fraction like



      $$frac{ax^n+text{higher order terms}}{bx^m+text{higher order terms}}=x^{n-m}frac{a+text{higher order terms}}{b+text{higher order terms}}$$ which tends to $0,dfrac ab$ or $pminfty$ depending on the sign of $n-m$.






      share|cite|improve this answer























      • Nice way to simplify even if it requires a few of experience to be handle in that way.
        – gimusi
        1 hour ago















      up vote
      2
      down vote













      There is nothing monstrous in that computation. If you want a compact resolution, compute separately the coefficients in increasing order (numerator/denominator).




      • constant terms: $1-1=0 / -1+1=0$;


      • linear terms: $3-1-2=0 / 0$;


      • quadratic terms: $dfrac92+dfrac12-2=dfrac{6}{2} / -dfrac{25}2$.



      As the first nonzero coefficients are of the same order, the limit is finite and is the ratio



      $$-frac{6}{25}.$$





      The trick is to obtain a fraction like



      $$frac{ax^n+text{higher order terms}}{bx^m+text{higher order terms}}=x^{n-m}frac{a+text{higher order terms}}{b+text{higher order terms}}$$ which tends to $0,dfrac ab$ or $pminfty$ depending on the sign of $n-m$.






      share|cite|improve this answer























      • Nice way to simplify even if it requires a few of experience to be handle in that way.
        – gimusi
        1 hour ago













      up vote
      2
      down vote










      up vote
      2
      down vote









      There is nothing monstrous in that computation. If you want a compact resolution, compute separately the coefficients in increasing order (numerator/denominator).




      • constant terms: $1-1=0 / -1+1=0$;


      • linear terms: $3-1-2=0 / 0$;


      • quadratic terms: $dfrac92+dfrac12-2=dfrac{6}{2} / -dfrac{25}2$.



      As the first nonzero coefficients are of the same order, the limit is finite and is the ratio



      $$-frac{6}{25}.$$





      The trick is to obtain a fraction like



      $$frac{ax^n+text{higher order terms}}{bx^m+text{higher order terms}}=x^{n-m}frac{a+text{higher order terms}}{b+text{higher order terms}}$$ which tends to $0,dfrac ab$ or $pminfty$ depending on the sign of $n-m$.






      share|cite|improve this answer














      There is nothing monstrous in that computation. If you want a compact resolution, compute separately the coefficients in increasing order (numerator/denominator).




      • constant terms: $1-1=0 / -1+1=0$;


      • linear terms: $3-1-2=0 / 0$;


      • quadratic terms: $dfrac92+dfrac12-2=dfrac{6}{2} / -dfrac{25}2$.



      As the first nonzero coefficients are of the same order, the limit is finite and is the ratio



      $$-frac{6}{25}.$$





      The trick is to obtain a fraction like



      $$frac{ax^n+text{higher order terms}}{bx^m+text{higher order terms}}=x^{n-m}frac{a+text{higher order terms}}{b+text{higher order terms}}$$ which tends to $0,dfrac ab$ or $pminfty$ depending on the sign of $n-m$.







      share|cite|improve this answer














      share|cite|improve this answer



      share|cite|improve this answer








      edited 1 hour ago

























      answered 1 hour ago









      Yves Daoust

      123k668218




      123k668218












      • Nice way to simplify even if it requires a few of experience to be handle in that way.
        – gimusi
        1 hour ago


















      • Nice way to simplify even if it requires a few of experience to be handle in that way.
        – gimusi
        1 hour ago
















      Nice way to simplify even if it requires a few of experience to be handle in that way.
      – gimusi
      1 hour ago




      Nice way to simplify even if it requires a few of experience to be handle in that way.
      – gimusi
      1 hour ago










      up vote
      1
      down vote













      From your picture, it seems an expansion at order $2$ will do. All functions should be expanded at the same order, using, say Taylor-Young's formula. Thus





      • $mathrm e^{3x}=1+3x+frac92x^2+o(x^2)$,


      • $sin x =x+o(x^2)$,


      • $cos x=1-frac12 x^2+o(x^2)$,


      • $ln(1-2x)=-2x-frac42 x^2+o(x^2)$
        Thus the numerator is
        $$N(x)=1+3x+frac92x^2-x-1+frac12 x^2-2x-2 x^2+o(x^2)=3 x^2+o(x^2).$$
        Can you proceed?






      share|cite|improve this answer



























        up vote
        1
        down vote













        From your picture, it seems an expansion at order $2$ will do. All functions should be expanded at the same order, using, say Taylor-Young's formula. Thus





        • $mathrm e^{3x}=1+3x+frac92x^2+o(x^2)$,


        • $sin x =x+o(x^2)$,


        • $cos x=1-frac12 x^2+o(x^2)$,


        • $ln(1-2x)=-2x-frac42 x^2+o(x^2)$
          Thus the numerator is
          $$N(x)=1+3x+frac92x^2-x-1+frac12 x^2-2x-2 x^2+o(x^2)=3 x^2+o(x^2).$$
          Can you proceed?






        share|cite|improve this answer

























          up vote
          1
          down vote










          up vote
          1
          down vote









          From your picture, it seems an expansion at order $2$ will do. All functions should be expanded at the same order, using, say Taylor-Young's formula. Thus





          • $mathrm e^{3x}=1+3x+frac92x^2+o(x^2)$,


          • $sin x =x+o(x^2)$,


          • $cos x=1-frac12 x^2+o(x^2)$,


          • $ln(1-2x)=-2x-frac42 x^2+o(x^2)$
            Thus the numerator is
            $$N(x)=1+3x+frac92x^2-x-1+frac12 x^2-2x-2 x^2+o(x^2)=3 x^2+o(x^2).$$
            Can you proceed?






          share|cite|improve this answer














          From your picture, it seems an expansion at order $2$ will do. All functions should be expanded at the same order, using, say Taylor-Young's formula. Thus





          • $mathrm e^{3x}=1+3x+frac92x^2+o(x^2)$,


          • $sin x =x+o(x^2)$,


          • $cos x=1-frac12 x^2+o(x^2)$,


          • $ln(1-2x)=-2x-frac42 x^2+o(x^2)$
            Thus the numerator is
            $$N(x)=1+3x+frac92x^2-x-1+frac12 x^2-2x-2 x^2+o(x^2)=3 x^2+o(x^2).$$
            Can you proceed?







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited 1 hour ago

























          answered 1 hour ago









          Bernard

          116k637108




          116k637108






















              up vote
              1
              down vote













              We need only quote the numerator and denominator up to $x^2$ terms: $$lim_{xto 0}frac{1+3x+color{blue}{9x^2/2}-x-1+color{blue}{x^2/2}-2xcolor{blue}{-2x^2}+O(x^3)}{-1+1color{blue}{-25x^2/2}+O(x^3)}.$$You'll find only $x^2$ terms survive in each.






              share|cite|improve this answer



























                up vote
                1
                down vote













                We need only quote the numerator and denominator up to $x^2$ terms: $$lim_{xto 0}frac{1+3x+color{blue}{9x^2/2}-x-1+color{blue}{x^2/2}-2xcolor{blue}{-2x^2}+O(x^3)}{-1+1color{blue}{-25x^2/2}+O(x^3)}.$$You'll find only $x^2$ terms survive in each.






                share|cite|improve this answer

























                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote









                  We need only quote the numerator and denominator up to $x^2$ terms: $$lim_{xto 0}frac{1+3x+color{blue}{9x^2/2}-x-1+color{blue}{x^2/2}-2xcolor{blue}{-2x^2}+O(x^3)}{-1+1color{blue}{-25x^2/2}+O(x^3)}.$$You'll find only $x^2$ terms survive in each.






                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  We need only quote the numerator and denominator up to $x^2$ terms: $$lim_{xto 0}frac{1+3x+color{blue}{9x^2/2}-x-1+color{blue}{x^2/2}-2xcolor{blue}{-2x^2}+O(x^3)}{-1+1color{blue}{-25x^2/2}+O(x^3)}.$$You'll find only $x^2$ terms survive in each.







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited 45 mins ago

























                  answered 1 hour ago









                  J.G.

                  20.5k21932




                  20.5k21932






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                      Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                      Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3030377%2fevaluating-the-limit-using-taylor-series%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      What visual should I use to simply compare current year value vs last year in Power BI desktop

                      Alexandru Averescu

                      Trompette piccolo